[Ashlock, D. and Lee, C. (2013). Agent-case embeddings for the analysis of evolved systems, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation17(2): 227–240.10.1109/TEVC.2012.2234464]Search in Google Scholar
[Axelrod, R. (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation, Basic Books, New York, NY.]Search in Google Scholar
[Beyer, H.-G. and Schwefel, H.-P. (2002). Evolution strategies—a comprehensive introduction, Natural Computing1(1): 3–52.10.1023/A:1015059928466]Search in Google Scholar
[Bucci, A., Pollack, J.B. and de Jong, E. (2004). Automated extraction of problem structure, in K. Deb et al. (Eds.), Genetic and Evolutionary Computation—GECCO-2004, Part I, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3102, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 501–512.10.1007/978-3-540-24854-5_53]Search in Google Scholar
[Chong, S.Y., Tiño, P., Ku, D.C. and Xin, Y. (2012). Improving generalization performance in co-evolutionary learning, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation16(1): 70–85.10.1109/TEVC.2010.2051673]Search in Google Scholar
[Chong, S.Y., Tiño, P. and Yao, X. (2008). Measuring generalization performance in coevolutionary learning, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation12(4): 479–505.10.1109/TEVC.2007.907593]Search in Google Scholar
[Chong, S.Y., Tiño, P. and Yao, X. (2009). Relationship between generalization and diversity in coevolutionary learning, IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games1(3): 214–232.10.1109/TCIAIG.2009.2034269]Search in Google Scholar
[Chong, S.Y. and Yao, X. (2005). Behavioral diversity, choices and noise in the iterated prisoner’s dilemma, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation9(6): 540–551.10.1109/TEVC.2005.856200]Search in Google Scholar
[Darwen, P.J. and Yao, X. (2001). Why more choices cause less cooperation in iterated prisoner’s dilemma, Proceedings of the 2001 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Seoul, South Korea, Vol. 2, pp. 987–994.]Search in Google Scholar
[Darwen, P. and Yao, X. (2000). Does extra genetic diversity maintain escalation in a co-evolutionary arms race, International Journal of Knowledge-Based Intelligent Engineering Systems4(3): 191–200.]Search in Google Scholar
[de Jong, E.D. (2004). The incremental Pareto-coevolution archive, in K. Deb et al. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3102, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 525–536.10.1007/978-3-540-24854-5_55]Search in Google Scholar
[Ficici, S.G. (2004). Solution Concepts in Coevolutionary Algorithms, Ph.D. thesis, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fogel, D.B. (1991). The evolution of intelligent decision making in gaming, Cybernetics and Systems22(2): 223–236.10.1080/01969729108902281]Search in Google Scholar
[Fogel, D.B. (2001). Blondie24: Playing at the Edge of AI, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA.10.1016/B978-155860783-5/50016-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Frean, M. (1996). The evolution of degrees of cooperation, Journal of Theoretical Biology182(4): 549–59.10.1006/jtbi.1996.0194]Search in Google Scholar
[Hart, S. and Mas-Colell, A. (2000). A simple adaptive procedure leading to correlated equilibrium, Econometrica68(5): 1127–1150.10.1111/1468-0262.00153]Search in Google Scholar
[Hillis, W.D. (1990). Co-evolving parasites improve simulated evolution as an optimization procedure, Physica D42(1–3): 228–234.10.1016/0167-2789(90)90076-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Jaśkowski, W. (2011). Algorithms for Test-Based Problems, Ph.D. thesis, Poznań University of Technology, Poznań.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jaśkowski, W. (2014). Systematic n-tuple networks for Othello position evaluation, ICGA Journal37(2): 85–96.10.3233/ICG-2014-37203]Search in Google Scholar
[Jaśkowski, W. and Krawiec, K. (2011). How many dimensions in cooptimization?, in N. Krasnogor (Ed.), Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, ACM, New York, NY, pp. 829–830.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jaśkowski, W., Krawiec, K. and Wieloch, B. (2008). Evolving strategy for a probabilistic game of imperfect information using genetic programming, Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines9(4): 281–294.10.1007/s10710-008-9062-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Jaśkowski, W., Liskowski, P., Szubert, M. and Krawiec, K. (2013). Improving coevolution by random sampling, in C. Blum (Ed.), GECCO’13: Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, ACM, Amsterdam, pp. 1141–1148.10.1145/2463372.2463512]Search in Google Scholar
[Jaśkowski, W., Szubert, M. and Liskowski, P. (2014). Multi-criteria comparison of coevolution and temporal difference learning on Othello, in A.I. Esparcia-Alcazar and A.M. Mora (Eds.), EvoApplications 2014, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 8602, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 301–312.10.1007/978-3-662-45523-4_25]Search in Google Scholar
[Juillé, H. and Pollack, J.B. (1998). Coevolving the ideal trainer: Application to the discovery of cellular automata rules, Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Conference on Genetic Programming, Madison, WI, USA, pp. 519–527.]Search in Google Scholar
