[Anguelovski I. 2011. Understanding the dynamics of community engagement of corporations in communities: the iterative relationship between dialogue processes and local protest at the Tintaya copper mine in Peru. Soc. & Natural Res., 24, 4: 384-399.10.1080/08941920903339699]Search in Google Scholar
[Auty R., Mikesell R. 1998. Sustainable development in mineral economies. Clarendon Press, Oxford.]Search in Google Scholar
[Avci D., Adaman F., Ozkaynak B. 2010. Valuation languages in environmental conflicts: how stakeholders oppose or support gold mining at Mount Ida, Turkey. Ecol. Econ., 70, 2: 228-238.]Search in Google Scholar
[Azapagic A. 2004. Developing a framework for sustainable development indicators for the mining and minerals industry. J. of Clean. Prod., 12, 6: 639-662.]Search in Google Scholar
[Azinger K. 1998. Geology – Methodology for developing a stakeholder-based external affairs strategy. CIM Bull., 91, 1019: 87-93.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bacci D., Diniz T. 2013. Mining in urban areas: methodological proposal for the identification and mediation of socio-environmental conflicts. Revista Escola de Minas, 66, 3: 369-374.]Search in Google Scholar
[Badera J. 2008. Opinie i postawy społeczności lokalnej wobec projektu górniczego na przykładzie Zawiercia. Gosp. Sur. Mineral., 24, 4/4: 23-40.]Search in Google Scholar
[Badera J. 2010. Konflikty społeczne na tle środowiskowym związane z udostępnianiem złóż kopalin w Polsce.. Gosp. Sur. Mineral., 26, 1: 105-125.]Search in Google Scholar
[Badera J. 2013. Local communities’ knowledge of lignite surface mining – sources and level of satisfaction: examples from central Poland. Environ. & Socio-econ. Stud., 1, 2: 29-35.]Search in Google Scholar
[Badera J., Jaksoń M. 2011. Rola środków masowego przekazu w konfliktach społeczno-środowiskowych związanych z działalnością górniczą. Prace Nauk. Inst. Górn. Polit. Wrocł., 132, Stud. i Mat., 39, Górn. i geol. XV: 3-9.]Search in Google Scholar
[Badera J., Kocoń P. 2014. Local community opinions regarding the socio-environmental aspects of lignite surface mining: experiences from central Poland. Energy Policy, 66: 507-516.10.1016/j.enpol.2013.11.048]Search in Google Scholar
[Bomsel O., Borkey P., Glachant M., 1996. Is there room for environmental self-regulation in the mining sector? Resour. Policy, 22, 1-2: 79-86.10.1016/S0301-4207(96)00030-X]Search in Google Scholar
[Bowonder B. 1983. Environmental Management Conflicts in Developing Countries: An Analysis. Environ. Man., 7, 3: 211-222.]Search in Google Scholar
[Breaking new ground: mining, minerals and sustainable development. The Report of the MMSD Project. Earthscan Publ., London, 2002.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bristow C. 1994. Environmental aspects of mineral resource conservation in southwest England [in:] O’Halloran, D., Green, C., Harley, M. et al. (eds.), Geological and landscape conservation: Proc. of The Malvern Intern. Conf., 18-24 July 1993, Malvern: 79-86.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brody S., Grover H., Bernhardt S., Tang Z., Whitaker B., Spence C. 2006. Identifying Potential Conflicy Associated with Oil and Gas Exploration in Texas State Coastal Waters: A Multicriteria Spatial Analysis. Environ. Man., 38: 597-617.]Search in Google Scholar
[Buchanan K. 2013. Contested discourses, knowledge and socio-environmental conflict in Ecuador. Environ. Sci. & Policy, 30: 19-25.]Search in Google Scholar
[Butiu C., Pascaru M. 2011. Sustainable development and concentric public participation. The case of the Rosia Montana gold corporation mining project. J. of Environ. Prot. and Ecol., 12, 4a: 2236-2244.]Search in Google Scholar
[Byrska-Rąpała A. 2008. Geoetyka a społeczna odpowiedzialność przemysłu surowców energetycznych. Gosp. Sur. Mineral., 24, 4/4: 41-52.]Search in Google Scholar
[Byrska-Rąpała A. 2013. Social Responsibility Concept and Strategy for Sustainable Development in the Energy Sector and Principle of Geoethics. Proc. of Mining Pribram Symp. The Intern. Section Geoethics, Pribram: 33-43.]Search in Google Scholar
[Campbell G., Roberts M. 2010. Permitting a new mine: insights from the community debate. Resour. Policy, 35, 3: 210-217.]Search in Google Scholar
[Clark A., Clark J. 1999. The new reality of mineral development: social and cultural issues in Asia and Pacific nations. Resour. Policy, 25, 3: 189-196.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cragg W., Greenbaum A. 2002. Reasoning about Responsibilities: Mining Company Managers on What Stakeholders are Owed. J. of Business Ethics, 39: 319-335.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cragg W., Pearson D., Cooney J. 1995. Ethics, surface mining and the environment. Resour. Policy, 21, 4, 229-235.]Search in Google Scholar
[Damigos D., Kaliampakos D. 2006. The ‘battle of gold’ under the light of green economics: a case study from Greece. Environ. Geol., 50: 202-218.]Search in Google Scholar
[De Brucker K., Macharis C., Verbeke A. 2013. Multi-criteria analysis and the resolution of sustainable development dilemmas: A stakeholder management approach. European J. of Operat. Resour., 224, 1: 122-131.]Search in Google Scholar
[EPA, 1995. Community consultation and involvement [in:] ‘Best Practice Environmental Management in Mining’ series. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Commonwealth of Australia.]Search in Google Scholar
[Eser S., Luloff A. 2003. Community controversy over a proposed limestone quarry. Soc. & Natural Resour., 16, 9: 793-806.]Search in Google Scholar
[Esteves A. 2008a. Evaluating community investments in the mining sector using multi-criteria decision analysis to integrate SIA with business planning. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 28: 338-348.]Search in Google Scholar
[Estaves A. 2008b. Mining and social development: Refocusing community ivestment using multi-criteria decision analysis. Resour. Policy, 33,1: 39-47.]Search in Google Scholar
[Estaves A., Barclay M.-A. 2011. New Approaches to Evaluating the Performance of Corporate-Community Partnerships: A Case Study from the Minerals Sector. J. of Business Ethics, 103, 2: 189-202.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission 2011. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – Tackling the challenges in commodity markets and on raw materials. Brussels, 02.02.2011, COM (2011), 25 final.]Search in Google Scholar
[Farell L., Hamann R., Mackres E. 2012. A clash of cultures (and lawyers): Anglo Platinum and mine-affected communities in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Resour. Policy, 37, 2: 194-204.10.1016/j.resourpol.2011.05.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Fischel W. 2001. Why Are There NIMBYs? Land Econ., 77, 1: 144-152.]Search in Google Scholar
[Freudenberg N., Steinsapir C. 1991. Not in our backyards – the grass-roots environmental movement. Soc. & Natural Resour., 4, 3: 235-245.]Search in Google Scholar
[Frost F. 1995. The use of stakeholder analysis to understand ethical and moral issues in the primary resource sector. J. of Business Ethics, 14, 8: 653-661.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gałuszka A., Migaszewski Z. 2009. Problemy zrównoważonego użytkowania surowców mineralnych. Probl. Ekorozwoju, 4, 1: 123-130.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gold G. 2005. Geoethical aspects reflecting problems of the social and economic development of using mineral resources. Proc. of Mining Pribram Symp., The Intern. Section Geoethics, Pribram.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hajkowicz S., Heyenga S., Moffat K. 2011. The relationship between mining and socio-economic well being in Australia's regions. Resour. Policy, 36, 1: 30-38.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hebestreit C., Kulczycka J., Wirth H. (eds.) 2011. Sustainable production and consumption of mineral resources. Publ. IGSMiE PAN, Kraków.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hejmanowski R., Malinowska A., Sobczyk W., Ostręga A., Pomykała R., Sobczyk E. (eds.) 2008. New Challenges and Visions for Mining. Risk management & subsidence engineering. Sustainable development in mining industry (+ Mine closure). Gosp. Sur. Mineral., 24, 3/1: 470 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hilson G. 2000. Sustainable development policies in Canada’s mining sector: an overwiew of government and industry efforts. Environ. Sci. & Policy, 3, 4: 201-211.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hilson G. 2002. An overwiew of land use conflicts in mining communities. Land Use Policy, 19: 65-73.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hilson G. 2012. Corporate Social Responsibility in the extractive industries: Experiences from developing countries. Resour. Policy, 37, 2: 131-137.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hilson G., Murck B. 2000. Sustainable development in the mining industry: clarifying the corporate perspective. Resour. Policy, 26, 4: 227-238.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hilson G., Yakovleva N. 2007. Strained relations: A critical analysis of the mining conflict in Prestea, Ghana. Political Geogr., 26, 1: 98-119.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hipel K., Walker S. 2011. Conflict analysis in environmnetal management. Environmetrics, 22: 279-293.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hood G. 1995. Windy Craggy – An analysis of environmental interest group and mining-industry approaches. Resour. Policy, 21, 1, 13-20.]Search in Google Scholar
