[1. Elia M, Striano P, Fichera M, Gaggero R, Castiglia L, Galesi O, et al. 6q Terminal deletion syndrome associated with a distinctive EEG and clinical pattern: A report of five cases. Epilepsia. 2006; 47(5): 830-838.10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00522.x16686647]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Eash D, Waggoner D, Chung J, Stevenson D, Martin CL. Calibration of 6q subtelomere deletions to define genotype/phenotype correlations. Clin Genet. 2005; 67(5): 396-403.10.1111/j.1399-0004.2005.00424.x15811006]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Lee JY, Cho YH, Hallford G. Delineation of subtelomeric deletion of the long arm of chromosome 6. Ann Hum Genet. 2011; 75(6): 755-764.10.1111/j.1469-1809.2011.00675.x21950800]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Michelson M, Ben-Sasson A, Vinkler C, Leshinsky- Silver E, Netzer I, Frumkin A, et al. Delineation of the interstitial 6q25 microdeletion syndrome: Refinement of the critical causative region. Am J Med Genet A. 2012; 158A(6): 1395-1399.10.1002/ajmg.a.3536122585544]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Wadt K, Jensen LN, Bjerglund L, Lundstrom M, Kirchhoff M, Kjaergaard S. Fetal ventriculomegaly due to familial submicroscopic terminal 6q deletions. Prenat Diagn. 2012; 32(12): 1212-1217.10.1002/pd.398123065819]Search in Google Scholar
[6. McMaster MJ, David CV. Hemivertebra as a cause of scoliosis. A study of 104 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986; 68(4): 588-595]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Goldstein I, Makhoul IR, Weissman A, Drugan A. Hemivertebra: Prenatal diagnosis, incidence and characteristics. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2005; 20(2): 121-126.10.1159/00008243515692206]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Connor JM, Conner AN, Connor RA, Tolmie JL, Yeung B, Goudie D. Genetic aspects of early childhood scoliosis. Am J Med Genet. 1987; 27(2): 419-424.10.1002/ajmg.13202702203300334]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Leung YL, Buxton N. Combined diastematomyelia and hemivertebra: A review of the management at a single centre. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005; 87(10): 1380-1384.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Chen M, Chan B, Lam TP, Shek T, Lee CP, Tang MH. Sonographic features of hemivertebra at 13 weeks’ gestation. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2007; 33(1): 74-77.10.1111/j.1447-0756.2007.00483.x17212670]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Leung TY, Vogel I, Lau TK, Chong W, Hyett JA, Petersen OB, et al. Identification of submicroscopic chromosomal aberrations in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency and apparently normal karyotype. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 38(3): 314-319.10.1002/uog.898821400624]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Wax JR, Watson WJ, Miller RC, Ingardia CJ, Pinette MG, Cartin A, et al. Prenatal sonographic diagno-sis of hemivertebrae: Associations and outcomes. J Ultrasound Med. 2008; 27(7): 1023-1027.10.7863/jum.2008.27.7.102318577665]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Imaizumi K, Masuno M, Ishii T, Kuroki Y, Okuzumi N, Nakamura Y. Congenital scoliosis (hemi vertebra) associated with de novo balanced reciprocal translocation, 46,XX,t(13;17)(q34;p11.2). Am J Med Genet. 1997; 73(3): 244-246.10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19971219)73:3<244::AID-AJMG2>3.0.CO;2-S]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Ghebranious N, Blank RD, Raggio CL, Staubli J, McPherson E, Ivacic L, et al. A missense T (Brachyury) mutation contributes to vertebral malformations. J Bone Miner Res. 2008; 23(10): 1576-1583.10.1359/jbmr.080503]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Verhagen JM, Schrander-Stumpel CT, Krapels IP, de Die-Smulders CE, van Lint FH, Willekes C, et al. Congenital hydrocephalus in clinical practice: A genetic diagnostic approach. Eur J Med Genet. 2011; 54(6): e542-e547.10.1016/j.ejmg.2011.06.005]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Davis GH. Fetal hydrocephalus. Clin Perinatol. 2003; 30(3): 531-539.10.1016/S0095-5108(03)00053-8]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Garne E, Loane M, Addor MC, Boyd PA, Barisic I, Dolk H. Congenital hydrocephalus ‒ prevalence, prenatal diagnosis and outcome of pregnancy in four European regions. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2010; 14(2): 150-155.10.1016/j.ejpn.2009.03.005]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Li P, Pomianowski P, DiMaio MS, Florio JR, Rossi MR, Xiang B, et al. Genomic characterization of prenatally detected chromosomal structural abnormalities using oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization. Am J Med Genet A. 2011; 155A(7): 1605-1615.10.1002/ajmg.a.34043]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Rooms L, Reyniers E, Scheers S, van Luijk R, Wauters J, Van Aerschot L, et al. TBP as a candidate gene for mental retardation in patients with subtelomeric 6q deletions. Eur J Hum Genet. 2006; 14(10): 1090-1096.10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201674]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Abu-Amero KK, Hellani A, Salih MA, Al Hussain A, al Obailan M, Zidan G, et al. Ophthalmologic abnormalities in a de novo terminal 6q deletion. Ophthalmic Genet. 2010; 31(1): 1-11.10.3109/13816810903312535]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Backx L, Fryns JP, Marcelis C, Devriendt K, Vermeesch J, Van Esch H. Haploinsufficiency of the gene Quaking (QKI) is associated with the 6q terminal deletion syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2010; 152A(2): 319-326.10.1002/ajmg.a.33202]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Aberg K, Saetre P, Jareborg N, Jazin E. Human QKI, a potential regulator of mRNA expression of human oligodendrocyte-related genes involved in schizophrenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006; 103(19): 7482-7487.10.1073/pnas.0601213103]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Wilson GR, Wang HX, Egan GF, Robinson PJ, Delatycki MB, O’Bryan MK, et al. Deletion of the Parkin co-regulated gene causes defects in ependymal ciliary motility and hydrocephalus in the quakingviable mutant mouse. Hum Mol Genet. 2010; 19(8): 1593-1602.10.1093/hmg/ddq03120106870]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Peddibhotla S, Nagamani SC, Erez A, Hunter JV, Holder JL Jr, Carlin ME, et al. Delineation of candidate genes responsible for structural brain abnormalities in patients with terminal deletions of chromosome 6q27. Eur J Hum Genet. 2015; 23(1): 54-60.10.1038/ejhg.2014.51426673724736736]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Bettenhausen B, Hrabe de Angelis M, Simon D, Guenet JL, Gossler A. Transient and restricted expression during mouse embryogenesis of Dll1, a murine gene closely related to Drosophila Delta. Development (Cambridge, UK). 1995; 121(8): 2407-2418. 10.1242/dev.121.8.24077671806]Search in Google Scholar