Open Access

Association of the MTHFR C677T (rs1801133) polymorphism with idiopathic male infertility in a local Pakistani population


Cite

Introduction

Infertility is a state of failure to conceive in a year of unprotected intercourse with the same partner [1]. The male factors are responsible of infertility in 20.0 to 25.0% of couples [2]. In men, the main causes of infertility are oligospermia, asthenospermia, teratozoospermia and azoospermia [3,4]. Like other nutritional factors, availability of bioactive folate has recently been found to be related to male fertility [5].

Folates are an inter-convertible group of enzymes that metabolize amino acid, synthesize and methylate deoxy-ribonuleotides (dNTPs) [6,7]. Methyltetrahy-drofolate (MethylTHF) is the biologically active form of folate in plasma. An important enzyme, methylene-tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), reduces 5,10 methylenetetrahydrofolate into 5, MethylTHF and during this reduction, a homocysteine is converted into methionine by attaining a methyl group from methylenetetrahydrofolate [8].

Methionine is converted to S-adenosyl methionine that acts as a ‘methyl’ donor for DNA methylation. The 5,10 methylenetetrahydrofolate converts uracil into thymine for DNA synthesis [9]. Therefore, deficiency in folate intake or polymorphism(s) in the enzymes of the folate pathway may result in aberrant DNA synthesis and methylation, especially in rapidly dividing cells such as bone marrow and spermatogonia [10].

The MTHFR gene is composed of 11 exons and is located on the short arm of chromosome 1 at 1p36.22 [8,11]. Being an important enzyme of folate metabolism, the MTHFR gene product has been studied and found in a total of 65 polymorphisms. The C677T (rs1801133) polymorphism in the MTHFR gene reduces the enzyme activity by 35.0% [11] resulting in impairment of nucleic acid metabolic pathways. However, the condition can be managed by folic acid supplementation for determining the frequency of the MTHFR C677T mutation is a prerequisite.

The results of many of the molecular epidemiological studies on the association of the MTHFR C677T polymorphism and male infertility remain controversial due to small sample size, ambiguously defining infertility and confounding factors including ethnicity. In the present study, we determined an association between idiopathic sperm disorders and the MTHFR 677 CT polymorphism.

Materials and Methods
Sample Population

Initially, 1234 men with primary infertility (the couples never conceived) were recruited from various diagnostic setups, hakeems (Muslim physicians) and private clinics in two cities of Rawalpindi and Islamabad, Pakistan, for a period of 2 years (2011 and 2012). A cohort of 348 proven fathers (had at least two children), residents of the same area, was also taken as a control group.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

After approval and permission of the concerned authorities, infertile men fulfilling the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria of failure to conceive during 1 year of unprotected intercourse with the same partner were recruited [1]. Only those men, whose partners were already screened and had normal reproductive functions, were included. The men with other physiological disorders, congenital and psychological disorders including diabetes, allergies, timing of the onset of puberty, cryptorchidism, testicular torsion, ectopic testis, single testis and testicular damage at birth and varicocele were excluded. The men with mental disorders, i.e., depression [12], anxiety [13] and stress [14], screened by using standard scales, respectively, were also excluded. The past and present infections (mumps, high fever, tuberculosis, lung infections, reproductive tract infections and antisperm antibodies) and testicular or abdominal injury/surgery or vasectomy and Y-chromosome micro-deletions, were also excluded. Moreover, men (both fertile and infertile) with hormonal disorders [tri-iodothyronine (T3), tetra-iodothyronine (T4), thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), testosterone (T) and prolactin], and suspected lifestyle factors [smoking >5 cigarette (~5 gm tobacco)/day; tea/coffee/soft drinks (one or all) >3 times/ day or >600 mL (three cups)/day; wearing tight clothes >3 days a week and >12 hours/day for at least 1 year] were also excluded from the study.

