[Akbaba, S. (2014), ‘A critical assessment of a Eurosceptic party group on European integration: A case study of the European Conservatives and Reformists Group,’ Baltic Journal of European Studies, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 97–118. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2014-000610.2478/bjes-2014-0006]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Brack, N. (2012), ‘Eurosceptics in the European Parliament: exit or voice?’ Journal of European Integration, vol. 34, pp. 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2012.64108710.1080/07036337.2012.641087]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Brack, N. (2015), ‘The roles of Eurosceptic Members of the European Parliament and their implications for the EU,’ International Political Science Review, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251211557159010.1177/0192512115571590]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bressanelli, E. (2012), ‘National parties and group membership in the European Parliament: ideology or pragmatism?’ Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 737–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.64679010.1080/13501763.2011.646790]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bressanelli, E. (2013), ‘Competitive and coherent? Profiling the Europarties in the 2009 European Parliament elections,’ Journal of European Integration, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 653–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2012.71182410.1080/07036337.2012.711824]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union (2007), OJ C 115, 9.5.2008.]Search in Google Scholar
[Corbett, R.; Jacobs, F. & Shackleton, M. (2011), The European Parliament, 8th ed., London: John Harper Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Crespy, A. & Gajewska, K. (2010), ‘New parliament, new cleavages after the eastern enlargement? The conflict over the services directive as an opposition between the liberals and the regulators,’ Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 1185–1208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02109.x10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02109.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Dahl, R. A. (1966), Political Oppositions in Western Democracies, New Haven: Yale University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Demker, M. (2014), ‘Sailing along new cleavages: understanding the electoral success of the Swedish Pirate Party in the European Parliament election 2009,’ Government and Opposition, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 188–206. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2013.2410.1017/gov.2013.24]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Field, A. P. (2009), Discovering Statistics Using SPSS: (And Sex and Drugs and Rock ‘n’ Roll), 3rd ed., London: Sage Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Finke, D. (2014), ‘Domestic-level parliamentary scrutiny and voting behaviour in the European Parliament,’ Government and Opposition, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 207–231. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2013.2710.1017/gov.2013.27]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Finke, D. (2015), ‘Why do European political groups call the roll?’ Party Politics, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 750–762. https://doi.org/10.1177/135406881350951110.1177/1354068813509511]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Gostyńska, A. (2014), ‘The European Parliament and European Commission after the May elections,’ The Polish Quarterly of International Affairs, Polski Instytut Spraw Międzynarodowych, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 83–95.]Search in Google Scholar
[Helms, L. (2008), ‘Parliamentary opposition and its alternatives in a transnational regime: the European Union in perspective,’ The Journal of Legislative Studies, vol. 14, nos. 1–2, pp. 212–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357233080192120810.1080/13572330801921208]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hirschman, A. O. (1970), Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hobolt, S. B. (2015), ‘The 2014 European Parliament elections: divided in unity?’ Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 53, pp. 6–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.1226410.1111/jcms.12264]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Jensen, C. B.; Proksch, S.-O. & Slapin, J. B. (2013), ‘Parliamentary questions, oversight, and national opposition status in the European Parliament,’ Legislative Studies Quarterly, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 259–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.1201310.1111/lsq.12013]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Judge, D. & Earnshaw, D. (2008), The European Parliament, 2nd ed., Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07775-210.1007/978-1-137-07775-2]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kubát, M. (2010), Politická opozice v teorii a středoevropské praxi: (vybrané otázky) [Political Opposition in Theory and Central European Practices: (Selected Questions)], Praha: Dokořán.]Search in Google Scholar
[Leconte, C. (2010), Understanding Euroscepticism, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-05633-710.1007/978-1-137-05633-7]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Meijer, E. (2001), Written question E-2808/01 by Erik Meijer (GUE/NGL) to the Commission. 46,05% structural exceeding of deadlines for replies to non-priority written questions, Parliamentary Questions, OJ C 115 E, 16.05.2002, p. 164.]Search in Google Scholar
[Navarro, J. (2010), Questions in the European Parliament: What for? Preliminary Findings, Sciences Po Bordeaux: Spirit.]Search in Google Scholar
[Raunio, T. (1996), ‘Parliamentary questions in the European parliament: Representation, information and control,’ Journal of Legislative Studies, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 356–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357233960842049210.1080/13572339608420492]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Rozenberg, O. & Martin, S. (2011), ‘Questioning parliamentary questions,’ The Journal of Legislative Studies, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 394–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2011.59513210.1080/13572334.2011.595132]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Russo, F. & Wiberg, M. (2010), ‘Parliamentary questioning in 17 European Parliaments: some steps towards comparison,’ Journal of Legislative Studies, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357233100374011510.1080/13572331003740115]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Sánchez de Dios, M. & Wiberg, M. (2011), ‘Questioning in European Parliaments,’ The Journal of Legislative Studies, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 354–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2011.59512910.1080/13572334.2011.595129]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Sozzi, F. (2016), ‘Electoral foundations of parliamentary questions: evidence from the European Parliament,’ Journal of Legislative Studies, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2016.120265010.1080/13572334.2016.1202650]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Švecová, V. (2010), European Parliament and its Supervisory Powers over the European Commission—An Excursion into Parliament’s Task to Ensure Democratic Control over the Executive (Advanced Procedure), PhD thesis, Brno: Masaryk University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community (1951), ECSC Treaty, 18.4.1951.]Search in Google Scholar
[Volacu, A. (2012), ‘Cooperation and competition in the European Parliament: a game theoretical interpretation,’ Romanian Journal of European Affairs, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 39–60.]Search in Google Scholar
[Westlake, M. (1994), A Modern Guide to the European Parliament, London: Pinter Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wiberg, M. (1994), Parliamentary Control in the Nordic Countries: Forms of Questioning and Behavioural Trends, Helsinki: Finnish Political Science Association.]Search in Google Scholar