[Ahmad A., Ranjan S., Zhang W., Zou J., Pyykkö I., Kinnunen P. (2015). Novel endosomolytic peptides for enhancing gene delivery in nanoparticles. Biochim. Biophys., 1848: 544-553.]Search in Google Scholar
[An H., Jin B. (2012). Prospects of nanoparticle-DNAbinding and its implications in medical biotechnology. Biotechnol. Adv., 30: 1721-1732.]Search in Google Scholar
[Austin L., Mackey M., Dreaden E., El-Sayed M. (2014). The optical, photothermal, and facile surface chemical properties of gold and silver nanoparticles in biodiagnostics, therapy, and drug delivery. Arch. Toxicol., 88: 1391-1417.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bahrami A., Raatz M., Agudo- Canalejo J., Michel R., Curtis E., Hall C., Gradzielski M., Lipowsky R., Weikl T. (2014). Wrapping of nanoparticles by membranes. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 208: 214-224.]Search in Google Scholar
[Barkalina N., Charalambous C., Jones C., Coward K. (2014). Nanotechnology in reproductive medicine: Emerging applications of nanomaterials. Nanomedicine, 10: 921-938.]Search in Google Scholar
[Barkalina N., Jones C., Wood M., Coward K. (2015). Extracellular vesicle-mediated delivery of molecular compounds into gametes and embryos: learning from nature. Hum. Reprod. Update, 21: 627-639.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bosman S., Nieto S., Patton W., Jacobson J., Corselli J., Chan P. (2005). Development of mammalian embryos exposed to mixed-size nanoparticles. Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol., 32: 222-224.]Search in Google Scholar
[Breunig M., Lungwitz U., Liebl R., Goepferich A. (2007). Breaking up the correlation between efficacy and toxicity for nonviral gene delivery. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 104: 14454-14459.]Search in Google Scholar
[Campos V.,de Leon P., Komninou E., Dellagostin O., Deschamps J., Seixas F., Collares T. (2011). Nano SMGT: Transgene transmission into bovine embryos using hallosite clay nanotubes or nanopolymer to improve transfection efficiency. Theriogenology, 76: 1552-1560.]Search in Google Scholar
[Caracciolo G., Pozzi D., Capriotti A., Marianecci C., Carafa M., Marchini C., Montani M., Amici A., Amenitsch H., Digman M., Gratton E., Sanchez S., Lagana A. (2011). Factors determining the superior performance of lipid/DNA/protamine nanoparticles over lipoplexes. J. Med. Chem., 54: 4160-4171.]Search in Google Scholar
[Carmona- Ribeiro A. (2010). Biomimetic nanoparticles: preparation, characterization and biomedical applications. Int. J. Nanomedicine, 5: 249-259.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cortesi R., Campioni M., Ravani L., Drechsler M., Pinotti M., Esposito E. (2014). Cationic lipid nanosystems as carriers for nucleic acids. N. Biotechnol., 31: 44-54.]Search in Google Scholar
[Delgado D.,de Pozo-Rodriguez A., Solinis M., Rodriguez- Gascon A. (2011). Understanding the mechanism of protamine in solid lipid nanoparticle based lipofection: the importance of the entry pathway. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm., 79: 495-502.]Search in Google Scholar
[Eghbalsaied S., Ghaedi K., Laible G., Hosseini S., Forouzanfar M., Hajian M., Oback F., Nasr-Esfahani M., Oback B. (2013). Exposure to DNAis insufficient for in vitro transgenesis of live bovine sperm and embryos. Reproduction, 145: 97-108.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ekser B., Klein E., He J., Stolz D., Echeverri G., Long C., Lin C., Ezzelarab M., Hara H., Veroux M., Ayares D., Cooper D.K., Gridelli B. (2012). Genetically-engineered pig-to-baboon liver xenotransplantation: histopathology of xenografts and native organs. PLo S One, 7: e29720.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ema M., Kobayashi N., Naya M., Hanai S., Nakanishi J. (2010). Reproductive and developmental toxicity studies of manufactured nanomaterials. Reprod. Toxicol., 30: 343-352.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gandolfi F. (2000). Sperm-mediated transgenesis. Theriogenology, 53: 127-137.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gemeinhart R., Luo D., Saltzman W. (2005). Cellular fate ofamodular DNAdelivery system mediated by silica nanoparticles. Biotechnol. Prog., 21: 532-537.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ghosh P., Han G., De M., Kim C., Rotello V. (2008). Gold nanoparticles in delivery applications. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 60: 1307-1315.]Search in Google Scholar
