[Álvarez-Meza, A.M., Valencia-Aguirre, J., Daza-Santacoloma, G. and Castellanos-Domínguez, G. (2011). Global and local choice of the number of nearest neighbors in locally linear embedding, Pattern Recognition Letters32(16): 2171–2177.10.1016/j.patrec.2011.05.011]Search in Google Scholar
[Belkin, M. and Niyogi, P. (2003). Laplacian eigenmaps for dimensionality reduction and data representation, Neural Computation15(6): 1373–1396.10.1162/089976603321780317]Search in Google Scholar
[Brand, M. (2003). Charting a manifold, in S. Becker, S. Thrun and K. Obermayer (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 15, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 961–968.]Search in Google Scholar
[Camastra, F. (2003). Data dimensionality estimation methods: A survey, Pattern Recognition36(12): 2945–2954.10.1016/S0031-3203(03)00176-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Carter, K.M., Raich, R. and Hero, A.O. (2010). On local intrinsic dimension estimation and its applications, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing58(2): 650–663.10.1109/TSP.2009.2031722]Search in Google Scholar
[Chang, Y., Hu, C. and Turk, M. (2004). Probabilistic expression analysis on manifolds, IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR(2), Washington, DC, USA, pp. 520–527.]Search in Google Scholar
[Costa, J.A. and Hero, A.O. (2004). Geodesic entropic graphs for dimension and entropy estimation in manifold learning, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing52(8): 2210–2221.10.1109/TSP.2004.831130]Search in Google Scholar
[Costa, J.A. and Hero, A.O. (2005). Estimating local intrinsic dimension with k-nearest neighbor graphs, IEEE Transactions on Statistical Signal Processing30(23): 1432–1436.10.1109/SSP.2005.1628631]Search in Google Scholar
[Donoho, D.L. and Grimes, C. (2005). Hessian eigenmaps: New locally linear embedding techniques for high-dimensional data, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences102(21): 7426–7431.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dzemyda, G., Kurasova, O. and Žilinskas, J. (2013). Multidimensional Data Visualization: Methods and Applications, Optimization and Its Applications, Vol. 75, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.]Search in Google Scholar
[Einbeck, J. and Kalantan, Z. (2013). Intrinsic dimensionality estimation for high-dimensional data sets: New approaches for the computation of correlation dimension, Journal of Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence5(2): 91–97.10.4304/jetwi.5.2.91-97]Search in Google Scholar
[Elgammal, A. and su Lee, C. (2004a). Inferring 3d body pose from silhouettes using activity manifold learning, IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR(2), Washington, DC, USA, pp. 681–688.]Search in Google Scholar
[Elgammal, A. and su Lee, C. (2004b). Separating style and content on a nonlinear manifold, IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR(1), Washington, DC, USA, pp. 478–485.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fan, M., Zhang, X., Chen, S., Bao, H. and Maybank, S.J. (2013). Dimension estimation of image manifolds by minimal cover approximation, Neurocomputing105: 19–29.10.1016/j.neucom.2012.04.037]Search in Google Scholar
[Fukunaga, K. (1982). Intrinsic dimensionality extraction, in P. Krishnaiah and L. Kanal (Eds.), Classification, Pattern Recognition and Reduction of Dimensionality, Handbook of Statistics, Vol. 2, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 347–362.10.1016/S0169-7161(82)02018-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Fukunaga, K. and Olsen, D. (1971). An algorithm for finding intrinsic dimensionality of data, IEEE Transactions on Computers20(2): 176–183.10.1109/T-C.1971.223208]Search in Google Scholar
[Gong, S., Cristani, M., Yan, S. and Loy, C.C. (Eds.) (2014). Person Re-Identification, Advances in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Vol. XVIII, Springer, London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grassberger, P. and Procaccia, I. (1983). Measuring the strangeness of strange attractors, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena9(1–2): 189–208.10.1016/0167-2789(83)90298-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Hadid, A., Kouropteva, O. and Pietikäinen, M. (2002). Unsupervised learning using locally linear embedding: experiments with face pose analysis, 16th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, ICPR’02(1), Quebec City, Quebec, Canada, pp. 111–114.]Search in Google Scholar
[He, J., Ding, L., Jiang, L., Li, Z. and Hu, Q. (2014). Intrinsic dimensionality estimation based on manifold assumption, Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation25(5): 740–747.10.1016/j.jvcir.2014.01.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Hein, M. and Audibert, J. (2005). Intrinsic dimensionality estimation of submanifolds in rd, Machine Learning: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference (ICML 2005), Bonn, Germany, pp. 289–296.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jenkins, O.C. and Mataric, M.J. (2004). A spatio-temporal extension to isomap nonlinear dimension reduction, 21st International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML(69), Banff, Alberta, Canada, pp. 441–448.]Search in Google Scholar
[Karbauskaitė, R. and Dzemyda, G. (2009). Topology preservation measures in the visualization of manifold-type multidimensional data, Informatica20(2): 235–254.10.15388/Informatica.2009.248]Search in Google Scholar
[Karbauskaitė, R. and Dzemyda, G. (2014). Geodesic distances in the intrinsic dimensionality estimation using packing numbers, Nonlinear Analysis: Modelling and Control19(4): 578–591.10.15388/NA.2014.4.4]Search in Google Scholar
[Karbauskaitė, R., Dzemyda, G. and Marcinkevičius, V. (2008). Selecting a regularization parameter in the locally linear embedding algorithm, 20th International EURO Mini Conference on Continuous Optimization and Knowledge-based Technologies (EurOPT2008), Neringa, Lithuania, pp. 59–64.]Search in Google Scholar
[Karbauskaitė, R., Dzemyda, G. and Marcinkevičius, V. (2010). Dependence of locally linear embedding on the regularization parameter, An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research18(2): 354–376.10.1007/s11750-010-0151-y]Search in Google Scholar
[Karbauskaitė, R., Dzemyda, G. and Mazėtis, E. (2011). Geodesic distances in the maximum likelihood estimator of intrinsic dimensionality, Nonlinear Analysis: Modelling and Control16(4): 387–402.10.15388/NA.16.4.14084]Search in Google Scholar
[Karbauskaitė, R., Kurasova, O. and Dzemyda, G. (2007). Selection of the number of neighbours of each data point for the locally linear embedding algorithm, Information Technology and Control36(4): 359–364.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kégl, B. (2003). Intrinsic dimension estimation using packing numbers, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS(15), Cambridge, MA, USA, pp. 697–704.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kouropteva, O., Okun, O. and Pietikäinen, M. (2002). Selection of the optimal parameter value for the locally linear embedding algorithm, 1st International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, FSKD(1), Singapore, pp. 359–363.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kulczycki, P. and Łukasik, S. (2014). An algorithm for reducing the dimension and size of a sample for data exploration procedures, International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science24(1): 133–149, DOI: 10.2478/amcs-2014-0011.10.2478/amcs-2014-0011]Search in Google Scholar
[Lee, J.A. and Verleysen, M. (2007). Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction, Springer, New York, NY.10.1007/978-0-387-39351-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Levina, E. and Bickel, P.J. (2005). Maximum likelihood estimation of intrinsic dimension, in L.K. Saul, Y. Weiss and L. Bottou (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 17, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 777–784.]Search in Google Scholar
[Levina, E., Wagaman, A.S., Callender, A.F., Mandair, G.S. and Morris, M.D. (2007). Estimating the number of pure chemical components in a mixture by maximum likelihood, Journal of Chemometrics21(1–2): 24–34.10.1002/cem.1027]Search in Google Scholar
[Li, S. Z., Xiao, R., Li, Z. and Zhang, H. (2001). Nonlinear mapping from multi-view face patterns to a Gaussian distribution in a low dimensional space, IEEE ICCV Workshop on Recognition, Analysis, and Tracking of Faces and Gestures in Real-Time Systems (RATFG-RTS), Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp. 47–54.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mo, D. and Huang, S.H. (2012). Fractal-based intrinsic dimension estimation and its application in dimensionality reduction, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering24(1): 59–71.10.1109/TKDE.2010.225]Search in Google Scholar
[Nene, S.A., Nayar, S.K. and Murase, H. (1996). Columbia object image library (COIL-20), Technical Report CUCS-005-96, Columbia University, New York, NY.]Search in Google Scholar
[Niskanen, M. and Silven, O. (2003). Comparison of dimensionality reduction methods for wood surface inspection, 6th International Conference on Quality Control by Artificial Vision, QCAV(5132), Gatlinburg, TN, USA, pp. 178–188.]Search in Google Scholar
[Qiao, M.F.H. and Zhang, B. (2009). Intrinsic dimension estimation of manifolds by incising balls, Pattern Recognition42(5): 780–787.10.1016/j.patcog.2008.09.016]Search in Google Scholar
[Roweis, S.T. and Saul, L.K. (2000). Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding, Science290(5500): 2323–2326.10.1126/science.290.5500.232311125150]Search in Google Scholar
[Saul, L.K. and Roweis, S.T. (2003). Think globally, fit locally: Unsupervised learning of low dimensional manifolds, Journal of Machine Learning Research4: 119–155.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shin, Y.J. and Park, C.H. (2011). Analysis of correlation based dimension reduction methods, International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science21(3): 549–558, DOI: 10.2478/v10006-011-0043-9.10.2478/v10006-011-0043-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Tenenbaum, J.B., de Silva, V. and Langford, J.C. (2000). A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction, Science290(5500): 2319–2323.10.1126/science.290.5500.231911125149]Search in Google Scholar
[van der Maaten, L.J.P. (2007). An introduction to dimensionality reduction using MATLAB, Technical Report MICC 07-07, Maastricht University, Maastricht.]Search in Google Scholar
[Varini, C., Nattkemper, T. W., Degenhard, A. and Wismuller, A. (2004). Breast MRI data analysis by LLE, Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Montreal, Canada, Vol. 3, pp. 2449–2454.]Search in Google Scholar
[Verveer, P. and Duin, R. (1995). An evaluation of intrinsic dimensionality estimators, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence17(1): 81–86.10.1109/34.368147]Search in Google Scholar
[Weinberger, K.Q. and Saul, L.K. (2006). Unsupervised learning of image manifolds by semidefinite programming, International Journal of Computer Vision70(1): 77–90.10.1007/s11263-005-4939-z]Search in Google Scholar
[Yang, M.-H. (2002). Face recognition using extended isomap, IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP(2), Rochester, NY, USA, pp. 117–120.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yata, K. and Aoshima, M. (2010). Intrinsic dimensionality estimation of high-dimension, low sample size data with d-asymptotics, Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods39(8–9): 1511–1521.10.1080/03610920903121999]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhang, J., Li, S.Z. and Wang, J. (2004). Nearest manifold approach for face recognition, 6th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, Seoul, South Korea, pp. 223–228.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhang, Z. and Zha, H. (2004). Principal manifolds and nonlinear dimensionality reduction via local tangent space alignment, SIAM Journal of Scientific Computing26(1): 313–338.10.1137/S1064827502419154]Search in Google Scholar