[Baczyńska, E., Lorenc, M. W., & Kaźmierczak, U. (2017). The Landscape Attractiveness of Abandoned Quarries. Geoheritage, 1–15. DOI: 10.1007/s12371-017-0231-6.10.1007/s12371-017-0231-6]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Barba, F. J., Remondo, J., & Rivas, V. (1997). Propuesta de un procedimiento para armonizar la valoración de elementos del patrimonio geológico (Proposal of a procedure to harmonize the valuation of geological heritage elements). Zubia, 15, 11–20. DOI: 10.1007/s12371-017-0231-6.10.1007/s12371-017-0231-6]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Beranová, L., Balej, M., & Raška, P. (2017). Assessing the geotourism potential of abandoned quarries with multitemporal data (České Středohoří Mts., Czechia). GeoScape, 11(2), 93–111.10.1515/geosc-2017-0008]Search in Google Scholar
[Brilha, J. (2014). Mining and Geoconservation. In G. Tiess G., T. Majumder, & P. Cameron (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Mineral and Energy Policy. Berlin: Springer.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brilha, J. (2016). Inventory and Quantitative Assessment of Geosites and Geodiversity Sites: a Review. Geoheritage, 8(2), 119–134. DOI: 10.1007/s12371-014-0139-3.10.1007/s12371-014-0139-3]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Brilha, J. (2017). Geoheritage: Inventories and Evaluation. In E. Reynard & J. Brilha (Eds.), Geoheritage: Assessment, Protection and Management (pp. 69-85). Amsterdam/Oxford/Cambridge: Elsevier]Search in Google Scholar
[Brilha, J., Andrade, C., Azerêdo, A. C., Barriga, F. J. A. S., Cachão, M., Cunha, P. P., & Granja, M. H. (2005). Definition of the Portuguese frameworks with international relevance as an input for the European geological heritage characterisation. Episodes, 28(3), 177–186.10.18814/epiiugs/2005/v28i3/004]Search in Google Scholar
[Bruschi, V. M., Cendrero, A., & Albertos, J. A. C. (2011). A statistical approach to the validation and optimisation of geoheritage assessment procedures. Geoheritage, 3(3), 131–149. DOI: 10.1007/s12371-011-0038-9.10.1007/s12371-011-0038-9]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Cendrero, A., & Bruschi, V. M. (2005). Geosite Evaluation; Can we measure intangible values? Il Quaternario - Italian Journal of Quaternary Sciences, 18(1), 293-306.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cílek, V. (2002). Geodiverzita - opomíjený aspekt ochrany přírody a krajiny (Geodiversity – neglected aspect of landscape and nature conservation). Zprávy o geologických výzkumech v roce 2001, 13–15.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cleal, C. J. (2007). Geoconservation – what on Earth are we doing? In B. Hlad & U. Herlec (Eds.), Regional Conference on Geoconservation: Geological heritage in the South-European Europe (p. 25). Book of abstracts.]Search in Google Scholar
[Comanescu, L., & Dobre, R. (2009). Inventorying evaluating and tourism valuating the geomorphosites from the central sector of the Cealhau National park. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, 1(3), 86–96.]Search in Google Scholar
[Copper Coast geopark. (2017). Mining heritage. Retrieved October 26, 2017, from https://coppercoastgeopark.com/mining-heritage/.]Search in Google Scholar
[Coratza, P., & Giusti, C. (2005). Methodological proposal for the assessment of the scientific quality of geomorphosites. Il Quaternario - Italian Journal of Quaternary Sciences, 18(1), 305–313.]Search in Google Scholar
[Czech Geological Survey. (2017). Database of significant geological localities of the Czech Republic. Retrieved October 26, 2017, from http://lokality.geology.cz.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dávid, L. (2008). Quarrying: an anthropogenic geomorphological approach. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, 13, 66–74.]Search in Google Scholar
