[Ahmadjian, C. L. (2016), ‘Comparative institutional analysis and institutional complexity,’ Journal of Management Studies, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 12–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.1217810.1111/joms.12178]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Argyres, N. & Mayer, J. (2007), ‘Contract design as a firm capability: An integration of learning and transaction cost perspectives,’ Academy of Management Review, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 1060–1077. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.2658573910.5465/AMR.2007.26585739]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ayres, I. & Braithwaite, J. (1992), Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate, Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bagley, C. E. (2005), Winning legally: How legally astute management teams can use the law to create and capture value, Division of Research, Harvard Business School.]Search in Google Scholar
[Baldwin, R. & Black, J. (2008), ‘Really responsive regulation,’ The Modern Law Review, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 59–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2008.00681.x10.1111/j.1468-2230.2008.00681.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Barnett, R. E. (1986), ‘A consent theory of contract,’ Columbia L. Rev., vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 269–321. https://doi.org/10.2307/112270510.2307/1122705]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Barnett, R. E. (1992), ‘Conflicting visions: a critique of Ian Macneil’s relational theory of contract,’ Va. L. Rev., vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 1175–1206. https://doi.org/10.2307/107339510.2307/1073395]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Barocas, S. & Selbst, A. D. (2016), ‘Big data’s disparate impact,’ Cal. L. Rev., vol. 104, no. 3, p. 671. http://doi.org/10.15779/Z38BG3110.15779/Z38BG31]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Berger-Walliser, G.; Barton, T. D. & Haapio, H. (2017), ‘From visualization to legal design: A collaborative and creative process,’ Am. Bus. Law J., vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 347–392. http://doi.org/10.1111/ablj.1210110.1111/ablj.12101]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bilz, K. & Nadler, J. (2013), ‘Law, moral attitudes, and behavioral change,’ in E. Zamir & D. Teichman (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Behavioral Economics & the Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199945474.013.001010.1093/oxfordhb/9780199945474.013.0010]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Braithwaite, J. (2011), ‘The essence of responsive regulation,’ University of British Columbia L. Rev., vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 475–520.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bridoux, F. & Stoelhorst, J. W. (2014), ‘Microfoundations for stakeholder theory: Managing stakeholders with heterogeneous motives,’ Strategic Management Journal, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 107–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.208910.1002/smj.2089]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Böhme, R. & Köpsell, S. (2010). ‘Trained to accept?: a field experiment on consent dialogs,’ in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Atlanta: ACM, pp. 2403–2406. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.175368910.1145/1753326.1753689]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Cafaggi, F. (2007), ‘Self-regulation in European Contract Law,’ European Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 163–218.]Search in Google Scholar
[Campbell, D. (2004), Ian Macneil and the relational theory of contract, Center for Legal Dynamics of Advanced Market Societies (CDAMS) Discussion Paper, Kobe University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Campbell, D. (2004), ‘The incompleteness of our understanding of the law and economics of relational contract,’ Wis. L. Rev., no. 2, pp. 645–678.]Search in Google Scholar
[Christidis, K. & Devetsikiotis, M. (2016), ‘Blockchains and smart contracts for the internet of things,’ IEEE Access, vol. 4, pp. 2292–2303. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2016.256633910.1109/ACCESS.2016.2566339]Search in Google Scholar
[Clack, C. D.; Bakshi, V. A. & Braine, L. (2016), ‘Smart Contract Templates: essential requirements and design options,’ arXiv e-print, arXiv:1612.04496.]Search in Google Scholar
[Commonwealth of Australia (2000), Industry Self-Regulation in Consumer Markets, Report commissioned by the Australian Ministry of Finances and Regulation, August 2000. Retrieved from https://archive.treasury.gov.au/documents/1131/HTML/docshell.asp?URL=02_chap1.asp [accessed Oct 2017]]Search in Google Scholar
[Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, EU Regulatory Fitness, COM/2012/746 final, Strasbourg, 12.12.2012. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/smart-regulation/better_regulation/documents/com_2013_en.pdf [accessed Oct 2017]]Search in Google Scholar
[Communication from the Commission. Action plan ‘Simplifying and improving the regulatory environment’, COM/2002/0278 final. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52002DC0278 [accessed Oct 2017]]Search in Google Scholar
