[Ad Library (2019), Facebook. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/ads/library/?active_status=all&ad_type=political_and_issue_ads&country=UA [accessed Nov 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Ad Policies (2019a), ‘10.a Ads Related to Politics or Issues of National Importance,’ Facebook. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/policies/ads/restricted_content/political [accessed Nov 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Ad Policies (2019b), ‘10.b Disclaimers for Ads Related to Politics or Issues of National Importance,’ Facebook. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/policies/ads/restricted_content/disclaimers [accessed Nov 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Advertising Policies (2019), ‘Political content,’ Google. Retrieved from https://support.google.com/adspolicy/answer/6014595?hl=en [accessed Nov 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Animal Defenders International v. United Kingdom [2013], ECtHR, no. 48876/08, 22.4.2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[Barabash, Yu. H. (2012), ‘Okremi pytannia rozghliadu sudamy vyborchykh sporiv’ [Some issues of consideration of electoral disputes by courts], Viche, vol. 14, pp. 5–9.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bowman v. the United Kingdom [1998], ECtHR, no. 24839/94, 19.2.1998.]Search in Google Scholar
[Constitutional Court of Ukraine (2002), Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy u spravi za konstytutsiinym podanniam 63 narodnykh deputativ Ukrainy shchodo vidpovidnosti Konstytutsii Ukrainy (konstytutsiinosti) polozhen statti 43 Zakonu Ukrainy “Pro vybory narodnykh deputativ Ukrainy” (sprava pro vyborchu zastavu) [Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine], no. 1-18/2002, 30.1.2002]Search in Google Scholar
[Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia (2002), Reshenye ot ymeny Latvyiskoi Respublyky [Decision of the Constitutional court of the Republic of Latvia], no. 2002-08-01, 23.9.2002.]Search in Google Scholar
[Council of Europe (1998), Right to Privacy, Resolution of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, no. 1165, 26.06.1998.]Search in Google Scholar
[Council of Europe (1999), On measures concerning media coverage of election campaigns, Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, no. R(99)15, 9.9.1999.]Search in Google Scholar
[Council of Europe (2007), State of human rights and democracy in Europe, Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe resolution no. 1547, 15th Sitting, 18.4.2007.]Search in Google Scholar
[Daibu, A. A. & Abdulrazaq, F. F. (2016), ‘Legal and practical challenges to the enforcement of the right to freedom of expression in Nigeria,’ Yonsei LJ, vol. 7, pp. 87–126.]Search in Google Scholar
[Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council ‘On the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing,’ (General Data Protection Regulation), OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, pp. 1–88.]Search in Google Scholar
[Editorial Board of Pravoye Delo and Shtekel v. Ukraine [2011], ECtHR, no. 33014/05, 5.5.2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[ERR News (2018), ‘Za reklamoi estonskikh politikov i partii v facebook budut sledit,’ 29.11.2018. Retrieved from https://rus.err.ee/880986/za-reklamoj-jestonskih-politikov-i-partij-v-facebook-budut-sledit [accessed Nov 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Feldek v. Slovakia [2001], ECtHR, no. 29032/95, 12.7.2001.]Search in Google Scholar
[Glavaš, D. (2017), Political Advertising and Media Campaign During the Pre-election Period: A Comparative Study, Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, Commissioned by the OSCE Mission to Montenegro. Retrieved from https://www.osce.org/mission-to-montenegro/346631?download=true [accessed Nov 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Grinberg v. Russia [2005], ECtHR, no. 23472/03, 21.7.2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grofman, B. & Lijphart A., eds. (2003), Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences, Agathon Series on Representation, New York: Agathon Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Handyside v. the United Kingdom [1976], ECtHR, no. 5493/72, 7.12.1976.]Search in Google Scholar
[Karakó v. Hungary [2009], ECtHR, no. 39311/05, 28.4.2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kwiecień v. Poland [2007], ECtHR, no. 51744/99, 9.1.2007.]Search in Google Scholar
[La Rue, F. (2014), Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, Human Rights Council, A/HRC/26/30, 30.05.2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lingens v. Austria [1986], ECtHR, no. 9815/82, 8.7.1986.]Search in Google Scholar
[Loewy, A. H. (1993), ‘Freedom of speech as a product of democracy,’ University of Richmond Law Review, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 427–439.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kliuchkovskyi, Yu. B. (2018), Pryntsypy vyborchoho prava: doktrynalne rozuminnia, stan ta perspektyvy zakonodavchoi realizatsii v Ukraini: monohrafiia [Principles of electoral law: doctrinal understanding, status and prospects of legislative implementation in Ukraine: monograph], Kyiv: Vaite.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium [1987], ECtHR, no. 9267/81, 2.3.1987.]Search in Google Scholar
[Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom [1991], ECtHR, no. 13585/88, 24.10.1991.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pavlovic, M. (2017), ‘Legal limitations of freedom of expression in media,’ Int’l J. Econ. & L., vol. 7, no. 21, pp. 33–42.]Search in Google Scholar
[UNCHR (1995), Resolution of the United Nations Commission on Human Rights ‘Ways and means of overcoming obstacles to the establishment of a democratic society and requirements for the maintenance of democracy,’ no. 1995/60, 59th Meeting, 7.03.1995.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reilly, R. (2002), ‘Electoral systems for divided societies,’ Journal of Democracy, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2002.002910.1353/jod.2002.0029]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Shveda, Yu. R. (2015), Vybory vid A do Ya: Nastilna knyha menedzhera vyborchoi kampanii [Elections A to Z: campaign manager’s board book], Lviv: Astroliabiia.]Search in Google Scholar
[Venice Commission (2002), Code of Good Practice in Electoral Matters, adopted by the Venice Commission at its 51st Plenary Session (Venice, 5–6 July 2002).]Search in Google Scholar
[Yumak and Sadak v. Turkey [2008], ECtHR, no. 10226/03, 8.7.2008.]Search in Google Scholar