[Humphreys D. 2000. A business perspective on community relations in mining. Resour. Policy, 26, 3: 127-131.]Search in Google Scholar
[Humphreys D. 2001. Sustainable development: can the mining industry afford it? Resour. Policy, 27, 1: 1-7.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ioan C., Carcea M. 2014. The Roşia Montană – Gold Corporation project in the opinion of environmental engineering students – case study. Environ. Eng. and Manag. J. (in press).10.30638/eemj.2014.207]Search in Google Scholar
[IBA Community Toolkit: Negotiation and Implementation of Impact and Benefit Agreements (by G. Gibson and C. O’Faircheallaigh). The Walter & Duncan Gordon Found., Toronto, 2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[ISO, 2010. Guidance on Social Responsibility (ISO 26000: 2010, IDT).]Search in Google Scholar
[Jena P. 1992. Development and conservation of mineral-resources. Trans. of the Indian Inst. of Metals, 45, 2: 79-88.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jenkins H., Yakovleva N. 2006. Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: Exploring trends in social and environmental disclosure. J. of Cleaner Prod., 14, 3-4: 271–284.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kasztelewicz Z., Ptak M. 2009. Condition of the mining and energy sectors based on brown coal and conditionings of their development in Poland. Gosp. Sur. Mineral., 25, 3: 137-153.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kasztelewicz, Z., Zajączkowski, M. 2010. Wpływ działalności górnictwa węgla brunatnego na otoczenie. Polityka Energetyczna, 2: 227–243.]Search in Google Scholar
[Król E., Kot A., 2010. Influence of mineral resources on space management in communes where spas are located. Gosp. Sur. Mineral., 26, 3: 21-40.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kudełko J., Juzyk A., Zaremba L. 2011. The influence of Management by Values (MBV) on effectiveness in mining industry [in:] The Intern. conf. ‘Sustainable production and consumption of mineral resources – integrating the EU’s social agenda and resource efficiency’, Wrocław. [Abstracts of Papers]. Publ. IGSMiE PAN, Kraków: 45.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lane M., Rickson R. 1997. Resource development and resource dependency of indigenous communities: Australia's Jawoyn Aborigines and mining at Coronation Hill. Soc. & Natural Resour., 10, 2: 121-142.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lodhia S. 2012. Web based social and environmental communication in the Australian minerals industry: an application of media richness framework. J. of Cleaner Prod., 25: 73-85.10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.040]Search in Google Scholar
[Łucki Z., Byrska-Rąpała A., Soliński B., Stach I. 2006. Badanie świadomości energetycznej społeczeństwa polskiego. Polityka Energetyczna, 2: 5-63.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marguía D., Böhling K. 2013. Sustainability reporting on large-scale mining conflicts: the case of Bajo de la Alumbrera, Argentina. J. of Cleaner Prod., 41: 202-209.10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.012]Search in Google Scholar
[Merrill C.W. 1969. Conservation of mineral resources. Mining Congress J., 55, 8: 65-67.]Search in Google Scholar
[Michałowska E. 2008. Syndrom NIMBY jako przykład samoorganizacji społecznej na poziomie lokalnym. Stud. Region. i Lokalne, 1: 60-80.]Search in Google Scholar
[Moffat K., Zhang A. 2014. The paths to social licence to operate: An integrative model explaining community acceptance of mining. Resour. Policy, 39, 1: 61-70.]Search in Google Scholar
[Muradian R., Martinez-Alier J., Correa H. 2003. International capital versus local population: The environmental conflict of the Tambogrande Mining Project, Peru. Society & Natural Resour., 16, 9: 775-792.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mutti D., Yakovleva N., Vazquez-brust D. et al. 2012. Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: Perspectives from stakeholder groups in Argentina. Resour. Policy, 37, 2: 212-222.]Search in Google Scholar
[Naworyta W., Badera J. 2012. Diagnoza uwarunkowań społeczno - gospodarczych dla projektowanego zagospodarowania złoża Gubin. Polityka Energetyczna, 3: 107-118.]Search in Google Scholar
