Delamination Resistance Of Laminate Made With VBO MTM46/HTS Prepreg

1. ASTM D5528-12 Standard Test Method for Mode I Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Matrix CompositesSearch in Google Scholar

2. ASTM D6115-97 Standard Test Method for Mode I Fatigue Delamination Growth Onset of Unidirectional Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Matrix CompositesSearch in Google Scholar

3. ASTM D6671-13 Standard Test Method for Mixed Mode I-Mode II Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional Fiber Reinforced Polymer Matrix CompositesSearch in Google Scholar

4. Bai J. (ed.) (2013), Advanced fibre–reinforced polymer (FRP) compositesfor structural application, Woodhead Pu. Ltd.10.1533/9780857098641Search in Google Scholar

5. Becht G. J., Gillespie J. W. (1989), Numerical and Experimantal Evaluation of the Mode III Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Composite Materials, Polymer Composites, 10, 293-303.10.1002/pc.750100505Search in Google Scholar

6. Czabaj M. W., Ratcliffe J. (2012), Comparison of Intralaminar and Interlaminar Mode-I Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional IM7/8552 Graphite/Epoxy Composite, NACA raport NF 16762-15094.10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.09.008Search in Google Scholar

7. Czajkowska K., Czarnocki P, Lorenc Z. (2014), Interlaminar Mode II Toughness of Unidirectional CF-Epoxy Laminates Made of out of Autoclave Prepregs, Key Engineering Materials, 598, 45-50.10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.598.45Search in Google Scholar

8. Hiley M. (2000), Delamination between multi-directional ply interfaces in carbon-epoxy composite under static and fatigue loadings, Fracture of Polymers, Composites and Adhesives, ESIS Publication 27, 41-72.10.1016/S1566-1369(00)80008-4Search in Google Scholar

9. Kim R. Y. (2001), Polymer matrix composite (PMC) damage tolerance and repair technology, Report No. UDR-TR-2001-00041.Search in Google Scholar

10. Lander J. K., Kawashita L. F, Allegri G, Hallett S. R, Wisnom M. R., (2010), A cut ply specimen for the determination of mixedmode interlaminar fracture toughness, 14th European Conference on Composite Materials, 1-11.Search in Google Scholar

11. Meziere Y., Michel L. (2000), Mixed-Mode delamination Failure criteria in Carbon Fibre/Composite under Quasi-Static and Cyclic Loadings, Fracture of Polymers, Composites and Adhesives, ESIS Publication 27, 97-110.10.1016/S1566-1369(00)80011-4Search in Google Scholar

12. Murri B., (2011), Effect of Data Reduction and Fiber-Bridging on Mode I Delamination Characterization of Unidirectional Composites, Proceedings of the American Society for Composites 26th Annual Technical Conference/2nd Joint US-Canada Conference on Composites.Search in Google Scholar

13. Paris I., Minguet P. J., O’Brien T. K. (2003), Comparison of Delamination Characterisation for IM7/8552 Composite Woven and Tape Laminates, ASTM STP 1436, 372-390.10.1520/STP38422SSearch in Google Scholar

14. Stelzer S., Jones R., Brunner A. J. (2013), Interlaminar Fatigue Crack Growth In Carbon Fiber Reinforced Composites, The19th International Conference On Composite Materials, 1-9.Search in Google Scholar

15. Szekrenyes A. (2010), Crack Stability of Fractuer Specimens Used to Test Unidirectional Fiber Reinforced Material, Experimental chanics, 50, 473-482.10.1007/s11340-009-9251-8Search in Google Scholar