[1. Alpa, Guido, and Vincenzo Zeno-Zencovich. Italian Private Law. Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish, 2007.10.4324/9780203945056]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Beguerie, Philippe, and Claude Ducheseau. Kaip suprasti santuokinius sakramentus (How to Understand the Sacraments). Kaunas: Lietuvos katechetikos centras, 1998.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Brilius, Vytautas. “Sakramentinės Santuokos Pripažinimo Problemos Lietuvos Respublikos Civilinėje Teisėje” (The Recognition Problems of Sacramental Marriage in Civil Law of Lithuanian Republic). Soter 38 (2003): 47–59.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Collins, Randall, and Scott L. Coltrane. Sociology of Marriage and Family: Sex, Love and Property. Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 1991.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Doe, Norman. Law and Religion in Europe A comparative introduction. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199604005.003.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Hamilton, Carolyn, and Alison Perry. Family Law in Europe. London: Butterworths, 1995.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Kudinavičiūtė-Michailovienė, Inga. “Santuokinis Amžius – Santuokos Sudarymo Sąlyga” (The Age of Consent – the Request of Valid Conjugality). Jurisprudencija 55 (47) (2004): 78–89.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Kudinavičiūtė-Michailovienė, Inga. Santuokos sąlygos ir jų vykdymas (Conditions of marriage and their implementation). Vilnius: Justitia, 2006.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Meilius, Kazys. “Bažnytinė santuoka civilinių ir bažnytinių teismų praktikoje” (The marriage contracted in the Church, Civil law and the practice of courts). Soter 11 (39) (2003): 43–54.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Meilius, Kazys, ir Gediminas Sagatys. “Bažnyčios (Konfesijų) Nustatyta Tvarka Sudarytų Santuokų Kelias į Pripažinimą” (Way of Marriages to Acknowledgement Formed in Church (Confessions) Established Manner). Jurisprudencija 28 (2002): 128–136.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Mikelėnas, Valentinas, Šarūnas Keserauskas, and Zita Smirnovienė. LR Civilinio kodekso komentaras. Trečioji knyga. Šeimos teisė (Commentary on the Civil Code of the Republic of Lithuania. Third book. Family law). Vilnius: Justitia, 2002.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Mikelėnas, Valentinas. Šeimos teisė (Family Law). Vilnius: Justicia, 2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Murphy, John. International Dimensions in Family Law. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Nekrošius, Vytautas. Europos Sąjungos Civilinio Proceso Teisė (European Union Civil Procedure Law). Vilnius: Justitia, 2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. No author named. “At what age is it possible to get married?” (January 2016) // http://www.tallinn.ee/eng/Contraction-of-marriage#age.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. No author named. “Child marriage: 39 000 every day” (November 2015) // http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2013/child_marriage_20130307/en/.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. No author named. International Conference on State and Religious Communities Relationships: State and Religious Communities Relationships in Austria. Vilnius: Lithuanian Ministry of Justice, 2000.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. No author named. “Marriage” (January 2016) // http://www.infopankki.fi/en/living-in-finland/family/marriage.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. No author named. “Spain moves to raise minimum marriage age to 16.” theguardian.com (November 2015) // http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/apr/28/spain-marriage-age-16-legislation-senate.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. No author named. “World minimum marriage age chart.” independent.co.uk (January 2016) // http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/the-lowest-age-you-can-legally-get-married-around-the-world-10415517.html.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. North, Peter, and James Fawcett. Private International Law. London: Butterworths, 1987.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Rogers, Sarah. “What is International Marriage?” (April 2013) // http://www.ehow.com/facts_6722709_international-marriage_html#ixzz1JgeOnd6p.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Stockard, Janice E. Marriage in Culture: Practice and Meaning across Diverse Societies. Orlando: Harcourt College Publishers, 2002.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. UNICEF. “Child marriage” (January 2016) // http://www.unicef.org/azerbaijan/protection_10022.html.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Wardle, Lynn D., and Laurence C. Nolan. Fundamental Principles of Family Law. Praeger: David Orgon Coolidge Eds., 2002.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Wardle, Lynn D. International Marriage Recognition: A World Dilemma, in Families across Frontiers. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff publishers, 1996.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Wardle, Lynn D. “Marriage and Religious Liberty: Comparative Law Problems and Conflict of Laws Solutions.” Journal of Law and Family Studies 12 (2) (2010): 315–364.]Search in Google Scholar