[Cortés, P., ed. (2016), The New Regulatory Framework for Consumer Dispute Resolution, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198766353.001.000110.1093/acprof:oso/9780198766353.001.0001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Crawford, K. & Calo, R. (2016), ‘There is a blind spot in AI research,’ Nature, vol. 538, pp. 311–313. https://doi.org/10.1038/53831110.1038/538311]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Cruz, C. O. & Marques, R. C. (2013), ‘Flexible contracts to cope with uncertainty in public–private partnerships,’ International Journal of Project Management, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.09.00610.1016/j.ijproman.2012.09.006]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Dalhuisen, J. H. (2013), Dalhuisen on Transnational Comparative, Commercial, Financial and Trade Law Volume 2: Contract and Movable Property Law, London & New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[De Cremer, D.; Nguyen, B. & Simkin, L. (2016), ‘The integrity challenge of the Internet-of-Things (IoT): on understanding its dark side,’ Journal of Marketing Management, vol. 32, nos. 1–2, pp. 1–14. http://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2016.124751710.1080/0267257X.2016.1247517]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[De Matos, E.; Amaral, L. A. & Hessel, F. (2017), ‘Context-aware systems: technologies and challenges in Internet of Everything environments,’ in J. Batalla, G. Mastorakis, C. Mavromoustakis & E. Pallis (eds.) Beyond the Internet of Things, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50758-3_110.1007/978-3-319-50758-3_1]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[DiMaggio, P. & Powell, W. (1983), ‘The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organisational fields,’ American Sociological Review, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/209510110.2307/2095101]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[DiMatteo, L. A. (2010), ‘Strategic contracting: Contract law as a source of competitive advantage,’ American Business Law Journal, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 727–794. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1714.2010.01108.x10.1111/j.1744-1714.2010.01108.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (‘Directive on electronic commerce’), 17.07.2000. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32000L0031:en:HTML [accessed Oct 2017]]Search in Google Scholar
[Ebersold, K. & Glass, R. (2016), ‘The Internet of Things: a cause for ethnical concern,’ Issues in Information Systems, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 145–151.]Search in Google Scholar
[EESC (2017), ‘EU Digital Market: consumer protection must be top priority,’ European Economic and Social Committee. Retrieved from http://www.eesc.europa.eu/?i=portal.en.press-releases.41899 [accessed Oct 2017]]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission (2001), ‘Mandelkern Group on Better Regulation,’ Final Report. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/smart-regulation/better_regulation/documents/mandelkern_report.pdf [accessed Oct 2017]]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission (2015a), Review of EU Consumer Law (Fitness Check), Consumers. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/consumer_rights/review/index_en.htm [accessed Oct 2017]]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission (2015b), ‘Shaping the Digital Single Market,’ Digital Single Market Strategy, 25.03.2015. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/digital-single-market [accessed Oct 2015]]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission (2016), ‘Alternative and online dispute resolution (ADR/ODR),’ Consumers. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/solving_consumer_disputes/non-judicial_redress/adr-odr/index_en.htm [accessed Oct 2017]]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission (2017), Results of the Fitness Check of consumer and marketing law and of the evaluation of the Consumer Rights Directive, Justice and Consumers, 29.05.2017. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/just/item-detail.cfm?item_id=59332 [accessed Oct 2017]]Search in Google Scholar
[Fairfield, J. (2014), ‘Smart contracts, Bitcoin bots, and consumer protection,’ Wash. & Lee L. Rev. Online, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 35–299.]Search in Google Scholar
[Feigenson, N. (2014), ‘The visual in law: Some problems for legal theory,’ Law, Culture and the Humanities, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/174387211142112610.1177/1743872111421126]Search in Google Scholar
[Foss, N. J. & Klein, P. G. (2016), ‘Reflections on the 2016 Nobel Memorial Prize for contract theory,’ Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 167–180. https://doi.org/10.23941/ejpe.v9i2.23410.23941/ejpe.v9i2.234]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Freeman, R. E. (1994), ‘The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions,’ Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 409–421. https://doi.org/10.2307/385734010.2307/3857340]Search in Google Scholar
