[Adobe (2016). State of Create. Retrieved from /http://www.adobe.com/content/dam/acom/en/max/pdfs/AdobeStateofCreate_2016_Report_Final.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Aleksić, D., Černe, M., Dysvik, A., & Škerlavaj, M. (2016). I want to be creative, but … preference for creativity, perceived clear outcome goals, work enjoyment, and creative performance. European Journal Of Work And Organizational Psychology, 25, 363-383.10.1080/1359432X.2015.1077809]Search in Google Scholar
[Aljughaiman, A., & Mowrer-Reynolds, E. (2005). Teachers’ conceptions of creativity and creative students. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39, 17-34.10.1002/j.2162-6057.2005.tb01247.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Amabile, T. M., Schatzel, E. A., Moneta, G. B., & Kramer, S. J. (2004). Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 5-32.10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Adarves-Yorno, I., Haslam, S. A, & Postmes, T. (2008). And now for something completely different? The impact of group membership on perceptions of creativity. Social Influence, 3, 248-266.10.1080/15534510802341124]Search in Google Scholar
[Adarves-Yorno, I., Postmes, T., & Haslam, S. A. (2007). Creative innovation or crazy irrelevance? The contribution of group norms and social identity to creative behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 410-416.10.1016/j.jesp.2006.02.013]Search in Google Scholar
[Arndt, J., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., & Schimel, J. (1999). Creativity and terror management: The effects of creative activity on guilt and social projection following mortality salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 19-32.10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.19]Search in Google Scholar
[Baer, J. (2012). Domain specificity and the limits of creativity theory. Journal Of Creative Behavior, 46, 16-29.10.1002/jocb.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Beghetto, R. A., Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2014). Teaching for creativity in the common core classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Beghetto, R. A., Kaufman, J. C., & Baxter, J. (2011). Answering the unexpected questions: Exploring the relationship between students' creative self-efficacy and teacher ratings of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 342-349.10.1037/a0022834]Search in Google Scholar
[Brown, S. D., Lent, R. W., Telander, K., & Tramayne, S. (2011). Social cognitive career theory, conscientiousness, and work performance: A meta-analytic path analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79, 81-90.10.1016/j.jvb.2010.11.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Byron, K., & Khazanchi, S. (2012). Rewards and creative performance: A meta-analytic test of theoretically derived hypotheses. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 809-830.10.1037/a0027652]Search in Google Scholar
[Carter, N. T., Guan, L., Maples, J. L., Williamson, R. L., & Miller, J. D. (2016). The downsides of extreme conscientiousness for psychological well-being: The role of obsessive compulsive tendencies. Journal of Personality, 84, 510-522.10.1111/jopy.12177]Search in Google Scholar
[Church, A. T., Katigbak, M. S., Reyes, J. S., Salanga, M. C., Miramontes, L. A., & Adams, N. B. (2008). Prediction and cross-situational consistency of daily behavior across cultures: Testing trait and cultural psychology perspectives. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1199-1215.10.1016/j.jrp.2008.03.007]Search in Google Scholar
[Cropley, A. J. (1992). More ways than one: Fostering creativity. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cropley, D. H., Kaufman, J. C., & Cropley, A. J. (2008). Malevolent creativity: A functional model of creativity in terrorism and crime. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 105-115.10.1080/10400410802059424]Search in Google Scholar
[Cropley, D. H., Kaufman, J. C., White, A.E., & Chiera, B. A. (2014). Layperson perceptions of malevolent creativity: The good, the bad, and the ambiguous. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 400-412.10.1037/a0037792]Search in Google Scholar
[DeYoung, C. G. (2015). Cybernetic Big Five theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 33-58.10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Dunning, D., Johnson, K., Ehrlinger, J., & Kruger, J. (2003). Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 83-86.10.1111/1467-8721.01235]Search in Google Scholar
[Eidelman, S. & Crandall, C. S. (2012). Bias in favor of the status quo. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 270-281.10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00427.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Eidelman, S., Crandall, C.S., & Pattershall, J. (2009). The existence bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 765-775.10.1037/a0017058]Search in Google Scholar
[Eidelman, S., Pattershall, J., & Crandall, C. S. (2010). Longer is better. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 993-998.10.1016/j.jesp.2010.07.008]Search in Google Scholar
[Eschleman, K.J., Madsen, J., Alarcon, G. M., & Barelka, A. (2014). Benefiting from creative activity: The positive relationships between creative activity, recovery experiences, and performance-related outcomes. Journal Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87, 579-598.10.1111/joop.12064]Search in Google Scholar