[Němec V. 2003. Mineral deposits as ethical category [in:] Operation and development of the organization in a changing environment, III. High School of Manag. Publ., Legnica: 16-19.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nieć M., 2008. Stulecie idei ochrony złóż. Gosp. Sur. Mineral., 24, 2/2: 47-51.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nieman T., Merkin Z. 1995. Wildlife Management, Surface Mining, And Regional-Planning. Growth And Change, 26, 3: 405-424.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nikitina N. 2012. Geoethics: Theory, Principles, Problems. LLC Geoinformmark, Moscow, 18.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nikitina N. 2014. Mineral resource dilemma: how to balance interests of government, local communities and abiotic nature. Intern. J. of Environ. Research and Public Health, 11: 8632-8644.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nikolaou I., Evangelinos K. 2010. A SWOT analysis of environmental management practices in Greek Mining and mineral Industry. Resour. Policy, 35, 3: 226-234.]Search in Google Scholar
[Odell C., Scoble M., Recharte B. 2011. Improving socio-environmental outcomes at Andean mines. Intern. J. of Mining Reclamation and Environ., 25, 2: 133-151.]Search in Google Scholar
[O’Hare M. 1992. Waste disposal? Not In My Backyard. VSD, 59, 4.]Search in Google Scholar
[Operating in areas of conflict: An IPIECA guide for the oil and gas industry. Intern. Petroleum Industry Environ. Conserv. Association, London, 2008.]Search in Google Scholar
[Owen J., Kemp D. 2013. Social licence and mining: A critical perspective. Resour. Policy, 38, 1: 29-35.]Search in Google Scholar
[Peltonen L., Sairinen R. 2010. Integrating impact assessment and conflict management in urban planning: experiences from Finland. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 30: 312–318.]Search in Google Scholar
[Prell C., Hubacek K., Reed M. 2009. Stakeholder Analysis and Social Network Analysis in Natural Resource Management. Society & Natural Resour., 22, 6: 501-518.]Search in Google Scholar
[Prno J. 2013. An analysis of factors leading to the establishment of a social licence to operate in the mining industry. Resour. Policy, 38, 6: 577-590.]Search in Google Scholar
[Prno J., Slocombe S. 2012. Exploring the origins of ‘social license to operate’ in the mining sector: Perspectives from governance and sustainability theories. Resour. Policy, 37, 3: 346–357.]Search in Google Scholar
[Prno J., Slocombe S. 2014. A System-Based Conceptual Framework for Assessing the Determinants of a Social License to Operate in the Mining Industry. Environ. Manag., 53: 672–689.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ptak M. 2008. The usefulness of selected scientific methods to solve the conflicts of face mining and regions Nature 2000. Gosp. Sur. Mineral., 24, 3/1: 399-409.]Search in Google Scholar
[Radwanek-Bąk B. 2007. The concept of multi-criteria mineral resources protection. Environ. Geol., 52: 137-145.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ramani R., Sweigard R. 1984. Impacts of land-use planning on mineral resources. Mining Engineering, 36, 4: 362-369.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ranängen H., Zobel T. 2014. Exploring the path from management systems to stakeholder management in the Swedish mining industry. J. of Cleaner Prod. (in press, available online http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.025).]Search in Google Scholar
[Reed M., Graves A., Dandy N. et al. 2009. Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. J. of Environ. Manag., 90, 5: 1933-1949.]Search in Google Scholar
[Responsible mining. A toolkit for the prevention and mediation of conflicts in the development of the mining sector (ed.: G. Hughes). Univ. of Eastern Finland, Gaia Group Oy, Zoï Environ. Network, 2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ricci M., Bellaby P., Flynn R. 2010. Engaging the public on paths to sustainable energy: Who has to trust whom? Energy Policy, 38, 6: 2633-2640.]Search in Google Scholar
[Richards D. 2004. Integrating mineral development and biodiversity conservation into regional land-use planning. American Society For Testing And Materials, Special Technical Publ., 1458: 18-38.]Search in Google Scholar
[Robins G., Bates L., Pattison P. 2011. Network governance and environmental management: conflict and cooperation. Public Admin., 89, 4: 1293-1313.]Search in Google Scholar
