[Arter, D. (2000), ‘Small state influence within the EU: the case of Finland’s ‘Northern Dimension Initiative’,’ JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 677–697. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.0026010.1111/1468-5965.00260]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Björkdahl, A. (2008), ‘Norm advocacy: a small state strategy to influence the EU,’ Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 135–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176070170227210.1080/13501760701702272]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Blavoukos, S. & Bourantonis, D. (2012), ‘Policy entrepreneurs and foreign policy change: the Greek–Turkish rapprochement in the 1990s,’ Government and Opposition, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 597–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2012.01376.x10.1111/j.1477-7053.2012.01376.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Browning, C. (2006), ‘Small, smart and salient? Rethinking identity in the small states literature,’ Cambridge Review of International Affairs, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 669–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/0955757060100353610.1080/09557570601003536]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bueger, C. & Wivel, A. (2018), ‘How do small island states maximize influence? Creole diplomacy and the smart state foreign policy of the Seychelles,’ Journal of the Indian Ocean Region, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 170–188. https//doi.org/10.1080/19480881.2018.147112210.1080/19480881.2018.1471122]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Carter, R. G. & Scott, J. M. (2010), ‘Understanding congressional foreign policy innovators: mapping entrepreneurs and their strategies,’ The Social Science Journal, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 418–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2009.12.00310.1016/j.soscij.2009.12.003]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Checkel, J. (1993), ‘Ideas, institutions, and the Gorbachev foreign policy revolution,’ World Politics, vol. 45, no. 02, pp. 271–300. https://doi.org/10.2307/295066010.2307/2950660]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Cooper, A. & Shaw, T. (2009), Diplomacies of Small States: Resilience versus Vulnerability, New York: Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978023024691110.1057/9780230246911]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Crandall, M. (2014), ‘Soft security threats and small states: the case of Estonia,’ Defence Studies, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 30–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2014.89033410.1080/14702436.2014.890334]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Crandall, M. & C. Allan (2015), ‘Small states and big ideas: Estonia’s battle for cybersecurity norms,’ Contemporary Security Policy, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 346–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2015.106176510.1080/13523260.2015.1061765]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Cross, M. D. (2011), ‘Europe, a smart power?’ International Politics, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 691–706. https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2011.2810.1057/ip.2011.28]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[David, C. P. (2015), ‘How do entrepreneurs make national security policy? A case study of the G. W. Bush Administration,’ in I. Aflaki, E. Petridou & L. Miles (eds.) Entrepreneurship in the Polis: Understanding Political Entrepreneurship, London: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., pp. 151–170.]Search in Google Scholar
[Eckhardt, J. T. & Shane, S. A. (2003), ‘Opportunities and entrepreneurship,’ Journal of Management, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063030290030410.1177/014920630302900304]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Finnemore, M. & Sikkink, K. (1998), ‘International norm dynamics and political change,’ International Organization, vol. 52, no. 04, pp. 887–917. https://doi.org/10.1162/00208189855078910.1162/002081898550789]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Fox, A. (1959), The Power of Small States: Diplomacy in WWII, Chicago: Chicago University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Frohlich, N. & Oppenheimer, J. A. (1972), ‘Entrepreneurial politics and foreign policy,’ World Politics, vol. 24, no. S1, pp. 151–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/201056210.2307/2010562]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[George, N. M.; Parida, V.; Lahti, T. & Wincent, J. (2016), ‘A systematic literature review of entrepreneurial opportunity recognition: insights on influencing factors,’ International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 309–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-014-0347-y10.1007/s11365-014-0347-y]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Grøn, C. H. & Wivel, A. (2011), ‘Maximizing influence in the European Union after the Lisbon Treaty: from small state policy to smart state strategy,’ Journal of European Integration, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 523–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2010.54684610.1080/07036337.2010.546846]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ingebritsen, C. (2002), ‘Norm entrepreneurs: Scandinavia’s role in world politics,’ Cooperation and Conflict, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/001083670203700168910.1177/0010836702037001689]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Jakobsen, P. (2009), ‘Small states, big influence: the overlooked Nordic influence on the civilian ESDP,’ JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2008.01833.x10.1111/j.1468-5965.2008.01833.