Topographic attributes and ecological indicator values in assessing the ground-floor vegetation patterns

Angiolini C., Nucci A., Frigniani F. & Landi M. 2011. Using multivariate analyses to assess effects of fluvial type on plant species distribution in a Mediterranean river. Wetlands 31: 167-177. http://dx.doi/org/10.1007/s13157-010-0118-710.1007/s13157-010-0118-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Balkovič J., Kollár J. & Šimonovič V. 2012. Experience with using Ellenberg’s R indicator values in Slovakia: oli-gotrophic and mesotrophic submontane broad-leaved forests. Biologia, sec. Botany 67: 474-482. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/s11756-012-0027-810.2478/s11756-012-0027-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bergès L., Gègout J.-C. & Franc A. 2006. Can understory vegetation accurately predict site index? A comparative study using floristic and abiotic indices in sessile oak (Quercus petraea Liebl.) stands in northern France. Ann. For. Sci. 63: 31-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/forest:200509110.1051/forest:2005091Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Beven K. & Kirkby N. 1979. A physically based variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydro. Sci. Bull. 24: 43-69.10.1080/02626667909491834Search in Google Scholar

Burrough P. A. & McDonell R.A. 1998. Principles of Geographical Information Systems. 352 pp. Oxford University Press, New York.Search in Google Scholar

Crosti R., de Nicola C., Fanelli G. & Testi A. 2010. Ecological classification of beech woodlands in the Central Apennine through frequency distribution of Ellenberg indicators. Ann. Bot. n.s., 0: 97-104. Available: http://ojs.uniroma1.it/index.php/Annalidibotanica/article/view/9112/9052.pdf [01.06.2017].Search in Google Scholar

Cousins S. A. O. & Lindborg R. 2004. Assessing changes in plant distribution patterns – indicator species versus plant functional types. Ecol. Ind. 4: 17-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2003.11.00210.1016/j.ecolind.2003.11.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Czarnecka B. & Chabudziński Ł. 2011. Vegetation landscapes of a small-scale river valley in the light of the GIS analysis. Probl. Landscape Ecol. 20: 293-299.Search in Google Scholar

Czarnecka B. & Chabudziński Ł. 2014. Assessment of flora diversity in a minor river valley using ecological indicator values, Geographical Information Systems and Digital Elevation Models. Cent. Eur. J. Biol. 9: 220-231. http://dx.doi/org/10.2478/s11535-013-0263-010.2478/s11535-013-0263-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Czarnecka B. & Janiec B. 2001. Factors affecting the distribution and properties of forest soils in river breaks of Roztocze. Acta Agrophys. 50: 81-93.Search in Google Scholar

Czarnecka B. & Janiec B. 2002. Przełomy rzeczne Roztocza jako modelowe obiekty w edukacji ekologicznej. 232 pp.+photos. Wyd. UMCS, Lublin.Search in Google Scholar

Czarnecka B. & Janiec B. 2006. Krajobrazy roślinne jako wyraz naturalnych i antropogenicznych przemian środowiska małych dolin rzecznych Roztocza. Probl. Ecol. Krajobr. 16: 171-184Search in Google Scholar

Czarnecka B., Moszyńska U. & Fita K. 2001. Zbiorowiska leśne doliny Sopotu w granicach rezerwatu Czartowe Pole: stan aktualny i tendencje dynamiczne. Parki Nar. Rez. Przyr. 20: 63-87.Search in Google Scholar

Czarnecka B., Rysiak A. & Chabudziński Ł. 2015. How a river course influences the species richness and ecological requirements on two opposite riverbanks in a forest area. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 84: 13-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.5586/asbp.2014.03210.5586/asbp.2014.032Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Diekmann M. 2003. Species indicator values as an important tool in applied plant ecology – a review. Basic Appl. Ecol. 4: 493-506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1078/1439-1791-0018510.1078/1439-1791-00185Search in Google Scholar

Dorner B., Lertzman K. & Fall J. 2002. Landscape pattern in topographically complex landscapes: issues and techniques for analysis. Landscape Ecol. 17: 729-743. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:102294401966510.1023/A:1022944019665Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Ellenberg H. 1974. Zeigerwerte der Gefäßpfanzen Mittel-europas. Scr. Geobot. 9: 9-160.Search in Google Scholar

Ellenberg H., Weber H. E., Dül R., Wirth V., Werner W. & Paulissen D. 1992. Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen Mitteleuropas. Scr. Geobot. 18: 1-248.Search in Google Scholar

Ertsen A. C. D., Alkemade J. R. M. & Wassen M. J. 1998. Calibrating Ellenberg indicator values for moisture, acidity, nutrient availability and salinity in the Netherlands. Plant Ecol. 135: 113-124.Search in Google Scholar

ESRI 2003. Arc View spatial analyst. Advanced spatial analysis using raster and vector data. Environmental System Research Institute, Redlands.Search in Google Scholar

Evans J. S., Oakleaf J., Cushman S. A. & Theobald D. 2014. An ArcGIS toolbox for surface gradient and geomorphometric modeling. Version 2.0-0. Available: http://evansmurphy.wix.com/evansspatial.pdf. [02.12.2015].Search in Google Scholar

