[Adams, D. (2004). Usable knowledge in public policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 63(1):29-42.]Search in Google Scholar
[Arguello, J., Callan, J., and Shulman, S. (2008). Recognizing citations in public comments. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 5(1):49-71.]Search in Google Scholar
[Caplan, N. (1979). The two-communities theory and knowledge utilization. American Behavioral Scientist, 22(3):459-470.]Search in Google Scholar
[Desmarais, B. a. and Hird, J. A. (2014). Public policy’s bibliography: The use of research in US regulatory impact analyses. Regulation and Governance, 8:497-510.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dolowitz, D. and Marsh, D. (1996). Who Learns What from Whom: a Review of the Policy Transfer Literature. Political Studies, 21:343-351.]Search in Google Scholar
[Evans, B. and Wellstead, A. (2013). Policy dialogue and engagement between nongovernmental organizations and government: A survey of processes and instruments of Canadian policy workers. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 7(1):60-87.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gray, V. and Lowery, D. (2000). Where do Policy Ideas Come From? A Study of Minnesota Legislators and Staffers. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(3):573-597.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hird, J. a. (2005). Policy Analysis for What? The Effectiveness of Nonpartisan Policy Research Organizations, 33(1):83-105.10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00093.x]Search in Google Scholar
[House of Commons (2010) Major Road Network: Government Response to HC 505 of session 2009-10. First special report (HC 421 of session 2010-11). London: The Stationery Office Limited.]Search in Google Scholar
[House of Commons Transport Committee (2010). Major road network. Eights Report (HC 505 of session 2009-10). London: The Stationery Office Limited.]Search in Google Scholar
[Howlett, M. (2014). Policy advisory systems in theory and practice: concepts, empirical findings and research agendas. Prepared for delivery at the Workshop on Analytical Communities in Policy Advisory Systems at Global and Local level: Comparative Analysis of Policy Impact, Moskow.]Search in Google Scholar
[Howlett, M. (2009). Policy Analytical Capacity and Evidence-Based Policy-Making: Lessons from Canada. Canadian Public Administration 52(2): 153-75.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ingold, K. (2011). Network Structures within Policy Power, and Brokerage in Swiss Climate Policy. Policy Studies Journal, 39(3):435-459.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jackson-Elmoore, C., Dell, K., Creed, E., and Kearsley, D. (2014). The Gender Influence: Creating Access to the Public Policy Process. Prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the Australian Political Studies Association, Sydney.10.2139/ssrn.2440382]Search in Google Scholar
[James, T. E. and Jorgensen, P. D. (2009). Policy knowledge, policy formulation, and change: Revisiting a foundational question. Policy Studies Journal, 37:141-162. Ledermann, S. (2014). Evidenz und Expertise im vorparlamentarischen Gesetzgebungsprozess: Die Rolle von Verwaltung und externen Experten. Swiss Political Science Review, 20(3):453-485.]Search in Google Scholar
[Leydesdorff, L. (2007). Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58(9): 1303-1319.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marsden, P. V. (2011). Survey Methods for Network Data. In Scott, J. and Carrington, P. J., editors, Social Network Analysis, pages 370-385. Sage Publications, London.]Search in Google Scholar
[McAllister, R. R., McCrea, R., and Lubell, M. N. (2014). Policy networks, stakeholder interactions and climate adaptation in the region of South East Queensland, Australia. Regional Environmental Change, 14:527-539.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mooney, C. Z. (2015). Information Sources in State Legislative Decision Making. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 16(3):445-455.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nicolaisen, J. (2007). Citation Analysis. In Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, chapter 13, pages 609-641.10.1002/aris.2007.1440410120]Search in Google Scholar
[O’Connor, L. and Rapchak, M. (2012). Information use in online civic discourse: a study of health care reform debate. Liberty Trends, 60(3):497-521.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rich, A. (2004). Think Tanks, Public Policy, and the Politics of Expertise Think Tanks, Public Policy, and the Politics of Expertise. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rich, A. (2001). The Politics of Expertise in Congress and the News Media. Social Science Quarterly, 82(3):583-601.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rich, R. F. (1997). Measuring Knowledge Utilization: Processes and Outcomes. Knowledge and Policy, 10(3):11-24.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sabatier, P. A. and Whiteman, D. (1985). Legislative Decision Making and Substantive Policy Information: Models of Information Flow. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 10(3):395-421.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shulock, N. (1999). The Paradox of Policy Analysis: If It Is Not Used, Why Do We Produce So Much of It? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 18(2):226-244.10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199921)18:2<226::AID-PAM2>3.0.CO;2-J]Search in Google Scholar
[Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. (2008). Social Network Data. In Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, chapter 2, pages 28-66. Cambridge University Press, New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weible, C. M. (2008). Expert-based information and policy subsystems: a review and synthesis. The Policy Studies Journal, 36(4):615-636.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weiss, C. (1979). The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration. September/October: 426-431.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weiss, C. H. (1999). The Interface between Evaluation and Public Policy. Evaluation, 5(4):468-486.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yan, E. and Ding, Y. (2009). Applying centrality measures to impact analysis: a coauthorship network analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(10):2107-2118.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhang, G., Ding, Y., and Milojevic, S. (2013). Citation Content Analysis (CCA): a framework for syntactic and semantic analysis of citation content. 10.1002/asi.22850]Search in Google Scholar
