[Arnaud L., Haubruge E., Gage M.J.G. (2001). Sperm size and number variation in the red flour beetle. Zool. J. Linn. Soc-Lond., 133: 369–375.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bierła J.B., Giżejewski Z., Leigh C.M., Ekwall H., Söderquist L., Rodriguez-Martinez H., Zalewski K., Breed W.G. (2007). Sperm morphology of the Eurasian beaver Castor fiber: an example of a species of rodent with highly derived and pleiomorphic sperm populations. J. Morphol., 268: 683–689.]Search in Google Scholar
[Blom E. (1981). The morphological estimation of the spermatozoa defects of bull II: The proposal of new classification of spermatozoa defects (in Polish). Med. Weter., 37: 239–242.]Search in Google Scholar
[Calogero A.E., De Palma A., Grazioso C., Barone N., Romeo R., Rapazzo G., D’Agata R. (2001). Aneuploidy rate in spermatozoa of selected men with abnormal semen parameters. Hum. Reprod., 16: 1172–1179.10.1093/humrep/16.6.1172]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Casey P.J., Gravance C.G., Davis R.O., Chabot D.D., Liu I.K.M. (1997). Morphometric differences in sperm head dimensions of fertile and subfertile stallions. Theriogenology, 47: 575–582.10.1016/S0093-691X(97)00015-0]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Chenoweth P.J. (2005). Genetic sperm defects. Theriogenology, 64: 457–468.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.05.005]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[De Jarnette J.M., Saake R.G., Barne J., Volger C.J. (1992). Accessory sperm: their importance to fertility and embryo quality and attempts to alter their numbers in artificially inseminated cattle. J. Anim. Sci., 70: 484–491.10.2527/1992.702484x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Enciso M., Cisale H., Johnston S.D., Sarasa J., Fernandez J.L., Gosalvez J. (2011). Major morphological sperm abnormalities in the bull are related to sperm DNA damage. Theriogenology, 76: 23–32.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.12.034]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Evenson D.P., Wixon R. (2006). Clinical aspects of sperm DNA fragmentation detection and male infertility. Theriogenology, 65: 979–991.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.09.011]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Fischer M.A., Willis J., Zini A. (2003). Human sperm DNA integrity: correlation with sperm cytoplasmic droplets. Urology, 61: 207–211.10.1016/S0090-4295(02)02098-8]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Gage M.J.G., Morrow E.H. (2003). Experimental evidence for the evolution of numerous, tiny sperm via sperm competition. Curr. Biol., 13: 754–757.10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00282-3]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Gil M.C., Garcia-Herreros M., Baron F.J., Aparicio I.M., Santos A.J., Garcia-Marin L.J. (2009). Morphometry of porcine spermatozoa and its functional significance in relation with the motility parameters in fresh semen. Theriogenology, 71: 254–263.]Search in Google Scholar
[Górski K., Kondracki S., Wysokińska A., Nazaruk A. (2016). The importance of ejaculate volume for the physical parameters of ejaculates and sperm morphology of Hypor boars. Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fak., 22: 493–501.]Search in Google Scholar
[Górski K., Kondracki S., Wysokińska A. (2017). Ejaculate traits and sperm morphology depending on ejaculate volume in Duroc boars. J. Vet. Res., 61: 121–125.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hirai M., Boersma A., Hofflich A., Wolf E., Föll J., Aumüller R., Braun A.J. (2001). Objectively measured sperm motility and sperm head morphometry in boars (Sus scrofa): relation to fertility and seminal plasma growth factors. J. Androl., 22: 104–110.]Search in Google Scholar
[King G.J., Macpherson J.W. (1973). A comparison of two methods for boar semen collection. J. Anim. Sci., 36: 563–565.10.2527/jas1973.363563x4693863]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Knecht D., Środoń S., Duziński K. (2014). The influence of boar breed and season on semen parameters. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci., 44: 1–9.10.4314/sajas.v44i1.1]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kondracki S., Banaszewska D., Mielnicka C. (2005). The effect of age on the morphometric sperm traits of domestic pigs. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett., 10: 3–13.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kondracki S., Banaszewska D., Wysokińska A., Sadowska A. (2006). Ejaculate traits and spermatozoa morphology as related to spermatozoa concentration in ejaculates of Polish Large White boars. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep., Suppl., 3: 111–119.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kondracki S., Iwanina M., Wysokińska A., Górski K. (2013). The use of sexual activity measurements to assess ejaculatory performance of boars. Arch. Tierzucht, 56: 1052–1059.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kondracki S., Górski K., Wysokińska A., Jóźwik I. (2014). Correlation of ejaculate parameters and sperm morphology with the ejaculate volume of Pietrain boars. