Analyses Of Research For Understanding The Problems Of Patients With Diabetes

1. Luft R. (1986). Filling the gaps. Presentation at WHO Conference on Diabetes Care as a Model for Primary Health Care. Karolinska Institute, Stockholm.Search in Google Scholar

2. Chenitz, W. C., & Swanson, J. M. (1986). Qualitative research using grounded theory. In W. C. Chenitz & J. M. Swanson (Eds.), From practice to grounded theory (pp. 3-15). Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.Search in Google Scholar

3. Babler, E.K. & Strickland, C.J. (2000). Moving the journey towards independence: Adolescents transitioning to successful diabetes selfmanagement P17-19.Search in Google Scholar

4. Preventing insulin dependent diabetes mellitus: the environmental challenge. Diabetes Epidemiology Research International. (1987). Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 295(6596), 479-481.10.1136/bmj.295.6596.47912473373117180Search in Google Scholar

5. Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y.S. (2000). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar

6. Sackett, D.L., Straus, S.E., Richardson, W.S., Rosenberg, W. & Haynes, R.B. (2000). Evidence Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM. London: Churchill LivingstoneSearch in Google Scholar

7. Morse, J.M., Penrod, J. & Hupcey, J.E. (2000). Qualitative outcome analysis: evaluating nursing interventions for complex clinical phenomena. J Nurs Scholarsh. 32(2), 125-130..10.1111/j.1547-5069.2000.00125.x10887710Search in Google Scholar

8. Miller, W.R. (2010). Qualitative Research Findings as Evidence: Utility in Nursing Practice. Clinical Nurse Specialist CNS, 24(4), 191-193. http://doi.org/10.1097/NUR.0b013e3181e36087.10.1097/NUR.0b013e3181e36087302178520526118Search in Google Scholar

9. Barbour R. (2000). The role of qualitative research in broadening the “evidence base” for clinical practice. J Eval Clin Prac. 6(2), 155-163.10.1046/j.1365-2753.2000.00213.x10970009Search in Google Scholar

10. Cohen, D.J. & Crabtree, B.F. (2008). Evaluative criteria for qualitative research in health care: controversies and recommendations. Ann Fam Med. 6(4), 331-339. doi: 10.1370/afm.818Search in Google Scholar

11. Baker, G.R. (2011). The contribution of case study research to knowledge of how to improve quality of care. BMJ Qual Saf. 20 Suppl 1, i30-35. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.046490.Search in Google Scholar

12. Dougherty, D. & Conway, P.H. (2008). The „3T’s” road map to transform US health care: the „how” of high-quality care. JAMA. 299(19), 2319-2321. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.19.2319Search in Google Scholar

13. Berwick, D.M. (2008). The science of improvement. JAMA. 299(10), 1182-1184. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.10.1182Search in Google Scholar

14. Sparkes, A.C. (2001). Myth 94: qualitative health researchers will agree about validity. Qual Health Res. 11(4), 538-552. doi: 10.1177/104973230101100409Search in Google Scholar

15. Speziale, H.S. & Carpenter, D.R. (2007). Qualitative Research in Nursing: Advancing the Humanistic Imperative: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Search in Google Scholar