[Golovan S., Meidinger R., Ajakaiye A., Cottrill M., Wiederkehr M., Barney D., Plante C., Pollard J., Fan M., Hayes M., Laursen J., Hjorth J., Hacker R., Phil - lips J., Forsberg C. (2001). Pigs expressing salivary phytase produce low-phosphorus manure. Nat. Biotechnol., 19: 741-745.]Search in Google Scholar
[Green J., Zhou B., Mitalipova M., Beard C., Langer R., Jaenisch R., Anderson D. (2008). Nanoparticles for gene transfer to human embryonic stem cell colonies. Nano Lett., 8: 3126-3130.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grześkowiak B., Sánchez- Antequera Y., Hammerschmid E., Döblinger M., Eberbeck D., Woźniak A., Słomski R., Plank C., Mykhaylyk O. (2015). Nanomagnetic activation asaway to control the efficacy of nucleic acid delivery. Pharm. Res., 32: 103-121.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hammer R., Pursel V., Rexroad C. Jr, Wall R., Bolt D., Ebert K., Palmiter R., Brin - ster R. (1986). Production of transgenic rabbits, sheep and pigs by microinjection. J. Anim. Sci., 63: 269-278.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hart S. (2010). Multifunctional nanocomplexes for gene transfer and gene theraphy. Cell Biol. Toxicol., 26: 69-81.]Search in Google Scholar
[Houdebine L. (2009). Production of pharmaceutical proteins by transgenic animals. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infec. Dis., 32: 107-121.]Search in Google Scholar
[Huang J., Liu Ch., Yen K., Kang P., Sadhasivam S., Lin F. (2012). Cholaminchloride hydrochloride-cationized gelatin/calcium phosphate nanoparticles as gene carriers for transgenic chicken production. Process Biochem., 47: 1919-1925.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jiang Z., Sun C., Yin Z., Zhou F., Ge L., Liu X., Kong F. (2012). Comparison of two kinds of nanomedicine for targeted gene therapy: premodified or postmodified gene delivery systems. Int. J. Nanomedicine, 7: 2019-2031.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jura J., Smorąg Z., Słomski R., Lipiński D., Gajda B. (2007). Factors affecting the production of potential transgenic pigs by DNAmicroinjection;asix-year retrospective study. J. Anim. Feed Sci., 12: 636-645.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kami D., Takeda S., Itakura Y., Watanabe M., Toyoda M. (2011). Application of magnetic nanoparticles to gene delivery. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 12: 3705-3722.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kang L., Gao Z., Huang W., Jin M., Wang Q. (2015). Nanocarrier-mediated co-delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs and gene agents for cancer treatment. Acta Pharma. Sin. B, 5: 169-175.]Search in Google Scholar
[Keefer C. (2004). Production of bioproducts through the use of transgenic animal models. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 82-83: 5-12.]Search in Google Scholar
[Laible G. (2009). Enhancing livestock through genetic engineering - recent advances and future prospects. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infec. Dis., 32: 123-137.]Search in Google Scholar
[Laible G., Wei J., Wagner S. (2015). Improving livestock for agriculture - technological progress from random transgenesis to precision genome editing heraldsanew era. Biotechnol. J., 10: 109-120.]Search in Google Scholar
[Li Y., Wen G., Wang D., Zhang X., Lu Y., Wang J., Zhong L., Cai H., Zhang X., Wang Y. (2014). Acomplementary strategy for enhancement of nanoparticle intracellular uptake. Pharm. Res., 31: 2054-2064.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lipiński D., Zeyland J., Szalata M., Plawski A., Jarmuz M., Jura J., Korcz A., Smorąg Z., Peinkowski M., Słomski R. (2012). Expression of human growth hormone in the milk of transgenic rabbits with transgene mapped to the telomere region of chromosome 7q. J. Appl. Genet., 53: 435-442.]Search in Google Scholar