[Demek, J., Havlíček, M., Kirchner, K., Nehyba, S., & Lisá, L. (2005). K rozšíření poznatků o kvartérních sedimentech na Červeném kopci v Brně (Distribution of Quaternary sediments on the Červený kopec (Red Hill) in Brno). In Geomorfologický sborník (pp. 159–163). České Budějovice: University of South Bohemia.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dingwall, P. (2005). Geological world heritage: a global framework. A Contribution to the Global Theme Study of World Heritage Natural Sites. IUCN, WCPA, UNESCO.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dixon, G. (1996). Geoconservation: An International Review and Strategy for Tasmania. Parks and Wildlife Service, Occasional Paper No. 35. Tasmania: Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Environment and Land Management.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dowling, R. (2013). Global Geotourism – an Emerging Form of Sustainable Tourism. Czech Journal of Tourism, 2(2), 59–79. DOI: 10.2478/cjot-2013-0004.10.2478/cjot-2013-0004]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Dowling, R., & Newsome, D. (Eds.). (2010). Geotourism. The tourism of Geology and Landscape. Oxford: Goodfellow Publishers Ltd.]Search in Google Scholar
[Erhartič, B. (2010). Geomorphosite assessment. Acta geographica Slovenica, 50(2), 295–319. DOI: 10.3986/AGS50206.10.3986/AGS50206]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Evans, B. G., Cleal, C. J., & Thomas, B. A. (2017). Geotourism in an Industrial Setting: the South Wales Coalfield Geoheritage Network. Geoheritage, 10(1), 93–107. DOI: 10.1007/s12371-017-0226-3.10.1007/s12371-017-0226-3]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Fassoulas, C., Mouriki, D., Dimitriou-Nikolakis, P., & Iliopoulos, G. (2012). Quantitative assessment of geotopes as an effective tool for geoheritage management. Geoheritage, 4(3), 177–193. DOI: 10.1007/s12371-010-0012-y.10.1007/s12371-010-0012-y]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Fuertes-Gutiérrez, I., & Fernández-Martínez, E. (2010). Geosites inventory in the Leon Province (Northwestern Spain): a tool to introduce geoheritage into regional environmental management. Geoheritage, 2(1–2), 57–75.10.1007/s12371-010-0012-y]Search in Google Scholar
[Fuertes-Gutiérrez, I., & Fernández-Martínez, E. (2012). Mapping Geosites for Geoheritage Management: A Methodological Proposal for the Regional Park of Picos de Europa (León, Spain). Environmental management, 50(5), 789–806. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-012-9915-5.10.1007/s00267-012-9915-5]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[García-Cortés, A., & Carcavilla Urquí, L. (Eds.). (2013). Documento metodológico para la elaboración del inventario español de lugares de interés geológico (IELIG), version 18-07-2013 (Document for the elaboration of the Spanish inventory of geosites). Madrid: Geological and Mining Institute of Spain.]Search in Google Scholar
[GeoLoci geopark. (2017). Hornictví a montanistika (Mining and montanistics). Retrieved October 26, 2017, from https://geoloci.webnode.cz/geotopy-a-lokality/hornictvi/.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gilíková, H. et al. (2010). Vysvětlivky k základní geologické mapě České republiky 1:25 000, 24-413 Mokrá-Horákov (Explanatory notes to the basic geological map of the Czech Republic 1:25 000, 24-413 Mokrá-Horákov). Prague: Czech geological Survey.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gray, M. (2013). Geodiversity: Valuing and Conserving Abiotic Nature. Second Edition. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Goudie, A. (2006). The Human Impact on the Natural Environment. Sixth Edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hooke, R. L. (2000). On the history of humans as geomorphic agents. Geology, 28(9), 843–846. DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(2000)28<843:OTHOHA>2.0.CO;2.10.1130/0091-7613(2000)28<843:OTHOHA>2.0.CO;2]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hose, T. A. (2012). 3G’s for Modern Geotourism. Geoheritage, 4(1–2), 7–24. DOI: 10.1007/s12371-011-0052-y.10.1007/s12371-011-0052-y]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hose, T. A. (2017). The English Peak District (as a potential geopark): mining geoheritage and historical geotourism. Acta Geoturistica, 8(2), 32–49.10.1515/agta-2017-0004]Search in Google Scholar
