[1. Bourgault, Jacques, and Karolien Van Dorpe. “Managerial Reforms, Public Service Bargains and Top Civil Servant Identity.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 79 (1) (2013): 49–52 //DOI: 10.1177/0020852312467739.10.1177/0020852312467739]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Cerase, Francesco Paolo, and Domenica Farinella. “Public Service Motivation: How Does It Relate to Management Reforms and Changes in the Working Situation of Public Organizations? A Case Study of the Italian Revenue Agency.” Public Policy and Administration 24 (3) (2009): 281–305 //DOI: 10.1177/0952076709103812.10.1177/0952076709103812]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Christensen, Tom, and Per Lægreid. “New Public Management: Design, Resistance, or Transformation? A Study of How Modern reforms are Received in a Civil Service System.” Public Productivity & Management Review 23 (2) (1999): 169–173 //DOI: 10.2307/3380777.10.2307/3380777]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Christensen, Tom, and Per Lægreid. “Contexts and Administrative Reforms: A Transformative Approach”: 131–139. In: Christopher Pollitt, ed. Context in Public Policy and Management: The Missing Link? Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Civinskas, Remigijus. “Can a Senior Civil Servant Adapt to Managing by Contract? Reform and Civil Servants’ Preferences in Lithuanian Government.” Baltic Journal of Law & Politics 4(2) (2011): 154–186 //DOI: 10.2478/v10076-011-0016-1.10.2478/v10076-011-0016-1]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Daley, Dennis M. “Pay-for-Performance and the Senior Executive Service: Attitudes about the Success of Civil Service Reform.” The American Review of Public Administration 25 (4) (1995): 355–372 //DOI: 10.1177/027507409502500404.10.1177/027507409502500404]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Hammerschmid, Gerhard, Renate E. Meyer, and Christoph Demmke. “Public Administration Modernization: Common Reform Trends or Different Paths and National Understandings in the EU Countries”: 145–169. In: Kuno Schedler and Isabella Proeller, eds. Cultural Aspects of Public Management Reform. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2007.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Hammerschmid, Gerhard, Anca Oprisor, and Vid Štimac. “COCOPS Executive Survey on Public Sector Reform in Europe.” Research Report (2013): 33–44 // http://www.cocops.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/COCOPS-WP3-Research-Report.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Heyse, Liesbeth, Berber Lettinga, and Martijn Groenleer. “Explaining Reform in Europe: Comparisons, Patterns, and Reflections”: 171–192. In: Liesbeth Heyse, et al., eds. Reform in Europe Breaking the Barriers in Government. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Horton, Sylvia. “Participation and Involvement of Senior Staff in the Reform of the British Civil Service.” Review of Public Personnel Administration 25 (1) (2005): 56–68 //DOI: 10.1177/0734371X04268489.10.1177/0734371X04268489]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Huber, John D., and Charles R Shipan. Deliberate Discretion? The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.10.1017/CBO9780511804915]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Ketelaar, Anne, Nick Manning, and Edouard Turkisch. Performance-based Arrangements for Senior Civil Servants: OECD and other Country Experiences. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2007.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Lavertu, Stephane, David E. Lewis, and Donald P. Moynihan. “Administrative Reform, Political Ideology, and Bureaucratic Effort: The Case of Performance Management in the Bush Administration.” Typescript, Ohio State University (2013) // https://my.vanderbilt.edu/davidlewis/files/2011/12/LLM_Effort_010712-.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. LSDP rinkimų programa “Saugi, solidari ir teisinga Lietuva”, 2012 (The election programme “Secure, solidary and just Lithuania” of Lithuanian Social Democratic Party, 2012) // http://lsdp.lt/apie-partija/programos.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik. Sustainability of Civil Service Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe Five Years After EU Accession. Sigma papers No. 44. