[1. Adams, Guy. “‘The day I realized my toddler was addicted to the iPad’: Three-year-old William tugged at the duvet and woke his father demanding the tablet… at 4am” (January 2014) // http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2548365/As-revealed-one-three-children-use-tablet-talk-fathers-alarming-story-The-day-I-realised-toddler-addicted-iPad.html.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Beas Rodrigues, Edson. The General Exception Clauses of the TRIPS Agreement: Promoting Sustainable Development. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.10.1017/CBO9781139084222]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Birnhack, Michael. “Acknowledging Conflict between Copyright Law and Freedom of Expression under the Human Rights Act.” Entertainment Law Review 24 (2003): 1–35.10.2139/ssrn.368961]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Cook, Trevor. “Exceptions and Limitations in European Union Copyright Law.” Journal of Intellectual Property Rights 17 (2012): 243–245.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Cornish, William. Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyrights, Trademarks & Allied Rights. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1999.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Dinwoodie, Graeme. “Copyright Lawmaking Authority: An (Inter)Nationalist Perspective on the Treaty Clause.” Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts 30 (2007): 355–395.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Dworkin, Ronald, ed. The Philosophy of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. European Court of Human Rights. “Interlaken Follow-Up” (July 2010) // http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/2010_Interlaken_Follow-up_ENG.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Fatima, Shaheed. Using International Law in Domestic Courts. Portland: Hart Publishing, 2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Geiger, Christophe, ed. Constructing European Intellectual Property: Achievements and New Perspectives. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013.10.4337/9781781001646]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Griffiths, Jonathan, and Uma Suthersanen, eds. Copyright and Free Speech. Comparative and International Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Grosheide, Willem, ed. Intellectual Property and Human Rights: A Paradox. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2010.10.4337/9781849802048]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Helfer, Laurence, and Graeme Austin. Human Rights and Intellectual Property. Mapping the Global Interface. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.10.1017/CBO9780511976032]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Helfer, Laurence. “Human Rights and Intellectual Property: Conflict or Coexistence?” Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology 5 (2003): 47–61.10.2139/ssrn.459120]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Helfer, Laurence. “The New Innovation Frontier? Intellectual Property and the European Court of Human Rights.” Harvard International Law Journal 49 (2008): 1–52.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Lee, Joo-Young. A Human Rights Framework for Intellectual Property, Innovation and Access to Medicines. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, 2015.10.4324/9781315564845]Search in Google Scholar
[17. MacNaughton, Gillian, and Diane Frey. “Decent Work for All: A Holistic Human Rights Approach.” American University International Law Review 26 (2011): 441–483.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Mtima, Lateef ed. Intellectual Property, Entrepreneurship and Social Justice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015.10.4337/9781783470259]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Nimmer, Melville. “Does Copyright Abridge the First Amendment Guarantees of Free Speech and Press?” University of California Los Angeles Law Review 17 (1970): 1180–1204.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Richards, Neil. Intellectual Privacy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Rosati, Eleonora. “Copyright in the EU: In Search of (In)Flexibilities.” Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 9 (2014): 585–598.10.1093/jiplp/jpu034]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Sadurski, Wojciech. Freedom of Speech and Its Limits. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999.10.1007/978-94-010-9342-2]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Swan, Charles. “When Does Freedom of Speech Trump Copyright?” (February 2013) // http://www.theguardian.com/media-network/media-network-blog/2013/feb/13/freedom-speech-trump-copyright.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Torremans, Paul, ed. Copyright and Human Rights: Freedom of Expression, Intellectual Property, Privacy. Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2004.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Torremans, Paul. Intellectual Property and Human Rights. Enhanced Edition of Copyright and Human Rights. Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2008.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Voorhoof, Dirk, and Inger Høedt-Rasmussen. “ECHR: Copyright vs. Freedom of Expression” (January 2013) // http://kluwercopyrightblog.com/2013/01/25/echr-copyright-vs-freedom-of-expression/.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Waldron, Jeremy. “From Authors to Copiers: Individual Rights and Social Values in Intellectual Property.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 68 (1992): 841–887.]Search in Google Scholar
[1. Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. Portugal. European Court of Human Rights. 2007, no. 73049/01.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Ashby Donald and Others v. France. European Court of Human Rights. 2013, no. 36769/08.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Ashdown v. Telegraph Group Ltd. Court of Appeal of England and Wales. 2001, 4 All ER 666.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Axel Springer AG v. Germany. European Court of Human Rights. 2012, no. 39954/08.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Balan v. Moldova. European Court of Human Rights. 2008, no. 19247/03.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works. 1886, 1161 U.N.T.S. 3.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Official Journal, 2012, C 326/391.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Chassagnou and Others v. France. European Court of Human Rights. 1999, nos. 25088/94, 28331/95, 28443/95.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Cohen v. California. Supreme Court of the United States. 1971, 403 U.S. 15.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Consolidated Version of the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union. Official Journal, 2010, C 326/47.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. 1950, 213 U.N.T.S. 222.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Council Directive 91/250 on the legal protection of computer programmes. Official Journal, 1991, L 122.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Council Directive 92/100 on rental and lending rights and certain rights related to copyright in the field of intellectual property. Official Journal, 1992, L 346.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Council Directive 93/83 on the co-ordination of certain rules concerning copyright and rights related to copyright applicable to satellite broadcasting and cable retransmission. Official Journal, 1993, L 248.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Council Directive 93/98 harmonizing the term of protection of copyright and certain related rights. Official Journal, 1993, L 290.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society. Official Journal, 2001, L 167.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the legal protection of databases. Official Journal, 1996, L 77.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Eldred v. Ashcroft. Supreme Court of the United States. 2003, 537 U.S. 186.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises. Supreme Court of the United States. 1985, 471 U.S. 539.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Neij and Sunde Kolmisoppi v. Sweden. European Court of Human Rights. 2013, no. 40397/12.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Peck v. United Kingdom. European Court of Human Rights. 2003, no. 44647/98.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom. European Court of Human Rights. 1979, no. 6538/74.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. United Nations Vienna Declaration of Programme of Action. 1993, U.N. Doc. A/CONF.157/23.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 1948, G.A. Res. 217 (III) A, U.N. Doc. A/RES/217(III).]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. 1969, 1155 U.N.T.S. 331.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Von Hannover v. Germany. European Court of Human Rights, 2004, no. 59320/00.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Von Hannover v. Germany (No. 2). European Court of Human Rights, 2012, nos. 40660/08; 60641/08.]Search in Google Scholar