[Maga E., Murray J. (2010). Welfare applications of genetically engineered animals for use in agriculture. J. Anim Sci., 88: 1588-1591.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marshall K., Hurley W., Shanks R., Wheeler M. (2006). Effects of suckling intensity on milk yield and piglet growth from lactation-enhanced gilts. J. Anim. Sci., 84: 2346-2351.]Search in Google Scholar
[McBain S., Yiu H., Dobson J. (2008). Magnetic nanoparticles for gene and drug delivery. Int. J. Nanomedicine, 3: 169-180.]Search in Google Scholar
[Moura R., Melo L., Freitas V. (2011). Production of recombinant proteins in milk of transgenic and non-transgenic goats. Braz. Arch. Biol. Techn., 54: 927-938.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nam Y., Maclean N., Hwang G., Kim D. (2013). Autotransgenic and allotransgenic manipulation of growth traits in fish for aquaculture: Areview. J. Fish Biol., 72: 1-26]Search in Google Scholar
[Nel A., Xia T., Mandler L., Li N. (2006). Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science, 311: 622-627.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nitta S., Numata K. (2013). Biopolymer-based nanoparticles for drug/gene delivery and tissue engineering. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 14: 1629-1654.]Search in Google Scholar
[Perrier V., Kaneko K., Safar J., Vergara J., Tremblay P., De Armond S., Cohen F.,Prusiner S., Wallace A. (2002). Dominant-negative inhibition of prion replication in transgenic mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 99: 13079-13084.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pfeifer A., Zimmermann K., Plank C. (2012). Magnetic nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Pharm. Res., 29: 1161-1164.]Search in Google Scholar
[Plank C., Schillinger U., Scherer F., Bergemann C., Remy J., Krotz F., Anto n M., Lausier J., Rosenecker J. (2003). The magnetofection method: using magnetic force to enhance gene delivery. Biol. Chem., 384: 737-747.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pozzi D., Marchini C., Cardarelli F., Salomone F., Coppola S., Montani M., Za - baleta M., Digman M., Gratton E., Colapicchioni V., Caracciolo G. (2014). Mechanistic evaluation of the transfection barriers involved in lipid-mediated gene delivery: interplay between nanostructure and composition. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1838: 957-967.]Search in Google Scholar
[Prabha S., Zhou W., Panyam J., Labhasetwar V. (2002). Size-dependency of nanoparticlemediated gene transfection: studies with fractionated nanoparticles. Int. J. Pharm., 244: 105-115.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rothschild M., Plastow G. (2014). Applications of genomics to improve livestock in the developing world. Livest. Sci., 166: 76-83.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sauer U., Aumann A., Ma-Hock L., Landsiedel R., Wohlleben W. (2015). Influence of dispersive agent on nanomaterial agglomeration and implications for biological effects in vivo or in vitro. Toxicol. In Vitro, 29: 182-186.]Search in Google Scholar
[Severino P., Szymanski M., Favaro M., Azzoni A., Chaud M., Santana M., Sil- va A., Souto E. (2015). Development and characterization of cationic lipid nanocarrier as nonviral vector for gene delivery. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci., 66: 78-82.]Search in Google Scholar
[Slowing I., Vivero-Escoto J., Wu C., Lin V. (2008). Mesoporous silica nanoparticles as controlled release drug delivery and gene transfection carriers. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 60: 1278-1288.]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith K., Corrado S. (2005). Sperm-mediated transfer: applications and implications. Bio Essays, 27: 551-562.]Search in Google Scholar