[Feist, G. J., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.) (2017). Cambridge handbook of creativity and personality research. New York: Cambridge University Press. Florida, R. (2014). The rise of the creative class – revisited: Revised and expanded. New York: Basic Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Forgeard, M. J. C., & Kaufman, J. C. (2016). Who cares about imagination, creativity, and innovation, and why? A review. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10, 250-269.10.1037/aca0000042]Search in Google Scholar
[Freund, P. A., & Holling, H. (2008). Creativity in the classroom: A multilevel analysis investigating the impact of creativity and reasoning ability on GPA. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 309-318.10.1080/10400410802278776]Search in Google Scholar
[Gajda, A., Karwowski, M., & Beghetto, R. A. (2017). Creativity and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109, 269-299.10.1037/edu0000133]Search in Google Scholar
[Goncalo, J. A., Vincent, L. C., & Krause, V. (2015). The liberating consequences of creative work: How a creative outlet lifts the physical burden of secrecy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 59, 32-39.10.1016/j.jesp.2015.03.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Grigorenko, E. L., Jarvin, L., Diffley, R., Goodyear, J., Shanahan, E., & Sternberg, R. J. (2009). Are SATS and GPA enough? A theory-based approach to predicting academic success in secondary school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 964-981.10.1037/a0015906]Search in Google Scholar
[Haslam, N. (2011). The return of the anal character. Review of General Psychology, 15, 351-360.10.1037/a0025251]Search in Google Scholar
[Haslam, S. A., Adarves-Yorno, I., Postmes, T., & Jans, L. (2013). The collective origins of valued originality: A social identity approach to creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 384-401.10.1177/1088868313498001]Search in Google Scholar
[Heidenreich, S., & Spieth, P. (2013). Why innovations fail - The case of passive and active innovation resistance. International Journal of Innovation Management, 17, 1-42.10.1142/S1363919613500217]Search in Google Scholar
[Hennessey, B.A. (2010). Intrinsic motivation and creativity in the classroom: Have we come full circle? In R. A. Beghetto & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp. 329-361). New York: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Horn, D., & Salvendy, G. (2009). Measuring consumer perception of product creativity: Impact on satisfaction and purchasability. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 19, 223-240.10.1002/hfm.20150]Search in Google Scholar
[Hudson, N. W., & Fraley, R. C. (2015). Volitional personality trait change: Can people choose to change their personality traits? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 490-507.10.1037/pspp0000021]Search in Google Scholar
[Hudson, N. W., & Fraley, R. C. (2016). Changing for the better? Longitudinal associations between volitional personality change and psychological well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 603-615.10.1177/0146167216637840]Search in Google Scholar
[Hudson, N. W., & Roberts, B. W. (2014). Goals to change personality traits: Concurrent links between personality traits, daily behavior, and goals to change oneself. Journal of Research in Personality, 53, 68-83.10.1016/j.jrp.2014.08.008]Search in Google Scholar
[Hudson, N. W., & Roberts, B. W. (2016). Social investment in work reliably predicts change in conscientiousness and agreeableness: A direct replication and extension of Hudson, Roberts, and Lodi-Smith (2012). Journal of Research in Personality, 60, 12-23.10.1016/j.jrp.2015.09.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Hudson, N. W., Roberts, B. W., & Lodi-Smith, J. (2012). Personality trait development and social investment in work. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 334-344.10.1016/j.jrp.2012.03.002]Search in Google Scholar
[IBM. (2010). IBM 2010 Global CEO Study: Creativity selected as most crucial factor for future success [press release]. Retrieved from https://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/31670.wss]Search in Google Scholar
[Karwowski, M. (2010). Are creative students really welcome in the classroom? Implicit theories of “good” and “creative” student’ personality among Polish teachers. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences Journal, 2, 1233-1237.10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.179]Search in Google Scholar
[Karwowski, M. (2011). It doesn’t hurt to ask... But sometimes it hurts to believe. Predictors of Polish students’ creative self-efficacy. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 5, 154-164.10.1037/a0021427]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaufman, J. C. (Ed.) (2014). Creativity and mental illness. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139128902]Search in Google Scholar
