A Critical Look at the Subjective and Objective Purposes of Contract in Aharon Barak’s Theory of Interpretation

1. Barak, Aharon. Purposive Interpretation in Law. Princeton – Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2005.10.1515/9781400841264Search in Google Scholar

2. Beale, Hugh, Hein Kötz, Arthur Hartkamp, and Denis Tallon, eds. Cases, Materials and Text on Contract Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

3. Danet, Brenda. “Language in the Legal Process.” Law and Society 14(3) (1980): 445–550.10.2307/3053192Search in Google Scholar

4. Dannemann, Gerhard, and Stefan Vogenauer. The Common European Sales Law in Context. Oxford: OUP, 2013.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199678907.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

5. Dworkin, Ronald. Law’s Empire. London: Fontana Press, 1986.Search in Google Scholar

6. Fish, Stanley. “Intention Is All There Is: A Critical Analysis of Aharon Barak’s Purposive Interpretation in Law.” Cardozo Law Review 29(3) (2008): 1109–1146.Search in Google Scholar

7. Hasanbegović, Jasminka. “Pravne izreke Valtazara Bogišića skraja OIZ = Katalog narodnjačkih opštih pravnih toposa?” (Legal Sayings of Valtazar Bogišić from the Last Section of the General Property Code of Montenegro = A Catalogue of Folk Legal Topoi?): 329–379. In: Luka Breneselović, ed. Spomenica Valtazara Bogišića o stogodišnjici njegove smrti (In Memoriam of Valtazar Bogišić on the Centenary Anniversary of His Death). Beograd: Službeni glasnik, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

8. Henket, Maarten. “Contracts, Promises and Meaning: The Question of Intent.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 5 (1989): 129–148.10.1007/BF02053530Search in Google Scholar

9. MacCormick, Neil. Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory. Oxford: OUP, 1994.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198763840.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

10. Marella, Maria Rosaria. “The Old and the New Limits to Freedom of Contract in Europe.” European Review of Contract Law 2 (2006): 257–274.10.1515/ERCL.2006.019Search in Google Scholar

11. Mitchell, Catherine. Interpretation of Contracts. London & New York: Routledge-Cavendish, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

12. Rott, Hans. “Words in Contexts: Fregean Elucidations.” Linguistics and Philosophy 6 (2000): 621–641.10.1023/A:1005666826560Search in Google Scholar

13. Scalia, Antonin, Bryan A. Garner. Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts. St. Paul MN: Thompson–West, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

14. Schwartz, Alan, and Robert E. Scott. “Contract Theory and the Limits of Contract Law.” Yale Law Journal 113 (2003): 541–619.10.2307/3657531Search in Google Scholar

15. Schwartz, Alan. “Contract Theory and Theories of Contract Regulation.” Yale Law School Faculty Scholarship Series Paper 313 (2000): 101–110.10.3406/rei.2000.1040Search in Google Scholar

16. Slijepčević, Ratomir. “Tumačenje ugovora” (Interpretation of contracts): 321–332. In: Enciklopedija imovinskog prava i prava udruženog rada (Encyclopaedia of Patrimonial Law). Belgrade: Službeni list, 1978.Search in Google Scholar

17. Stojanović, Dragoljub. “Član 99. Primena odredaba i tumačenje spornih odredaba” (Article 99. Implementation of Terms and Interpretation of Disputed Term”): 203–210. In: Slobodan Perović, ed. Komentar Zakona o obligacionim odnosima (Commentary of the Code of Obligations). Belgrade: Savremena administracija, 1995.Search in Google Scholar

18. Villa, Vittorio. “A Pragmatically Oriented Theory of Legal Interpretation.” Revus 12 (2010): 89–120.10.4000/revus.146Search in Google Scholar

19. Wendel, W. Bradley. “The Craft of Legal Interpretation”: 153–178. In: Yasutomo Morigiwa, Michael Stolleis, and Jean-Louis Halpérin, eds. Interpretation of Law in the Age of Enlightenment. Heidelberg & London & New York: Springer 2011.10.1007/978-94-007-1506-6_9Search in Google Scholar

20. Zimmermann, Reinhard. The Law of Obligations. Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition. Oxford: OUP 1996.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198764267.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

1. Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts. Official Journal of the European Communities, 1993, no. L 95.Search in Google Scholar

2. Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR) of 2009: 131–543. In: Christian von Bar, Eric Clive and Hans Schulte-Nölke, eds. Principles, Definitions and Model Rules of European Private Law. Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR). Munich: Sellier, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

3. French Civil Code (Code Civil) of 1804 // www.legifrance.gouv.fr.Search in Google Scholar

4. General Property Code of Montenegro of 1888 [no longer in force]. Cetinje: Obod, 1980 [reprint from the original].Search in Google Scholar

5. German Civil Code (Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch) of 1901 // www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_bgb.Search in Google Scholar

6. Principles of European Contract Law (PECL) of 1998 and 2002 // http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/eu.contract.principles.parts.1.to.3.2002.Search in Google Scholar

7. Serbian Code of Obligations of 1978. Official Gazette of SFRY, no. 29/1978, 39/1985, 45/1989 and 57/1989, Official Gazette of FRY, no. 31/1993 and Official Gazette of SME no. 1/2003.Search in Google Scholar

8. UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) of 1980 // http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/sales/cisg/V1056997-CISG-e-book.pdf.Search in Google Scholar