Medical Students’ Acceptance of Online Assessment Systems

1. Wang TH.Implementation of Web-based dynamic assessment in facilitating junior high school students to learn mathematics.Computers & Education. 2011;56:1062-1071.10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.014Search in Google Scholar

2. Wang TH. Web-based dynamic assessment: Taking assessment as teaching and learning strategy for improving students’ e-learning effectiveness. Computers & Education. 2010;54:1157-1166.10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.001Search in Google Scholar

3. Wang TH. Web-based quiz-game-like formative assessment: Development and evaluation. Computers & Education. 2008;51:1247-1263.10.1016/j.compedu.2007.11.011Search in Google Scholar

4. Llamas-Nistal M, Fernández-Iglesias MJ, González-Tato J, Mikic-Fonte FJ. Blended e-assessment: Migrating classical exams to the digital world. Computers & Education. 2013;62:72-87.10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.021Search in Google Scholar

5. Petrişor M, Măruşteri M, Ghiga D, Şchiopu A. Online Assessment System. Applied Medical Informatics. 2011;28:23-28.Search in Google Scholar

6. Ventouras E, TriantisD, Tsiakas P, Stergiopoulos, C. Comparison of examination methods based on multiple-choice questions and constructed-response questions using personal computers. Computers & Education. 2010;54:455-461.10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.028Search in Google Scholar

7. Lee JW. Online support service quality, online learning acceptance, and student satisfaction. Internet and Higher Education. 2010;13:277-28310.1016/j.iheduc.2010.08.002Search in Google Scholar

8. Grieve R, Padgett CR, Moffitt RL.Assignments 2.0: The role of social presence and computer attitudes in student preferences for online versus offline marking. Internet and Higher Education. 2016;28:8-1610.1016/j.iheduc.2015.08.002Search in Google Scholar

9. Anderson LW, Krathwohl DR, Airasian PW, et al. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Pearson, Allyn& Bacon, New York. 2001Search in Google Scholar

10. Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med. 1990;65(9 Suppl):S63-6710.1097/00001888-199009000-000452400509Search in Google Scholar

11. Struyven K, Dochy F, Janssens S. Students’ perception about evaluation and assessment in higher education: A review. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education.2005;30:325-341.10.1080/02602930500099102Search in Google Scholar

12. Furnham A, Christopher A, Garwood J, Martin N. Ability, demography, learning style and personality trait correlates of student preferences for assessment method. Educational Psychology. 2008;28:15-27.10.1080/01443410701369138Search in Google Scholar

13. Dascalu CG, Enache AM, Mavru RB, Zegan G. Computer-based MCQ Assessment for Students in Dental Medicine - Advantages and Drawbacks. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015;187:22-27.10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.005Search in Google Scholar