Fijałkowski D. 1973. Zespoły trawiasto-turzycowe rezerwatu krajobrazowego Czartowe Pole. Ann. UMCS, s. C, 28: 145-164.Search in Google Scholar

Feldmeyer-Christe E., Ecker K., Küchler M., Graf U. & Waser L. 2007. Improving predictive mapping in Swiss mire ecosystems through re-calibration of indicator values. Appl. Veg. Sci. 10: 183-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-109X.2007.tb00516.x10.1111/j.1654-109X.2007.tb00516.xSearch in Google Scholar

Fitterer J. L., Nelson T. A., Coops N. C. & Wulder M. A. 2012. Modelling the ecosystem indicators of British Columbia using Earth observation data and terrain indices. Ecol. Indicat. 20: 151-162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.02410.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.024Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Francis R. A., Tibaldeschi P. & McDougall L. 2008. Fluvially-deposited large wood and riparian plant diversity Wetland Ecol. Manage. 16: 371-382. http://dx.doi/org/10.1007/s11273-007-9074-210.1007/s11273-007-9074-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Franklin J. 1995. Predictive vegetation mapping: geographic modelling of biospatial patterns in relation to environmental gradients. Progress Phys. Geogr. 19: 474-499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03091333950190040310.1177/030913339501900403Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Fu P. & Rich P. M. 2002. A geometric solar radiation model with applications in agriculture and forestry. Comp. Electr. Agricult. 37: 25-35.10.1016/S0168-1699(02)00115-1Search in Google Scholar

Gégout J.-C., Hervé J. -Ch., Houllier F. & Pierrat J.-C. 2003. Prediction of forest soil nutrient status using vegetation. J. Veg. Sci. 14: 55-62.10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02127.xSearch in Google Scholar

Godefroid S. & Dana E. D. 2007. Can Ellenberg’s indicator values for Mediterranean plants be used outside their region of definition? J. Biogeogr. 34: 62–68.10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01582.xSearch in Google Scholar

Grabs T., Seibert J., Bishop K. & Laudon H. 2009. Modeling spatial patterns of saturated areas: A comparison of the topographic wetness index and a dynamic distributed model. J. Hydrol. 373: 15-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.03.03110.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.03.031Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hengl T. 2006. Finding the right pixel size. Comp. Geosci. 32: 1283-1298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2005.11.00810.1016/j.cageo.2005.11.008Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hutchinson M. F. 1989. A new procedure for gridding elevation and stream line data with automatic removal of spurious pits. J. Hydrol. 106: 211-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(89)90073-510.1016/0022-1694(89)90073-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Janiec B. & Czarnecka B. 2001. The „Czartowe Pole” landscape reserve in Roztocze (SE Poland) in the light of interdisciplinary research. Ekol. (Bratislava) 20, Suppl. 4: 222-232.Search in Google Scholar

Jolley R. L., Lockaby B. G. & Cavalcanti G. G. 2010. Changes in riparian forest composition along a sedimentation rate gradient. Plant Ecol. 210: 317-330. http://dx.doi/org/10.1007/s11258-010-9759-010.1007/s11258-010-9759-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kopecký M. & Čižkova Š. 2010. Using topographic wetness index in vegetation ecology: does the algorithm matter? Appl. Veg. Sci. 13: 450-459. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-109X.2010.01083.x10.1111/j.1654-109X.2010.01083.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kraak M. J. & Ormeling F. 2003. Cartography. Visualisation of geospatial data. 205 pp. Longnam Group, UK.Search in Google Scholar

Kumar L., Skidmore A. K. & Knowles E. 1997. Modelling topographic variation in solar radiation in a GIS environment. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 11: 475-497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13658819724226610.1080/136588197242266Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Lawesson J. E., Fosaa A. M. & Olsen E. 2003. Calibration of Ellenberg indicator values for the Faroe Islands, Appl. Veg. Sci. 6: 53-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-109X.2003.tb00564.x10.1111/j.1654-109X.2003.tb00564.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Lepš J. & Šmilauer P. 2003. Multivariate analysis of ecological data using Canoco. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511615146Search in Google Scholar

Lyon J. & Sagers C. L. 1998. Structure of herbaceous plant assemblages in a forested riparian landscape, Plant Ecol. 138: 1-16.Search in Google Scholar

Matuszkiewicz J. 1977. Przegląd fitosocjologiczny zbiorowisk leśnych Polski. Cz. 4. Bory świerkowe i jodłowe. Phytocoenosis­ 6(3): 151-227.Search in Google Scholar

Matuszkiewicz W. 2008. Przewodnik do oznaczania zbiorowisk­roślinnych Polski. In: J. B. Faliński (ed.). Vademecum Geobotanicum 3, 537 pp. Wyd. Nauk. PWN, Warszawa.Search in Google Scholar

