Relational Benefits and Quality of Relation — Towards Understanding of the Ties Between Science and Business

1. Pabian, A. (2007). Reklama nowych technologii na rynkach przemysłowych. W: T. Markowski, D. Trzmielak i J. Sosnowski (eds.). Marketing Technologiczny i marketing terytorialny, Polska Akademia Nauk Komitet Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Kraju, Biuletyn, Zeszyt 235, 292-300.Search in Google Scholar

2. Agrawal, A. (2001). University-to-indusrty knowledge transfer: literature review and unanswered questions. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3, 285-302.10.1111/1468-2370.00069Search in Google Scholar

3. Ajzen, I. (1991). Theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processs, 50, 179-211.10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-TSearch in Google Scholar

4. Baker, T.L., Simpson, P.M., and Siguaw, J.A. (1999). The Impact of Suppliers Perceptions on Reseller Market Orientation on Key Relationship Constructs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27, 50-57.10.1177/0092070399271004Search in Google Scholar

5. Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory. In: Vasta, R. (eds.), Annals of child development. Vol. 6. Six theories of child development, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1-60.Search in Google Scholar

6. Berry, L.L., Relationship Marketing in Emerging Perspectives on Services Marketing, Berry, L.L., Shostack, G.L. and Upah, G.D. (eds.), Chicago: American Marketing Association: 25-28.Search in Google Scholar

7. Caloghirou, Y., Tsakanikas, A., Vonortas, N.S. (2001). University-industry cooperation in the context of the European framework programmes. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 153-161.10.1023/A:1013025615518Search in Google Scholar

8. Carayol, N. (2003). Objectives, agreements and matching in science-industry collaborations: reassembling the pieces of the puzzle. Research Policy, 32, 887-908.10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00108-7Search in Google Scholar

9. Lendner, Ch. (2007). University technology transfer through university business incubators and how they help start-ups. In: F. Thérin, E. Elgar, (eds.). Handbook of Research on Techno-Entrepreneurship, 163-16910.4337/9781847205551.00016Search in Google Scholar

10. Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R.R. and Walsh, J.P. (2002). Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, (1), 1-23.10.1287/mnsc.48.1.1.14273Search in Google Scholar

11. Crosby, L.A. Building and maintaining Quality in the Service Relationship. In: S.W. Brown, and E. Gummesson, (eds), Service Quality: Multidisciplinary and Multinational Perspectives. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 269-287.Search in Google Scholar

12. Lange, D., Belinko, K. and Kalligatsi, K. (2000). Building successful technology commercialization teams: pilot empirical support for the theory of cascading commitment, Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 25, 169-180.Search in Google Scholar

13. D’Este, P. and Patel, P. University-industry linkages in the UK: what are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy, 36 (9), 1295-1313.10.1016/j.respol.2007.05.002Search in Google Scholar

14. Dooley, L. and Kirk, D. (2007). University-industry collaboration. Grafting the entrepreneurial paradigm onto academic structures. European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 10 No. 3, 316-332.Search in Google Scholar

15. Dorsch, M.J., Swanson, S.R., and Kelley, S.W. (1998). The role of Relationship Quality in the Stratification of Vendors as Perceived by Customers. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26, 128-42.10.1177/0092070398262004Search in Google Scholar

16. Fei, Li, et al. (2015). How to manage the industry-university collaborative relationship to improve the innovation performance. Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), 2015 Portland International Conference on. IEEE.10.1109/PICMET.2015.7273066Search in Google Scholar

17. Foss, L. and Gibson, D. (2015). The entrepreneurial university. Context and institutional change. Routledge, NY .Search in Google Scholar

18. Garbarino, E., Johnson, M.S. (1999). The Different Roles of Satisfaction, trust, and Commitment in Customer Relationships. Journal of Marketing, 63, 70-87.10.1177/002224299906300205Search in Google Scholar

19. Grönroos, Ch. (1997). From Marketing Mix to Relationship Marketing - Towards a Paradigm Shift in Marketing. Management Decision, 35, 322-339.10.1108/00251749710169729Search in Google Scholar

20. Grzegorczyk, M., Trzmielak, D. (2015). Knowledge Transfer and Technology Commercialization - comparative study in: Building Sustainable R&D Centers in Emerging Technology Regions, ed. David Gibson, Jan Slovak, Masaryk University, 61-74.Search in Google Scholar