Consequently, a total 437 idiopathic infertile men including 57 azoospermic, 66 oligospermic, 44 asthenozoospermic, 29 teratozoospermic, 20 oligoasthenospermic and 221 infertile normospermic men were recruited, after ruling out nongenetic factors. Moreover, 218 normospermic fertile men who had two children (or more), were included as controls. The samples and controls screened for MTHFR C677T belonged to the Punjabi ethnic group as self-defined by subjects.

Semen Sampling

The semen samples were initially collected for analysis of a suspected fertility problem in men. The semen samples were also obtained from fertile men (control group). Each individual gave semen samples twice by masturbation after 3-5 days of abstinence, their written consent was obtained for the sample to be used further in molecular research.

Blood Sampling

At least 10 mL of a single blood sample was collected from the antecubital vein of each subject and stored in vacutainers with EDTA as anticoagulant. Blood samples were immediately transported to the Genetics Laboratory, Institute of Biomedical Sciences and Genetic Engineering (IBGE), Islamabad, Pakistan, where the plasma was separated from all samples by cen-trifugation and stored at −25 °C until further analysis. The cellular portion was used for DNA extraction for genetic analysis.

Sample Analyses
Semen Analysis

Semen parameters (semen volume, sperm concentration, sperm motility, sperm morphology, liquefaction time, pH and colour) were determined in a private laboratory by an expert using standard methods. The semen samples were categorized into one of the semen group defined by WHO [1]. (Table 3.1). The volume was measured using a graduated glass pipette. The sperm concentration was counted using a sperm counting chamber (Jiansu Sanwe Medical Science and Technology Co. Ltd., Xuzhou, China). The concentration, motility and morphology of sperm cells were observed using a binocular microscope at x100 magnification (Olympus Optical Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The semen pH was determined with a digital pH meter.

Genetic Analysis

Total genomic DNA was extracted from blood samples using a standard phenol/ chloroform extraction method.

MTHFR C677T Genotyping

The MTHFR C677T polymorphism was analyzed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of the genomic DNA with primers 5’-ACC CAC AGA AAA TAC CCA G-3’ (forward) and 5’-TGC CCC ATT ATT TA-3’ (reverse) (Alpha DNA, Montreal, Quebec, Canada) with an initial step consisting of denaturation for 4 min. at 94 °C, annealing for 45 seconds at 60 °C, extension for 45 seconds at 72 °C, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 45 seconds, annealing at 60 °C for 45 seconds, extension at 72 °C for 45 seconds, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The amplified PCR products were digested with HinfI restriction endonuclease (Fermentas Life Sciences, Burlington, ON, Canada) as the C677T polymorphism creates a restriction site for it.

Gel Electrophoresis

The digested product was elec-trophoresed on a 3.0% agarose gel with ethidium bromide staining which was then visualized through ultraviolet transillumination. The normal allele with cytosine at position 677 (C677) formed an undigested fragment of 198 bp, while the mutant allele with thymine in position 677 (T677) formed fragments of 175 and 23 bp.

Statistical Analysis

The allele frequency of the MTHFR 677C>T polymorphism was determined by counting alleles through electrophoresis gel analysis. The χ2 analysis was used to determine the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium of the alleles in the population.

DNA electrophoresis of the MTHFR C677T mutation on 3.0% agarose gel. 1: undigested; homozygous normal allele (CC) 198 bp; 2 and 3: heterozygous allele (CT) 175 and 23 bp.

The association of the MTHFR 677C>T polymorphism with subgroups of male infertility was determined by logistic regression analysis adjusting the effects of age, body mass index (BMI), occupation, working hours, and working shift. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using the International Business Machines (IBM) Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) v20.0 for Windows (IBM SPSS; http://www.ibm.com).

Results

Genotype distribution of the MTHFR 677C>T polymorphism of the 655 subjects analyzed: 472 (72.06%) subjects were homozygous for the C allele (CC), 166 (25.34%) subjects were heterozygous (CT), and 17 (2.60%) subjects were homozygous for the T allele (TT). The minor allele (T) frequency of the MTHFR 677C>T polymorphism was 0.153, and the genotype distributions did not deviate from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p >0.05) (Tables 1 and 2).