[Goodin, R. E. (1998), The Theory of Institutional Design, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gunningham, N.; Grabosky, P. & Sinclair, D. (1998), Smart Regulation: Designing Environmental Policy, Oxford: Clarendon Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gunningham, N. & Sinclair, D. (1999), ‘Designing smart regulation,’ in Economic Aspects of Environmental Compliance Assurance, OECD Global Forum on Sustainable Development.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hesselink, M. W. (2015), ‘Democratic contract law,’ European Review of Contract Law, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 81–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/ercl-2015-000610.1515/ercl-2015-0006]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hollander-Blumoff, R. (2016), ‘Fairness beyond the adversary system: procedural justice norms for legal negotiation,’ Fordham L. Rev., vol. 85, no. 5, pp. 2081–2095.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hussain, F. (2017), ‘Internet of Everything,’ in Internet of Things: Building Blocks and Business Models, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55405-1_110.1007/978-3-319-55405-1_1]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[IACCM (n.d.), International Association for Contract & Commercial Management [Home page]. Retrieved from http://www.iaccm.com/ [accessed Oct 2017]]Search in Google Scholar
[Ivens, B. S. (2002), ‘Governance norms in relational exchange: What we do know and what we do not know,’ in Proceedings of the 18th Annual IMP Conference, vol. 5, no. 7, Dijon: IMP.]Search in Google Scholar
[Izmalkov, S. & Sonin, K. (2017), ‘Basics of contract theory,’ Voprosy ekonomiki, no. 1.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jaakkola, K. (2004), ‘A way to successful and strategic contract management,’ Nordnet-International Project Management Conference, Finland.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jackson, D. (2016), ‘Human-centered legal tech: integrating design in legal education,’ The Law Teacher, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 82–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2016.114646810.1080/03069400.2016.1146468]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kähler, L. (2013), ‘Contract-management duties as a new regulatory device,’ Law & Contemp. Probs., vol. 76, pp. 89–103. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.228568910.2139/ssrn.2285689]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kar, R. B. (2016), ‘Contract as empowerment,’ The University of Chicago Law Review, vol. 82, pp. 759–834.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kerikmäe, T.; Hamulak, O. & Chochia, A. (2016), ‘A historical study of contemporary human rights: deviation or extinction?’ Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 98−115. https://doi.org/10.11590/abhps.2016.2.0610.11590/abhps.2016.2.06]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kerikmäe, T. & Rull, A., eds. (2016), The Future of Law and eTechnologies, Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26896-510.1007/978-3-319-26896-5]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kerikmäe, T. & Särav, S. (2015), ‘Legal impediments in the EU to new technologies on the example of e-residency, Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 71–90.]Search in Google Scholar
[Keskitalo, P. (2006), Contracts+Risks+Management=Contractual Risk Management? PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø, Norway.]Search in Google Scholar
[Koulu, R. (2016), ‘Blockchains and online dispute resolution: smart contracts as an alternative to enforcement,’ Scripted: A Journal of Law, Technology & Society, vol. 13, no. 1. http://doi.org/10.2966/scrip.130116.4010.2966/scrip.130116.40]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Lumineau, F. & Malhotra, D. (2011), ‘Shadow of the contract: How contract structure shapes interfirm dispute resolution,’ Strategic Management Journal, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 532–555. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.89010.1002/smj.890]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Macaulay, S. (1963), ‘Non-contractual relations in business: A preliminary study,’ American Sociological Review, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 55–67. https://doi.org/10.2307/209045810.2307/2090458]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Macher, J. T. & Richman, B. D. (2008), ‘Transaction cost economics: An assessment of empirical research in the social sciences,’ Business and Politics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–63. https://doi.org/10.2202/1469-3569.121010.2202/1469-3569.1210]Search in Google Scholar
[Mack, E. (1981), ‘In defense of ‘Unbridled’ freedom of contract,’ American Journal of Economics and Sociology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1981.tb01366.x10.1111/j.1536-7150.1981.tb01366.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Macneil, I. R. (1980), The New Social Contract: An Inquiry into Modern Contractual Relations, New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.10.2307/1288310]Search in Google Scholar
[Macneil, I. R. (1983), ‘Values in contract: internal and external,’ Nw. UL Rev., vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 340–418.]Search in Google Scholar
[Macneil, I. R. (1999), ‘Relational contract theory: challenges and queries,’ Nw. UL Rev., vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 877–907.]Search in Google Scholar
