The Status of the Social in Creativity Studies and the Pitfalls of Dichotomic Thinking*

Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Ed. Michael Holquist. Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin and London: University of Texas Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, V. R., & Paulus, P. B. (2002). Making group brainstorming more effective: Recommendations from an associative memory perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 208-212.10.1111/1467-8721.00202Search in Google Scholar

Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-KonsultitOy.Search in Google Scholar

Farr, R. M. (1983). Wilhelm Wundt (1832-1920) and the origins of psychology as an experimental and social science. British Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 4, 289-301.10.1111/j.2044-8309.1983.tb00596.xSearch in Google Scholar

Citko, K. (2015). “ And what is a beautiful poem” ? Reflections of a poet on Vlad Petre Glăveanu’s ‘The psychology of creativity: A critical reading’. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 97-101; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0015.10.1515/ctra-2015-0015Search in Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1998). Creativity and genius: A systems perspective. In A. Steptoe (Ed.) Genius and the mind: Studies of creativity and temperament (pp. 39-66). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York, NY: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Galton, F. (1874). English men of science: Their nature and nurture. London: MacMillan.Search in Google Scholar

Gillespie, A. (2006a). Becoming other: From social interaction to self-reflection. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Gillespie, A. (2006b). Games and the development of perspective taking. Human Development, 49, 87-92.10.1159/000091334Search in Google Scholar

Gillespie, A., & Martin, J. (2014). Position exchange theory: A socio-material basis for discursive and psychological positioning. New Ideas in Psychology, 32, 73-79.10.1016/j.newideapsych.2013.05.001Search in Google Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P. (2011). Creativity as cultural participation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41, 1, 48-67.10.1111/j.1468-5914.2010.00445.xSearch in Google Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P. (2012). From dichotomous to relational thinking in the psychology of creativity: A review of great debates. Creativity and Leisure: An intercultural and crossdisciplinary journal, 1, 2, 83-96.Search in Google Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P. (forthcoming). Creativity as a sociocultural act. Journal of Creative Behavior.Search in Google Scholar

Gralewski, J. (2015). The Psychology of Creativity: A Discussion Between Creative Potential and Its Realization. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 49-55; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0007.10.1515/ctra-2015-0007Search in Google Scholar

Graumann, C. F. (1986). The individualization of the social and the desocialization of the individual: Floyd H. Allport’s contribution to social psychology. In C. F. Graumann & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Changing conceptions of crowd mind and behavior (pp. 97-116). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Harré, H. R., & van Langenhove, L. (Eds.) (1998). Positioning theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Hennessey, B. A. (2015). Comment on “ The Psychology of Creativity: A Critical Reading” by Vlad Petre Glăveanu. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 32-37; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0004.10.1515/ctra-2015-0004Search in Google Scholar

Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1999). Consensual assessment. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity, Vol. 1 (pp. 346–359). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hermans, H. J. M. (2001). The Dialogical Self: Toward a theory of personal and cultural positioning. Culture Psychology, 7, 243-281.10.1177/1354067X0173001Search in Google Scholar

Hermans, H. J. M. (2002). The dialogical self as a society of mind. Theory & Psychology, 12(2), 147-160.10.1177/0959354302122001Search in Google Scholar

Hoff, E., & Carlsson, I. (2015). She, You and They – More actors on the creativity research stage! Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 38-43; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0005.10.1515/ctra-2015-0005Search in Google Scholar

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Hui, A. N. N. (2015). Commentary on ‘The psychology of creativity: A critical reading’. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 56-63; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0008.10.1515/ctra-2015-0008Search in Google Scholar

Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jovchelovitch, S. (2007). Knowledge in context: Representations, community and culture. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203968895Search in Google Scholar

Karwowski, M. (2015). Notes on Creative Potential and Its Measurement. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 4-16; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0001.10.1515/ctra-2015-0001Search in Google Scholar

Knopf, A. A. (1924). Principles of psychology. New York, NY: Kantor, J. R.Search in Google Scholar

Kharkhurin, A. (2015). The Big Question in creativity research: The transcendental source of creativity. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 90-96; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0014.10.1515/ctra-2015-0014Search in Google Scholar

