Morpho-Pathological Review on the Healing of Synthetic Vascular Grafts

1. Donovan TJ, Zimmerman B. The effect of artificial surface on blood coagulability, with special reference to polyethylene. Blood. 1949;4:1310.10.1182/blood.V4.12.1310.1310Search in Google Scholar

2. Vroman L. Methods of investigating protein interaction on artificial and natural surfaces. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1978;516:300.10.1111/j.1749-6632.1987.tb33050.xSearch in Google Scholar

3. Shepard AD, Gelfand JA, Callow AD, O’Donnell TF Jr. Complement activation by synthetic vascular prostheses. J Vasc Surg. 1984;1:829.10.1016/0741-5214(84)90015-6Search in Google Scholar

4. McCollum CN, Kester RC, Rajah SM, et al. Arterial graft maturation, the duration of thrombotic activity in Dacron aortobifemoral grafts measured by platelet and fibrinogen kinetics. Br J Surg. 1981;68:61.10.1002/bjs.1800680120Search in Google Scholar

5. Kzhyshkowska J, Gudima A, Riabov V, et al. Macrophage responses to implants: Prospects for personalized medicine. J Leukoc Biol. 2015; Published online before print July 13, 2015 doi:10.1189/jlb.5VMR0415-166R. http://www.jleukbio.org/content/early/2015/07/13/jlb.5VMR0415-166R.longSearch in Google Scholar

6. Swartbol P, Truedsson L, Parsson H, Norgren L. Tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6 release from white blood cells induced by different graft materials In Vitro are affected by pentoxifylline and iloprost. J Biomed Master Res. 1997;36:400.10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19970905)36:3<400::AID-JBM15>3.0.CO;2-HSearch in Google Scholar

7. Raiter A, Bechor Z, Kleiman M, et al. Angiogenic peptides improve blood flow and promote capillary growth in a diabetic and ischaemic mouse model. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;40(3):381-388.10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.02.003Search in Google Scholar

8. Alobaid N, Salacinski HJ, Sales KM, et al. Nanocomposites containing bioactive peptides promote endothelialisation by circulating progenitor cells: An In Vitro evaluation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006;32(1):76-83.10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.11.034Search in Google Scholar

9. Cassar K, Bachoo P, Ford I, Greaves M, Brittenden J. Markers of coagulaton activation, endothelial stimulation and inflammation in patients with peripheral arterial disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;29(2):171-176.10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.11.001Search in Google Scholar

10. Armitage JD, Lindsey NJ, Homer-Vanniasinkam S. The role of endothelial cell reactive antibodies in peripheral arterial disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006;31(2):170-175.10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.05.044Search in Google Scholar

11. Daryapeyma A, Pedersen G, Laxdal E, et al. Neutrophil CD64 as a marker for postoperative infection: A pilot study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;38(1):100-103.10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.03.012Search in Google Scholar

12. Lorenz U, Schäfer T, Ohlsen K, et al. In Vivo detection of Staphylococcus aureus I n biofilm on vascular prostheses using non-invasive biophotonic imaging. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;41(1):68-75.10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.09.007Search in Google Scholar

13. Calligaro KD, Veith FJ, Schwartz ML, Dougherty MJ, DeLaurentis DA. Differences in early versus late extracavitary arterial graft infections. J Vasc Surg. 1995;22(6):680-688.10.1016/S0741-5214(95)70058-7Search in Google Scholar

14. Anderson JM. Chapter 4 Mechanisms of inflammation and infection with implanted devices. Cardiovasc Pathol. 1993;2(3):33-41.10.1016/1054-8807(93)90045-4Search in Google Scholar

15. Zimmerli W, Sendi P. Pathogenesis of implant-associated infection: the role of the host. Sem Immunol. 2011;33(3):295-306.10.1007/s00281-011-0275-7Search in Google Scholar

16. Anderson JM, Rodriguez A, Chang DT. Innate and adaptive immune responses in tissue engineering. Sem Immunol. 2008;20(2):86-100.10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.004Search in Google Scholar

17. Geary KJ, Tomkiewicz ZM, Harrison HN, et al. Differential effects of a gram-negative and a gram-positive infection on autogenous and prosthetic grafts. J Vasc Surg. 1990;11(2):339-347.10.1016/0741-5214(90)90278-ISearch in Google Scholar