Sex determination in Northern Thai from crania by using computer-aided design software and conventional caliper methods

[1]Krogman WM, Iscan MY. The human skeleton in forensic medicine. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas; 1986.KrogmanWMIscanMYThe human skeleton in forensic medicineSpringfield, ILCharles C. Thomas1986Search in Google Scholar

[2]Arnay-de-la-Rosa M, González-Reimers E, Fregel R, Velasco-Vázquez J, Delgado-Darias T, González AM, Larrugac JM. Canary islands aborigin sex determination based on mandible parameters contrasted by amelogenin analysis. J Archaeol Sci. 2007; 34:1515–22.Arnay-de-la-RosaMGonzález-ReimersEFregelRVelasco-VázquezJDelgado-DariasTGonzálezAMLarrugacJMCanary islands aborigin sex determination based on mandible parameters contrasted by amelogenin analysisJ Archaeol Sci20073415152210.1016/j.jas.2006.11.008Search in Google Scholar

[3]Ongkana N, Sudwan P. Morphologic indicators of sex in Thai mandibles. Chiang Mai Med J. 2010; 49:123–8.OngkanaNSudwanPMorphologic indicators of sex in Thai mandiblesChiang Mai Med J2010491238Search in Google Scholar

[4]Steyn M, Iscan MY. Sexual dimorphism in the crania and mandibles of South African whites. Forensic Sci Int. 1998; 98:9–16.SteynMIscanMYSexual dimorphism in the crania and mandibles of South African whitesForensic Sci Int19989891610.1016/S0379-0738(98)00120-0Search in Google Scholar

[5]Macaluso PJ Jr. Sex discrimination from the glenoid cavity in black South Africans: morphometric analysis of digital photographs. Int J Legal Med. 2011; 125:773–8.MacalusoPJ JrSex discrimination from the glenoid cavity in black South Africans: morphometric analysis of digital photographsInt J Legal Med2011125773810.1007/s00414-010-0508-7Search in Google Scholar

[6]Patriquin ML, Steyn M, Loth SR. Metric analysis of sex differences in South African black and white pelves. Forensic Sci Int. 2005; 147:119–27.PatriquinMLSteynMLothSRMetric analysis of sex differences in South African black and white pelvesForensic Sci Int20051471192710.1016/j.forsciint.2004.09.074Search in Google Scholar

[7]Steyn M, Iscan MY. Metric sex determination from the pelvis in modern Greeks. Forensic Sci Int. 2008; 179:86.e81–6.SteynMIscanMYMetric sex determination from the pelvis in modern GreeksForensic Sci Int200817986e81610.1016/j.forsciint.2008.04.022Search in Google Scholar

[8]Steyn M, Patriquin ML. Osteometric sex determination from the pelvis-does population specificity matter. Forensic Sci Int. 2009; 191:113.e1–5.SteynMPatriquinMLOsteometric sex determination from the pelvis-does population specificity matterForensic Sci Int2009191113e1510.1016/j.forsciint.2009.07.009Search in Google Scholar

[9]U-pathi J, Saenphet S, Thanachaikun S, Harnsiriwattanakit K, Sudwan P. Equations to determine sex from the hip and the sacral bones in Thais. Siriraj Med J. 2016; 68:S46–9.U-pathiJSaenphetSThanachaikunSHarnsiriwattanakitKSudwanPEquations to determine sex from the hip and the sacral bones in ThaisSiriraj Med J201668S469Search in Google Scholar

[10]Iscan MY, Steyn M. Craniometric determination of population affinity in South Africans. Int J Legal Med. 1999; 112:91–7.IscanMYSteynMCraniometric determination of population affinity in South AfricansInt J Legal Med199911291710.1016/S1353-1131(99)90011-1Search in Google Scholar

[11]Dayal MR, Spocter MA, Bidmos MA. An assessment of sex using the skull of black South Africans by discriminant function analysis. HOMO. 2008; 59:209–21.DayalMRSpocterMABidmosMAAn assessment of sex using the skull of black South Africans by discriminant function analysisHOMO2008592092110.1016/j.jchb.2007.01.00118439606Search in Google Scholar

[12]Kranioti EF, Iscan MY, Michalodimitrakis M. Craniometric analysis of the modern Cretan population. Forensic Sci Int. 2008; 180:110. e1–5.KraniotiEFIscanMYMichalodimitrakisMCraniometric analysis of the modern Cretan populationForensic Sci Int2008180110e1510.1016/j.forsciint.2008.06.01818718728Search in Google Scholar

[13]Robinson MS, Bidmos MA. The skull and humerus in the determination of sex: reliability of discriminant function equations. Forensic Sci Int. 2009; 186:86.e1–5.RobinsonMSBidmosMAThe skull and humerus in the determination of sex: reliability of discriminant function equationsForensic Sci Int200918686.e1510.1016/j.forsciint.2009.01.00319216037Search in Google Scholar

[14]Sangvichien S, Boonkaew K, Chuncharunee A, Komoltri C, Piyawinitwong S, Wongsawut A, Namwongsa S. Sex determination in Thai skulls by using craniometry: multiple logistic regression analysis. Siriraj Med J. 2007; 59:216–21.SangvichienSBoonkaewKChuncharuneeAKomoltriCPiyawinitwongSWongsawutANamwongsaSSex determination in Thai skulls by using craniometry: multiple logistic regression analysisSiriraj Med J20075921621Search in Google Scholar

[15]Mahakkanukrauh P, Sinthubua A, Prasitwattanaseree S, Ruengdit S, Singsuwan P, Praneatpolgrang S, et al. Craniometric study for sex determination in a Thai population. Anat Cell Biol. 2015; 48:275–83.MahakkanukrauhPSinthubuaAPrasitwattanasereeSRuengditSSingsuwanPPraneatpolgrangSet alCraniometric study for sex determination in a Thai populationAnat Cell Biol2015482758310.5115/acb.2015.48.4.275470170226770879Search in Google Scholar

[16]Patil KR, Mody RN. Determination of sex by discriminant function analysis and stature by regression analysis: a lateral cephalometric study. Forensic Sci Int. 2005; 147:175–80.PatilKRModyRNDetermination of sex by discriminant function analysis and stature by regression analysis: a lateral cephalometric studyForensic Sci Int20051471758010.1016/j.forsciint.2004.09.07115567623Search in Google Scholar

[17]Benazzi S, Maestri C, Parisini S, Vecchi F, Gruppioni G. Sex assessment from the sacral base by means of image processing. J Forensic Sci. 2009; 54:249–54.BenazziSMaestriCParisiniSVecchiFGruppioniGSex assessment from the sacral base by means of image processingJ Forensic Sci2009542495410.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00947.x19207288Search in Google Scholar

[18]Benazzi S, Maestri C, Parisini S, Vecchi F, Gruppioni G. Sex assessment from the acetabular rim by means of image analysis. Forensic Sci Int. 2008; 180:58.e51–3.BenazziSMaestriCParisiniSVecchiFGruppioniGSex assessment from the acetabular rim by means of image analysisForensic Sci Int200818058e51310.1016/j.forsciint.2008.06.00718692971Search in Google Scholar

[19]Thuanthong T, Sudwan P. Sex Determination of the parameters related to the frontal bone of Thai people by measurement. Proceedings of the 23^rd National Graduate Research Conference. Rajamangala University of Technology Isan, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand. 2011 December 23–24; 395–9. [in Thai]ThuanthongTSudwanPSex Determination of the parameters related to the frontal bone of Thai people by measurement. Proceedings of the 23^rd National Graduate Research ConferenceRajamangala University of Technology Isan, Nakhon RatchasimaThailand2011December 23–24; 395–9in ThaiSearch in Google Scholar

[20]Buikstra JE, Ubelaker DH. Standards for data collection from human skeletal remains. Fayetteville: Arkansas Archaeological Survey. 1994; 44:185–202.BuikstraJEUbelakerDHStandards for data collection from human skeletal remainsFayetteville: Arkansas Archaeological Survey199444185202Search in Google Scholar

[21]De Paiva LA, Segre M. Sexing the human skull through the mastoid process. Rev Hosp Clin. 2003; 58:15–20.De PaivaLASegreMSexing the human skull through the mastoid processRev Hosp Clin200358152010.1590/S0041-8781200300010000412754585Search in Google Scholar

[22]Guyton AC, Hall JE. Textbook of medical physiology. 9th ed. Saunders: Philadelphia; 1996.GuytonACHallJETextbook of medical physiology. 9th edSaundersPhiladelphia1996Search in Google Scholar

[23]Osunwoke EA, Amah-Tariah FS, Ekere IM, Ede O. Sexual dimorphism in facial dimensions of the Bini’s of south-southern Nigeria. Asian J Med Sci. 2011; 3:71–3OsunwokeEAAmah-TariahFSEkereIMEdeOSexual dimorphism in facial dimensions of the Bini’s of south-southern NigeriaAsian J Med Sci20113713Search in Google Scholar

[24]Kemkes A, Göbel T. Metric assessment of the “mastoid triangle” for sex determination: a validation study. J Forensic Sci. 2006; 51:985–9KemkesAGöbelTMetric assessment of the “mastoid triangle” for sex determination: a validation studyJ Forensic Sci200651985910.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00232.x17018073Search in Google Scholar

[25]Rattanasalee P, Mekjaidee K, Prasitwattanaseree S, Sinthubua A. Could zygomatic angles be used for determining the sex of Thai skeletal remains? Chiang Mai Med J. 2014; 53:75–9.RattanasaleePMekjaideeKPrasitwattanasereeSSinthubuaACould zygomatic angles be used for determining the sex of Thai skeletal remains?Chiang Mai Med J201453759Search in Google Scholar

[26]Luo L, Wang M, Tian Y, Duan F, Wu Z, Zhou M, Rozenholc Y. Automatic sex determination of skulls based on a statistical shape model. Comput Math Methods Med. 2013; 2013:251628. doi: 10.1155/2013/251628LuoLWangMTianYDuanFWuZZhouMRozenholcYAutomatic sex determination of skulls based on a statistical shape modelComput Math Methods Med2013201325162810.1155/2013/251628383884124312134Open DOISearch in Google Scholar