[1. T. Chan and L. Vese, Active contours without edges, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 266-277, 2001.10.1109/83.90229118249617]Search in Google Scholar
[2. D. Mumford and J. Shah, Optimal approximations by piecewise smooth functions and associated variational problems, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 577-685, 1989.10.1002/cpa.3160420503]Search in Google Scholar
[3. T. Chan, S. Esedofiglu, and M. Nikolova, Algorithms for finding global minimizers of image segmentation and denoising models, SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 1632|1648, 2006.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. X. Bresson, S. Esedofiglu, P. Vandergheynst, J.-P. Thiran, and S. Osher, Fast global minimization of the active contour/snake model, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 151-167, 2007.10.1007/s10851-007-0002-0]Search in Google Scholar
[5. R. Yildizofiglu, J.-F. Aujol, and N. Papadakis, Active contours without level sets, in ICIP 2012 - IEEE International Conference on Image Pro- cessing (Orlando, FL, Sept. 30 - Oct. 3, 2012), pp. 2549-2552, IEEE, 2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. A. Chambolle and T. Pock, A first-order primal-dual algorithm for convex problems with applications to imaging, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 120-145, 2011.10.1007/s10851-010-0251-1]Search in Google Scholar
[7. J. Yuan, E. Bae, and X. Tai, A study on continous max-ow and mincut approaches, in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 2217- 2224, IEEE, 2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. G. Paul, J. Cardinale, and I. F. Sbalzarini, Coupling image restoration and segmentation: A generalized linear model/bregman perspective, In- ternational Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 104, pp. 69-93, 2013.10.1007/s11263-013-0615-2]Search in Google Scholar
[9. L. Antonelli, V. De Simone, and D. di Serafino, On the application of the spectral projected gradient method in image segmentation, J. Math. Imaging Vis., vol. 54, pp. 106-116, Jan. 2016.10.1007/s10851-015-0591-y]Search in Google Scholar
[10. A. Beck and M. Teboulle, A fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems, SIAM J. Img. Sci., vol. 2, pp. 183-202, Mar. 2009.10.1137/080716542]Search in Google Scholar
[11. E. Birgin, J. Martfifinez, and M. Raydan, Spectral projected gradient methods: review and perspectives, Journal of Statistical Software, vol. 60, no. 3, 2014.10.18637/jss.v060.i03]Search in Google Scholar
[12. J. Barzilai and J. Borwein, Two-point step size gradient methods, IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, vol. 8, pp. 141-148, 1988.10.1093/imanum/8.1.141]Search in Google Scholar
[13. D. di Serafino, V. Ruggiero, G. Toraldo, and L. Zanni, On the steplength selection in gradient methods for unconstrained optimization, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2017.10.1016/j.amc.2017.07.037]Search in Google Scholar
[14. L. Grippo, F. Lampariello, and S. Lucidi, A nonmonotone line search technique for Newton's method, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 707-716, 1986.10.1137/0723046]Search in Google Scholar
[15. T. Goldstein, X. Bresson, and S. Osher, Geometric applications of the split Bregman method: segmentation and surface reconstruction, Jour- nal of Scientific Computing, vol. 45, no. 1-3, pp. 272-293, 2010.10.1007/s10915-009-9331-z]Search in Google Scholar
[16. L. Bregman, The relaxation method of finding the common points of convex sets and its application to the solution of problems in convex programming, USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathemati- cal Physics, vol. 7, pp. 69-93, 1967.10.1016/0041-5553(67)90040-7]Search in Google Scholar
[17. S. Setzer, Split bregman algorithm, douglas-rachford splitting and frame shrinkage, in Proc. of the Second International Conference on Scale Space Methods and Variational Methods in Computer, vol. 5567, pp. 464-476, 2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. O. Güler, New proximal point algorithms for convex minimization, SIAM Journal on Optimization, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 649-664, 1992.10.1137/0802032]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Y. Nesterov, A method of solving a convex programming problem with convergence rate o (1/k2), Soviet Mathematics Doklady, vol. 27, pp. 372- 376, 1983.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. G. Peyrfie, The numerical tours of signal processing, Advanced Computational Signal and Image Processing IEEE Computing in Science and Engineering, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 94-97, 2011.10.1109/MCSE.2011.71]Search in Google Scholar
[21. D. Martin, C. Fowlkes, D. Tal, and J. Malik, A database of human segmented natural images and its application to evaluating segmentation algorithms and measuring ecological statistics, in Proc. 8th Int'l Conf. Computer Vision, vol. 2, pp. 416-423, July 2001.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. W. M. Rand, Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 66, no. 336, pp. 846-850, 1971.10.1080/01621459.1971.10482356]Search in Google Scholar