[ACEA (2009), ‘European automobile industry requests EU to suspend trade negotiations with South Korea,’ ACEA Press Release, 5 February.]Search in Google Scholar
[Attinà, F. (1990), ‘The voting behaviour of the European Parliament members and the problem of Europarties,’ European Journal of Political Research, no. 18. pp. 557–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1990.tb00248.x10.1111/j.1475-6765.1990.tb00248.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Baldwin, R. E. & Magee, C. S. (2000), Congressional Trade Votes: From NAFTA Approval to Fast-Track Defeat, Policy Analyses in International Economics no. 59, Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brzinski, J. B. (1995), ‘Political group cohesion in the European Parliament, 1989–1994,’ in C. Rhodes & S. Mazey (eds.) The State of the European Union, vol. 3, London: Longman.10.1515/9781685857943-008]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission (2006), Global Europe: Competing in the World, COM(2006) 567 final, 4.10.2006.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Parliament (2013), The European Parliament: Electoral Procedures, Fact Sheets on the European Union - 2013, Brussels: European Parliament.]Search in Google Scholar
[Héritier, A.; Moury, C.; Schoeller, M.; Meissner, K. & Mota, I. (2015), The European Parliament as a Driving Force of Constitutionalisation, Brussels: European Parliament.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hiscox, M. J. (2002), ‘Commerce, coalition, and factor mobility: evidence from congressional votes on trade legislation,’ The American Political Science Review, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 593–608. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305540200035710.1017/S0003055402000357]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hix, S. (2000), How MEPs Vote, ESRC One Europe or Several? Programme Briefing Note 1/00, Falmer: University of Sussex.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hix, S. (2001), ‘Legislative behaviour and party competition in the European Parliament: an application of nominate to the EU,’ Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 663–688. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.0032610.1111/1468-5965.00326]Search in Google Scholar
[Hix, S. (2002), ‘Parliamentary behavior with two principals: preferences, parties and voting in the European Parliament,’ American Journal of Political Science, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 688–698. https://doi.org/10.2307/308840810.2307/3088408]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hix, S. & Høyland, B. (2013), ‘Empowerment of the European Parliament,’ Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 16, pp. 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurevpolisci-032311-11073510.1146/annurevpolisci-032311-110735]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hix, S. & Lord, C. (1997), Political Parties in the European Union, London: Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25560-310.1007/978-1-349-25560-3]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hix, S. & Noury, A. (2009a), ‘After enlargement: voting patterns in the Sixth European Parliament,’ Legislative Studies Quarterly, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 159–174. https://doi.org/10.3162/03629800978831428210.3162/036298009788314282]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hix, S. & Noury, A. (2009b), ‘Voting patterns and alliance formation in the European Parliament,’ Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, no. 364, pp. 821–831. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.026310.1098/rstb.2008.0263268971419073477]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hix, S.; Noury, A. & Roland, G. (2007), Democratic Politics in the European Parliament, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978051149195510.1017/CBO9780511491955]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Krajewski, M. (2005), ‘External trade law and the Constitution Treaty: towards a federal and more democratic common commercial policy?’ Common Market Law Review, no. 1, pp. 91–127.10.54648/COLA2004070]Search in Google Scholar
[Lim, H. & Sung, H. (2011), ‘Empirical analyses of U.S. congressional voting on recent FTA,’ The B. E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–37. https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1682.236310.2202/1935-1682.2363]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Noury, A. G. & Roland, G. (2002), ‘European Parliament: Should it have more power?’ Economy Policy, vol. 17, no. 35, pp. 279–319.10.1111/1468-0327.t01-1-00090]Search in Google Scholar
[Van den Putte, L.; De Ville, F. & Orbie, J. (2014), The European Parliament’s New Role in Trade Policy: Turning Power into Impact, CEPS Special Report, no. 89. Retrieved from http://aei.pitt.edu/51025/1/CEPS_SR_89_EP_New_Role_in_EU_Trade_Policy.pdf [accessed Sep 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Raunio, T. (1997), The European Perspective: Transnational Party Groups in the 1989–1994 European Parliament, London: Ashgate.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reichert, T. (2004), ‘EU trade policy decision making and WWF’s trade policy work in Brussels,’ Paper presented at seminar ‘The Relationship between MEAs and WTO Rules’, Szentendre (10 May 2004).]Search in Google Scholar
[Ringe, N. (2010), Who Decides, and How? Preferences, Uncertainty, and Policy Choice in the European Parliament, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199572557.003.000110.1093/acprof:oso/9780199572557.003.0001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[VoteWatch (2010), Voting Behaviour in the New European Parliament: The First Year, Annual Report 2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wolfstädter, L.; Becker, S. & Kreilinger, V. (2018), Rights and Role of the European Parliament in Common Commercial Policy, Policy Paper no. 215, Jacques Delors Institut.]Search in Google Scholar
[Woolcock, S. (2007), European Union Policy towards Free Trade Agreements, ECIPE Working Paper no. 03/2007.]Search in Google Scholar
[Xie, T. (2006), ‘Congressional roll call voting on China trade policy,’ American Politics Research, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 732–758. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X0628916210.1177/1532673X06289162]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar