Influence of different excipients on the properties of hard gelatin capsules with metamizole sodium

1. Augsburger L.L. (1996). Hard and soft gelatin capsules. In: Modern Pharmaceutics, 3rd ed. Banker G.S., Rhodes C.T. (editors). New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.; p. 395.Search in Google Scholar

2. Basak G.W., Drozd-Sokołowska J., Wiktor-Jedrzejczak W.: Update on the incidence of metamizole sodium-induced blood dyscrasias in Poland. J. Int. Med. Res., 38(4), 1374, 2010.10.1177/147323001003800419Search in Google Scholar

3. Bowman B.J., Ofner III C.M. (2002). Hard gelatin capsules. In: Protein-Based Films and Coatings. Gennadios A. (editor). Boca Raton: CRC Press; p.367.Search in Google Scholar

4. Daraghmeh N. et al.: Co-processed chitin-mannitol as a new excipient for oro-dispersible tablets. Mar. Drugs, 13(4), 1739, 2015.10.3390/md13041739Search in Google Scholar

5. Edwards J. et al.: Single dose dipyrone for acute postoperative pain. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 2010. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003227.pub2.10.1002/14651858.CD003227.pub2Search in Google Scholar

6. Efentakis M., Vlachou M.: Evaluation of high molecular weight poly(oxyethylene) (Polyox) polymer: studies of flow properties and release rates of furosemide and captopril from controlled-release hard gelatin capsules. Pharm. Dev. Technol., 5(3), 339, 2000.10.1081/PDT-100100549Search in Google Scholar

7. European Pharmacopoeia, 7^th ed. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

8. Faqih A.M. et al.: Effect of moisture and magnesium stearate concentration on flow properties of cohesive granular materials. Int. J. Pharm., 336(2), 338, 2007.10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.12.024Search in Google Scholar

9. Huber M. et al.: Metamizole-induced agranulocytosis revisited: results from the prospective Berlin case-control surveillance study. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol., 71(2), 219, 2015.10.1007/s00228-014-1777-8Search in Google Scholar

10. Jalil R., Ferdous A.J.: Effect of viscosity increasing agent and electrolyte concentration on the release rate of theophylline from a HPMC based sustained release capsules. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm., 19(19), 2637, 1993.10.3109/03639049309047206Search in Google Scholar

11. Kołodziejczyk M.K., Kołodziejska J., Zgoda M.M.: Ibuprofen release preferences of medicinal products, the market share of excipients vermet of a polymer. Polim. Med., 40(4), 19, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

12. Korzeniowska K., Jankowski J., Jabłecka A.: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Farm. Współ., 3, 192, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

13. Lahdenpää E., Niskanen M., Yliruusi J.: Crushing strength, disintegration time and weight variation of tablets compressed from three Avicelä PH grades and their mixtures. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm., 43, 315, 1997.Search in Google Scholar

14. Luukkonen P. et al.: Rheological characterization of microcrystalline cellulose and silicified microcrystalline cellulose wet masses using a mixer torque rheometer. Int. J. Pharm., 188(2), 181, 1999.10.1016/S0378-5173(99)00219-7Search in Google Scholar

15. Martínez-Martín P. et al.: Efficacy and safety of metamizol vs. acetylsalicylic acid in patients with moderate episodic tension-type headache: a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, multicentre study. Cephalalgia, 21(5), 604, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

16. Murtada A.O., Abdelkarim M.A., Huyam A.M.: The effect of sodium starch glycolate concentration on physical effectiveness of chlorpheniramine tablets. Indian J. Pharm. Educ., 4(1), 47, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

17. Nikolova I. et al.: Metamizole: A review profile of a well-known “forgotten” drug. Part I: Pharmaceutical and nonclinical profile. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip., 26(6), 3329, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

18. Nokhodchi A. et al.: The role of oral controlled release matrix tablets in drug delivery systems. Bioimpacts, 2(4), 175, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

19. Overguard A.B.A. et al.: Patients’ evaluation of shape, size, and color of solid dosage forms. Pharm. World Sci., 23(5), 185, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

20. Patel R., Podczeck F.: Investigation of the effect of type and source of microcrystalline cellulose on capsule filling. Int. J. Pharm., 128, 123, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

21. Shah R.B., Tawakkul M.A., Khan M.A.: Comparative evaluation of flow for pharmaceutical powders and granules. AAPS PharmSciTech., 9(1), 250, 2008.10.1208/s12249-008-9046-8297691118446489Search in Google Scholar

22. Shlieout G., Arnold K., Müller G.: Powder and mechanical properties of microcrystalline cellulose with different degrees of polymerization. AAPS PharmSciTech., 3(2), 45, 2002.10.1208/pt030211275031312916948Search in Google Scholar

23. Stegemann S. (2002). Hard gelatin capsules today –and tomorrow, 2^nd ed. Bornem: Capsugel Library.Search in Google Scholar

24. Zgoda M.M.: Aktualnie stosowane substancje pomocnicze w technologii stałych doustnych środków farmaceutycznych. Farm. Pol., 59(17), 890, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

25. Zhang P.Y. et al.: Preparation of poly (vinyl butyral) hollow fiber ultrafiltration membrane via wet-spinning method using PVP as additive. Desalination, 278, 186, 2011.10.1016/j.desal.2011.05.026Search in Google Scholar