[Ilies, D. C., & Josan, N. (2007). Preliminary contribution to the investigation of the geosites from Apuseni Mountains (Romania). Revista de geomorfologie, 9, 53–59.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jacková, K., & Romportl, D. (2008). The relationship between geodiversity and habitat richness in Šumava National Park and Krivoklástsko PLA (Czech Republic): a quantitative analysis approach. Journal of Landscape Ecology, 1(1), 24–38.10.2478/v10285-012-0003-6]Search in Google Scholar
[JNCC (Joint Nature Conservation Committee). (1977). Guidelines for selection of Earth Science SSSIs. Retrieved October 26, 2017, from http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-2317.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kirchner, K. et al. (2017). Local geoheritage: its importance and potential for geotourist and recreational activities (a case study from Lomnicko area). In J. Fialová & D. Pernicová (Eds.), Public recreation and landscape protection – with nature hand in hand? (pp. 202–211). Brno: Mendel University in Brno.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kirchner, K., & Smolová, I. (2010). Základy antropogenní geomorfologie (Fundamentals of anthropogenic geomorphology). Olomouc: Palacký University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kubalíková, L. (2013). Geomorphosite assessment for geotourism purposes. Czech Journal of Tourism, 2(2), 80-104. DOI: 10.2478/cjot-2013-0005.10.2478/cjot-2013-0005]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kubalíková, L., & Kirchner, K. (2016). Geosite and Geomorphosite Assesment as a Tool for Geoconservation and Geotourism Purposes: a Case study from Vizovická vrchovina Highland (Eastern Part of the Czech Republic). Geoheritage, 8(8), 5–14. DOI: 10.1007/s12371-015-0143-2.10.1007/s12371-015-0143-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Kubalíková, L., Kirchner, K., & Bajer, A. (2017). Secondary geodiversity and its potential for urban geotourism: a case study from Brno city, Czech Republic. Quaestions Geographicae, 36(3), 63-73.10.1515/quageo-2017-0024]Search in Google Scholar
[Kubalíková, L., & Bajer, A. (2018). Geotourism within urban areas: new ways of promotion of natural and cultural heritage (case study from Brno city) In L. Lněnička (Ed.), Conference proceedings from Central-European geographical conference (in prep.). Brno: Masaryk University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lóczy, D. (2010). Anthropogenic Geomorphology in Environmental Management. In J. Szabó, L. Dávid, & D. Loszy (Eds.), Anthropogenic Geomorphology. A Guide to Man-Made Landforms (pp 25–38). Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London/New York: Springer.]Search in Google Scholar
[London Geodiversity Partnership. (2014). London Geodiversity Action Plan 2014-2018. London: Capita Symonds with assistance from the London Geodiversity Partnership and Natural England. Retrieved November 17, 2017, from http://www.londongeopartnership.org.uk/downloads/LGAP%202014-2018.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[López-García, J. A., Oyarzun, R., Andrés, S. L., & Martínez, J. I. M. (2011). Scientific, Educational, and Environmental Considerations Regarding Mine Sites and Geoheritage: A Perspective from SE Spain. Geoheritage, 3(4), 267-275.10.1007/s12371-011-0040-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Mata-Perelló, J., Carrión, P., Molina, J., & Villas-Boas, R. (2017). Geomining Heritage as a Tool to Promote the Social Development of Rural Communities. In E. Reynard & J. Brilha (Eds.), Geoheritage: Assessment, Protection and Management (pp. 167–177). Amsterdam/Oxford/Cambridge: Elsevier]Search in Google Scholar
[Migoń, P. (2012). Geomorfologia (Geomorphology). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 461 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Müller, P., & Novák, Z. (2000). Geologie Brna a okolí (Geology of Brno and its surroundings). Prague: Czech geological institute.]Search in Google Scholar
[Osborne, R. A. L. (2000). Presidential Address for 1999-2000. Geodiversity: „green“ geology in action. Proc. Linn. Soc. NSW, 122, 149–173.]Search in Google Scholar