[Smorąg Z., Słomski R., Cierpka L. (2013). Biotechnological and medical aspects of xenotransplantation (in Polish). Ośrodek Wydawnictw Naukowych PAN, Poznań, 2nd ed., pp. 73-93.]Search in Google Scholar
[Song G., Han J. (2011). Avian biomodels for use as pharmaceutical bioreactors and for studying human diseases. Ann. NY Acad. Sci., 1229: 69-75.]Search in Google Scholar
[Svenson S., Prud’homme R. (2012). Multifunctional nanoparticles for drug delivery applications: imaging, targeting, and delivery. Nanostructure Science and Technology. Springer Science+ Business Media, LLC Springer-Verlag, New York, USA, pp. 9-29.10.1007/978-1-4614-2305-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Tabatt K., Kneuer C., Sametti M., Olbrich K., Muller R., Lehr C., Bakowsky U. (2004). Transfection with different colloidal systems: comparison of solid lipid nanoparticles and liposomes. J. Control. Release, 97: 321-332.]Search in Google Scholar
[Taylor U., Garrels W., Barchanski A., Peterson S., Sajti L., Lucas- Hahn A., Gamrad L., Baulain U., Klein S., Kues W., Barcikowski S., Rath D. (2014). Injection of ligand-free gold and silver nanoparticles into murine embryos does not impact preimplantation development. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol., 5: 677-688.]Search in Google Scholar
[Taylor U., Tiedemann D., Rehbock C., Kues W., Barcikowski S., Rath D. (2015). Influence of gold, silver and gold-silver alloy nanoparticles on germ cell function and embryo development. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol., 6: 651-664.]Search in Google Scholar
[Verma V., Gautam S., Palta P., Manik R., Singla S., Chauhan M. (2008). Development ofapronuclear DNAmicroinjection technique for production of green fluorescent protein-expressing bubaline (Bubalus bubalis) embryos. Theriogenology, 69: 655-665.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang Y., Zhao S., Bai L., Fan J., Liu E. (2013). Expression system and species used for transgenic animal bioreactors. Bio. Med. Res. Int., 2013: 580463.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang J., Yao H., Shi X. (2014 a). Cooperative entry of nanoparticles into the cell. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 73: 151-165.10.1016/j.jmps.2014.09.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang Y., Cui H., Sun C., Du W., Zhao X., Chen W. (2014 b). Amagnetic nanoparticle-based multiple-gene delivery system for transfection of porcine kidney cells. PLo S One, 9(7):e102886.10.1371/journal.pone.0102886410556425048709]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang Y., Zhao Q., Han N., Bai L., Li J., Liu J., Che E., Hu L., Zhang Q., Jiang T., Wang S. (2015). Mesoporous silica nanoparticles in drug delivery and biomedical applications. Nanomedicine, 11: 31 3-327.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ward K. (2000). Transgene-mediated modifications to animal biochemistry. Trends Biotechnol., 18: 99-102.]Search in Google Scholar
[Whitelaw C., Lilico S., King T. (2008). Production of transgenic farm animals by viral vectormediated gene transfer. Reprod. Domest. Anim., 43(suppl.2): 355-358.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yoisungnern T., Choi Y., Han J., Kang M., Das J., Gurunathan S., Kwon D., Cho S., Park C., Chang W., Chang B., Parnpai R., Kim J. (2015). Internalization of silver nanoparticles into mouse spermatozoa results in poor fertilization and compromised embryo development. Sci. Rep., 5: 11170.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zanin H., Hollanda L., Ceragioli H., Ferreira M., Machado D., Lancellotti M., Catharino R., Baranauskas V., Lobo A. (2014). Carbon nanoparticles for gene transfection in eukaryotic cell lines. Mater Sci. Eng. C Mater Biol. Appl., 39: 359-370.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhou X., Laroche F., Lemers G., Torraca V., Voscamp P., Lu T., Chu F., Spaik H., Abrahms J., Liu Z. (2012). Ultra-small graphene oxide functionalized with polyethylenimine (PEI) for very efficient gene delivery in cell and zebrafish embryos. Nano Res., 5: 703-709.]Search in Google Scholar