[Karwowski, M., Czerwonka, M., & Kaufman, J. C. (in press). Does intelligence strengthen creative metacognition? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaufman, J. C. (2015). Why creativity isn’t in IQ tests, why it matters, and why it won’t change anytime soon…. Probably. Journal of Intelligence 3, 59-72.10.3390/jintelligence3030059]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaufman, J. C. (2016). Creativity 101 (2nd Ed). New York: Springer.10.1891/9780826129536]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaufman, J. C., & Agars, M. D. (2009). Being creative with the predictors and criteria for success. American Psychologist, 64, 280-281.10.1037/a0014926]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2002). Could Steven Spielberg manage the Yankees?: Creative thinking in different domains. Korean Journal of Thinking & Problem Solving, 12, 5-15.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2006). Intelligent testing with Torrance. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 99-102.10.1207/s15326934crj1801_11]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2013). In praise of Clark Kent: Creative metacognition and the importance of teaching kids when (not) to be creative. Roeper Review, 35, 155-165.10.1080/02783193.2013.799413]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaufman, J. C., Beghetto, R A., & Watson, C. (2016). Creative metacognition and self-ratings of creative performance: A 4-C perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 394-399.10.1016/j.lindif.2015.05.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaufman, J. C., Bromley, M. L., & Cole, J. C. (2006). Insane, poetic, lovable: Creativity and endorsement of the “Mad Genius” stereotype. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 26, 149-161.10.2190/J207-3U30-R401-446J]Search in Google Scholar
[Kim, K. H. (2006). Can only intelligent people be creative? A meta-analysis. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16, 57-66.10.4219/jsge-2005-473]Search in Google Scholar
[Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1121-1134.10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121]Search in Google Scholar
[Kuncel, N. R., Ones, D. S., & Sackett, P. R. (2010). Individual differences as predictors of work, educational, and broad life outcomes. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 331-33610.1016/j.paid.2010.03.042]Search in Google Scholar
[Kyllonen, P. C., Walters, A. M., & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Noncognitive constructs and their assessment in graduate education. Educational Assessment, 10, 153-184.10.1207/s15326977ea1003_2]Search in Google Scholar
[Laukkanen, T., Sinkkonen, S., Kivijärvi, M. & Laukkanen, P. (2007). Innovation resistance among mature consumers. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 24, 419-427.10.1108/07363760710834834]Search in Google Scholar
[Lee, K., Rho, S., Kim, S., & Jun, G. J. (2007). Creativity-innovation cycle for organizational exploration and exploitation: Lessons from Neowiz - A Korean Internet company. Long Range Planning: International Journal of Strategic Management, 40, 505-523.10.1016/j.lrp.2007.06.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Lichtenberg, J., Woock, C., & Wright, M. (2008). Ready to innovate: Are educators and executives aligned on the creative readiness of the U.S. (Conference Board Research Report No. R-1424-08-RR). New York: The Conference Board.]Search in Google Scholar
[Licuanan, B. F., Dailey, L. R., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Idea evaluation: Error in evaluating highly original ideas. Journal of Creative Behavior, 41, 1-27.10.1002/j.2162-6057.2007.tb01279.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Long, H., Plucker, J. A., Yu, Q., Ding, Y., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Research productivity and performance of journals in creativity sciences: A bibliometric analysis. Creativity Research Journal, 26, 353-360.10.1080/10400419.2014.929425]Search in Google Scholar
[McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (3rd ed., pp. 150–181). New York: Guilford Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Madjar, N., Greenberg, E., & Chen, Z. (2011). Factors for radical creativity, incremental creativity, and routine, noncreative performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 730-743.10.1037/a0022416]Search in Google Scholar
[Martin-Rios, C., & Parga-Dans, E. (2016). The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese: Non-technological innovation in creative industries. Creativity and Innovation Management, 25, 6-1710.1111/caim.12131]Search in Google Scholar
[Measelle, J. R., John, O. P., Ablow, J. C., Cowan, P. A., & Cowan, C. P. (2005). Can children provide coherent, stable, and valid self-reports on the Big Five dimensions? A longitudinal study from ages 5 to 7. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 90-10610.1037/0022-3514.89.1.90]Search in Google Scholar
[Metzl, E. S. (2009). The role of creative thinking in resilience after hurricane Katrina. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3, 112-123.10.1037/a0013479]Search in Google Scholar
[Miron, E., Erez, M., & Naveh, E. (2004). Do personal characteristics and cultural values that promote innovation, quality, and efficiency compete or complement each other? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 175-199.10.1002/job.237]Search in Google Scholar
[Miron-Spektor, E., Erez, M., & Naveh, E. (2011). The effect of conformist and attentive-to-detail members on team innovation: Reconciling the innovation paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 740-760.10.5465/amj.2011.64870100]Search in Google Scholar
[Mueller, J. S., Goncalo, J. A., & Kamdar, D. (2011). Recognizing creative leadership: Can creative idea expression negatively relate to perceptions of leadership potential? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 494-498.10.1016/j.jesp.2010.11.010]Search in Google Scholar