Allele frequencies of the MTHFR C677T mutation in the studied subjects.

Patient GroupAlleleInfertile Men n (%)Fertile Men n (%)OR (95% CI)p ValueAOR (95% CI)p Value
AzoospermicCT90 (78.95)24 (21.05)404 (92.66)32 (7.34)13.37 (1.89-5.99)0.00012.05 (1.14-3.70)0.017

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

OligospermicCT95 (71.97)37 (28.03)404 (92.66) 32 (7.34)14.92 (2.91-8.30)0.00014.36 (2.52-7.53)0.000

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

AsthenozoospermicCT64 (72.73)24 (27.27)404 (92.66)32 (7.34)13.70 (2.09-6.52)0.00013.70 (1.98-6.89)0.001

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

TeratozoospermicCT41 (70.69)17 (29.31)404 (92.66)32 (7.34)15.23 (2.68-10.23)0.00013.31 (1.61-6.82)0.000

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

OATCT29 (72.50)11 (27.50)404 (92.66)32 (7.34)12.39 (1.14-5.03)0.02113.33 (1.37-8.07)0.008

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

Infertile normospermicCT387 (87.56)55 (12.44)404 (92.66)32 (7.34)10.90 (0.61-1.32)0.58111.77 (1.10-2.85)0.018

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

Total infertile subjectsCT706 (80.78)168 (19.22)404 (92.66) 32 (7.34)11.50 (1.10-2.05)0.01212.12 (1.38-3.92)0.016

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

OR: odds ratio; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; AOR: odds ratio adjusted for age, body mass index (BMI), occupation, working shift and hours; C: wild type; T: mutated; OAT: oligoasthenoteratospermic.

Genotype frequencies of the MTHFR C677T mutation in the studied subjects.

Patient GroupGenotypeInfertile Men n (%)Fertile Men n (%)OR (95% CI)p ValueAOR (95% CI)p Value
AzoospermicCCCTTTCT + TT36 (63.16)18 (31.58)3 (5.26)21 (36.84)187 (85.78)30 (13.76)1 (0.46)31 (14.22)13.12 (1.57-6.186)15.58 (1.58-154.06)3.52 (1.82-6.80)0.0010.0190.00012.59 (1.27-5.30)13.30 (1.23-33.20)2.12 (1.09-4.15)0.009

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

0.033

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

0.027

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

OligospermicCCCTTTCT + TT34 (51.52)27 (40.91)5 (7.58)32 (48.48)187 (85.78)30 (13.76)1 (0.46)31 (14.22)14.95 (2.62-9.35)27.50 (3.12-242-77)5.58 (3.07-10.49)0.0000.0030.00014.33 (2.18-8.59)24.05 (2.54-87.34)5.01 (2.58-9.71)0.000

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

0.006

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

0.000

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

AsthenozoospermicCCCTTTCT + TT22 (50.00)20 (45.45)2 (4.55)22 (50.00)187 (85.78)30 (13.76)1 (0.46)31 (14.22)15.67 (2.76-11.62)17.00 (1.48-195.20)6.03 (2.99-12.18)0.0000.0230.00015.10 (2.32-11.23)15.93 (1.22-97.81)5.03 (2.35-10.75)0.000

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

0.035

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

0.000

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

TeratozoospermicCCCTTTCT + TT15 (51.72)11 (37.39)3 (10.34)14 (48.28)187 (85.78)30 (13.76)1 (0.46)31 (14.22)14.57 (1.92-10.89)37.40 (3.66-381-91)5.63 (2.48-12.80)0.0000.0020.00012.90 (1.09-7.76)30.99 (2.91-82.3)3.17 (1.27-7.91)0.033

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

0.004

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

0.014

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

OATCCCTTTCT + TT10 (50.00)9 (45.00)1 (5.00)10 (50.00)187 (85.78)30 (13.76)1 (0.46)31 (14.22)15.61 (2.12-14.94)18.70 (1.09-321.32)6.03 (2.32-15.68)0.0000.0440.00014.10 (0.23-13.19)14.68 (0.61-68.20)4.55 (1.46-14.14)0.018

