Open Access

Investigation of the Options to Extend the Period of Market Supply with Fruits of Cape Gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.)


Cite

CARVALHO, C. P. – VILLAÑO, D. – MORENO, D. A. – SERRANO, M. – VALERO, D. 2015. Alginate edible coating and cold storage for improving the physicochemical quality of cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.). In Journal of Food Science and Nutritions, vol. 1, pp. 102–112. ISSN 2048-7177.Search in Google Scholar

CHERNOOK, L. G. 1997. Tomato, pepper, eggplant, cape gooseberry. In Series Vitalis, pp. 288. ISBN 1156-258-369.Search in Google Scholar

CHRISTOV, Ch. 2010. Cape goosverry – Physalis peruviana L. In Seeds of rare and unknown fruits and vegetables. Available at: www.hobi-semena.com (accessed March, 2010). ISSN 6853-2569.Search in Google Scholar

FISCHER, G. – HERRERA, A. – ALMANZA, P. J. 2011 Cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.). In Postharvest biology and technology of tropical and subtropical fruits, vol. 2, pp. 374–396. ISSN 978-1-84569-733-4.Search in Google Scholar

FOWEL, J. – COHEN, L. 1992. Practicle statistics for field biology. New York : John Wiley & Sons. 223 p. ISBN 978-1-118-30055-8.Search in Google Scholar

GARZÓN-ACOSTA, C. P. – VILLARREAL-GARZÓN, D. M. – FISCHER, G. – HERRERA, A. O. – SANJUANELO, D. W. 2014. Deficiencies of phosphorus, calcium and magnesium affect the postharvest quality of cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) fruits. In Acta horticulturae, vol. 1047, pp. 208–216. ISSN 0567-7572.Search in Google Scholar

HERNANDO, P. E. – REYES, A. J. – ÁLVAREZ-HERRERA, J. G. – LEGUIZAMO, M. F. – JOYA, J. G. 2015. Comportamiento del fruto de uchuva Physalis peruviana L., bajo diferentes temperaturas de almacenamiento. In Revista de Ciencias Agrícolasta, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 26–35. ISSN 2238-1171.Search in Google Scholar

IVANOVA, V. – PANCHEV, V. – TABASHKA, T. 2014. The influence of the term of seed harvesting of lime (Tilia ssp.) on the vegetative behaviours of seedlings. In Scientific works of Union of Scientist of Bulgaria, ser. Techniques and technology, vol. 12, pp. 310–16. ISSN 1311-9192.Search in Google Scholar

JAEGER, P. 2001. Study of the Market For Rwandan Physalis In Europe. New York : ADAR Agribusiness Centre, p 17. ISBN 879-235-123-7.Search in Google Scholar

KENDALL, H. 2008. Cape gooseberry. In Kendall farm. Available at: http://www.kendallfarms.com.au/home2.htm (accessed October, 2008). ISSN 8421-3852.Search in Google Scholar

KLINAC, N. J. – WOOD, F. H. 1986. Cape Gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.). In Orchardist of New Zealand, vol. 59, pp. 103. ISSN 0110-6260.Search in Google Scholar

McCAIN, R. 1993. Goldenberry, passion fruit, & white sapote: Potential fruits for cool subtropical areas. In New Crops, edited by J. Janick and J.E. Simon. New York, John Wiley and Sons, pp. 479–486. ISBN 0-471-59374-5.Search in Google Scholar

MORTON, J. F. 1987. Cape gooseberry. In: Fruits of Warm Climates, edited by J.F. Morton. Winterville : Creative Resource Systems, Inc, pp. 430–434. Available at: http://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/morton/cape gooseberry.html (accessed May 21, 2007).Search in Google Scholar

NOVOA, R. H. – BOJACA, M. – GALVIS, J. A. – FISCHER, G. 2006. Fruit maturity and calyx drying influence post-harvest behavior of Cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) stored at 12 °C. In Agronomía Colombiana, vol.24, no. 1, pp. 77–86. ISSN 0120-9965.Search in Google Scholar

