[Adamik Tamás. 2012. Cicero összes retorikaelméleti művei. [Cicero’s Complete Works on the Theory of Rhetorics.] Bratislava: Kalligram.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1986. “Beszédelméleti jegyzetek.” [“Notes on the Theory of Speech.”] In A beszéd és a valóság [Speech and Reality], trans. Orosz István, 517–547. Bratislava: Madách.]Search in Google Scholar
[Beasley, Mary Fowler. 1973. “It’s What You Don’t Say: Omissio in Cicero’s Speeches.” Southern Speech Communication Journal vol.39. no. 1: 11–20.10.1080/10417947309372212]Search in Google Scholar
[Benyovszky, Krisztián. 2006. “Az elhallgatás alakzatai.” [“The Figures of Speech of Reticence.”] Kalligram. vol. 15. no. 11-12.]Search in Google Scholar
[http://www.kalligram.eu/Kalligram/Archivum/2006/XV.-evf.-2006.-november-december/KOeLTESZET-ES-RETORIKA/Az-elhallgatas-alakzatai (Last accessed 19 April 2016)]Search in Google Scholar
[Cicero, Marcus Tullius. 1935. De amicitia. [On Friendship.] Ed. and trans. William Armistead Falconer. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cicero, Marcus Tullius. 1978 [1909]. In Pisonem. [Against Piso.] Ed. and trans. Albert Curtius Clark. Oxford: Calderon.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cicero, Marcus Tullius. 1990. De oratore. [On the Orator.] Ed. Augustus S. Wilkins. Hildesheim, Zürich, New York: Georg Olms Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cicero, Marcus Tullius. 2011. Cicero Against Verres, 2.1.53-86. Trans. Ingo Gildenhard. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cicero, Quintus Tullius. 2002. Handbook of Electioneering. Ed. and trans. Shackleton Bailey, David Roy. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/DLCL.quintus_tullius_cicero-handbook_electioneering.2002]Search in Google Scholar
[Cornificius, Quintus. 1978 [1954]. Rhetorica ad Herennium. [Rhetoric for Herennius.] Trans. Hary Caplan. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[David, Jean-Michel et al. 1973. “Le ‘Commentariolum Petitionis’ de Quintus Cicéron.” [“The ‘Commentariolum Petitionis’ of Quintus Cicero.”] ANRW vol. I no. 3: 239–277.]Search in Google Scholar
[Haury, Auguste. 1951. L’ironie et l’humor chez Ciceron. [Irony and Humour at Cicero.] Leiden: Brill.]Search in Google Scholar
[Németh, György. 2005. “Hogyan nyerjük meg a választásokat?” [“How to Win the Elections?”] Médiakutató no. 1 http://www.mediakutato.hu/cikk/2005_01_tavasz/01_hogyan_nyerjuk (Last accessed 19 April 2016)]Search in Google Scholar
[Nisbet, Robert George Murdoch. 1961. Cicero: In L. Calpurnium Pisonem Oratio. [Against Piso.] Oxford: Calderon Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nótári Tamás. 2006. Hogyan nyerjük meg a választásokat? Quintus Tullius Cicero: A hivatalra pályázók kézikönyve. [How to Win the Elections? The Handbook of Those Who Seek to Obtain an Office.] Trans. Tamás Nótári. Ed. György Németh. Szeged: Lectum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pap, Levente. 2015. Cicero: Piso Ellen. [Cicero Against Piso.] Cluj-Napoca: Erdélyi Múzeum Egyesület.]Search in Google Scholar
[Quintilianus, Marcus Fabius. 1920. Institutio Oratoria. [Institutes of Oratory.] Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sartre, Jean Paul. 1969. Mi az irodalom? [What Is Literature?] Trans. Árpád Vígh. Budapest: Gondolat.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shackleton Bailey, D. R. 2002. Cicero. Letters to Quintus and Brutus – To Octavian – Invectives – Handbook of Electioneering. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sumner, Graham Vincent. 1973. The Orators in Cicero’s Brutus: Prosopography and Chronology. Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781487574024]Search in Google Scholar
[Voinea, Alexandru Lucian. 2014. “Communication and Manipulation to Cicero.” Journal of Romanian Literary Studies no. 5: 218–227.]Search in Google Scholar