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

0.0980.009

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

Infertile normospermicCCCTTTCT + TT168 (76.02)51 (23.08)2 (0.90)53 (23.98)187 (85.78)30 (13.76)1 (0.46)31 (14.22)11.89 (1.15-3.12)2.23 (0.20-24.77)1.90 (1.17-3.12)0.0120.5150.01011.92 (1.12-3.27)2.48 (0.22-28.28)1.95 (1.17-3.26)0.017

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

0.4640.011

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

Total infertile subjectsCCCTTTCT + TT285 (65.22)136 (31.12)16 (3.66)152 (34.78)187 (85.78)30 (13.76)1 (0.46)31 (14.22)12.97 (1.92-4.60)10.50 (1.38-79.83)3.22 (2.10-4.94)0.0000.0230.00011.81 (1.17-2.80)9.24 (1.20-70.92)2.01 (1.31-3.08)0.008

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

0.032

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

0.001

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

OR: odds ratio; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; AOR: odds ratio adjusted for age, body mass index (BMI), occupation, working shift and hours; C: wild type; T: mutated; OAT: oligoasthenoteratospermic.

Prevalence and Odds Ratios of Male Infertility According to Carriers of the Minor Allele of the MTHFR C677T Polymorphism. a) Allele frequencies

The relative MTHFR 677 allele and genotype frequencies of the individual risk factors of the male infertility in the total populations are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. Results show that the MTHFR C>T polymorphism increases the odds ratio (OR) [2.12, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.38-3.92] of male infertility significantly (p <0.05).

In addition, after classifying the men into different infertility groups, allelic frequencies were significantly different between infertile and fertile men. The minor allele (T) frequency was highest in teratospermic men (0.293%), followed by oligospermic (0.280%), oligoasthenoteratospermic (OAT) (0.275%), asthenospermic (0.273%), azoospermia (0.210%), normospermic infertile (0.124%) and fertile men (0.073%) (Table 1).

Genotype Frequencies

According to Table 2, men with MTHFR 677 CT and TT genotypes are at a greater risk (OR: 1.81, 95 %CI: 1.17-2.80, p = 0.008 and OR: 9.24, 95% CI: 1.20-70.92, p = 0.032, respectively) of male infertility. All the subgroups of male infertility (azoospermic, oligospermic, asthenospermic, OAT and normospermic infertile) had significantly (p <0.05) higher frequencies of CT and TT genotype as compared to fertile men. The combined genotypes (CT + TT) were also found to be significantly associated with male infertility (OR: 2.01, 95 %CI: 1.31-3.08, p <0.001) (Table 2).

Discussion

Spermatogenesis is a complex process involving about 2000 genes and various non genetic factors. The gene mutations and disrupted expression may distort maturation of spermatocytes. DNA methylation ensures the regulated expression of genes. However, DNA methylation is done only in the presence of methionine. A homocysteine is converted into methionine by MTHFR through transferring a methyl group from methylenetetrahyfrofolate [8]. Therefore, a mutation in the MTHFR such as C677T may reduce methylation of DNA [11]. In addition, a reduced conversion of homocysteine into methionine may lead to hyper-homocysteinemia, and cause DNA and cell membrane damages, testicular arterial sclerosis, and impairment of spermatogenesis [11,15-17].

However, results of most of the molecular epidemiological studies on association of MTHFR 677CT polymorphism and male infertility remain controversial. A total of 20 of 41 studies showed association of the polymorphism with male infertility. Out of four [18-21] studies carried out on African populations, only one ([18] showed a significant association of the 677T with infertility in Egyptian men. Furthermore, a study on Moroccan infertile men showed a protective role of the MTHFR 677T polymorphism [22]. Comparatively, more than half the number of Asian studies (14 out of 22) [22-32,36-38,41-42] expressed this association, while only a few Caucasian studies (six out of 15) [44-47,50-51] exhibited it.