PANAYOTOV, N. – TCORLIANIS, S. 2000. The effect of type of seedlings and of the planting scheme on productivity and quality of tomatilo (Physalis peruviana L.) grown under Bulgarian condition. In Acta Horticulture, vol. 579, pp. 373–376. ISSN 0567-7572.Search in Google Scholar

PANAYOTOV, N. – PEVICHAROVA, G. 2002. Investigation on the possibilities for cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) post-harvest storage. In Proceeding of the First Symposium of Horticulture, 16–20 October 2002, Ohrid, Republic of Macedonia, pp. 634–637. ISBN 0567-7572.Search in Google Scholar

PATEL, P. R. – NEETA, B. G. – TADAPANENI, V. – RAO, R. 2011. Physiochemical changes in sunberry (Physalis minima L.) fruit during growth and ripening. In Fruits, 2011, vol. 66, pp. 37–46. ISBN 965-895-2658-6-7.Search in Google Scholar

PEIRIS, K. H. S. – MALLON, J. L. – KAYS, S. L. 1999. Raspiratry rate and vital heat of some specially vegetables at various storage temperatures. In HortTechnology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 46–49. ISSN 1063-0198.Search in Google Scholar

RAFAEL, H. N. – MAURICIO, B. – JESÚS, A. G. – GERHARD, F. 2006. La madurez del fruto y el secado del cáliz influyen en el comportamiento poscosecha de la uchuva, almacenada a 12 °C (Physalis peruviana L.). In Agronomia Colombia, vol. 24, no. 1, pp.138–145. ISSN 0120-9965.Search in Google Scholar

RAMADAN, M. F. – MOERSEL, J. T. 2007. Impact of enzymatic treatment on chemical composition, physicochemical properties and radical scavenging activity of goldenberry (Physalis peruviana L.) juice. In Journals of Science for Food Agriculture, vol. 87, pp. 452–460. ISSN 1097-0010.Search in Google Scholar

RAMADAN, M. F. 2011. Bioactive phytochemicals, nutritional value, and functional properties of cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana). In Food Research International, vol. 44, pp. 1830–1836. ISSN 0963-9969.Search in Google Scholar

SAHOO, D. P. – MAHAPATRA, A. K. DAS – SAHOO, N. R. 2002. Effect of nitrogen and potassium on growth and yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) Var. Utkal Kumari. Haryana. In Journal of Horticultural Science., vol. 31, no. 3–4, pp. 264–266. ISSN 1611-4426.Search in Google Scholar

SARKAR, T. K. – PRADHAN, U. – CHATTOPADHYAY, T. K., 1993. Storability and quality changes of capegooseberry fruit as influenced by packaging and stage of maturity. In Annals of Agricultural Research, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 396–401. ISSN 0570-1783.Search in Google Scholar

SHOPOVA, N. – CHOLAKOV, D. – HAYTOVA, D. 2014a. Productivity of the plants for late field tomato production depending on the age and planting area of the seedling. In Journal of International Scientific Publications: Agriculture and Food, vol. 2, pp.179–191. ISBN 879-235-123-7.Search in Google Scholar

SHOPOVA, N. – CHOLAKOV, D. – HAYTOVA, D. 2014b. Effect of the composition of seedlings mixture on the physiological behaviour and photosynthetic productivity of tomato plants. In Journal of International Scientific Publications: Agriculture and Food, vol. 2, pp.171–178. ISBN 879-235-123-7.Search in Google Scholar

VALDENEGRO, M. – FUENTES, L. – HERRERA, R. – MOYA-LEÓN, M. A. 2012. Changes in antioxidant capacity during development and ripening of goldenberry (Physalis peruviana L.) fruit and in response to 1-methylcyclopropene treatment. In Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol. 67, pp. 110–117. ISSN 0925-5214.Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1338-5259
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
2 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Industrial Chemistry, Green and Sustainable Technology