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Joenniemi, P. (1998), ‘From small to smart: reflections on the concept of small states,’ Irish Studies in International Affairs, vol. 9, pp. 61–62.]Search in Google Scholar
[Katzenstein, P. J. (1985), Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kouskouvelis, I. (2015), ‘Smart leadership in a small state: the case of Cyprus,’ in A. Tziampiris & S. Litsas (eds.) The Eastern Mediterranean in Transition: Multipolarity, Politics and Power, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 93–117.]Search in Google Scholar
[Krasner, S. D. (1981), ‘Transforming international regimes,’ International Studies Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 119–148. https://doi.org/10.2307/260021310.2307/2600213]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Lumpkin, G. T. (2011), ‘From legitimacy to impact: moving the field forward by asking how entrepreneurship informs life,’ Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.10410.1002/sej.104]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Lumpkin, G. T. & Dess, G. G. (1996), ‘Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance,’ Academy of Management Review, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 135–172. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.960216156810.5465/amr.1996.9602161568]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Martin, R. L. & Osberg, S. (2007), ‘Social entrepreneurship: the case for definition,’ Stanford Social Innovation Review, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 28–39.]Search in Google Scholar
[Miles, L. (2015), ‘Political Entrepreneurship as painful choices: an examination of Swedish (post)-neutrality security policy,’ in I. Aflaki, E. Petridou & L. Miles (eds.) Entrepreneurship in the Polis: Understanding Political Entrepreneurship, London: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., pp. 133–150.]Search in Google Scholar
[Milta, M. (2015), ‘Lithuania’s foreign policy under the Eastern Partnership Programme in 2009–2014: from small state policy to smart state strategy,’ Lithuanian Foreign Policy Review, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1515/lfpr-2016-000810.1515/lfpr-2016-0008]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Moravcsik, A. (1999), ‘A new statecraft? Supranational entrepreneurs and international cooperation,’ International Organization, vol. 53, no. 02, pp. 267–306. https://doi.org/10.1162/00208189955088710.1162/002081899550887]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Nasra, S. (2011), ‘Governance in EU foreign policy: exploring small state influence,’ Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 164–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.54449010.1080/13501763.2011.544490]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Nye, Jr., J. S. (2008), The Powers to Lead, Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Panke, D. (2012a), ‘Dwarfs in international negotiations: how small states make their voices heard,’ Cambridge Review of International Affairs, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 313–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2012.71059010.1080/09557571.2012.710590]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Panke, D. (2012b), ‘Small states in multilateral negotiations. What have we learned?’ Cambridge Review of International Affairs, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 387–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2012.71058910.1080/09557571.2012.710589]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Pastore, G. (2013), ‘Small new Member States in the EU foreign policy: toward ‘Small State Smart Strategy’?’ Baltic Journal of Political Science, vol. 3, pp. 67–84. https://doi.org/10.15388/BJPS.2013.2.281810.15388/BJPS.2013.2.2818]Search in Google Scholar
[Pedi, R. (2016), Theory of International Relations: Small States in the International System, PhD thesis, Thessaloniki: University of Macedonia. School of Social Sciences, Humanities and Arts, Department of International Relations. Retrieved from http://thesis.ekt.gr/thesisBookReader/id/38599#page/1/mode/2up [accessed Feb 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Pedi, R. & Kouskouvelis, I. (2019), ‘Cyprus in the Eastern Mediterranean: a small state seeking for status,’ in S. Litsas & A. Tziampiris (eds.) The New Eastern Mediterranean, New York: Springer, pp. 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90758-1_910.1007/978-3-319-90758-1_9]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Petridou, E.; Aflaki, I. & Miles, L. (2015), ‘Unpacking the theoretical boxes of political entrepreneurship,’ in I. Aflaki, E. Petridou & L. Miles (eds.) Entrepreneurship in the Polis: Understanding Political Entrepreneurship, London: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., pp. 1–16.]Search in Google Scholar