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci., 20: 703–709.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kowalewski D., Kondracki S., Górski K., Bajena M., Wysokińska A. (2016). Effect of piggery microclimate on ejaculate performance of artificial insemination boars. Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fak., 22: 225–232.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kubo-Irie M., Matsumiya K., Iwamoto T., Kaneko S., Ishijima S. (2005). Morphological abnormalities in the spermatozoa of fertile and infertile men. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 70: 70–81.10.1002/mrd.2018915515050]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Long J.A., Wildt D.E., Wolfe B.A., Critser J.K., De Rossi R.V., Howard J.G. (1996). Sperm capacitation and the acrosome reaction are compromised in teratospermic domestic cats. Biol. Reprod., 54: 638–646.10.1095/biolreprod54.3.6388835386]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Malo A.F., Gomendio M., Garde J., Lang-Lenton B., Soler A.J., Roldan E.R.S. (2006). Sperm design and sperm function. Biol. Lett., 2: 246–249.]Search in Google Scholar
[Noorafshan A., Karbalay-Doust S. (2010). A simple method for unbiased estimating of ejaculated sperm tail length in subjects with normal and abnormal sperm motility. Micron, 41: 96–99.10.1016/j.micron.2009.09.00219819707]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ostermeier G.C., Sargeant G.A., Yandell B.S., Evenson D.P., Parrish J.J. (2001). Relationship of bull fertility to sperm nuclear shape. J. Androl., 22: 595–603.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pinart E., Camps R., Briz M.O., Bonet S., Egozcue J. (1998). Unilateral spontaneous abdominal cryptorchidism: structural and ultrastructural study of sperm morphology. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 49: 247–268.]Search in Google Scholar
[Regulation of the Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development (2010). The Journal of Laws of 15 February, 2010, No. 56, Pos. 344.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ruiz-Sanchez A.I., O’Donoghue R., Novak S., Dyck M.K., Cosgrove J.R., Dixon W.T., Foxcroft G.R. (2006). The predictive value of routine semen evaluation and IVF technology for determining relative boar fertility. Theriogenology, 66: 736-748.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.12.01216529803]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Smital J., De Sousa L.L., Mohnsen A. (2004). Differences among breeds and manifestation of heterosis in AI boar sperm output. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 80: 121-130.]Search in Google Scholar
[Steinholt H.C., Chandler J.E., Baron R.A., Adkinson R.W. (1994). Chromosome and sperm size of Holsteins with and without bovine leukocyte adhesion deficiency. J. Dairy Sci., 77: 1239-1250.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sun F., Ko R., Martin R.H. (2006). Is there a relationship between sperm chromosome abnormalities and sperm morphology? Reprod. Biol. Endocrin., 4: 1-15.10.1186/1477-7827-4-1139531416436209]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Swine Nutrition Requirements (1993). The Kielanowski Institute Animal Physiology and Nutrition, Polish Academy of Sciences. Omnitech-Press, Warsaw, Poland.]Search in Google Scholar
[Thurston L.M., Watson P.F., Mileham A.J., Holt W.V. (2001). Morphologically distinct sperm subpopulations defined by Fourier shape descriptors in fresh ejaculates correlate with variation in boar semen quality following cryopreservation. J. Androl., 22: 382-394.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wysokińska A., Kondracki S. (2013). Assessment of the effect of heterosis on semen parameters of two-breed crosses of Duroc, Hampshire and Pietrain boars. Arch. Tierzucht, 56: 65-74.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wysokińska A., Kondracki S. (2014 a). Assessment of changes in sperm cell membrane integrity occurring during the storage of semen from genetically different males using two diagnostic methods. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 94: 601–606.10.4141/cjas2013-095]Search in Google Scholar
[Wysokińska A., Kondracki S. (2014 b). Assessment of sexual activity levels and their association with ejaculate parameters in two-breed hybrids and purebred Duroc and Pietrain boars. Ann. Anim. Sci., 14: 559-571.10.2478/aoas-2014-0030]Search in Google Scholar
[Wysokińska A., Kondracki S., Banaszewska D. (2009). Morphometrical characteristics of spermatozoa in Polish Landrace boars with regard to the number of spermatozoa in an ejaculate. Reprod. Biol., 9: 271-282.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wysokińska A., Kondracki S., Iwanina M. (2015). The usefulness of selected physicochemical indices, cell membrane integrity and sperm chromatin structure in assessments of boar semen sensitivity. Asian Austral. J. Anim., 28: 1713-1720.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zheng H., Stratton C.J., Morozumi K., Jin J., Yanagimachi R., Yan W. (2007). Lack of Spem 1 causes aberrant cytoplasm removal, sperm deformation, and male infertility. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 104: 6852-6857.]Search in Google Scholar