Similarly, all the studies [22-28] except one [29] reported a significant association of the 677T anomaly with male infertility. Seven studies on Indian populations reported contrasting observations to each other [30-36]. Four Indian studies [30-33] showed a significant association of mutant genotypes with infertility, while three studies [34-36] showed no statistically significant difference of 677 C>T variants between infertile and fertile males. Dhillon et al. [35] explained the variations in results that their study included a majority of OAT patients in comparison to the majority of azoospermic cases in the study by Singh et al. [29]. Gupta et al. [30] included both azoospermic and OAT individuals, showing a significant association of mutant alleles and genotypes with infertility. It was reported that the three Indian populations studied were not ethnically different [30]. Three [36-38] of five [36-40] other Asian studies showed significantly higher mutant genotypes in infertile groups than fertile groups of Iranian men. Similarly, studies carried out on Korean infertile men also had contrasting results [41-43].

Moreover, in Caucasian populations, few studies reported that the polymorphism in MTHFR was a risk of male infertility [44-48]. However, other studies inferred that the mutant genotype is not such a risk [49-58]. Moreover, few studies gave contrasting conclusions for the same population [47,48].

Therefore, the differences in the results could be attributed to other factors such as variations in recruitment of subjects, sample size, ethnicity and geographic factors (Tables 3 and 4). The results are also dependent on the reproductive health (testicular, hormonal, and epididymal, etc.), general health (infections, surgeries, fever and antibodies, etc.) and lifestyle factors (clothing, occupation, smoking, caffeine intake, etc.), which were not addressed while selecting subjects in many of the previous studies. There were eight studies [18,22,23,26,27,31,37,49] that showed association of 677T with male infertility and seven studies [20,39,40,50-52,58] that lack association and did not mention criteria of selection of infertile men. Furthermore, nine studies [23,24,26-28,32,37,38,47] showing association and eight studies [19,28,34,39,40,48,50,57] that showed no association, did not mention selection criteria of fertile men as a control group (data not shown).

Allelic distribution of the MTHFR C677T mutation in infertile patients and controls from various other populations.

StudyCountryPatientsControlsPatientsControlsORSELower LimitUpper Limitp Value
[Refs.]nnCT (%)CT (%)
African
[18]Egypt13990133125 (48.45)12654 (30.00)2.190.201.473.280.000

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

[19]Egypt10710716351 (23.83)15658 (27.10)0.840.220.541.300.438
[20]Algeria74849555 (36.67)11058 (35.52)1.100.230.691.740.690
[21]Morocco344690523165 (23.98)988392 (28.41)0.800.110.640.980.033
Asian
[22]China18253140224 (61.54)5848 (45.28)1.930.221.252.990.003

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

[23]China355252420290 (40.85)351153 (30.36)1.580.121.242.020.000

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

[24]China75729258 (38.67)10836 (25.00)1.890.261.153.120.013

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

[25]China8213364100 (60.98)133133 (50.00)1.560.201.052.320.027

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

[26]China131293125139 (52.65)338248 (42.32)1.520.151.132.030.005

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

[27]China29090216364 (62.76)9585 (47.22)1.880.171.342.640.000

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

[28]China271180262280 (51.66)149211 (58.61)0.750.140.580.990.040

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

[29]India15120025052 (17.22)36337 (9.25)2.040.231.303.200.002

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

[30]India522315872172 (16.48)56070 (11.11)1.580.151.172.120.003

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

[31]India12201311 (45.83)373 (7.50)10.440.732.5143.370.001

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

[32]India6373641048226 (17.74)62799 (13.64)1.370.131.061.760.017

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

[33]India20623035854 (13.11)41842 (9.13)1.500.220.982.300.062
[34]India179200239119 (33.24)240160 (40.00)0.750.150.551.010.054
[35]India10010018614 (7.00)18119 (9.50)0.720.370.351.470.365
[36]Iran164328196132 (40.24)436220 (33.54)1.330.141.011.670.039

