A Study on Fracture Resistance of Class IV Cavities Treated with Pins

1 . Butchard , D., A. Grieve et J. Kamel. Retention of composite restorations: A comparison between a threated pin and a dentine binding agent. - British Dental J., 165, 1988, № 6, 217-219. 10.1038/sj.bdj.4806563Search in Google Scholar

2 . Burgess, J. O., A. Alvares et J. B. Summit. Fracture resistance of complex amalgam restorations. - Operative Dentistry, 22, 1997, № 3, 128-132. Search in Google Scholar

3 . Federick , D. A marriage of convenience: bonds of retention pins and composites. - J. Prosthetic Dentistry, 57, 1987, № 3, 270-276. 10.1016/0022-3913(87)90295-2Search in Google Scholar

4 . Felton , D. et al. Pulpal response to treated pin and retentive slot techniques: A pilot investigation. - J. Prosthetic Dentistry, 66, 1991, № 5, 597-602. 10.1016/0022-3913(91)90436-ZSearch in Google Scholar

5 . Imbery, T. A., J. O. Burgess et R. C. Batzer. Comparing the resistance of dentin bonding agents and pins in amalgam restorations. - J. Am. Dental Association,126, 1995, № 6, 753-759. 10.14219/jada.archive.1995.02707797731Search in Google Scholar

6 . Muhlbauer, J. et al. Composite pins in class IV restorations. - Operative Dentistry, 27, 2002, № 3, 285-288. Search in Google Scholar

7 . Neme , A., D. Evans et B. Maxson. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results. - Operative Dentistry, 25, 2000, 512-519. Search in Google Scholar

8 . Pickard, H. M. A manual of operative dentistry. Oxford University Press, 1983, p. 129, 149, 153, 204, 206, 232. Search in Google Scholar

9 . Redtenbacher, K. Use of retentive pins in composite restorations class IV. - Quintessence International, 1975, 6, 7, 31-32. Search in Google Scholar

10 . Roberts, H., C. Hermesch et D. Charlton. The use of resin composite pins to improve retention of class IV restorations. - Operative dentistry, 25, 2000, 4, 2, 270-273. Search in Google Scholar

11 . Sen, D., E. Nayir et F. Cetiner. Shear bond strength of amalgam reinforced with a bonding agent and/or dentin pins. - J. Prosthetic Dentistry, 87, 2002, № 4, 446-450. 10.1067/mpr.2002.122865Search in Google Scholar

12 . Standlee, J., E. Collard et A. Caputo. Dentinal defects caused by some twist drills and retentive pins. - Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 24, 1970, № 2, 185-192.10.1016/0022-3913(70)90143-5Search in Google Scholar

13. Summitt, J. B.et all. The performance of bonded versus pin retained complex amalgam restorations: a five year clinical evaluation. - Journal of American Dental Association, 132, 2001, № 7, 923-931. 10.14219/jada.archive.2001.030511480646Search in Google Scholar

14 . Summitt, J. B.et al. Six year clinical evaluation of bonded and pin-retained complex amalgam restorations. - Operative Dentistry, 29, 2004, № 3, 261-268. Search in Google Scholar

15 . Terence, A., et al. Comparing the resistance of dentin bonding agents. - J. Am. Dental Association, 126, 1995, 753. 10.14219/jada.archive.1995.0270Search in Google Scholar

16 . Vaught, R. L. Mechanical versus chemical retention for restoring complex restorations. What is the evidence? - J. Dental Education, 71, 2007, № 10, 1356-1362. 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2007.71.10.tb04400.xSearch in Google Scholar