[Palacio-Prieto, J. L. (2015). Geoheritage Within Cities: Urban Geosites in Mexico City. Geoheritage, 7(4), 365–373. DOI: 10.1007/s12371-014-0136-6.10.1007/s12371-014-0136-6]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Panizza, M. (2001). Geomorphosites: concepts, methods and example of geomorphological survey. Chinese Science Bulletin, 46, 4–6. DOI: 10.1007/BF03187227.10.1007/BF03187227]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Panizza, M., & Piacente, S. (1993). Geomorphological assets evaluation. Zeitschrift fur geomorfologie, Supp. Band, 87, 13–18.]Search in Google Scholar
[Panizza, M., & Piacente, S. (2005). Geomorphosites: a bridge betwenn scientific research, cultural integration and artistic suggestion. Il Quaternario – Italian Journal of Quaternary Sciences, 18(1), 3–10.]Search in Google Scholar
[Panizza, M., & Piacente, S. (2008). Geomorphosites and geotourism. Rev. Geogr. Acadêmica, 2(1), 5–9.]Search in Google Scholar
[Panizza, M., & Reynard, E. (2005). Géomorphosites: définition, évaluation et cartographie (Geomorphosites: definition, assessment and cartography). Géomorphologie: relief, processus, environnement, 1(3), 177–180.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pereira, P., Pereira, D. I., & Alves, M. I. (2007). Geomorphosite assessment in Montesinho Natural Park (Portugal). Geographica Helvetica, 62(3), 159–168.10.5194/gh-62-159-2007]Search in Google Scholar
[Pereira, P., & Pereira, D. (2010). Methodological guidelines for geomorphosite assessment. Géomorphologie: relief, processus, environnement, 1(3), 215–222.10.4000/geomorphologie.7942]Search in Google Scholar
[Petersen, J. (2002). The role of roadcuts, quarries, and other artificial exposures in geomorphology education. Geomorphology, 47, 289–301. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-555X(02)00095-8.10.1016/S0169-555X(02)00095-8]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Pica, A., Fredi, P., & Del Monte, M. (2014). The Ernici Mountains Geoheritage (Central Apennines, Italy): Assessment of the Geosites for Geotourism Development. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, 7/14(2), 193-206.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pica, A., Vergari, F., Fredi, P., & Del Monte, M. (2016). The Aeterna Urbs geomorphological heritage (Rome, Italy). Geoheritage, 8, 31-42.10.1007/s12371-015-0150-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Pica, A., Luberti, G. M., Vergari, F., Fredi, P., & Del Monte, M. (2017). Contribution for an urban geomorphoheritage assessment method: proposal from three geomorphosites in Rome (Italy). Quaestiones Geographicae, 36(3), 21–36. DOI: 10.1515/quageo-2017-0030.10.1515/quageo-2017-0030]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Pralong, J. P. (2005). A method for assessing tourist potential and use of geomorphological sites. Géomorphologie: relief, processus, environnement, 1(3), 189–196.10.4000/geomorphologie.350]Search in Google Scholar
[Pralong, J. P., & Reynard, E. (2005). A proposal for a classification of geomorphological sites depending on their tourist value. Il Quaternario - Italian Journal of Quaternary Sciences, 18(1), 315–321.]Search in Google Scholar
[Prosser, C. (2016). Geoconservation, Quarrying and Mining: Opportunities and Challenges Illustrated Through Working in Partnership with the Mineral Extraction Industry in England. Geoheritage, 1–12. DOI: 10.1007/s12371-016-0206-z10.1007/s12371-016-0206-z]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Reynard, E., Fontana, G., Kozlik, L., & Scapozza, C. (2007). A method for assessing „scientific“ and „additional values“ of geomorphosites. Geographica Helvetica, 62(3), 148–158.10.5194/gh-62-148-2007]Search in Google Scholar