Lohman, D. F., & Lakin, J. (2006). Nonverbal test scores as one component of an identification system: Integrating ability, achievement, and teacher ratings. In J. VanTassel-Baska (Ed.). Alternative assessments for identifying gifted and talented students. Austin, TX: Prufrock Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lubart, T. (2003). Psychologie de la créativité. Paris: Armand Colin.Search in Google Scholar

Lubart, T., & Caroff, X. (2015). Has creativity research become a trivial pursuit? Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 44-48; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0006.10.1515/ctra-2015-0006Search in Google Scholar

Marková, I. (2003). Dialogicality and social representations: The dynamics of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Min Tang, L. (2015). Revisiting the systems approach: Commentary on Glăveanu’s paper “ The Psychology of Creativity: A Critical Reading”. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 79-84; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0012.10.1515/ctra-2015-0012Search in Google Scholar

Montuori, A., & Purser, R. (1997). Social creativity: The challenge of complexity. Translation of Le dimensioni sociali della creatività. Pluriverso, 1, 2, 78-88.Search in Google Scholar

Moran, S. (2015). Creativity is a label for the aggregated, time-dependent, subjective judgments by creators and by adopters. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 64-69; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0009.10.1515/ctra-2015-0009Search in Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In R. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social representations (pp. 3-70). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nijstad, B., & Paulus, P. (2003). Group creativity: Common themes and future directions. In P. Paulus & B. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 326-339). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Persson, R. (2015). Erudite, insightful and immensely important: A commentary on V. P. Glǎveanu’s critical article ‘The psychology of creativity – a critical reading’. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 17-20; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0002.10.1515/ctra-2015-0002Search in Google Scholar

Plucker, J. A., & Runco, M. A. (1998). The death of creativity measurement has been greatly exaggerated: Current issues, recent advances, and future directions in creativity assessment. Roeper Review, 21, 1, 36-39.10.1080/02783199809553924Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (2015). A Commentary on the social perspective on creativity. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 21-31; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0003.10.1515/ctra-2015-0003Search in Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2003). Creative cultures, nations, and civilizations: Strategies and results. In P. Paulus & B. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 304-325). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tan, A.-G. (2015). Knowing creativity. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 85-89; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0013.10.1515/ctra-2015-0013Search in Google Scholar

Tanggaard, L. (2015). Reaching out for everyday life creativity. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 75-78; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0011.10.1515/ctra-2015-0011Search in Google Scholar

Tanggaard, L. & Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). Creativity assessment as intervention: The case of creative learning. Akademisk Kvarter/Academic Quarter, 9(1), 18-30.Search in Google Scholar

Tylor, E. B. (1871). Primitive culture: Researches into the development of mythology, philosophy, religion, art and custom, 1. London: Murray.Search in Google Scholar

Valsiner, J. (Ed.) (1986). The individual subject and scientific psychology. New York, NY: Plenum.10.1007/978-1-4899-2239-7Search in Google Scholar

Valsiner, J. (2014). An invitation to cultural psychology. New Delhi: Sage.10.4135/9781473905986Search in Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Edited by M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Souberman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wagoner, B. (2015). From crisis to creativity: Towards a psychology of creating. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 70-74; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0010.10.1515/ctra-2015-0010Search in Google Scholar

Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20, 2,158-177.10.1037/h0074428Search in Google Scholar

West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied psychology: An international review, 51, 3, 355-424.10.1111/1464-0597.00951Search in Google Scholar

Zeng, L., Proctor, R. W., & Salvendy, G. (2011). Can traditional divergent thinking tests be trusted in measuring and predicting real-world creativity? Creativity Research Journal, 23, 1, 24-37.10.1080/10400419.2011.545713Search in Google Scholar

Zha, P., Walczyk, J. J., Griffith-Ross, D. A., Tobacyk, J. J., & Walczyk, D. F. (2006). The impact of culture and individualism–collectivism on the creative potential and achievement of American and Chinese adults. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 3, 355-366.10.1207/s15326934crj1803_10Search in Google Scholar