Methods Applied for Measurement and Visualization of Changes in Biodiversity

[1] Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Andrzejewski R, Weigle A. Różnorodność biologiczna Polski (Biological diversity of Poland). Warszawa: Narodowy Fundusz Ochrony Środowiska; 2003.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Curds CR. A theoretical study of factors influencing the microbial population dynamics of the activated sludge process - I The effects of diurnal variations of sewage and carnivorous ciliated protozoa. Water Res. 1973;7(9):1269-1284. DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(73)90004-3.10.1016/0043-1354(73)90004-3Search in Google Scholar

[4] Al-Shahwani SM, Horan NJ. The use of protozoa to indicate changes in the performance of activated sludge plants. Water Res. 1991;25(6):633-638. DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(91)90038-R.10.1016/0043-1354(91)90038-RSearch in Google Scholar

[5] Forney LJ, Liu WT, Guckert JB, Kumagai Y, Namkung E, Nishihara T, et al. Structure of microbial communities in activated sludge: Potential implications for assessing the biodegradability of chemicals. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety. 2001;49(1):40-53. DOI: 10.1006/eesa.2001.2034.10.1006/eesa.2001.2034Search in Google Scholar

[6] De Gregorio C, Caravelli AH, Zaritzky NE. Application of biological indices and a mathematical model for the detection of metal coagulant overload in a laboratory scale activated sludge reactor with phosphate simultaneous precipitation. Chem Eng J. 2011;172(1):52-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.05.063.10.1016/j.cej.2011.05.063Search in Google Scholar

[7] Babko R, Łagód G, Jaromin-Gleń KM. Abundance and structure of ciliated protozoa community at the particular devices of “Hajdów” WWTP. Ann Set Environ Protect. 2012;14:56-68.Search in Google Scholar

[8] O'Reilly N, Novotny V. Water quality, ecological and flood risks to receiving waters due to urban runoff and urbanization. Technical report No. 2. Institute for Urban Environmental Risk Management, Marquette University; 1999.Search in Google Scholar

[9] The Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group (FISRWG) Stream Corridor Restoration -Principles, Processes and Practices, by the Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group, 1998.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Ogbeibu AE, Orihabor BJ. Ecological impact of river impoundment using benthic macro-invertebrates as indicators. Water Res. 2002;36(10):2427-2436. DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00489-4.10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00489-4Search in Google Scholar

[11] Borchardt D, Richter S. Identification of significant pressures and impacts upon receiving waters. Water Sci Technol. 2003;48(10):33-38.10.2166/wst.2003.0532Search in Google Scholar

[12] Stastna G, Kabelkova I, Stransky D. Interaction of river dam and system sewer (in Czech). Stavebni obzor. 2008;17(1):16-20.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Whitaker RH. Evolutional measurements of species diversity. Taxon. 1972;21(2/3):213-251.10.2307/1218190Search in Google Scholar

[14] Shannon CE, Weaver W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Chicago, 1949, reprint 1998.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Woodiwiss FS. The biological system of stream classification used by Trent River Board. Chem Industry. 1964;11:443-447.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Washington HG. Diversity, biotic and similarity indices: a review with special relevance to aquatic ecosystems. Water Res. 1984;18(6):653-694. DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(84)90164-7.10.1016/0043-1354(84)90164-7Search in Google Scholar

[17] Brower JE, Zar JH, Von Ende CN. Field and Laboratory Methods for General Ecology. New York: WCB McGraw-Hill 1998.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Madoni P. A sludge biotic index (SBI) for evaluation of activated sludge plants based on the microfauna analysis. Water Res. 1994;28(1):67-75. DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(94)90120-1.10.1016/0043-1354(94)90120-1Search in Google Scholar

[19] Knoben RAE, Roos C, van Oirschot MCM. Biological assessment methods for watercourses. UN/ECE Task Force on Monitoring & Assessment, Lelystad; 1995.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Ravera O. A comparison between diversity, similarity and biotic indices applied to the macroinvertebrate community of a small stream: the Ravella river (Como Province, Northern Italy). Aquat Ecol. 2001;35:97-107.10.1023/A:1011433813309Search in Google Scholar

[21] Gorzel M, Kornijów R. Biologiczne metody oceny jakości wód rzecznych. Kosmos. 2004;53(2):183-191.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Kokes J, Zahradkova S, Nemejcova D, Hodovsky J, Jarkovsky J, Soldan T. The PERLA system in the Czech Republic: a multivariate approach for assessing the ecological status of running waters. Hydrobiologia. 2006;566(1):343-354. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-006-0085-4.10.1007/s10750-006-0085-4Search in Google Scholar

[23] Rożej A, Cydzik-Kwiatkowska A, Kowalska B, Kowalski D. Structure and microbial diversity of biofilms on different pipe materials of a model drinking water distribution systems. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014:1-11. DOI: 10.1007/s11274-014-1761-6.10.1007/s11274-014-1761-6Search in Google Scholar

