[Askari, Kaveh. 2014. Making Movies into Art: Picture Craft from the Magic Lantern to Early Hollywood. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.5040/9781838711436]Search in Google Scholar
[Balázs, Béla. 2010 [1924/1930]. Early Film Theory: Visible Man and the Spirit of Film. Oxford, New York: Berghahn.]Search in Google Scholar
[Blom, Ivo. 2001. Quo Vadis? From Painting to Cinema and Everything in Between. In La decima musa: Il cinema e le altre arti [The Tenth Muse: Cinema and other Arts], eds. Leonardo Quaresima and Laura Vichi, 281–292. Udine: Forum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bottomore, Stephen. 1996. ‘Nine Days’ Wonder’: Early Cinema and its Sceptics. In Cinema: the Beginnings and the Future, ed. Christopher Williams, 135–149. London: University of Westminster Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brewster, Ben and Lea Jacobs. 1997. Theatre to Cinema: Stage Pictorialism and the Early Feature Film. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brockhaus Konversations-Lexikon. 1902. Vol. 10. Leipzig, Berlin, Wien: Brockhaus Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[Curtis, Scott. 2015. The Shape of Spectatorship: Art, Science, and Early Cinema in Germany. New York: Columbia University Press.10.7312/columbia/9780231134033.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[De Vry, Henry. 1909. Dunkelnummern: eine fachtechnische Plauderei [Dark Acts: a Technical Talk]. Das Organ vol. 48: 6–8.]Search in Google Scholar
[Delluc, Louis. 1988 [1917]. Beauty in the Cinema. In French Film Theory and Criticism: A History. Anthology 1907–1939. Vol. I: 1907–1929, ed. Richard Abel, 137–139. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Diederichs, Helmut H. 2001. Frühgeschichte deutscher Filmtheorie. Ihre Entstehung und Entwicklung bis zum Ersten Weltkrieg [History of Early German Film Theory until WWI]. http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/4924. Last accessed 11. 09. 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Diederichs, Helmut H., ed. 2004. Geschichte der Filmtheorie. Kunsttheoretische Texte von Méliès bis Arnheim [History of Film Theory: Art Theoretical Texts from Méliès to Arnheim]. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Doane, Mary Ann. 2002. The Emergence of Cinematic Time: Modernity, Contingency, the Archive. Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctv1pnc1jq]Search in Google Scholar
[Epstein, Jean. 1986 [1921]. The Senses I (b). In French Film Theory and Criticism: A History/Anthology 1907–1939. Vol. I: 1907–1929, ed. Richard Abel, 241–246. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Faulk, Barry, J. 2004. Music Hall and Modernity: The Late-Victorian Discovery of Popular Culture. Athens: Ohio University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Feuillade, Louis. 1910. Le Film Esthétique [The Aesthetic Film]. Ciné-journal vol. 92: 19.]Search in Google Scholar
[Galt, Rosalind. 2011. Pretty: Film and the Decorative Image. New York: Columbia University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gonzaga Urbina, Luis. 2008 [1896]. Le Cinématographe [The Cinematograph]. In Le cinéma: naissance d’un art 1895–1920 [The Cinema: Birth of an Art], eds. Daniel Banda and José Moure, 44–47. Paris: Flammarion.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gunning, Tom. 1986. The Cinema of Attractions: Early Film, Its Spectators and the Avant-Garde. Wide Angle no. 8: 63–70.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gunning, Tom. 1995 [1989]. An Aesthetic of Astonishment: Early Film and the (In)Credulous Spectator. In Viewing Positions: Ways of Seeing Film, ed. Linda Williams, 114–133. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gunning, Tom. 2009. The Attraction of Motion: Modern Representation and the Image of Movement. In Film 1900: Technology, Perception, Culture, eds. Annemone Ligensa and Klaus Kreimeier, 165–173. New Barnet: John Libbey.]Search in Google Scholar
[Günsberg, A. 1903. Aesthetik bei Variété-Darbietungen [Aesthetics in Variety Shows]. Das Programm no. 79: n.p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Günsberg, A. 1906. Psychologische Wirkungen von Schaunummern [Psychological Effects of Show Acts]. Der Artist no. 1140: n.p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Häfker, Hermann. 1907. Das Recht auf Schönheit [The Right for Beauty]. Der Kinematograph no. 41: n.p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hellwig, A. [Albert?]. 1909. Lebende Bilder einst und jetzt [Living Pictures Then and Now]. Das Organ no. 19: 1–2.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jooss, Birgit. 1999. Lebende Bilder: Körperliche Nachahmungen von Kunstwerken in der Goethezeit [Living Pictures: Corporeal Imitations of Artworks in Goethe’s Era]. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaes, Anton, Nicholas Baer and Michael Cowan, eds. 2016. The Promise of Cinema: German Film Theory 1907–1933. Oakland: University of California Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kessler, Frank. 