[Si Hu, Bi Haipu, Li Xiaohong, Chunche Yang. 2010. Environmental evaluation for sustainable development of coal mining in Qijiang, Western China. Intern. J. of Coal Geol., 81, 3: 163-168.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sirb L., Popa D. 2014. An approach in terms of fuzzy logic within Rosia Montana mining project regarding the ensurance of business and community sustaintability by using cyanide. J. of Environ. Prot. and Ecol., 15, 1: 223-233.]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith E., Marquez M. 2000. The other side of the NIMBY syndrome. Society & Natural Resour., 13, 3: 273-280.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sobczyk E., Badera J. 2013. The problem of developing prospective hard coal deposits from the point of view of social and environmental conflicts with the use of AHP method. Gosp. Sur. Mineral., 29, 4: 5-24.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sobczyk W. 2007. Badania opinii respondentów na temat uciążliwości środowiskowej górnictwa węgla kamiennego. Górn. i Geoinż., 3/1: 497-506.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sobczyk W., Kowalska A., Sobczyk E. 2014. The use of AHP multi-criteria method and Leopold matrix to assess the impact of gravel and sand pits on the environment of the Jasiołka Valley. Gosp. Sur. Mineral., 30, 2: 157-172.]Search in Google Scholar
[Social Impact Assessment of Resource Projects. Mining for Development: Guide to Australian Practice (by D. Franks). Intern. Mining for Development Centre, 2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stakeholder engagement: Good Practice Handbook for Companies Doing Business in Emerging Markets. Intern. Finance Corp., Washington, 2007.]Search in Google Scholar
[Steelman T., Carmin J. 1998. Common property, collective interests, and community opposition to locally unwanted land uses. Society & Natural Resour., 11, 5: 485-504.]Search in Google Scholar
[Suopajärvi L. 2013. Social impact assessment in mining projects in Northern Finland: Comparing practice to theory. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 42: 25–30.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tiainen H., Sairinen R., Novikov V. 2014. Mining in the Chatkal Valley in Kyrgyzstan – Challenge of social sustainability. Resour. Policy, 39, 1: 80-87.]Search in Google Scholar
[Turns D. 2008. The Socio-Economic and Environmental Impacts of Coal Mining on the Hunter Valley and Bowen Basin Communities. Australasian Inst. of Mining And Metallurgy Publ. Ser., 6: 13-18]Search in Google Scholar
[Uberman R., Ostręga A. 2008. Wykorzystanie metody Analitycznego Procesu Hierarchicznego dla waloryzacji (rankingu) polskich złóż węgla. Gosp. Sur. Mineral., 24, 2/4: 73-95.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vesalon L., Cretan R. 2013. 'Cyanide kills!' Environmental movements and the construction of environmental risk at Rosia Montana., Romania. AREA, 45, 4: 443-45110.1111/area.12049]Search in Google Scholar
[Vintro C., Fortuny J., Sanmiquel L., Frejio M., Edo J., 2012. Is corporate responsibility possible in the mining sector? Evidence from Catalan companies. Resour. Policy, 37, 2: 118-125.10.1016/j.resourpol.2011.10.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Warhurst A. 1998. Corporate Social Responsibility & the Mining Industry. MERN Research Bull. & Newsletter, 13-14: 81-97]Search in Google Scholar
[Warhurst A., Mitchell P. 1998. Technological innovation and the minerals industry – towards sustainability in the new millennium [in:] Minerals, Land and The Natural Environment: The Foundations of Wealth (conf. proc.). Inst. Min. & Met., London: 147-158.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wellmer F., Becker-Platen J. 2002. Sustainable development and the exploitation of mineral and energy resources: a review. Intern. J. of Earth Sci., 91: 723-745.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wolsink M. 2006. Invalid theory impedes our understanding: a critique on the persistence of the language of NIMBY. Transactions of the Inst. of British Geogr., 31, 1: 85-91.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yasmi Y., Schanz H., Salim A. 2006. Manifestation of conflict escalation in natural resource management. Environ. Sci. & Policy, 9: 538-546.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zobrist J., Sima M., Dogaru D. et al. 2009. Environmental and socioeconomic assessment of impacts by mining activities – a case study in the Certej River catchment, Western Carpathians, Romania. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 16 (Suppl. 1): S14-S26.]Search in Google Scholar
