Applying the Business Process and Practice Alignment Meta-model: Daily Practices and Process Modelling

1. Bider, I., Jalali, A. (2016), “Agile business process development: why, how and when-applying Nonaka’s theory of knowledge transformation to business process development”, Information Systems and e-Business Management, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 693-731.10.1007/s10257-014-0256-1Search in Google Scholar

2. Castela, N., Dias, P., Zacarias, M., Tribolet, J. (2012), “Collaborative maintenance of business process models”, International Journal of Organisational Design and Engineering, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 61-84.10.1504/IJODE.2012.045903Search in Google Scholar

3. Degani, A., Wiener, E. L. (1997), “Procedures in complex systems: the airline cockpit”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Human, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 302-312.10.1109/3468.568739Search in Google Scholar

4. Heidari, F., Loucopoulos, P., Kedad, Z. (2011), “A Quality-Oriented Business Process Meta-Model”, 7th International Workshop, EOMAS 2011, held at CAiSE 2011, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, London.10.1007/978-3-642-24175-8_7Search in Google Scholar

5. Hevner, A., March, S., Park, J., Ram, S. (2004), “Design Science in Information Systems Research”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 75-105.10.2307/25148625Search in Google Scholar

6. Hollingaworth, D. (2004), “The Workflow Reference Model: 10 Years On”, in Fischer, L. (Ed.), Workflow Handboook 2004, Future Strategies Inc., FL USA, pp. 295-312.Search in Google Scholar

7. Mutschler, B., Weber, B., Reichert, M. (2008), “Workflow management versus case handling: results from a controlled software experiment”, Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on Applied computing, ACM, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil, pp. 82-89.10.1145/1363686.1363711Search in Google Scholar

8. OMG (2013), “Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN)”, available at: http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0.2/PDF/ (20 April 2017).Search in Google Scholar

9. Pomerol, J. C., Brézillon, P. (2011), “About some relationships between knowledge and context”, CONTEXT ’01 Proceedings of the Third International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Modeling and Using Context, Springer-Verlag, London.Search in Google Scholar

10. Reichert, M., Dadam, P., Jurisch, M., Kreher, U., Goser, K. (2008), “Architectural Design of Flexible Process Management Technology”, PRIMIUM Subconference at the Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (MKWI), Garching, Germany.Search in Google Scholar

11. Sierhuis, M., Clancey, W. J., Hoof, R. V., Hoog, R. D. (2000), “Modeling and simulating work practices from Apollo 12”, available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3d76/f89964ab7a3cce44f3b7b543700350408afc.pdf (20 April 2017).Search in Google Scholar

12. Sierhuis, M., Clancey, W. J. (1997), “Knowledge, practice, activities and people”, available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0ad9/feccef60f8331727fd53a9eb34a15eb00f2c.pdf (20 April 2017).Search in Google Scholar

13. Thom, L. H., Iochpe, C., Mitschang, B. (2005), “TMBP: A Transactional Metamodel for Business Process Modeling Based on Organizational Structure Aspects”, CAiSE Short Paper Proceedings, Porto.Search in Google Scholar

14. Verner, L. (2004), “BPM: The Promise and the Challenge”, Queue, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 82-91.10.1145/984458.984503Search in Google Scholar

15. Zacarias, M., Magalhães, R., Pinto, H. S., Tribolet, J. (2010), “An agent-centric and ‘context-aware’ perspective for the alignment between individuals and organizations”, Information Systems Journal, Vol. 35 No. 4, pp. 441-466.Search in Google Scholar

16. Zacarias, M., Martins, P. V. (2014), “Business Alignment Methodology: The Discovery Phase”, Information Resources Management Journal, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 1-20.10.4018/irmj.2014010101Search in Google Scholar