[Barbic, J. (2006). Foreword. In J. Barbic (ed.), The reform of the administrative judiciary and administrative procedures (pp. 7-10). Scientific Council for Public Administration, Justice and the Rule of Law, Croatian Academy of Science and Arts, Book Forth, Zagreb.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bernstein, M. H. (1995). Regulating Business by Independent Commission. Princeton University Press, USA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447-468.10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x]Search in Google Scholar
[CARDS. (2004a). Twinning Project: Strategy Paper for the Drafting of a new Law on Administrative Disputes, http://www.upravnisudrh.hr/frames.php?right=CARDS2004.html.]Search in Google Scholar
[CARDS. (2004). Twinning Project: Impact Assessment of the draft for a new Law on Administrative Court Procedure and recommendations for its implementation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Christensen, T. & Lægreid, P. (2004). Regulatory Agencies - the Challenges of Balancing Agency Autonomy and Political Control. Stein Rokkan Centre for Social Studies, WP 18.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gagro B. & Juric-Knezevic D. (2006). The quality of administrative acts and activities from the experience of the ACRC with suggestions for improvements. In J. Barbic (ed.), The reform of the administrative judiciary and administrative procedures (pp. 19-37). Scientific Council for Public Administration, Justice and the Rule of Law, Croatian Academy of Science and Arts, Book Forth, Zagreb.]Search in Google Scholar
[Geradin, D. (2006). The Development of European Regulatory Agencies: What the EU should learn from American Experience. http://ssrn.com/abstract=877922.]Search in Google Scholar
[Geradin, D. & Petit, N. (2011). Judicial Review in European Union Competition Law: A Quantitive and Qualitative Assessment. TILEC Discussion Paper, DP 2011-008, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1698342.]Search in Google Scholar
[Geradin, D. & Petit, N. (2004). The Development of Agencies at EU and National Levels: Conceptual Analysis and Proposals for Reform. NYU School of Law, Jean Monnet Working Paper 01/04.]Search in Google Scholar
[Giunio, M. (2013). Connecting the court to the citizen as an eliminatory criterion for reimbursement of administrative dispute. Croatian Law Review, 13 (3), 42-49.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jerovsek, T. (2006). The experience of Slovenia in the administrative judiciary and conceptual changes in the regulation of administrative disputes. In J. Barbic (ed.), The reform of the administrative judiciary and administrative procedures (pp. 64-81). Scientific Council for Public Administration, Justice and the Rule of Law, Croatian Academy of Science and Arts, Book Forth, Zagreb.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kopric, I. (2006). Administrative judiciary in the context of EU standards. In J. Barbic (ed.), The reform of the administrative judiciary and administrative procedures (pp. 58-64). Scientific Council for Public Administration, Justice and the Rule of Law, Croatian Academy of Science and Arts, Book Forth, Zagreb.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lavrijssen, S. & de Visser, M. (2006). Independent administrative authorities and the standard of judicial review. Utrecht Law Review, 2(1), 111-135.10.18352/ulr.19]Search in Google Scholar
[Lukanovic-Ivanisevic, D. (2014). Trial within a reasonable time in the administrative judiciary - The practice of the Supreme Court of the RoC. In I. Kopric (ed.) Europeanization of administrative judiciary in Croatia. (pp. 135-155). Institute for Public Administration, Zagreb, Croatia.]Search in Google Scholar
[Majone, G. (1999). The Regulatory State and its Legitimacy Problems, West European Politics, 22(1), 1-24.10.1080/01402389908425284]Search in Google Scholar
[Majone, G. (1994). The Rise of the Regulatory State in Europe, West European Politics, 17(3), 77-101.10.1080/01402389408425031]Search in Google Scholar
[Marusic-Babic, G. (2014). The execution of the new Administrative Disputes Act. In I. Kopric (ed.) Europeanization of administrative judiciary in Croatia. (pp. 191-201). Institute for Public Administration, Zagreb, Croatia.]Search in Google Scholar
[McCraw, T.K. (1984). Propeths of Regulation. Harvard University Press, Massachusetts.]Search in Google Scholar
[Medvedovic, D. (2011). The complete reform of administrative judiciary. Proceedings of the 49th meeting of Jurists, Opatija, 11-13 May 2011, The Croatian Association of corporate lawyers, Zagreb, 253-291.]Search in Google Scholar
[Medvedovic, D. (2003). Administrative judiciary in Croatia - Contribution for the historical overview. In Kriskovic, V., Krbek, I., Ivančević, V., Borković, I. & Medvedovic, I. (ed.) Hrestomaty of administrative law. (pp. 309-356). Suvremena javna uprava, Zagreb, Croatia.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ministry of Justice (2012). The general criteria for judges. Zagreb, Croatia.]Search in Google Scholar
[Musa, A. (2014). Agency model of public administration. Faculty of Law, Zagreb, Croatia.]Search in Google Scholar
[Musa, A. (2013). Good Governance in Croatian regulatory agencies: towards a legal framework. in Kopric, I., Musa, A. i Djulabic, V. (eds.), Agency in Croatia, (pp. 103-154). Institute for Public Administration, Zagreb.]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD. (2002). Regulatory Policies in OECD Countries - From Interventionism to Regulatory Governance. Paris.]Search in Google Scholar
[Omejec, J. (2006). The relationship of the Constitutional Court of the RoC and the Administrative Court of the RoC in the control of public administration in the RoC, In J. Barbic (ed.), The reform of the administrative judiciary and administrative procedures (pp. 81-97). Scientific Council for Public Administration, Justice and the Rule of Law, Croatian Academy of Science and Arts, Book Forth, Zagreb.]Search in Google Scholar
[Petrovic, S. (2008). The concept and role of independent regulators. Law in Economy, 3, 462-489.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pierce, R. (2010). What do the studies of judicial review of agency actions mean? Administrative Law Review, Forthcoming; GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 505; http://ssrn.com/abstract=1604701.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pierce, R. J. & Weiss, J. A. (2011). An Empirical Study of Judicial Review of Agency Interpretations of Agency Rules, Administrative Law Review, Forthcoming; GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 523; http://ssrn.com/abstract=1744990.]Search in Google Scholar
[Popovic, N. & Maricic, D. (2014). Proceedings before independent regulatory bodies and the new Administrative Disputes Act. In I. Kopric (ed.) Europeanization of administrative judiciary in Croatia. (pp. 201-226). Institute for Public Administration, Zagreb, Croatia.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sikic, M. & Turudic, M. (2013). The costs of an administrative dispute. Collected Papers of the Law Faculty of the University of Rijeka, 34(2), 841-857.]Search in Google Scholar
[Smerdel, B. (2012). Platypus Reconsidered: How to integrate Independent Regulators into the German Constitutional Order. In Bodiroga-Vukobrat N., Sander, G., Baric, S. (eds.), Regulatory Agencies in the Tension Between Law and Economics (pp. 11-24). Verlag Dr. Kovac, Hamburg.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sunstein, C. R. (1987). Constitutionalism after the New Deal, Harvard Law Review, 101(2), 421-510.10.2307/1341264]Search in Google Scholar
[Tushnet, M. (2009). Against Judicial Review, Harvard Public Law Working Paper No. 09-20, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1368857.10.2139/ssrn.1368857]Search in Google Scholar