[Malerba, F. (2002), ‘Sectoral systems of innovation and production,’ Research Policy, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00139-110.1016/S0048-7333(01)00139-1]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Marshall, K.; Picou, S. & Schlichtmann, J. R. (2004), ‘Technological disasters, litigation stress, and the use of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms,’ Law & Policy, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 289–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0265-8240.2004.00013.x10.1111/j.0265-8240.2004.00013.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[McLaughlin, J.; McLaughlin, J. & Elaydi, R. (2014), ‘Ian Macneil and relational contract theory: evidence of impact. Journal of Management History,’ vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 44–61. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMH-05-2012-004210.1108/JMH-05-2012-0042]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Menkel-Meadow, C. (2013), ‘Crisis in legal education or the other things law students should be learning and doing,’ McGeorge L. Rev., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 133–160.]Search in Google Scholar
[Menkel-Meadow, C. (2017), Dispute Processing and Conflict Resolution: Theory, Practice and Policy, Ashgate: Routledge.10.4324/9781315257600]Search in Google Scholar
[Norton Rose Fulbright (2016), ‘Norton Rose Fulbright releases 2016 Litigation Trends Annual Survey’, 15 September. Retrieved from http://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/news/142350/norton-rose-fulbright-releases-2016-litigation-trends-annual-survey [accessed Oct 2017]]Search in Google Scholar
[Nylén, D. & Holmström, J. (2015), ‘Digital innovation strategy: A framework for diagnosing and improving digital product and service innovation,’ Business Horizons, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2014.09.00110.1016/j.bushor.2014.09.001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Nyman-Metcalf, K. & Täks, E. (2013), ‘Simplifying the law—can ICT help us?’ International Journal of Law and Information Technology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 239–268. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eat00310.1093/ijlit/eat003]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on ‘The proactive law approach: a further step towards better regulation at EU level,’ 2009/C 175/05, 28.7.2009. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52008IE1905 [accessed Oct 2017]]Search in Google Scholar
[Passera, S. (2012), ‘Enhancing contract usability and user experience through visualization—an experimental evaluation,’ in Information visualisation (iv): 2012 16th international conference on Information Visualisation, IEEE, pp. 376–382. https://doi.org/10.1109/IV.2012.6910.1109/IV.2012.69]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Passera, S. & Haapio, H. (2013), ‘Transforming contracts from legal rules to usercentered communication tools: a human-information interaction challenge,’ Communication Design Quarterly Review, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1145/2466489.246649810.1145/2466489.2466498]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Poppo, L. & Zenger, T. (2002), ‘Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements?’ Strategic Management Journal, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 707–725. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.24910.1002/smj.249]Search in Google Scholar
[Posner, R. A. (2005), ‘The law and economics of contract interpretation,’ Tex. L. Rev., vol. 83, pp. 1581–2185.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rindova, V. P. & Kotha, S. (2001), ‘Continuous “morphing”: Competing through dynamic capabilities, form, and function,’ Academy of Management Journal, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1263–1280. https://doi.org/10.2307/306940010.2307/3069400]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Roach, M. (2016), ‘Toward a new language of legal drafting,’ J. High Tech. L., vol. 17, pp. 43–177.]Search in Google Scholar
[Romzek, B. S. & Johnston, J. M. (2002), ‘Effective contract implementation and management: A preliminary model,’ Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 423–453. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a00354110.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003541]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Rouvroy, A. & Stiegler, B. (2016), ‘The digital regime of truth: from the algorithmic governmentality to a new rule of law,’ transl. by A. Nony & B. Dillet, La Deleuziana: Online Journal of Philosophy, vol. 3, pp. 6–27.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2006), ‘Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will?’ Journal of Personality, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 1557–1586. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00420.x10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00420.x17083658]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Schulte-Nölke, H. (2015), ‘The brave new world of EU consumer law—without consumers, or even without law?’ Journal of European Consumer and Market Law, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 135–139. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.265707110.2139/ssrn.2657071]Search in Google Scholar
[Schwartz, A. & Scott, R. E. (2010), ‘Contract interpretation redux,’ The Yale Law Journal, vol. 109, no. 5, pp. 926–964.]Search in Google Scholar