[1. Agreement between the Holy See and the Italian Republic. Modifications to the Lateran Concordat. February 18, 1984.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Austrian Marriage Act. 1938, BGBl. I, no. 15/2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. A.Z. v V.B. Supreme Court of Lithuania, 2008, no. 3K-3-148/2008.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Belgian Civil Code. L 19-01-1990, Art. 8, 03-21-1804.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Brook v Brook. 1861, no. 9 HLC 193.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Civil Code of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 2000, no. 74-2262.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Code of Canon Law. Canon Law Society of America, 1999.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Danish Marriage Act. 1969, no. 256.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Finish Marriage Act. 234/1929; amendments up to 1226/2001 included.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. French Civil Code. 2006, no. 2006-399.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Gaudium et spes. Pastoral Constitution//Resolutions of the 2nd Vatican Council. Promulgated by His Holiness, Pope Paul VI on December 7. Vatican: The Coniliar And Post Conciliar Documents by Costello, 1965.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. German Civil Code. Last amended by Article 4 para. 5 of the Act of 10-01-2013 (Federal Law Gazette I page 3719), 01-02-2002.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. G.K. v G.S. Supreme Court of Lithuania, 2007, no. 3K-7-6/2007.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. In Re May’s estate. Court of Appeals of New York, 1953, no. 305 N.Y. 486, 114 N.E.2d 4.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Italian Civil Code. 03-16-1942, no. 262.10.7326/0003-4819-16-2-262]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Kuklycz v Kuklycz. 1972, no. VR 50.10.25291/VR/1972-VR-50]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Latvian Civil Code. Ziņotājs, 1993, no. 22; Valdības Vēstnesis, 1937, no. 41.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Lietuvos Respublikos Civilinio Kodekso, 3.14 Straipsnio Pakeitimo Įstatymas (Amendment Law of the Civil Code of the Republic of Lithuania). Official Gazette, 2000, no. 74-2262.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Lietuvos Respublikos Civilinio Kodekso 3.14 Straipsnio Pakeitimo, Įstatymo Projekto, Aiškinamasis Raštas (Explanatory note of the amendment of the Civil Code of the Republic of Lithuania). 2005-02-08, no. XP-246.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Lietuvos Respublikos Civilinio Kodekso 3.14 Straipsnio Pakeitimo, Įstatymo Projekto, Aiškinamasis Raštas (Explanatory note of the amendment of the Civil Code of the Republic of Lithuania). 2009-07-23, no. XIP-944.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Lietuvos Respublikos ir Šventojo Sosto Sutartis “Dėl Santykių tarp Katalikų Bažnyčios ir Valstybės Teisinių Aspektų” (Agreement between the Holy See and the Republic of Lithuania concerning juridical aspects of the relations between the Catholic Church and the State). Official Gazette, 2000, no. 67–2022.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Lietuvos Respublikos Konstitucija (Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania). Official Gazette, 1992, no. 33-1014.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Lietuvos Respublikos Religinių Bendruomenių ir Bendrijų Įstatymas (Law on Religious Communities of the Republic of Lithuania). Official Gazette, 1995, no. 89-1985.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Lietuvos Respublikos Seimo Kanceliarijos Teisės Departamento Išvada Dėl Lietuvos Respublikos Civilinio Kodekso 3.14 Straipsnio Pakeitimo Įstatymo Projekto (Conclusion of the Lithuanian Seimas Law Department on the amendment Project Law of the Civil Code of the Republic of Lithuania). 2005-02-10, no. XP – 246.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Lietuvos Vyskupų Konferencijos nutarimas dėl pasirengimo santuokos sakramentui programos (Decision of Lithuanian Bishop Conference regarding program for preparation for matrimonial sacrament). Bažnyčios žinios, 1996, no. 22.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. M. Č. v G. P. Supreme Court of Lithuania, 2006, no. 3K-7-20/2006.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. M. K. and A. S. v Civil Registry. Court of Appeal of Lithuania, 2002, no. 2A-1608.]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Ogden v. Ogden. 1908, P 46.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Ollemnis Conventio Inter Apostolicam Sedem Et Poloniae Rem Publicam (Concordat between the Holy See and the Republic of Polad). July 28, 1993.]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Reid v Reid. 1911, no. 72 Misc. 214, 129 N.Y.10.1016/S0372-5545(17)66906-2]Search in Google Scholar
[31. R.Ž. v Pravieniškių 1-mieji pataisos namai. Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania, 2008, no. A-525-219-08.]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Savenis v Savenis. 1950, no. SASR 309.]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Simonin v Mallac. 1860, no. 2 Sw & Tr 67.10.1038/scientificamerican01281860-67a]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Spanish Civil Code. Approved 24-07-1889, last amended by Law No. 20/2011 of 21-07-2007.]Search in Google Scholar
[35. The Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania of 28 September 2011 On The Compliance Of The Provisions Of The State Family Policy Concept As Approved By Resolution Of The Seimas Of The Republic Of Lithuania No. X-1569 “On The Approval Of The State Family Policy Concept” Of 3 June 2008 With The Constitution Of The Republic Of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 2011, no. 118-5564.]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Valstybė v J. L., I. K. and P. B. Court of Appeal of Lithuania, 2015, no. 1A-127-518.]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Wolfenden v Wolfenden. 1946, no. P 61.]Search in Google Scholar