[Reynard, E., Perret, A., Bussard, J., Grangier, L., & Martin, S. (2016). Integrated approach for the Inventory and Management of geomorphological Heritage at the Regional Scale. Geoheritage, 8, 43–60.10.1007/s12371-015-0153-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Reynard, E., Pica, A., & Coratza, P. (2017). Urban geomorphological heritage. An overview. Quaestiones Geographicae, 36(3), 7–20. DOI: 10.1515/quageo-2017-0022.10.1515/quageo-2017-0022]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Reynolds, J. (2001). Notes to accompany RIGS recording, assessment and designation and notification sheets. In Notes on the UKRIGS Conference 2001. Penirth: UKRIGS Conference. Retrieved November 17, 2017, from http://wiki.geoconservationuk.org.uk/images/8/8d/Assessinfo.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[Serrano-Cañadas, E., & González-Trueba, J. J. (2005). Assessment of geomorphosites in natural protected areas; the Picos de Europa National Park (Spain). Géomorphologie: relief, processus, environnement, 1(3), 197–208.10.4000/geomorphologie.364]Search in Google Scholar
[Sharples, C. (2002). Concepts and principles of geoconservation. Tasmanian Parks & Wildlife Service website, September 2002. Retrieved November 17, 2017, from http://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/geoconservation.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stefano, M., & Paolo, S. (2017). Abandoned Quarries and Geotourism: an Opportunity for the Salento Quarry District (Apulia, Southern Italy). Geoheritage, 9(4), 463–477. DOI: 10.1007/s12371-016-0201-4.10.1007/s12371-016-0201-4]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Suzuki, D., & Takagi, H. (2017) Evaluation of geosites for sustainable planning and management in geotourism. Geoheritage, 1–13. DOI: 10.1007/s1237-017-0225-4.10.1007/s1237-017-0225-4]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Szabó, J., Dávid, L., & Loczy, D. (Eds.). (2010). Anthropogenic Geomorphology. A Guide to Man-Made Landforms. Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London/New York: Springer.10.1007/978-90-481-3058-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Tůma, A. et al. (2011). Plán péče o Národní přírodní památku Červený kopec na období 2012–2021. (Care plan of National Natural Monument Červený kopec for the years 2012–2021). Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic. Retrieved October 21, 2017, from http://drusop.nature.cz/ost/archiv/plany_pece/index.php?frame&ID=24299.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tuscan Mining Geopark. (2017). Tuscan Mining Geopark. Retrieved February 26, 2017, from https://www.coopcollinemetallifere.it/en/parco-colline-metallifere.]Search in Google Scholar
[UNESCO. (1972). Convention concerning the protection of the world cultural and natural heritage. Retrieved October 22, 2017, from: http://whc.unesco.org/archive/convention-en.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ústřední seznam ochrany přírody (Central database of nature conservation). (2017). Retrieved October 26, 2017, from http://drusop.nature.cz/portal.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wimbledon, W. A. (2011). Geosites—a mechanism for protection, integrating national and international valuation of heritage sites. Geologia dell’Ambiente, 2, 13-25.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zelenka, J. et al. (2014). Metodiky národních geoparků (Methods for national geoparks). Chrudim/Prague: Vodní zdroje Chrudim a Ministerstvo životního prostředí (Ministry of Environment, Czech Republic).]Search in Google Scholar
[Zeman, A. (1992). New data on the Quaternary at Červený kopec hill in Brno. Scripta Geology, 22, 123–131.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zouros, N. (2007). Geomorphosite assessment and management in protected areas of Greece. Case study of the Lesvos Island - coastal geomorphosites. Geographica Helvetica, 62(3), 169–180. DOI: 10.5194/gh-62-169-2007.10.5194/gh-62-169-2007]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Zwoliński, Z., Hildebrandt-Radke, I., Mazurek, M., & Makohonienko, M. (2017a). Existing and proposed urban geosites values resulting from geodiversity of Poznań City. Quaestiones Geographicae, 36(3), 125–149. DOI: 10.1515/quageo-2017-0031.10.1515/quageo-2017-0031]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Zwoliński, Z., Najwer, A., & Giardino, M. (2017b). Methods for Assessing Geodiversity. In E. Reynard & J. Brilha (Eds.), Geoheritage: Assessment, Protection and Management (pp. 27–52). Amsterdam/Oxford/Cambridge: Elsevier10.1016/B978-0-12-809531-7.00002-2]Search in Google Scholar