[Platias, A. (1986), High Politics in Small Countries: An Inquiry into the Security Policies of Greece, Israel and Sweden, PhD thesis, Ithaca: Cornell University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Posner, R. A. (2009), The Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory, Boston: Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctv2d7x4n7]Search in Google Scholar
[Pozen, D. (2008), ‘We are all entrepreneurs now,’ Wake Forest Law Review, vol. 43, pp. 283–340.]Search in Google Scholar
[Prasad, N. (2009), ‘Small but smart: Small states in the global system,’ in A. Cooper & T. Shaw (eds.) The Diplomacies of Small States: Between Resilience and Vulnerability, New York: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 41–64. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230246911_310.1057/9780230246911_3]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Prause, G. (2014), ‘Smart specialization and EU eastern innovation cooperation: a conceptual approach,’ Baltic Journal of European Studies, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 3–19. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2014-000110.2478/bjes-2014-0001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Rickli, J. M. (2008), ‘European small states’ military policies after the cold war: from territorial to niche strategies,’ Cambridge Review of International Affairs, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 307–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/0955757080225343510.1080/09557570802253435]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ripsman, N. M.; Taliaferro, J. W. & Lobell, S. E. (2016), Neoclassical Realist Theory of International Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199899234.001.000110.1093/acprof:oso/9780199899234.001.0001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Sarasvathy, S. D. & Venkataraman, S. (2011), ‘Entrepreneurship as method: open questions for an entrepreneurial future,’ Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00425.x10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00425.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Sarri, K.et al. (2012), ‘Introduction to entrepreneurship,’ [in Greek] in K. Sarri & A. Trihopoulou (eds.) Women Entrepreneurship, An Approach to the Greek Reality, Athens: Rosili, pp. 20–39.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schmidl, E. (2001), ‘Small states and international operations,’ in E. Reiter & H. Gartner (eds.) Small States and Alliances, Heidelberg: Physica Verlag, pp. 85–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-13000-1_810.1007/978-3-662-13000-1_8]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Smed, U. T. & Wivel, A. (2017), ‘Vulnerability without capabilities? Small state strategy and the international counter-piracy agenda,’ European Security, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2016.126594110.1080/09662839.2016.1265941]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Solarte-Vásquez, M.C. & Nyman-Metcalf, K. (2017), ‘Smart contracting: a multidisciplinary and proactive approach for the EU digital single market,’ Baltic Journal of European Studies, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 208–246. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2017-001710.1515/bjes-2017-0017]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Súilleabháin, A. Ó. (2014), Small States at the United Nations: Diverse Perspectives, Shared Opportunities, New York: International Peace Institute.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tarp, M. N. & Hansen, J. O. B. (2013), Size and Influence: How Small States Influence Policy Making in Multilateral Arenas, DIIS Working paper, no. 2013: 11, Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies.]Search in Google Scholar
[The World Bank (2018), Small but Smart: Benin and Togo Cooperate to Ensure Water Security. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2018/01/25/small-but-smart-benin-and-togo-cooperate-to-ensure-water-security [accessed 6 Nov 2018]]Search in Google Scholar
[Thorhallsson, B. (2012), ‘Small states in the UN security council: means of influence?’ The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, vol. 7, pp. 135–160. https://doi.org/10.1163/187119112X62845410.1163/187119112X628454]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Tiilikainen, T. (2006), ‘Finland—an EU member with a small state identity,’ Journal of European Integration, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/0703633050048059910.1080/07036330500480599]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Waltz, K. (1979), Theory of International Relations, Reading: Addison-Wesley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wivel, A. (2010), ‘From small states to smart state: devising a strategy for influence in the European Union,’ in R. Steinmetz & A. Wivel (eds.) Small States in Europe: Challenges and Opportunities, Abingdon: Ashgate, pp. 15–30.]Search in Google Scholar