[24] Gotelli NJ, Entsminger GL. EcoSim: Null models software for ecology. Version 7.0, Jericho: Ackuiret Intelligence Inc. and Kesey-Bear, USA, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Błędzki LA. Method for comparing species richness and species diversity (in Polish). Part I. Bioskop. 2007;1:18-22.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Błędzki LA. Method for comparing species richness and species diversity (in Polish). Part II. Bioskop. 2007;2:20-23.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Łagód G, Chomczyńska M, Montusiewicz A, Malicki J, Bieganowski A. Proposal of measurement and visualization methods for dominance structures in the saprobe communities. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2009;16(3):369-377.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Colwell RK, Chao A, Gotelli NJ, Lin SY, Mao CX, Chazdon RL, et al. Models and estimators linking individual-based and sample-based rarefaction, extrapolation and comparison of assemblages. J Plant Ecol. 2012;5(1):3-21. DOI: 10.1093/jpe/rtr044.10.1093/jpe/rtr044Search in Google Scholar

[29] MacArthur RH. Patterns of species diversity. Biol Rev. 1965;40(4):510-533. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1965.tb00815.x.10.1111/j.1469-185X.1965.tb00815.xSearch in Google Scholar

[30] Hulbert SH. The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology. 1971;52(4):577-586. DOI: 10.2307/1934145.10.2307/1934145Search in Google Scholar

[31] Magurran A. Ecological Diversity and its Measurements. London, Sydney, Croom Helm; 1988.10.1007/978-94-015-7358-0Search in Google Scholar

[32] Gove IH, Patil GP, Swindel BF, Taille C. Ecological Diversity and Forest Management. Handbook of Statistic 12, Patil GP, Rao CR, editors. Amsterdam, London, New York, Tokyo: Elsevier Science; 1994;12:409-462. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-7161(05)80014-8.10.1016/S0169-7161(05)80014-8Search in Google Scholar

[33] Krebs CJ. Ecology. The Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance. Harper-Collins College Publishers; New York; 1994.Search in Google Scholar

[34] Lamb EG, Bayne E, Holloway G, Schieck J, Boutin S, Herbers J, et al. Indices for monitoring biodiversity change: Are some more effective than others? Ecol Indicators. 2009;9(3):432-444. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.06.001.10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.06.001Search in Google Scholar

[35] Patil GP, Taillie C. An overview of diversity. In: Ecological Diversity in Theory and Practice. Grassle JF, Patil GP, Smith W, Taillie C, editors. Fairland, MD: International Co-operative Publishing House; 1979: 23-48.Search in Google Scholar

[36] Patil GP, Taillie C. Diversity as a concept and its measurement. J Amer Statist Assoc. 1982;77(379):548-567. DOI: 10.2307/2287709.10.2307/2287709Search in Google Scholar

[37] Patil GP, Taillie C. A study of diversity profiles and orderings for a bird community in the vicinity of Colstrip, Montana. In: Patil GP, Rosenzweig ML, editors. Contemporary Quantitative Ecology and Related Econometrics. Fairland, MD: International Co-operative Publishing House; 1979: 23-48.Search in Google Scholar

[38] Swindel BF, Lloyd R, Patil GP, Taillie C, Conde L. U.S. National Forest Management Act, forest ecosystems diversity and diversity profiles. Conenoses. 1987;2(1):1-8.Search in Google Scholar

[39] Ten Brink BJE, Hosper SH, Colijn F. A quantitative method for description and assessment of ecosystems: the AMOEBA - approach. Marine Pollut Bull. 1991;23:265-270. DOI: 10.1016/0025-326X(91)90685-L.10.1016/0025-326X(91)90685-LSearch in Google Scholar

[40] Lane WEM, Peters JS. Ecological objectives for management purposes: applying the amoeba approach. J Aquatic Ecos Health. 1993;2:277-286.10.1007/BF00044031Search in Google Scholar

[41] Wefering FM, Danielson LE, White NM. Using the AMOEBA approach to measure progress toward ecosystem sustainability within a shellfish restoration project in North Carolina. Ecol Modelling. 2000;130(1-3):157-166. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00205-2.10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00205-2Search in Google Scholar

[42] Collie JS, Gislason H, Vinther M. Using AMOEBAs to display multispecies, multifleet fisheries advice. ICES J Marine Sci. 2003;60(4):709-720. DOI: 10.1016/S1054-3139(03)00042-0.10.1016/S1054-3139(03)00042-0Search in Google Scholar

[43] Chao A, Gotelli NJ, Hsieh TC, Sander EL, Ma KH, Colwell RK, et al. Rarefaction and extrapolation with Hill numbers: a framework for sampling and estimation in species diversity studies. Ecol Monographs 2014;84(1):45-67. DOI: 10.1890/13-0133.1.10.1890/13-0133.1Search in Google Scholar