[Solarte-Vasquez, M. C.; Järv, N. & Nyman-Metcalf, K. (2016), ‘Usability factors in transactional design and smart contracting,’ in The Future of Law and eTechnologies, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 149–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26896-5_810.1007/978-3-319-26896-5_8]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Solarte-Vasquez, M. C. & Rungi, M. (2017, forthcoming), ‘Perceptions on collaboration affecting the viability of the Smart Contracting approach,’ Journal of Management and Change.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stephenson, P. (2013), ‘Twenty years of multi-level governance: “Where does it come from? What is it? Where is it going?”,’ Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 817–837. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.78181810.1080/13501763.2013.781818]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Stinchcombe, A. L. (1985), ‘Contracts as hierarchical documents,’ in A. Stinchcombe & C. Heimer (eds.) Organization Theory and Project Management, Oslo: N.U. Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stoker, G. (1998), ‘Governance as theory: five propositions,’ International Social Science Journal, vol. 50, no. 155, pp. 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.0010610.1111/1468-2451.00106]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Susskind, R. & Susskind, D. (2015), The Future of the Professions: How Technology will Transform the Work of Human Experts, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198713395.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Szabo, N. (1997), ‘The idea of smart contracts,’ Nick Szabo’s Papers and Concise Tutorials, 6.]Search in Google Scholar
[Teece, D. J. (2007), ‘Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance,’ Strategic Management Journal, vol. 28, no. 13, pp. 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.64010.1002/smj.640]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Termeer, C. J.; Dewulf, A.; Breeman, G. & Stiller, S. J. (2015), ‘Governance capabilities for dealing wisely with wicked problems,’ Administration & Society, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 680–710. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539971246919510.1177/0095399712469195]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Tufte, E. R. & Graves-Morris, P. R. (1983), The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, vol. 2, no. 9, Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Van Ham, P. (2013), European Integration and the Postmodern Condition: Governance, Democracy, Identity, Abingdon: Routledge.10.4324/9780203453193]Search in Google Scholar
[Van Marrewijk, M. (2003), ‘Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion,’ Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:102333121224710.1023/A:1023331212247]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Van Oosterhout, J. H.; Heugens, P. P. & Kaptein, M. (2006), ‘The internal morality of contracting: Advancing the contractualist endeavor in business ethics,’ Academy of Management Review, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 521–539. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2006.2131891510.5465/AMR.2006.21318915]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Voss, J. P.; Bauknecht, D. & Kemp, R., eds. (2006), Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/978184720026610.4337/9781847200266]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Voß, J. P., & Bornemann, B. (2011), ‘The politics of reflexive governance: challenges for designing adaptive management and transition management,’ Ecology and Society, vol. 16, no. 2. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04051-16020910.5751/ES-04051-160209]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Wagner, B. (2016), Draft Report on the Human Rights Dimensions of Algorithms. Committee of Experts on Internet Intermediaries, Council of Europe, MSINET (2016)06.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wilhelmsson, T. (2004), ‘Varieties of welfarism in European contract law,’ European Law Journal, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 712–733. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2004.00240.x10.1111/j.1468-0386.2004.00240.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Williamson, O. E. (1979), ‘Transaction-cost economics: the governance of contractual relations,’ The Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 233–261. https://doi.org/10.1086/46694210.1086/466942]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Williamson, O. E. (1981), ‘The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach,’ American Journal of Sociology, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 548–577. https://doi.org/10.1086/22749610.1086/227496]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Zahra, S. A. & George, G. (2002), ‘The net-enabled business innovation cycle and the evolution of dynamic capabilities,’ Information Systems Research, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 147–150. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.2.147.9010.1287/isre.13.2.147.90]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ziefle, M. (2002), ‘The influence of user expertise and phone complexity on performance, ease of use and learnability of different mobile phones,’ Behaviour & Information Technology, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/014492902100004853810.1080/0144929021000048538]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar