Development of assisted reproductive technology services in Thailand between 2008 and 2014 before the new law: Results generated from the National ART Registry, Royal Thai College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

[1]Mascarenhas MN, Flaxman SR, Boerma T, Vanderpoel S, Stevens GA. National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: a systematic analysis of 277 health surveys. PLoS Med. 2012; 9:e1001356.MascarenhasMNFlaxmanSRBoermaTVanderpoelSStevensGANational, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: a systematic analysis of 277 health surveysPLoS Med20129e100135610.1371/journal.pmed.1001356Search in Google Scholar

[2]Okhovati M, Zare M, Zare F, Bazrafshan MS, Bazrafshan A. Trends in global assisted reproductive technologies research: a scientometrics study. Electron Physician. 2015; 7:1597–601.OkhovatiMZareMZareFBazrafshanMSBazrafshanATrends in global assisted reproductive technologies research: a scientometrics studyElectron Physician20157159760110.19082/1597Search in Google Scholar

[3]Kushnir VA, Barad DH, Albertini DF, Darmon SK, Gleicher N. Systematic review of worldwide trends in assisted reproductive technology 2004–2013. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2017; 15:6.KushnirVABaradDHAlbertiniDFDarmonSKGleicherNSystematic review of worldwide trends in assisted reproductive technology 2004–2013Reprod Biol Endocrinol201715610.1186/s12958-016-0225-2Search in Google Scholar

[4]Whittaker A. From mung ming to baby gammy: a local history of assisted reproduction in Thailand. Reprod Biomed Online. 2016; 2:71–8.WhittakerAFrom mung ming to baby gammy: a local history of assisted reproduction in ThailandReprod Biomed Online2016271810.1016/j.rbms.2016.05.005Search in Google Scholar

[5]Pruksananonda K, Suwajanakorn S, Boonkasemsanti W, Virutamasen P, Chinpilas V. Importance factors for the establishment of a successful program of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). In: Gomel V, Leung PCK, editors. In vitro fertilization and assisted reproduction. Bologna: Monduzzi Editore; 1997, p. 537–40.PruksananondaKSuwajanakornSBoonkasemsantiWVirutamasenPChinpilasVImportance factors for the establishment of a successful program of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)In:GomelVLeungPCKeditors.In vitro fertilization and assisted reproductionBolognaMonduzzi Editore199753740Search in Google Scholar

[6]Vutyavanich T, Piromlertamorn W, Ellis J; Reproductive Medicine Subcommittee, Royal Thai College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Assisted reproductive technologies in Thailand: 2001–2007 results generated from the ART Registry, Royal Thai College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2011; 37:236–44.VutyavanichTPiromlertamornWEllisJReproductive Medicine Subcommittee, Royal Thai College of Obstetricians and GynaecologistsAssisted reproductive technologies in Thailand: 2001–2007 results generated from the ART Registry, Royal Thai College of Obstetricians and GynaecologistsJ Obstet Gynaecol Res2011372364410.1111/j.1447-0756.2010.01384.xSearch in Google Scholar

[7]Pruksananonda K, Virutamasen P. Future concern for assisted reproductive technology in Thailand. Thai J Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 9:57–63.PruksananondaKVirutamasenPFuture concern for assisted reproductive technology in ThailandThai J Obstet Gynecol199795763Search in Google Scholar

[8]Whittaker A. International surrogacy as disruptive industry in Southeast Asia. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press; 2018.WhittakerAInternational surrogacy as disruptive industry in Southeast AsiaNew Brunswick, New JerseyRutgers University Press201810.2307/j.ctv6p3zpSearch in Google Scholar

[9]Crooks VA, Turner L, Snyder J, Johnston R, Kingsbury P. Promoting medical tourism to India: messages, images, and the marketing of international patient travel. Soc Sci Med. 2011; 72:726–32.CrooksVATurnerLSnyderJJohnstonRKingsburyPPromoting medical tourism to India: messages, images, and the marketing of international patient travelSoc Sci Med2011727263210.1016/j.socscimed.2010.12.022Search in Google Scholar

[10]Whittaker A. Cross-border assisted reproduction care in Asia: implications for access, equity and regulations. Reprod Health Matters. 2011; 19:107–16.WhittakerACross-border assisted reproduction care in Asia: implications for access, equity and regulationsReprod Health Matters2011191071610.1016/S0968-8080(11)37575-1Search in Google Scholar

[11]Virutamasen P, Pruksananonda K, Limpaphayom K, Chokevivat V, Kunaratanapruk S. The regulation of assisted reproductive technology in Thailand. J Med Assoc Thai. 2001; 84:1490–4.VirutamasenPPruksananondaKLimpaphayomKChokevivatVKunaratanaprukSThe regulation of assisted reproductive technology in ThailandJ Med Assoc Thai20018414904Search in Google Scholar