2006. The Cinema of Attractions as Dispositif. In The Cinema of Attractions Reloaded, ed. Wanda Strauven, 57–69. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kleibömer, Georg. 1909. Kinematograph und Grammophon im Dienste der Kunst [Cinematograph and Grammophone in the Service of Art]. Der Kinematograph no. 127: n.p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kurz-Elsheim, Franz. 1904. Variété und Kunst [Variety Theater and Art]. Der Artist no. 1022: n.p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lange, Konrad. 1912. Der Kinematograph vom ästhetischen Standpunkt [The Cinematograph from an Aesthetic Viewpoint]. In Der Kinematograph als Volksunterhaltungsmittel, 100. Flugschrift des Dürerbundes zur Ausdruckskultur [The Cinematograph as Popular Entertainment], ed. Robert Gaupp and Konrad Lange, 12–50. München: Dürerbund.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lasker, Franz. 1904. Zur Aesthetik der Circus-Kostüme [On the Aesthetics of Circus Costumes]. Der Artist no. 1025: n.p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Maase, Kaspar. 1997. Grenzenloses Vergnügen. Der Aufstieg der Massenkultur 1850–1970 [Pleasure without Boundaries: The Rise of Mass Culture]. Frankfurt a. M.: Fischer.]Search in Google Scholar
[Musser, Charles. 2006. A Cinema of Contemplation, a Cinema of Discernment: Spectatorship, Intertextuality and Attractions in the 1890s. In The Cinema of Attractions Reloaded, ed. Wanda Strauven, 159–179. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Robert, Valentine. 2018. Early Cinema’s Realizations: The Pictorial in the Tableau Style. In The Image in Early Cinema: Form and Material, eds. Scott Curtis, Philippe Gauthier, Tom Gunning and Joshua Yumibe, 289–299. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Runge, Jörn E. 2009. Olga Desmond: Preußens nackte Venus [Prussia’s Naked Venus]. Friedland: Steffen.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schiller, Friedrich. 1992 [1793]. On Grace and Dignity. http://www.schillerinstitute.org/educ/aesthetics/Schiller_On_Grace_and_Dignity.pdf. Last accessed 11. 09. 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schwartz, Vanessa R. 1995. Cinematic Spectatorship before the Apparatus: The Public Taste for Reality in Fin-de-Siècle Paris. In Cinema and the Invention of Modern Life, eds. Vanessa Schwartz and Leo Charney, 297–319. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520916425-013]Search in Google Scholar
[Schweinitz, Jörg, ed. 1992. Prolog vor dem Film: Nachdenken über ein neues Medium [Prologue before the Film: Thinking about a New Medium]. Leipzig: Reclam.]Search in Google Scholar
[Serner, Walter. 2016 [1913]. Cinema and Visual Pleasure. In The Promise of Cinema: German Film Theory 1907–1933, eds. Anton Kaes, Nicholas Baer and Michael Cowan, 41–35. Oakland: University of California Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Simmel, Georg. 2008 [1903]. Kant und die moderne Ästhetik [Kant and Modern Aesthetics]. In Jenseits der Schönheit. Schriften zur Ästhetik und Kunstphilosophie [Beyond Beauty: Writings on Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art], ed. Ingo Meyer, 163–178. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stead, W. T. 1906. Notes from London. Der Artist no. 1128: n.p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Taudien, Gustav. 1913. Maler heraus! [Painters Come Out!]. Der Kinematograph no. 34: n.p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wiegand, Daniel. 2016. Gebannte Bewegung: Tableaux vivants und früher Film in der Kultur der Moderne [Captured Motion: Tableaux Vivants and Early Cinema in the Culture of Modernity]. Marburg: Schüren.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wiegand, Daniel. 2018a. The Unsettling of Vision: Tableaux Vivants, Early Cinema, and Optical Illusions. In The Image in Early Cinema: Form and Material, eds. Scott Curtis, Philippe Gauthier, Tom Gunning and Joshua Yumibe, 26–35. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.10.2307/j.ctv6p40j.5]Search in Google Scholar
[Wiegand, Daniel. 2018b. Taming Motion: On a Certain Tendency in Early Film Theoretical Writing. In A Treasure Trove: Friend of the Photoplay – Visionary – Spy? New Trans-disciplinary Approaches to Hugo Münsterberg’s Life and Oeuvre, ed. Rüdiger Steinmetz, 61–69. Leipzig: Universitätsverlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[Winter, O. 1996 [1896]. Life is a Game According to a Set of Rules. In In the Kingdom of Shadows: A Companion to Early Cinema, eds. Colin Harding and Simon Popple, 13–17. London: Cygnus Arts Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wolf-Czapek, Karl Wilhelm. 1908. Die Kinematographie: Wesen, Entstehung und Ziele des lebenden Bildes [The Cinema: Essence, Origins and Goals of the Living Picture]. Dresden: Union Deutsche Verlagsgesellschaft.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wolf-Czapek, Karl Wilhelm. 1910. Ueber den Stil des Kunstfilms [On the Style of the Artistic Movie]. Der Kinematograph no. 189: n.p.]Search in Google Scholar
