[AOAC (2012). Official Methods of Analysis, 19th ed., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA, USA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bolsen K.K., Moore K., Coblentz W.K., Siefers M.K., White J.S. (2003). Sorghum silage. In: Silage Science and Technology, L. Al-Amoodi (ed.). Madison, WI, USA, pp. 609–632.10.2134/agronmonogr42.c13]Search in Google Scholar
[Carmi A., Aharoni V., Edelstein M., Umiel N., Hagiladi A., Yosef E., Nikbachat M., Zenou A., Miron J. (2006). Effects of irrigation and plant density on yield, composition and in vitro digestibility of a new forage sorghum variety, Tal, at two maturity stages. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 131: 120–132.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cattani M., Tagliapietra F., Maccarana L., Hansen H.H., Bailoni L., Schiavon S. (2014). Technical note: In vitro total gas and methane production measurements from closed or vented rumen batch culture systems. J. Dairy Sci., 97: 1736–1741.]Search in Google Scholar
[Colombini S., Rapetti L., Colombo D., Galassi G., Crovetto G.M. (2010). Brown midrib forage sorghum silage for the dairy cow: nutritive value and comparison with corn silage in the diet. Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 9: 273–277.]Search in Google Scholar
[Colombini S., Galassi G., Crovetto G.M., Rapetti L. (2012). Milk production, nitrogen balance, and fiber digestibility prediction of corn, whole plant grain sorghum, and forage sorghum silages in the dairy cow. J. Dairy Sci., 95: 4457–4467.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dann H.M., Grant R.J., Cotanch K.W., Thomas E.D., Ballard C.S., Rice R. (2008). Comparison of brown midrib sorghum-sudangrass with corn silage on lactational performance and nutrient digestibility in Holstein dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 91: 663–672.]Search in Google Scholar
[Di Marco O.N., Ressia M.A., Arias S., Aello M.S., Arzadun M. (2009). Digestibility of forage silages from grain, sweet and bmr sorghum types: Comparison of in vivo, in situ and in vitro data. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 153: 161–168.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gallardo M., Gagiotti M. (2004). La reservas y lo deseable, calidad en forrajes conservados. Manual de actualización técnica. Merco Láctea, San Francisco, Córdova, Argentina.]Search in Google Scholar
[Menke K.H., Steingass H. (1988). Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and gas production using rumen fluid. Anim. Res. Dev., 28: 7–55.]Search in Google Scholar
[National Research Council (NRC) (2001). Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle, 7th ed., National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pesce D.M.C., Goncalves L.C., Rodrigues N.M., Borges I., Rodrigues J.A.S. (2000). Percentage and loss of dry matter and in vitro dry matter digestibility of 20 sorghum genotypes silages. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec., 52: 250–255.]Search in Google Scholar
[Romero L.A. (2004). Ensilaje de soja, calidad en forrajes conservados. Manual de actualización técnica, Merco Láctea, San Francisco, Córdova, Argentina, pp. 40–41.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rymer C., Huntington J.A., Williams B.A., Givens D.I. (2005). In vitro cumulative gas production techniques: History, methodological considerations and challenges. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 123–124: 9–30.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sanchez A.C., Subudhi P.K., Rosenow D.T., Nguyen H.T. (2002). Mapping QTLs associated with drought resistance in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench). Plant Mol. Biol., 48: 71–726.]Search in Google Scholar
[Śliwiński B., Brzóska F., Węglarzy K., Bereza M. (2012). Effect of silage from maize and strip-cropped sorghum and maize on dairy cow’s yield and milk composition. Ann. Anim. Sci., 12: 367–379.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tagliapietra F., Cattani M., Hindrichsen I.K., Hansen H.H., Colombini S., Bailoni L., Schiavon S. (2012). True dry matter digestibility of feeds evaluated in situ with different bags and in vitro using rumen fluid collected from intact donor cows. Anim. Prod. Sci., 52: 338–346.]Search in Google Scholar
