Assessment of structural and functional condition of rats bone tissue under the influence of various parameters of vibration

1. Compston JE. Sex steroids and bone. Physiol Rev. 2001;81(1):419-47.10.1152/physrev.2001.81.1.41911152762Search in Google Scholar

2. Kolesnyk DA, Silenko YuI. Condition of blood biochemical indices under experimental osteoporosis. Actual Problems of the Modern Medicine, 2011;3(35),20-22). [Article in Russian]Search in Google Scholar

3. Santos-Filho SD, Meyer PF, Ronzio OA, Bonelli L, Fonseca AS, Bernardo-Filho M. Whole body vibration exercise: what do you know about scientific interest? FIEP Bull. 2010;80:875-78).Search in Google Scholar

4. Schutska HV, Hudyma AA, Boris RM. Features of bone tissue remodeling in condition of hypokinetic osteoporosis and politrauma in experiment. Actual Probl Transport Medicine. 2013;1:31.Search in Google Scholar

5. Seibel MP. Dynamics of bone and cartilage metabolism. Robins S.P., Belezikian J.P. UK:Elsevier;2006:919.Search in Google Scholar

6. Krajnak K, Riley DA, Wu J, McDowell T, Welcome DE, Xu XS, Dong RG. Frequency-dependent effects of vibration on physiological systems: experimental with animals and other human surrogates. Ind Health. 2012;50(5):343-53.10.2486/indhealth.MS1378Search in Google Scholar

7. Ozcivici E, Luu YK, Adler B, Qin YX, Rubin J, Judex S, Rubin CT. Mechanical signals as anabolic agents in bone. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2010;6(1):50-9.10.1038/nrrheum.2009.239374304820046206Search in Google Scholar

8. Sehmisch S, Galal R, Kolios L, Tezval M, Dullin C, Zimmer S, et al. Effects of low-magnitude, high-frequency mechanical stimulation in the rat osteopenia model. Osteoporos Int. 2009;20(12):1999-2008.10.1007/s00198-009-0892-3277721519283328Search in Google Scholar

9. von Stengel S, Kemmler W, Engelke K, Kalender WA. Effects of whole body vibration on bone mineral density and falls: results of the randomized controlled ELVIS study with postmenopausal women. Osteoporosis Int. 2011;22(1):317-25.10.1007/s00198-010-1215-420306017Search in Google Scholar

10. Christiansen BA, Kotiya AA, Silva MJ. Constrained tibial vibration does not produce an anabolic bone response in adult mice. Bone. 2009;45(4):750-9.10.1016/j.bone.2009.06.025277476619576309Search in Google Scholar

11. Judex S, Rubin C. Is bone formation induced by high-frequency mechanical signals modulated by muscle activity? J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2010;10(1):3.Search in Google Scholar

12. Lynch MA, Brodt MD, Silva MJ. Skeletal effects of whole-body vibration in adult and aged mice. J Orthop Res. 2010;28(2):241-7.10.1002/jor.20965292969619658155Search in Google Scholar

13. Rubin C, McLeod K. Promotion of bony ingrowth by frequency-specific, low-amplitude mechanical strain. Clinical Orthopedy. 1994;298:165-74.10.1097/00003086-199401000-00022Search in Google Scholar

14. Wang Y, Azaïs T, Robin M, Vallée A, Catania C, Legriel P, et al. The predominant role of collagen in the nucleation, growth, structure and orientation of bone apatite. Nature Materials. 2012;11(8): 724-33.10.1038/nmat336222751179Search in Google Scholar

15. Wenger KH, Freeman JD, Fulzele S, Immel DM, Powell BD, Molitor P, et al. Effect of whole-body vibration on bone properties in aging mice. Bone. 2010;47(4):746-55.10.1016/j.bone.2010.07.01420638490Search in Google Scholar

16. Rubin C, Turner AS, Bain S, Mallinckrodt C, McLeod K. Low mechanical signals strengthen long bones. Nature. 2001;412:603-4.10.1038/3508812211493908Search in Google Scholar

17. Paschold HW, Mayton AG. Whole-body vibration: Building awareness in SH&E. American Society of Safety Engineers. Occupation Hazards. 2011;54(4):30-5.Search in Google Scholar

18. Abercromby AF, Amonette WE, Layne CS, McFarlin BK, Hinman MR, Paloski WH. Vibration exposure and biodynamic responses during whole-body vibration training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39: 1794-800.10.1249/mss.0b013e3181238a0f17909407Search in Google Scholar

19. Bovenzi M, Hulshof C. An update review of epidemiologic studies on the relationship between exposure to whole-body vibration and low back pain. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1999;72.6:351-65.10.1007/s00420005038710473835Search in Google Scholar

20. Cherniuk VI, Nazarenko VI. [Editors]. Public health standards of industrial general and local vibration: PHS 3.3.6.038-99. Kyiv; 2000:46.Search in Google Scholar

21. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 2631-1:1997. Mechanical Vibration and Shock-Evaluation of Human Exposure to Whole-Body Vibration – Part 1: General Requirements. Switzerland, Geneva; 1997.Search in Google Scholar

22. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 2631-2:2003. Mechanical Vibration and Shock-Evaluation of Human Exposure to Whole-Body Vibration – Part 2: Continuous and shock induced vibration in buildings (1 to 80 Hz). Switzerland, Geneva; 2003.Search in Google Scholar

23. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 5349-1:2001. Mechanical Vibration – Measurement and Evaluation of Human Exposure to Hand Transmitted Vibration. Part 1: General Requirements. London (British standard); 2001.Search in Google Scholar

24. Kostyshyn NM, Grzegotsky MR. Evaluation of mineral density and bone metabolism in rats under various vibration parameters. Exp Clin Physiol Biochem. 2016;2:74.Search in Google Scholar

25. Eastell R, Hannon RA. Biomarkers of bone health and osteoporosis risk. Proc Nutr Soc. 2008;67:157-62.10.1017/S002966510800699X18412989Search in Google Scholar

26. Chen GX, Zheng S, Qin S, Zhong ZM, Wu XH, Huang ZP, et al. Effect of low-magnitude whole-body vibration combined with alendronate in ovariectomized rats: A random controlled osteoporosis prevention study. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:5.10.1371/journal.pone.0096181401045624796785Search in Google Scholar

27. Wheater G, Elshahaly M, Tuck SP, Datta HK, van Laar JM. The clinical utility of bone marker measurements in osteoporosis. J Transl Med. 2013;11(1):210.10.1186/1479-5876-11-201376590923984630Search in Google Scholar