Duplex Methylation-Specific Semi-Quantitative Real-Time PCR for Cost-Effective & Time-Efficient Diagnostic Screening of Chromosome 15 and 14 Imprinted Regions

1. Paro-Panjan D, Neubauer D. Congenital hypotonia: is there an algorithm? J Child Neurol. 2004;19(6):439-42.10.1177/08830738040190060815446393Search in Google Scholar

2. Leyenaar J, Camfield P, Camfield C. A schematic approach to hypotonia in infancy. Paediatr Child Health. 2005;10(7):397-400.10.1093/pch/10.7.397272256119668647Search in Google Scholar

3. Mitter D, Buiting K, von Eggeling F, Kuechler A, Liehr T, Mau-Holzmann UA, et al. Is there a higher incidence of maternal uniparental disomy 14 [upd(14)mat]? Detection of 10 new patients by methylation-specific PCR. Am J Med Genet A. 2006;140(19):2039-49.10.1002/ajmg.a.3141416906536Search in Google Scholar

4. Ramsden SC, Clayton-Smith J, Birch R, Buiting K. Practice guidelines for the molecular analysis of Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes. BMC Med Genet. 2010;11:70.10.1186/1471-2350-11-70287767020459762Search in Google Scholar

5. Askree SH, Dharamrup S, Hjelm LN, Coffee B. Parent-of-origin testing for 15q11-q13 gains by quantitative DNA methylation analysis. J Mol Diagn. 2012;14(3):192-8.10.1016/j.jmoldx.2012.01.00522426236Search in Google Scholar

6. Burman P, Ritzen EM, Lindgren AC. Endocrine dysfunction in Prader-Willi syndrome: a review with special reference to GH. Endocr Rev. 2001;22(6):787-99.10.1210/edrv.22.6.044711739333Search in Google Scholar

7. Butler MG. Prader-Willi Syndrome: Obesity due to Genomic Imprinting. Current Genomics. 2011;12(3):204-15.10.2174/138920211795677877313700522043168Search in Google Scholar

8. Bird LM. Angelman syndrome: review of clinical and molecular aspects. Appl Clin Genet. 2014;7:93-104.10.2147/TACG.S57386403614624876791Search in Google Scholar

9. Murphy SK, Wylie AA, Coveler KJ, Cotter PD, Papenhausen PR, Sutton VR, et al. Epigenetic detection of human chromosome 14 uniparental disomy. Hum Mutat. 2003;22(1):92-7.10.1002/humu.1023712815599Search in Google Scholar

10. Irving MD, Buiting K, Kanber D, Donaghue C, Schulz R, Offiah A, et al. Segmental paternal uniparental disomy (patUPD) of 14q32 with abnormal methylation elicits the characteristic features of complete patUPD14. Am J Med Genet A. 2010;152A(8):1942-50.10.1002/ajmg.a.33449381965320602488Search in Google Scholar

11. Hosoki K, Kagami M, Tanaka T, Kubota M, Kurosawa K, Kato M, et al. Maternal uniparental disomy 14 syndrome demonstrates prader-willi syndrome-like phenotype. J Pediatr. 2009;155(6):900-3 e1.10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.06.045Search in Google Scholar

12. Wang HL, Liang DS, Xia Y, Xia C, Wu LQ. [Genetic diagnosis and prenatal diagnosis of Angelman syndrome]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi. 2009;26(5):511-3.Search in Google Scholar

13. Wang W, Law HY, Chong SS. Detection and discrimination between deletional and non-deletional Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes by methylation-specific PCR and quantitative melting curve analysis. J Mol Diagn. 2009;11(5):446-9.10.2353/jmoldx.2009.090015Search in Google Scholar

14. Fu A, Leaderer D, Zheng T, Hoffman AE, Stevens RG, Zhu Y. Genetic and epigenetic associations of circadian gene TIMELESS and breast cancer risk. Mol Carcinog. 2012;51(12):923-9.10.1002/mc.20862Search in Google Scholar

15. Rodenhiser D, Mann M. Epigenetics and human disease: translating basic biology into clinical applications. CMAJ. 2006;174(3):341-8.10.1503/cmaj.050774Search in Google Scholar

16. Skaar DA, Li Y, Bernal AJ, Hoyo C, Murphy SK, Jirtle RL. The human imprintome: regulatory mechanisms, methods of ascertainment, and roles in disease susceptibility. ILAR J. 2013;53(3-4):341-58.10.1093/ilar.53.3-4.341Search in Google Scholar

17. Jay P, Rougeulle C, Massacrier A, Moncla A, Mattei MG, Malzac P, et al. The human necdin gene, NDN, is maternally imprinted and located in the Prader-Willi syndrome chromosomal region. Nat Genet. 1997;17(3):357-61.10.1038/ng1197-357Search in Google Scholar

18. Wey E, Bartholdi D, Riegel M, Nazlican H, Horsthemke B, Schinzel A, et al. Mosaic imprinting defect in a patient with an almost typical expression of the Prader-Willi syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet. 2005;13(3):273-7.10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201337Search in Google Scholar

19. Cassidy SB, Dykens E, Williams CA. Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes: sister imprinted disorders. Am J Med Genet. 2000;97(2):136-46.10.1002/1096-8628(200022)97:2<136::AID-AJMG5>3.0.CO;2-VSearch in Google Scholar

20. Valente KD, Varela MC, Koiffmann CP, Andrade JQ, Grossmann R, Kok F, et al. Angelman syndrome caused by deletion: a genotype-phenotype correlation determined by breakpoint. Epilepsy Res. 2013;105(1-2):234-9.10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2012.12.005Search in Google Scholar

21. Lossie AC, Whitney MM, Amidon D, Dong HJ, Chen P, Theriaque D, et al. Distinct phenotypes distinguish the molecular classes of Angelman syndrome. J Med Genet. 2001;38(12):834-45.10.1136/jmg.38.12.834Search in Google Scholar

22. Saitoh S, Wada T, Okajima M, Takano K, Sudo A, Niikawa N. Uniparental disomy and imprinting defects in Japanese patients with Angelman syndrome. Brain Dev. 2005;27(5):389-91.10.1016/j.braindev.2003.12.01316023557Search in Google Scholar