Mendas A. 2010. The contribution of the digital elevation models and geographic information systems in a watershed hydrologic research. Appl. Geomatics 2: 33-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12518-010-0019-810.1007/s12518-010-0019-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Mirek Z., Piękoś-Mirkowa H., Zając A. & Zając M. 2002. Flowering plants and pteridophytes of Poland. A checklist. In: Z. Mirek (ed.). Biodiversity of Poland, 1, 442 pp. W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków.Search in Google Scholar

Moelsund J. E., Arge L., Bøcher P., Dalgaard T., Odgaard M. V, Nygaard B. & Svenning J-Ch. 2013. Topographically controlled soil moisture is the primary driver of local vegetation patterns across a lowland region. Ecosphere 4: 1-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/ES13-00134.110.1890/ES13-00134.1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Moore D. M., Lees B. G. & Davey S. M. 1991. A new method for predicting vegetation distributions using decision tree analysis in a geographic information systems. Environ. Manage. 15: 59–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF0239383810.1007/BF02393838Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Petřik P. & Wild J. 2006. Environmental correlates of the patterns of plant distribution at the meso-scale: a case study from Northern Bohemia (Czech Republic). Preslia 78: 211-234.Search in Google Scholar

Pfeffer K., Pebesma E. J. & Burrough P. A. 2003. Mapping alpine vegetation using vegetation observations and topographic attributes. Landscape Ecol. 18: 759-776: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:LAND.0000014471.78787.d010.1023/B:.0000014471.78787.d0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Sarr D. A., Hibbs D. E. & Huston M. A. 2005. A hierarchical perspective of plant diversity. Quart. Rev. Biol. 80: 187-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/43305810.1086/43305816075870Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Schaffers A. P. & Sýkora K. V. 2000. Reliability of Ellenberg indicator values for moisture, nitrogen and soil reaction: a comparison with field measurements, J. Veg. Sci. 11: 225-244. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/323680210.2307/3236802Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Seidling W. 2005. Ground floor vegetation assessment within the intensive (Level II) monitoring of forest ecosystems in Germany: chances and challenges. Eur. J. Forest Res. 124: 301-312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10342-005-0087-110.1007/s10342-005-0087-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Seidling W. & Fischer R. 2008. Deviances from expected Ellenberg indicator values fornitrogen are related to N throughfall deposition in forests. Ecol. Indic. 8: 639-646. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2007.09.00410.1016/j.ecolind.2007.09.004Search in Google Scholar

Sørensen R., Zinko U. & Seibert J. 2006. On the calculations of the topographic wetness index evaluation of different methods based on field observation. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 10: 101-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-10-101-200610.5194/hess-10-101-2006Search in Google Scholar

Tappeiner U., Tasser E. & Tappeiner G. 1998. Modelling vegetation patterns using natural and anthropogenic influence factors: preliminary experience with a GIS based model applied to an Alpine area. Ecol. Model. 113: 225-237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(98)00145-810.1016/S0304-3800(98)00145-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Ter Braak C. J. F. & Šmilauer P. 2002. CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows. User’s guide: software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). 491 pp. Microcomputer Power, Ithaca.Search in Google Scholar

Urbański J. 2012. GIS w badaniach przyrodniczych. Available: http://ocean.ug.edu.pl/~oceju/centrumGIS/dane/GIS_w_badaniach_przyrodniczych_12_2.pdf [01.06.2017].Search in Google Scholar

van Dobben H. F., ter Braak C. J. F. & Dirkse G. M. 1999. Undergrowth as a biomonitor for deposition of nitrogen and acidity in pine forest. Forest Ecol. Manage. 114: 83-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00383-110.1016/S0378-1127(98)00383-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Wamelink G. W. W., van Dobben H. F. & van der Eerden L. J. M. 1998. Experimental calibration of Ellenberg’s indicator value for nitrogen. Envir. Polution 102, S1: 371-375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(98)80056-010.1016/S0269-7491(98)80056-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Wamelink G. W. W., Joosten V., van Dobben H. F. & Berendse F. 2002. Validity of Ellenberg indicator values judged from physico-chemical field measurements, J. Veg. Sci. 13: 269-278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2002.tb02047.x10.1111/j.1654-1103.2002.tb02047.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Werner K. J. & Zedler J. B. 2002. How sedge meadows, soils, microtopography, and vegetation respond to sedimentation, Wetlands 22: 451-466. http://dx.doi/org/10.1672/0277-5212(2002)022[0451:HSMSMA] 2.0.CO;210.1672/0277-5212(2002)022[0451:HSMSMA]2.0.CO;2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Wilson J. P. & G allant J. C. (eds). 2000. Terrain analysis. Principles and applications. 520 pp. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Search in Google Scholar

Wilson S. McG., Pyatt D. G., Malcolm D. C. & Connolly T. 2001. The use of ground vegetation and humus type as indicators of soil nutrient regime for an ecological site classification of British forests Forest. Ecol. Manage. 140: 101-116.10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00318-2Search in Google Scholar

Zarzycki K., Trzcińska-Tacik H., Różański W., Szeląg Z., Wołek J. & Korzeniak U. 2002. Ecological indicator values of vascular plants of Poland. In: Z. Mirek (ed.). Biodiversity of Poland, 2, 183 pp. W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków.Search in Google Scholar