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik, and Tim Veen. “Governing the Post-Communist State: Government Alternation and Senior Civil Service Politicisation in Central and Eastern Europe.” East European Politics 28 (1) (2012): 4–22 //DOI:10.1080/13523279.2011.635651.10.1080/13523279.2011.635651]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Nakrošis, Vitalis. “Valstybės tarnybos reforma 2008-2012 metais: kodėl neįvyko sisteminė kaita?” (Civil Service Reform in 2008-2012: Why did not Happen Systemic Change?): 89–141. In: Vitalis Nakrošis, Egidijus Barcevičius, and Ramūnas Vilpišauskas, eds. Kada reformos virsta pokyčiais? Politinis dėmesys, palaikymo koalicijos ir lyderystė A. Kubiliaus Vyriausybės veiklos 2008-2012 m. laikotarpiu (When Reforms Becomes Changes? Political Attention, Advocacy Coalitions and Leadership during the period from 2008 to 2012 of the 15th Government [Prime Minister A. Kubilius]). Vilnius: Vilniaus universiteto leidykla, 2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Nakrošis, Vitalis, and Liutauras Gudžinskas. “Party Patronage and State Politicisation in The Post-Communist Countries of Central and Eastern Europe: A Game Theory Approach.” NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 5 (2) (2012): 89–110 //DOI: 10.2478/v10110-012-0007-y.10.2478/v10110-012-0007-y]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Nemec, Juraj. “Public Management Reforms in CEE: Lessons Learned”: 346-371. In: Geert Bouckaert, et al., eds. Public Management Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe. Bratislava: NISPAcee Press, 2008.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Newman, Janet. “Constituting Context?”: 35-43. In: Christopher Pollitt, ed. Context in Public Policy and Management: the Missing Link? Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Nica, Elvira. “Organizational Culture in the Public Sector.” Economics, Management, and Financial Markets (2) (2013): 179–184.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. No author named. “Įvyko Personalo valdymo komisijos posėdis” (There was the meeting the Commission of Personnel Management under the of Civil Service Department of the Republic of Lithuania) (April 25, 2014) // http://www.vtd.lt/index.php?-564797654.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. No author named. “Konferencijoje pristatytos valstybės tarnybos naujovės” (The innovations of public service were presented at the Conference) (April 11, 2014) // http://www.vtd.lt/index.php?193102649.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. No author named. “Nacionalinėje M.Mažvydo bibliotekoje įvyko diskusija, skirta aptarti aktualius valstybės tarnybos reformos klausimus” (In Martynas Mažvydas national library of Lithuania was held discussion about relevant issues of public service reform) (March 27, 2014) // http://www.vtd.lt/index.php?-880619066.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. No author named. “Pasiūlymai dėl valstybės tarnybos tobulinimo pristatyti Viešojo valdymo tobulinimo komisijoje” (Proposals for improvement of the civil service were delivered at the meeting of the Public Management Improvement Commission) (April 25, 2014) // http://www.vtd.lt/index.php?-1924836334.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. No author named. “Siūlymai dėl VT tobulinimo buvo pristatyti valstybės ir savivaldybių institucijų ir įstaigų personalo administravimo tarnybų vadovams” (Proposals for improvement of the civil service were delivered to the heads of personnel management divisions of State and municipal institutions) (January 14, 2014) // http://www.vtd.lt/index.php?593053071.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. No author named. “Valstybės tarnybos departamento direktorius Osvaldas Šarmavičius Seimo Valstybės valdymo ir savivaldybių komitetui pristatė informaciją apie Valstybės tarnybos aktualijas” (The Head of Civil Service Department presented information on public service issues for the Committee of State Administration and Local Authorities of the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania) (March 26, 2014) // http://www.vtd.lt/index.php?626697502.]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Ongaro, Edoardo. Public Management Reform and Modernization: Trajectories of Administrative Change in Italy, France, Greece, Portugal and Spain. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2009.10.4337/9781849802284]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Ongaro, Edoardo. “Explaining Contextual Influences on the Dynamics of Public Management Reforms: Reflections on Some Ways Forward”: 198-201. In: Christopher Pollitt, ed. Context in Public Policy and Management: The Missing Link? Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Pivoras, Saulius. “Laukia nuosaiki ir subrandinta reforma” (A Moderate and Matured Reform Awaits). Valstybės tarnybos aktualijos (2015 m. rugsėjis).]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Pivoras, Saulius, Remigijus Civinskas, and Ernesta Buckienė. Valstybės tarnybos sistemos tobulinimas Lietuvoje: pasirinkimai, požiūriai, sandėriai (Improving Civil Service System in Lithuania: Choices, Attitudes, Bargains). Vilnius: Versus aureus, 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Pollitt, Christopher, ed. Context in Public Policy and Management: The Missing Link? Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Pollitt, Christopher. “Preface: Context – a missing link?”: XVII-XVII. In: Christopher Pollitt, ed. Context in Public Policy and Management: The Missing Link? Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Pollitt, Christopher. “Second link”: 208–216. In: Christopher Pollitt, ed. Context in Public Policy and Management: The Missing Link? Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Pollitt, Christopher. “Fourth link”: 407–412. In: Christopher Pollitt, ed. Context in Public Policy and Management: The Missing Link? Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Pollitt, Christopher, and Geert Bouckaert. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis-New Public Management, Governance and the Neo-Weberian State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Rauleckas, Rimantas, et al. “Public Administration Reforms during Fiscal Crisis in Lithuania: Perceptions of Senior Civil Servants.” Viešoji politika ir administravimas 12 (3) (2013): 350–362.10.5755/j01.ppaa.12.3.5290]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Schedler, Kuno, and Isabella Proeller. “Public Management as a Cultural Phenomenon: Revitalizing Societal Culture in International Public Management Research”: 3–28. In: Kuno Schedler and Isabella Proeller, eds. Cultural Aspects of Public Management Reform. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2007.]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Schein, Edgar H. Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, 2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Streeck, Wolfgang, and Kathleen Thelen. “Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies”: 3–15. In: Wolfgang Streeck and Kathleen Thelen, eds. Beyond Continuity. Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Van de Walle, Steven, Gerhard Hammerschmid, Vid Štimac, and Anca Oprisor. “How Do Top Public Officials Evaluate Public Sector Reforms? Findings from the COCOPS Top Executive Survey.” Draft (2014) // http://www.kozminski.edu.pl/fileadmin/www/seminarium_interdyscyplinarne/Kozminski_COCOPS_survey_0403.docx.]Search in Google Scholar
[42. White, Geoff, Paul Dennison, David Farnham, and Sylvia Horton. “Public Management Reform and Employee Voice in UK Public Services”: 211–234. In: Peter Leisink, Bram Steijn, and Ulke Veersma, eds. Industrial Relations in the New Europe: Enlargement, Integration and Reform. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2007.]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Yang, Kaifeng, and Anthony Kassekert. “Linking Management Reform with Employee Job Satisfaction: Evidence from Federal Agencies”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20(2) (2010): 413–436 //DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mup010.10.1093/jopart/mup010]Search in Google Scholar
[1. Lietuvos Respublikos valstybės tarnybos įstatymo 2, 6, 9, 10, 14, 16, 21, 222, 25, 311, 41, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47 straipsnių 3 priedo pakeitimo ir papildymo bei įstatymo papildymo 131, 182, 201, 211, 221 straipsniais įstatymas (Law on amending and supplementing articles in the Law on civil service of the Republic of Lithuania). Draft of Law by the Ministry of the Interior of the Republic of Lithuania No. 12-3971-01 (November 28, 2012) // http://www.lrs.lt/pls/proj/dokpaieska.showdoc_l?p_id=164164&p_query=&p_tr2=&p_org=12&p_fix=y.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Lietuvos Respublikos Vyriausybės 2013 m. veiklos ataskaita (Government Annual Performance Report for 2013). Resolution of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania No. 257 of the 26th of March, 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Valstybės valdymo tobulinimo komisijos (Saulėlydžio komisijos) posėdžio protokolas (Meeting Protocol of the Public Management Improvement Commission [Sunset] under the Government of Lithuania). No. 63-5 of the 9th of May, 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Šešioliktosios Lietuvos Respublikos Vyriausybės 2012–2016 metų programa (The Programme of the 16th Government of the Republic of Lithuania for 2012–2016). Resolution of the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania No XII-51 of the 13th of December, 2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Valstybės tarnybos departamento 2014 m. veiklos planas (Civil Service Department’s Performance Plan for 2014). Order of the Head of Civil Service Department of the Republic of Lithuania No. 27V-63 of the 31th of March, 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Viešojo valdymo tobulinimo 2012–2020 m. programa (Public Governance Improvement programme for 2012–2020). Resolution of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania No. 171 of the 7th of February, 2012.]Search in Google Scholar
