Application of the Nonparametric DEA Meta-frontier Approach with Undesirable Outputs in the Case of EU Regions

1. Annoni, P., Dijkstra, L. (2013). EU Regional Competitiveness Index 2013. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union.Search in Google Scholar

2. Barnes, A., Revoredo-Giha, C. (2011), “A Metafrontier Analysis of Technical Efficiency of Selected European Agricultures”, paper prepared for presentation at the EAAE 2011 Congress Change and Uncertainty, available at: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/114807/2/Revoredo-Giha_Cesar_416.pdf (10 July 2016)Search in Google Scholar

3. Chiu, Ching-Ren et al. (2012), “Decomposition of the environmental inefficiency of the meta-frontier with undesirable output”, Energy Economics, Vol. 34, pp. 1392–1399.10.1016/j.eneco.2012.06.003Search in Google Scholar

4. Chung, Y. et al. (1997), “Productivity and undesirable outputs: A directional distance function approach”, Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 51 No. 3, pp. 229–240.10.1006/jema.1997.0146Search in Google Scholar

5. European Commission (2013), “Regional Policy Inforegio. Draft EU Regional Competitiveness Index: RCI 2013”, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/cs/information/publications/studies/2013/draft-eu-regional-competitiveness-index-rci-2013 (28 January 2016)Search in Google Scholar

6. Eurostat (2015) “Data. Regional Statistics by NUTS classification”, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database (20 December 2015)Search in Google Scholar

7. Färe, R. et al. (2006), “Productivity growth and convergence in the European Union”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 25, pp. 111–141.10.1007/s11123-006-7134-xSearch in Google Scholar

8. Färe, R. et al. (2015). “Distance Functions in Primal and Dual Spaces”, in Zhu, J. et al. (Eds.), Data Envelopment Analysis. A Handbook of Models and Methods, Springer, New York, pp. 12–32.Search in Google Scholar

9. Halkos, G. E. et al. (2015), “Regional sustainability efficiency index in Europe: an additive two-stage DEA approach. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/s12351-015-0170-4Search in Google Scholar

10. Hanclova, J. (2015), “Comparison of production performance in information and communication sectors in the EU selected countries“, in IDIMT-2015: Information Technology and Society Interaction and Interdependence: 23^rd Interdisciplinary Information Management Talks, Sept. 9-11, 2015, Poděbrady, Czech Republic, Trauner, Linz, pp. 111–118.Search in Google Scholar

11. Macpherson, A.J., Principe, P.P., Smith, E.R. (2010), “A Directional distance function approach to regional environmental-economic assessments”, Ecological Economics, Vol. 69, pp. 1918–1925.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.012Search in Google Scholar

12. Mandak, J. (2014), “ICT and technical efficiency of 15 EU countries: A stochastic frontier analysis approach”, in Mathematical Methods in Economics, MME 2014: 32^nd international conference: September 10-12, Olomouc, Czech Republic, Palacký University, Olomouc, pp. 602–607.Search in Google Scholar

13. O’Donell, C.J., Rao, D.S.P., Battese, G.E. (2008), “Metafrontier Frameworks for Study of Firm-level Efficiencies and Technology ratios”, Empirical Economics, Vol. 34, pp. 231–255.10.1007/s00181-007-0119-4Search in Google Scholar

14. Oh, D. (2010), “A Metafrontier Approach for Measuring an Environmentally Sensitive Productivity Growth Index”, Energy Economics, Vol. 32, pp. 146–157.10.1016/j.eneco.2009.07.006Search in Google Scholar

15. Picazo-Tadeo, A.J., Reig-Martínez, E., Hernández_Sancho, F. (2005), “Directional Distance Functions and Environmental Regulation”, Energy Economics, Vol. 27, pp. 131–142.10.1016/j.reseneeco.2004.07.001Search in Google Scholar

16. Rehacek, P. (2011), “Risk management and FMEA”, in Proceedings of the 9^th International Conference on Strategic Management and its Support by Information Systems (SMSIS 2011), 5^th - 7^th September, Čeladná, Czech Republic, Ostrava, VŠB-Technical University of Ostrava, pp. 154–158.Search in Google Scholar

17. Shephard, R.W. (1970). Theory of Cost and Production Functions, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

18. Song, M. et al. (2012), “Environmental efficiency evaluation based on data envelopment analysis: A review”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 16, pp. 4465–4469.10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.052Search in Google Scholar

19. Stanickova, M. (2014), “Competitiveness Factors in Regional Growth: the Case of Central and Eastern European Countries”, in Honova, I. et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2^nd International Conference on European Integration 2014, VŠB-TUO, Ostrava, pp. 634–643.Search in Google Scholar

20. Tran, L.T. et al. (2006), “A generalized distance measure for integrating multiple environmental assessment indicators”, Landscape Ecology, Vol. 21. No. 4, pp. 469–476.10.1007/s10980-005-5324-ySearch in Google Scholar

21. World Economic Forum (2013), “The Global Competitiveness Report 2013–2014”, WEF, Lausanne.Search in Google Scholar

22. Yuan, P.et al. (2013), “Measuring the environmental efficiency of the Chinese industrial sector: A directional distance function approach”, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, Vol. 58, pp. 936–947.10.1016/j.mcm.2012.10.024Search in Google Scholar