[Knowles, J.D., Watson, R.A. and Corne, D. (2001). Reducing local optima in single-objective problems by multi-objectivization, EMO’01: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, Zurich, Switzerland, pp. 269–283.]Search in Google Scholar
[Krawiec, K., Jaśkowski, W. and Szubert, M. (2011). Evolving small-board go players using coevolutionary temporal difference learning with archive, International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science21(4): 717–731, DOI: 10.2478/v10006-011-0057-3.10.2478/v10006-011-0057-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Lucas, S.M. (2007). Learning to play Othello with n-tuple systems, Australian Journal of Intelligent Information Processing Systems9(4): 1–20.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lucas, S.M. and Runarsson, T.P. (2006). Temporal difference learning versus co-evolution for acquiring Othello position evaluation, IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Games, Reno, NV, USA, pp. 52–59.]Search in Google Scholar
[Luke, S. and Wiegand, R.P. (2002). When coevolutionary algorithms exhibit evolutionary dynamics, in A.M. Barry (Ed.), GECCO 2002: Proceedings of the Bird of a Feather Workshops, Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, AAAI, New York, NY, pp. 236–241.]Search in Google Scholar
[Manning, E.P. (2010). Using resource-limited Nash memory to improve an Othello evaluation function, IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games2(1): 40–53.10.1109/TCIAIG.2010.2042598]Search in Google Scholar
[Nolfi, S. and Floreano, D. (1998). Coevolving predator and prey robots: Do “Arms races” arise in artificial evolution?, Artificial Life4(4): 311–335.10.1162/10645469856862010352236]Search in Google Scholar
[Pollack, J.B. and Blair, A.D. (1998). Co-evolution in the successful learning of backgammon strategy, Machine Learning32(3): 225–240.10.1023/A:1007417214905]Search in Google Scholar
[Popovici, E., Bucci, A., Wiegand, R.P. and de Jong, E.D. (2011). Coevolutionary principles, in G. Rozenberg et al. (Eds.), Handbook of Natural Computing, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 987–1033.]Search in Google Scholar
[Popovici, E. and De Jong, K. (2009). Monotonicity versus performance in co-optimization, FOGA’09: Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGEVO Workshop on Foundations of Genetic Algorithms, Orlando, FL, USA, pp. 151–170.]Search in Google Scholar
[Poundstone, W. (1992). Prisoner’s Dilemma: John von Neuman, Game Theory, and the Puzzle of the Bomb, Doubleday, NY.10.1063/1.2809809]Search in Google Scholar
[Reynolds, C. (1994). Competition, coevolution and the game of tag, in R.A. Brooks and P. Maes (Eds.), Artificial Life IV: Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 59–69.]Search in Google Scholar
[Runarsson, T. and Lucas, S. (2014). Preference learning for move prediction and evaluation function approximation in Othello, IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games6(3): 300–313.10.1109/TCIAIG.2014.2307272]Search in Google Scholar
[Samothrakis, S., Lucas, S., Runarsson, T. and Robles, D. (2012). Coevolving game-playing agents: Measuring performance and intransitivities, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation17(2): 1–15.10.1109/TEVC.2012.2208755]Search in Google Scholar
[Szubert, M., Jaśkowski, W. and Krawiec, K. (2009). Coevolutionary temporal difference learning for Othello, IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Games, Milan, Italy, pp. 104–111.]Search in Google Scholar
[Szubert, M., Jaśkowski, W. and Krawiec, K. (2011). Learning board evaluation function for Othello by hybridizing coevolution with temporal difference learning, Control and Cybernetics40(3): 805–831.]Search in Google Scholar
[Szubert, M., Jaśkowski, W. and Krawiec, K. (2013a). On scalability, generalization, and hybridization of coevolutionary learning: A case study for Othello, IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games5(3): 214–226.10.1109/TCIAIG.2013.2258919]Search in Google Scholar
[Szubert, M., Liskowski, P., Jaśkowski, W. and Krawiec, K. (2013b). Shaping fitness function for evolutionary learning of game strategies, in C. Blum (Ed.), GECCO’13: Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, ACM, Amsterdam, pp. 1149–1156.10.1145/2463372.2463513]Search in Google Scholar
[Szubert, M., Jaśkowski, W., Liskowski, P. and Krawiec, K. (2015). The role of behavioral diversity and difficulty of opponents in coevolving game-playing agents, in M.A. Mora and G. Squilero (Eds.), EvoApplications 2015, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 9028, Springer, pp. 394–405.10.1007/978-3-319-16549-3_32]Search in Google Scholar
[Watson, R.A. and Pollack, J.B. (2001). Coevolutionary dynamics in a minimal substrate, Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2001), San Francisco, CA, USA, pp. 702–709.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yoshioka, T., Ishii, S. and Ito, M. (1998). Strategy acquisition for the game ”Othello” based on reinforcement learning, in S. Usui and T. Omori (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Neural Information Processing, ICONIP98, IOA Press, Kitakyushu, pp. 841–844.]Search in Google Scholar