Effects of Contextual Factors on ESD in Teacher Education

Ates, D., Teksöz, G., & Ertepınar, H. (2017). Exploring the role of future perspective in predicting Turkish university students’ beliefs about global climate change. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Development, 8(1), 32–52.10.1515/dcse-2017-0003Search in Google Scholar

Aslandağ Soylu, B., Yanpar Yelken, T., & Külekci, M. K. (2016). Evaluating lifewide learning habits of academicians for sustainable development. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 7(2), 132–143. doi: 10.1515/dcse-2016-002110.1515/dcse-2016-0021Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Barth, M., Godemann, J., Rieckmann, M., & Stoltenberg, U. (2007). Developing key competencies for sustainable development in higher education. Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 8(4), 416–430.10.1108/14676370710823582Search in Google Scholar

Burns, S. N., & Grove, S. K. (2003). Understanding nursing research. 3rd edition. Philadelphia: Saunders.Search in Google Scholar

Corte, M. V., den Broka, P., Kamp, M., & Bergen, T. (2013). Teacher research in Dutch professional development schools: Perceptions of the actual and preferred situation in terms of the context, process and outcomes of research. European Journal of Teacher Education, 36(1), 3–23.10.1080/02619768.2012.662639Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209–240). Thousands Oaks, Calif.: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Çoklar, A. N., & Kabakçi. Yurdakul, I. (2017). Technology Integration Experiences of Teachers. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 8(1), 19–31.10.1515/dcse-2017-0002Search in Google Scholar

de Haan, G. (2006). The BLK ‘21’ programme in Germany: a ‘Gestaltungskompetenz’-based model for education for sustainable development. Environmental Education Research, 1, 19–32.10.1080/13504620500526362Search in Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methodologies. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) P9 Eurydice. (2009). Indicators on initial teacher education (extracted from Key Data on Education).Search in Google Scholar

Fernet, C., Trépanier, S. G., Austin, S., & Levesque-Côté, J. (2016). Committed, inspiring, and healthy teachers: How do school environment and motivational factors facilitate optimal functioning at career start? Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 481–491.10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.019Search in Google Scholar

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1980). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research (11th ed.). New York: Aldine Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Gholami, J., & Qurbanzada, I. (2016). Key stakeholders’ attitudes towards teacher education programs in TEFL: a case study of Farhangian university in Iran. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18(2), 5–20. doi: 10.1515/jtes-2016-001110.1515/jtes-2016-0011Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Grayson, J. L., & Alvarez, H. K. (2008). School climate factors relating to teacher burn-out: A mediator model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1349–1363.10.1016/j.tate.2007.06.005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Grossman, P., & McDonald, M. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 184–205. doi: 10.3102/000283120731290610.3102/0002831207312906Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hiller, K., & Reichart, B. (2017). Motivation of civic education teachers-in-training in the field of education for sustainable development. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Development, 8(1), 81–89.10.1515/dcse-2017-0006Search in Google Scholar

Iliško, Dz. (2007). Teachers as agents of societal change. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 7, 14–26.10.2478/v10099-009-0002-9Search in Google Scholar

Ingvarson, L., Beavis, A., & Kleinhenz, E. (2007). Factors affecting the impact of teacher education programmes on teacher preparedness: implications for accreditation policy. European Journal of Teacher Education, 30(4), 351–381. doi: 10.1080/0261976070166415110.1080/02619760701664151Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kilgore, K., Griffin, C., Otis-Wilborn, A., & Winn, J. (2003). The problems of beginning special education teachers: Exploring the contextual factors influencing their work. Action in Teacher Education, 25(1), 38–47. doi: 10.1080/01626620.2003.1046329110.1080/01626620.2003.10463291Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Knoblauch, D., & Hoy, A. W. (2008). “Maybe I can teach those kids.” The influence of contextual factors on student teachers’ efficacy beliefs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 166–179.10.1016/j.tate.2007.05.005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Maxwell, J. A. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 279–299.10.17763/haer.62.3.8323320856251826Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. London: Sage Publication.Search in Google Scholar

Naylor, D. A., Campbell-Evans, G., & Maloney, C. (2015). Learning to teach: What do pre-service teachers report. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(11), 120–136.10.14221/ajte.2015v40n11.7Search in Google Scholar

Pehkonen, E., & Turner, G. (1999). Teachers’ professional development: What are the key change factors for mathematics teachers? European Journal of Teacher Education, 22(2–3), 259–275.10.1080/0261976899020259Search in Google Scholar

Pipere, A. (2016). Envisioning complexity: Towards a new conceptualization of educational research for sustainability. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 7(2), 68–91. doi: 10.1515/dcse-2016-001710.1515/dcse-2016-0017Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Salīte, I. (2015). Searching for sustainability in teacher education and educational research: Experiences from the Baltic and Black Sea Circle Consortium for educational research. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 6, 21–29.10.1515/dcse-2015-0002Search in Google Scholar

Sahin, E. (2016). Delving into key dimensions of ESD through analyses of a middle school science textbook. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 7(2), 34–42. doi: 10.1515/dcse-2016-001410.1515/dcse-2016-0014Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Schildkamp, K., & Kuiper, W. (2010). Data-informed curriculum reform: Which data, what purposes, and promoting and hindering factors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 482–496.10.1016/j.tate.2009.06.007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (Eds). (1998). Basics of qualitative research, techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). London, CA: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Sundh, S. (2016). Corpus of young learners’ English in the Baltic region n texts for studies on sustainable development. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 7(2), 92–104. doi: 10.1515/dcse-2016-001810.1515/dcse-2016-0018Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Thornberg, R. (2012). Informed grounded theory. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56(3), 243–259.10.1080/00313831.2011.581686Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Williams, D. L., Edwards, B., & Kuhel, K. A. (2016). Culturally responsive dispositions in prospective mathematics teachers. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 7(2), 17–33. doi: 10.1515/dcse-2016-001310.1515/dcse-2016-0013Open DOISearch in Google Scholar