[12]Deonandan R. Recent trends in reproductive tourism and international surrogacy: ethical considerations and challenges for policy. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2015; 8:111–9.DeonandanRRecent trends in reproductive tourism and international surrogacy: ethical considerations and challenges for policyRisk Manag Healthc Policy20158111910.2147/RMHP.S63862454480926316832Search in Google Scholar

[13]Sunderam S, Kissin DM, Crawford SB, Folger SG, Boulet SL, Warner L, Barfield WD. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance—United States, 2015. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2018; 67:1–28.SunderamSKissinDMCrawfordSBFolgerSGBouletSLWarnerLBarfieldWDAssisted reproductive technology surveillance—United States, 2015MMWR Surveill Summ20186712810.15585/mmwr.ss6703a1582994129447147Search in Google Scholar

[14]Jones HW. Seven roads traveled well and seven to be traveled more. Fertil Steril. 2011; 95:853–6.JonesHWSeven roads traveled well and seven to be traveled moreFertil Steril201195853610.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.01.02421276969Search in Google Scholar

[15]Chambers GM, Paul RC, Harris K, Fitzgerald O, Boothroyd CV, Rombauts L, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Australia and New Zealand: cumulative live birth rates as measures of success. Med J Aust. 2017; 207:114–8.ChambersGMPaulRCHarrisKFitzgeraldOBoothroydCVRombautsLAssisted reproductive technology in Australia and New Zealand: cumulative live birth rates as measures of successMed J Aust2017207114810.5694/mja16.0143528764619Search in Google Scholar

[16]European IVFMCftESoHR, Embryology, Calhaz-Jorge C, de Geyter C, Kupka MS, de Mouzon J, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2012: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2016; 31:1638–52.European IVFMCftESoHR, EmbryologyCalhaz-JorgeCde GeyterCKupkaMSde MouzonJAssisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2012: results generated from European registers by ESHREHum Reprod20163116385210.1093/humrep/dew15127496943Search in Google Scholar

[17]Mansour R, Ishihara O, Adamson GD, Dyer S, de Mouzon J, Nygren KG, et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: Assisted Reproductive Technology 2006. Hum Reprod. 2014; 29:1536–51.MansourRIshiharaOAdamsonGDDyerSde MouzonJNygrenKGInternational Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: Assisted Reproductive Technology 2006Hum Reprod20142915365110.1093/humrep/deu08424795090Search in Google Scholar

[18]Zamora S, Clavero A, Gonzalvo MC, de Dios Luna Del Castillo J, Roldan-Nofuentes JA, Mozas J, et al. PGS-FISH in reproductive medicine and perspective directions for improvement: a systematic review. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011; 28:747–57.ZamoraSClaveroAGonzalvoMCde Dios Luna Del CastilloJRoldan-NofuentesJAMozasJPGS-FISH in reproductive medicine and perspective directions for improvement: a systematic reviewJ Assist Reprod Genet2011287475710.1007/s10815-011-9578-9317011421713549Search in Google Scholar

[19]Meldrum D. Society for assisted reproductive technology/centers for disease control and prevention in vitro fertilization registry 2.0. Fertil Steril. 2013; 100:1212–3.MeldrumDSociety for assisted reproductive technology/centers for disease control and prevention in vitro fertilization registry 2.0Fertil Steril20131001212310.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.09.03424112526Search in Google Scholar

[20]Boulet SL, Mehta A, Kissin DM, Warner L, Kawwass JF, Jamieson DJ. Trends in use of and reproductive outcomes associated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. JAMA. 2015; 313:255–63.BouletSLMehtaAKissinDMWarnerLKawwassJFJamiesonDJTrends in use of and reproductive outcomes associated with intracytoplasmic sperm injectionJAMA20153132556310.1001/jama.2014.17985434321425602996Search in Google Scholar

[21]Calhaz-Jorge C, de Geyter C, Kupka MS, de Mouzon J, Erb K, Mocanu E, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2012: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2016; 31 (8):1638–52.Calhaz-JorgeCde GeyterCKupkaMSde MouzonJErbKMocanuEAssisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2012: results generated from European registers by ESHREHum Reprod201631816385210.1093/humrep/dew151Search in Google Scholar

[22]Ishihara O, Adamson GD, Dyer S, de Mouzon J, Nygren KG, Sullivan EA, et al. International committee for monitoring assisted reproductive technologies: world report on assisted reproductive technologies, 2007. Fertil Steril. 2015; 103:402–13.IshiharaOAdamsonGDDyerSde MouzonJNygrenKGSullivanEAInternational committee for monitoring assisted reproductive technologies: world report on assisted reproductive technologies, 2007Fertil Steril20151034021310.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.11.00425516078Search in Google Scholar