[Mueller, J. S., Melwani, S., & Goncalo, J. A. (2012). The bias against creativity: Why people desire but reject creative ideas. Psychological Science, 23, 13-17.10.1177/0956797611421018]Search in Google Scholar
[Mullet, D. R., Willerson, A., Lamb, K. N., & Kettler, T. (2016). Examining teacher perceptions of creativity: A systematic review of the literature. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 9-30.10.1016/j.tsc.2016.05.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Nicol, J. J., & Long, B. C. (1996). Creativity and perceived stress of female music therapists and hobbyists. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 1-10.10.1207/s15326934crj0901_1]Search in Google Scholar
[Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 322–338.10.1037/a0014996]Search in Google Scholar
[Poropat, A. E. (2014). A meta-analysis of adult-rated child personality and academic performance in primary education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 239-252.10.1111/bjep.12019]Search in Google Scholar
[Pretz, J. E., & Kaufman, J. C. (2017). Do traditional admissions criteria reflect applicant creativity? Journal of Creative Behavior, 51, 240-251.10.1002/jocb.120]Search in Google Scholar
[Pretz, J. E., & McCollum, V. A. (2014). Self-perceptions of creativity do not always reflect actual creative performance. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 227-23610.1037/a0035597]Search in Google Scholar
[Priest, T. (2006). Self-evaluation, creativity, and musical achievement. Psychology of Music, 34, 47-61.10.1177/0305735606059104]Search in Google Scholar
[Ram, S., & Sheth, J. N. (1989). Consumer resistance to innovations: the marketing problem and its solutions. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 6, 5-14.10.1108/EUM0000000002542]Search in Google Scholar
[Roberts, B. W., Luo, J., Briley, D. A., Chow, P. I., Su, R., & Hill, P. L. (2017). A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 117-141.10.1037/bul0000088]Search in Google Scholar
[Schieman, S., & Young, M. (2010). The demands of creative work: Implications for stress in the work-family interface. Social Science Research, 39, 246-259.10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.05.008]Search in Google Scholar
[Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262-274.10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262]Search in Google Scholar
[Schmitt, N. (2012). Development of rationale and measures of noncognitive college student potential. Educational Psychologist, 47, 18-29.10.1080/00461520.2011.610680]Search in Google Scholar
[Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 361-388.10.1080/10400410409534549]Search in Google Scholar
[Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., & Crant, J. M. (2001). What do proactive people do? A longitudinal model linking proactive personality and career success. Personnel Psychology, 54, 845-874.10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00234.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd. New York: Free Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sternberg, R. J., Pretz, J. E., & Kaufman, J. C. (2003). Types of innovations. In L. Shavinina (Ed.), The international handbook of innovation (pp. 158-169). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tadmor, C. T., Satterstrom, P., Jang, S., & Polzer, J. T. (2012). Beyond individual creativity: The superadditive benefits of multicultural experience for collective creativity in culturally diverse teams. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43, 384-392.10.1177/0022022111435259]Search in Google Scholar
[Torrance, E. P. (1963). Education and the creative potential. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vock, M., Preckel, F., & Holling, H. (2011). Mental abilities and school achievement: A test of a mediation hypothesis. Intelligence, 39, 357-369.10.1016/j.intell.2011.06.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Ward, T. B. (1994). Structured imagination: The role of category structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psychology, 27, 1-40.10.1006/cogp.1994.1010]Search in Google Scholar
[Ward, T. B., Dodds, R. A., Saunders, K. N., & Sifonis, C. M. (2000). Attribute centrality and imaginative thought. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1387–1397.10.3758/BF03211839]Search in Google Scholar
[Ward, T. B., & Sifonis, C. M. (1997). Task demands and generative thinking: What changes and what remains the same? Journal of Creative Behavior, 31, 245-259.10.1002/j.2162-6057.1997.tb00797.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Wortman, J., Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2012). Stability and change in the Big Five personality domains: Evidence from a longitudinal study of Australians. Psychology and Aging, 27, 867-874.10.1037/a0029322]Search in Google Scholar
[Yap, C., Chai, K., & Lemaire, P. (2005). An empirical study on functional diversity and innovation in SMEs. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14, 176–190.10.1111/j.1476-8691.2005.00338.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Zajonc, R. B. (2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current directions in psychological science, 10, 224-228.10.1111/1467-8721.00154]Search in Google Scholar
[Zell, E., & Krizan, Z. (2014). Do people have insight into their abilities? A metasynthesis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 111–125.10.1177/1745691613518075]Search in Google Scholar