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

[37]Iran11813216175 (31.78)20658 (21.97)1.650.201.112.470.014

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

[38]Iran242255327157 (32.44)386124 (24.31)1.490.141.131.970.005

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

[39]Iran26677402130 (24.44)7480 (51.95)0.300.190.210.430.100
[40]Iran300303430170 (28.33)426180 (29.70)0.940.130.731.200.600
[41]Korea371396410332 (44.73)490302 (38.13)1.310.101.071.610.009

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

[42]Korea360325411309 (42.92)402248 (38.15)1.220.110.981.510.073
[43]Korea8524610466 (38.82)280212 (43.090.840.180.591.200.332
Caucasian
[44]Brazil15623322290 (28.85)38779 (16.95)1.990.181.412.800.000

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

[45]Brazil13317318383 (68.80)29947 (13.85)2.890.211.934.310.000

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

[46]Slovenia10011110991 (45.50)14478 (35.14)1.540.201.042.280.030

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

[47]Italy59465464 (54.24)5735 (38.04)1.930.281.113.360.020

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

[48]Italy9310511175 (40.32)11991 (43.33)0.880.200.591.320.545
[49]Turkey1005013268 (34.00)8020 (20.00)2.060.291.163.650.013

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

[50]Germany255200321189 (37.09)273127 (31.75)1.270.140.961.670.095
[51]The Netherlands7711311242 (27.27)14878 (34.51)0.710.230.451.110.137
[52]Serbia52566836 (34.62)7240 (35.71)0.950.290.541.670.866
[53]Poland284352399169 (29.75)482222 (31.53)0.920.120.721.170.494
[54]Jordan150150197103 (34.33)21585 (28.33)1.320.180.971.870.114
[55]Sweden14918220989 (29.87)261103 (28.30)1.080.170.771.510.658
[56]France250114337163 (32.00)15078 (34.21)0.930.170.671.300.668
[57]Russia180301250110 (30.56)421181 (30.07)1.020.140.771.360.873
[58]Canada39195820 (51.22)2117 (44.74)0.430.420.190.960.041

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

OR: odds ratio; SE: standard error.

Genetic distribution of the MTHFR C677T mutation in infertile patients and controls from various other populations.

StudyCountryPatientsControlsPatientsControlsORSELower LimitUpper LimitP Value
[Refs.]nnCCCT + TT (%)CCCT + TT (%)
African
[18]Egypt13990109133 (54.96)144111 (43.53)1.580.181.112.260.011

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

[19]Egypt1071075584 (60.43)4149 (54.44)1.280.270.752.180.370
[20]Algeria74843143 (58.11)3648 (57.14)1.040.320.551.960.902
[21]Morocco344690199145 (42.15)351339 (49.13)0.750.130.580.980.034

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

Asian
[22]China1825327155 (85.16)1538 (71.70)2.270.371.104.670.027

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

[23]China355252130225 (63.38)128124 (49.21)1.790.171.292.480.001

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

[24]China75722748 (64.00)4032 (44.44)2.220.341.154.310.018

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

[25]China821331468 (82.93)3697 (72.93)1.800.350.903.600.095
[26]China1312933597 (73.48)98293 (74.94)0.930.230.591.450.741
[27]China2909039251 (86.55)2466 (73.33)2.340.291.324.160.004

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

[28]China27118075196 (72.32)32148 (82.22)0.570.240.350.900.016

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

[29]India15120010546 (30.46)16337 (18.50)1.930.251.173.170.010

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

[30]India522315378144 (27.59)25164 (20.32)1.490.171.072.090.019

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

[31]India122048 (66.67)182 (10.00)18.000.962.7219.230.003

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

[32]India637364447190 (29.83)27589 (24.45)1.310.150.981.760.068
[33]India20623015848 (23.30)18842 (18.26)1.360.240.852.160.195
[34]India1792008198 (54.75)70130 (65.00)0.650.210.430.990.042

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

[35]India1001008614 (14.00)8119 (19.00)0.690.380.331.480.342
[36]Iran16432858106 (64.63)144184 (56.10)1.430.200.972.110.070
[37]Iran1181325167 (56.78)7755 (41.67)1.840.261.113.040.017

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

[38]Iran242255109133 (54.96)144111 (43.53)1.580.181.112.260.011

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

[39]Iran26677153113 (42.48)3344 (57.14)0.550.260.330.920.024

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

[40]Iran300303161139 (46.33)151152 (50.17)0.860.160.621.180.347
[41]Korea371396103268 (72.24)145251 (63.38)1.500.161.112.040.009

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

[42]Korea360325115245 (68.06)118207 (63.69)1.210.160.881.670.229
[43]Korea852463055 (64.71)87159 (64.63)1.000.260.601.680.990
Caucasian
[44]Brazil1562338175 (48.08)16766 (28.33)2.340.221.533.580.000

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

[45]Brazil1331736667 (50.38)13637 (21.39)3.730.252.276.140.000

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

[46]Slovenia1001112971 (71.00)4764 (57.66)1.800.291.013.190.045

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

[47]Italy59461148 (81.36)1828 (60.87)2.810.451.166.780.022

A p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

[48]Italy931053756 (60.22)4362 (59.05)1.050.290.591.850.867
[49]Turkey100504456 (56.00)3020 (40.00)1.910.350.963.810.066
[50]Germany255200114141 (55.29)92108 (54.00)1.050.190.731.530.783
[51]The Netherlands771134235 (45.45)5063 (55.75)0.660.300.371.180.164
[52]Serbia52562230 (57.69)2333 (58.93)0.950.390.442.040.896
[53]Poland284352143256 (64.16)166316 (65.56)0.940.140.711.240.665
[54]Jordan1501506783 (55.33)7476 (50.67)1.210.230.771.900.418
[55]Sweden1491827376 (51.01)9488 (48.35)1.110.220.721.720.631
[56]France250114118132 (52.80)4965 (57.02)0.840.230.541.320.454
[57]Russia1803018991 (50.56)153148 (49.17)1.060.190.731.530.769
[58]Canada39192217 (43.59)811 (57.89)0.560.570.191.700.308

OR: odds ratio; SE: standard error.

In addition, the MTHFR C677T association with male infertility was also affected by folate supplementation, usually prescribed in infertility. The status of folate and supplementation is not mentioned in the previous studies except four [34,36,42,55].

Although a single study that took folate levels as a factor of infertility in Caucasian men also found no association of 677T with male infertility, we can assume, depending on the socioeconomic and health facilities that the Caucasians may have comparatively more chances of folate supplementation than Asians, thus lowering the association of 677T with infertility [42,59,60]. The previous studies described that 35.0% of the Pakistani population is folate deficient (61) and no organized folate supplementation program is currently working for the general population.

Conclusions

The present study of the association between idiopathic sperm disorders and the MTHFR 677T polymorphism suggests that the polymorphism might be a factor of male infertility in Pakistan. The results showed a significantly (p <0.05) higher T allele and gene frequencies in the infertile men as compared to the fertile men. Furthermore, the carriers of the T allele were more in all semen groups of infertile men as compared to the control group. Association of male infertility with MTHFR C677T polymorphisms provokes investigation of the effects of folic acid supplementation in infertile men on sperm parameters. However, the present study is about only one ethnic group in Pakistan, which was self-defined by the subjects, while, MTHFR 677T frequencies in the Pakistani populations have been reported to be greatly variable and may influence the frequencies of SNPs. Therefore, studies must be conducted to investigate the association of SNPs also at the ethnic level. Secondly, the screening of infertile men must include karyotyping that was not done in the present study. We suggest that further studies must consider folate levels and folate supplementation while selecting subjects in genetic studies. Similarly, the studies must consider other well defined factors of reproductive health, general health and lifestyle factors in exclusion criteria. Further research, analyzing multiple fertility regions/loci in idiopathic infertile men is also required through high throughput analyzers, i.e., microarray, etc.

eISSN:
1311-0160
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
2 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Medicine, Basic Medical Science, other