From a Text to Practice and Back Again. Making Knowledge(s) Work for Participatory Budgeting in Poland

Austin, J. L. (1975). How to Do Things With Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Barad, Karen. (2003). Posthumanist Performativity: Toward anUnderstanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. Signs, 28, 801-831.10.1086/345321Search in Google Scholar

Bluj, A., & Stokłuska, E. (2015). Budżet partycypacyjny (obywatelski) krokpo kroku. Poradnik dla praktyków (Participatory [Civic] Budgeting Step byStep. A Guidebook for Practitioners). Warsaw: The Unit for Social Researchand Innovation ‘Shipyard’. Accessed 1 May 2016. http://stocznia.org.pl/app/uploads/2016/01/BP_krokpokroku.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation.Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. InLaw J. (Ed.), Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge (pp.196-233). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar

Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guidethrough Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Clarke, J., Bainton, D., Lendvai, N., & Stubbs, P. (2015). Making PolicyMove. Towards a Politics of Translation and Assemblage. Bristol: PolicyPress.Search in Google Scholar

Colebatch, H. K., Hoppe, R., & Noordegraaf, M. (2010). UnderstandingPolicy Work. In Colebatch, H. K., Hoppe, R., & Noordegraaf, M. (Eds.), Working for Policy (pp. 11-25). Amsterdam: Amsterdam UniversityPress.Search in Google Scholar

Freeman, R. (2009). What is ‘translation’?. Evidence & Policy: A Journal ofResearch, Debate and Practice 5/4: 429-447.Search in Google Scholar

Freeman, R., & Sturdy, S. (2015a). Introduction: Knowledge in Policy- Embodied, Inscribed, Enacted. In Freeman, R., & Sturdy, S. (Eds.), Knowledge in Policy. Embodied, Inscribed, Enacted (pp. 1-17). Bristol: Policy Press.10.1332/policypress/9781447309987.003.0001Search in Google Scholar

Freeman, R., & Sturdy, S. (2015b). Knowledge and Policy In Researchand Practice. In Freeman, R., & Sturdy, S. (Eds.), Knowledge in Policy.Embodied, Inscribed, Enacted (pp. 201-218). Bristol: Policy Press.10.1332/policypress/9781447309987.003.0011Search in Google Scholar

Glab, V., & Parés, M. (2015). Narzędzia ICT w procesach budżetupartycypacyjnego. [ICT Tools in the Processes of Participatory Budgeting].Warsaw: The Unit for Social Research and Innovation ‘Shipyard’.Accessed 1 May 2016. http://stocznia.org.pl/app/uploads/2016/01/Narze%CC%A8dzia-ICT-w-procesach-budz%CC%87etupartycypacyjnego.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Kębłowski, W. (2014). Budżet partycypacyjny. Ewaluacja. (ParticipatoryBudgeting in Poland: an Evaluation). Warsaw: Instytut Obywatelski.Accessed 1 January 2017. http://www.instytutobywatelski.pl/wpcontent/uploads/2014/07/budzet-partycypacyjny-web.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Kołtun, A. (2015). Can Knowledge be (a) Performative? Performativity inthe Studies of Science. Lublin: Wydawnictwo UMCS.Search in Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1983). Give Me a Laboratory and I will Raise the World. InKnorr Cetina, K. & Mulkay, M. (Eds.), Science Observed. Perspectives onthe Social Studies of Science (pp. 141-170). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1992). Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a FewMundane Artifacts. In Bijker, W. E. & Law, J. (Eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change (pp. 225-258).Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1996). On Interobjectivity. Mind, Culture, and Activity: AnInternational Journal Traduction, 3/4, 228-245.10.1207/s15327884mca0304_2Search in Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s Hope. Essays on the Reality of Science Studies.Cambridge, MA, London, UK: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Law, J. (2004). After Method. Mess in Social Science Research. London, New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Law, J. (2007; draft version). Actor Network Theory and MaterialSemiotics. Accessed 11 November 2014. http://www.heterogeneities.net/publications/Law2007ANTandMaterialSemiotics.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Law, J. (2008; draft version). Seeing Like a Survey. Accessed 11November 2014. http://www.heterogeneities.net/publications/Law2008SeeingLikeASurvey.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Maybin Jo. (2015). “’We Know Who to Talk to’: Embodied Knowledge inEngland’s Department of Health”. In Freeman, R., & Sturdy, S. (Eds.), Knowledge in Policy. Embodied, Inscribed, Enacted (pp. 79-102). Bristol: Policy Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ostrowski, Ł., & Rudnicki, R. (2015). Jak ewaluować budżet partycypacyjny(obywatelski)? (How to Evaluate a Participatory (Civic) Budget?). Warsaw: TheUnit for Social Research and Innovation ‘Shipyard’. Accessed 1 May 2016. http://stocznia.org.pl/app/uploads/2016/01/Jak-ewaluowac-BP-BO.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2015). Fast Policy. Experimental Statecraft atthe Thresholds of Neoliberalism. Minneapolis: University of MinnesotaPress.10.5749/minnesota/9780816677306.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Pickering, A. (1992). From Science as Knowledge to Science as Practice.In Pickering, A. (Ed.), Science as Practice and Culture (pp. 1-26). Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pickering, A., & Stephanides, A. (1992). Constructing Quaternions: On the Analysis of Conceptual Practice. In Pickering, A. (Ed.), Science as Practice and Culture (pp. 139-167). Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rouse, J. (2014). Scientific Practice and the Scientific Image. In Soler, L., Zwart, S., Israel-Jost, V., & Lynch, M. (Eds.), Science After the Practice Turn in the Philosophy, History, and Social Studies of Science (pp. 277-294). London, New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Ryle, G. (1949). Knowing How and Knowing That. In Gilbert Ryle: Collected Papers. Vol. 2, (pp. 212-225). New York: Barnes and Noble. Search in Google Scholar

Standardy Procesów Budżetu Partycypacyjnego w Polsce (Standards for the Processes of Participatory Budgeting in Poland). (2014). Various convenors. Warsaw: The Unit for Social Research and Innovation ‘Shipyard’. Accessed 1 January 2016. http://stocznia.org.pl/publikacje/standardy-procesow-budzetu-partycypacyjnego-w-polsce/Search in Google Scholar

Szaranowicz-Kusz, M. (2016). Participatory Budgeting in Poland. Infos, 1/205, 1-4. Accessed 1 January 2017. http://orka.sejm.gov.pl/WydBAS.nsf/0/DFD81CE49C17B3D6C1257F50005058B1/$file/Infos_205EN.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Sześciło, D. (2015). Participatory budgeting in Poland. Quasi-referendum instead of deliberation. Hrvatska i komparativna javna uprava, 2, 373-388.Search in Google Scholar

Wehling, P. (2006). The Situated Materiality of Scientific Practices: Postconstructivism - a New Theoretical Perspective in Science Studies?. Science, Technology & Innovation Studies, 1, 81-100.Search in Google Scholar

Yin, R. (2003). Case study research, design and methods. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar