Dependent Market Economies and Hierarchical Market Economies and their National Innovation Systems: The Case of Poland and Mexico

1. Aoki, M. (1994). The Contingent Governance of Teams: An Analysis of Institutional Complementarity. International Economic Review, vol. 35, p. 657–676.10.2307/2527079Search in Google Scholar

2. Barcikowska, R. (2017). Innovation in Social-Economic Development in Poland. Research Institutes as Entities and Contractors of Innovative Activities in Poland. Marketing of Scientific and Research Organizations. Vol. 25 (3), p. 103–116.Search in Google Scholar

3. Borges-Quinones, M. and Saucedo-Acosta, E.J. (2018). El engranaje institucional como elemento del enfoque sistemático de la innovación en Latinoamerica. Ciencia UAT. Vol. 12, (2), p. 78–89.Search in Google Scholar

4. Cámara de Diputados México, (2018). http://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/ (18/05/18).Search in Google Scholar

5. Díaz, Á., (2008). América Latina y el Caribe: La propiedad intelectual después de los tratados de libre comercio, Santiago de Chile: CEPAL. https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/2526/S0600728_es.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (01/04/18)Search in Google Scholar

6. Fernández, I. (2010). Institucionalidad pública desconcentrada y gobernanza territorial en Chile: desafíos para el desarrollo territorial equitativo. In Barbieri, M y Zurbriggen, C. (Coord.) Acción colectiva, Gobierno y Territorio: experiencias Cono Sur. (pp. 81–106). Flacso: Montevideo. http://web.flacso.edu.uy/assets/acci%C3%B3n-colectiva-gobierno-y--territorio.-flacso-uy.pdf. (20.05.2018).Search in Google Scholar

7. Ginebra, X., (2008), La propiedad industrial y la competencia económica en México, Boletín Méxicano de Derecho Comparado. UNAM, no. 121, pages. 117–171. https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/derechocomparado/article/view/3961/5021 (20/05/18).Search in Google Scholar

8. Hall, P., Soskice, D. (2001). An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism. In: Hall, P., Soskice, D. (Eds.). Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (Vol. 1, pp. 1–68), Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199247757.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

9. Jankowska, B., Matysek-Jedrych, A., Mroczek-Dabrowska, K. (2017). Efficiency of National Innovation Systems — Poland and Bulgaria in The Context of the Global Innovation Index. Comparative Economic Research, Vol. 20 (3), p. 77–94.10.1515/cer-2017-0021Search in Google Scholar

10. Lundvall, B. (Ed.) (1992). National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter.Search in Google Scholar

11. Natera, A. (2004). La noción de Gobernanza como gestión pública participativa y reticular. Madrid: Universidad Carlos III.Search in Google Scholar

12. Natera, A. (2005). La gobernanza como modo emergente de gobierno y gestión pública. Revista Gestión y Análisis de las políticas públicas. No. 33–34, p. 53–65.10.24965/gapp.vi33-34.391Search in Google Scholar

13. Nelson, R.R. (Ed.) (1993). National Innovation Systems: A Comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

14. Nölke, A., Vliegenthart, A. (2009). Enlarging the Varieties of Capitalism. The Emergence of Dependent Market Economies in East Central Europe. World Politics, Vol. 61 (4), p. 670–702.Search in Google Scholar

15. North, D. (1992). Institutions and economic theory. American Economist, vol. 36, p. 3–6.10.1177/056943459203600101Search in Google Scholar

16. Rodrik, D. (2007). One Economics Many Recipes. Globalization, Institutions and economic Growth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400829354Search in Google Scholar

17. Prats, J. (2005).? Qué es la gobernanza?. Revista Internacional de Gobernabilidad para el Desarrollo Humano. N° 17. Institut Internacional de Governabilitat de CatalunyaSearch in Google Scholar

18. Rullan-Rosanis, S., Casanova, L. (2016). A review of the Mexican National Innovation System. International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research, Vol. 8, p. 59–68.Search in Google Scholar

19. Schneider, B. (2009). Hierarchical Market Economies and Varieties of Capitalism in Latin America. Journal of Latin American Studies, Vol. 41 (3), p. 553–575.10.1017/S0022216X09990186Search in Google Scholar

20. Schumpeter, J. (1943). Socialism, Capitalism and Democracy. London: Allen & Unwin.Search in Google Scholar

21. The Economist Unit, (2018). Democracy index. https://www.eiu.com/home.aspx (20.05 2018).Search in Google Scholar

22. Transparency International (2018). Corruption perception index 2017. https://www.transparency.org/news/feature/corruption_perceptions_index_2017 (20.05 2018).Search in Google Scholar

23. Torre, V. (2010). Problemas de precios de transferencia de bienes intangibles en las empresas multinacionales. Boletín Méxicano de Derecho Comparado, UNAM, no. 128., s. 845–893. https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/derechocomparado/article/view/ 4628/5968) (28.04.2018).Search in Google Scholar

24. World Justice Project (2018). Rule of law index 2017–2018. https://worldjusticeproject.org (18.05.2018).Search in Google Scholar