21. Gummesson, E. (2002). Total Relationship Marketing. Rethinking Marketing Management: From 4Ps to 30Rs. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

22. Gwinner, K.P., Gremler, D.D. and Bitner, M.J. (1998). Relational Benefits in Services Industries: The Customer’s perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26, 101-114.10.1177/0092070398262002Search in Google Scholar

23. Hall, B.H. University-industry partnerships in the United States. In: Contzen, J.P., Gibson, D. and heitor, M.V. (eds), Rethinking Science Systems and Innovation Policies. Proceedings og the 6th international Conference on technology Policy and Innovation. Ashland, OH: Purde University Press.Search in Google Scholar

24. Hastings, G., Donovan, R.J. (2002). International initiatives: Introduction and overview. Social Marketing Quarterly, 8, 2-4.10.1080/15245000212544Search in Google Scholar

25. Hennig-Thurau, T. (2000). Relationship Quality and Customer Retention through Strategic Communication of Customer Skills. Journal of Marketing Management, 16, 55-79.10.1362/026725700785100497Search in Google Scholar

26. Hoedemaekers, R. (2001). Commercialization, patents and moral assessment of biotechnology products. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, Vol. 23, No. 3, ss. 273-284.10.1076/jmep.26.3.273.3017Search in Google Scholar

27. Mohr, J. (2001). Marketing of High-technology products and innovations, Prentice Hall.Search in Google Scholar

28. Jaffe, A.B. (1989). Real effects of academic research. The American Economic Review. 79.5, 957-970.Search in Google Scholar

29. Kozmetzky, G., Williams, F. andWilliams, V. (2004). New Wealth. Commercialization of Science and Technology for Business and Economic Development. Praeger, s. 4.Search in Google Scholar

30. van den Berge, L. and Guild, P.D. (1986). Firm perceptions of competitive advantage of new university technology and their impact on exclusivity of licensing transactions. Inter- national Journal of Innovation and Technology Management 2007, Vol. 4, No. 4, ss. 479-494, according to: R.N. Foster, Innovation: The Attacker’s advantage. Summit Books, New York.Search in Google Scholar

31. Lee, Y.S. (2000). The sustainability of university-industry research collaborations: and empirical assesment. Journal of Technology Transfer, 25, 111-133.10.1023/A:1007895322042Search in Google Scholar

32. Maibach, E.W. and Cotton, D. (1995). Moving people to behaviour change: a staged social cognitive approach to message design. In: Maibach, E. and Parrott, R. (eds). Designing Health Messages. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

33. Mansfield, E. (1995). Academic research underlying industrial innovations: Sources, characteristics, and financing. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 77, 55-65.10.2307/2109992Search in Google Scholar

34. McMillan, G.S. and Hamilton, R.D. (2003). The impact of publicly funded basic research: an integrative extension of martin and Salter. IEEE transactions on Engineering Management, 50, 184-191.10.1109/TEM.2003.810829Search in Google Scholar

35. Mischel, W. (1971). Introduction to Personality. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., New York.Search in Google Scholar

36. Mowery, D.C. and Nelson, R.R. (eds.) Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation: University-Industry technology before and After the Bayh-Dole Act. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

37. Palmer, A., Bejou, D. (1994). Buyer-Seller relationships: A Conceptual Model and Empirical Investigation. Journal of Marketing Management, 10, 495-512.10.1080/0267257X.1994.9964296Search in Google Scholar

38. Perkmann, M., and Walsh, K. (2007). University-industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9, 259-280.10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00225.xSearch in Google Scholar

39. Plewa, C., Quester, P. and Baaken, T. Relationship marketing and university - industry linkages: conceptual framework. Marketing Theory, 5 (2005), 433-456.Search in Google Scholar

40. Plewa, C., Korff, N., Johnson, C., Macpherson, G., Baaken, T. and Rampersad, G.C. (2013). The evolution of university-industry linkages-A framework. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 30, 21-44.10.1016/j.jengtecman.2012.11.005Search in Google Scholar

41. Reichheld, F., and Sasser, W.E. (1990). Zero defections: Quality Comes to Services. Harvard Business Review, 68, 105-11.Search in Google Scholar

42. Reynolds, K.E., Sharon, E.B. (1999a). Customer benefits and Company Consequences of Customer Salesperson relationships in Retailing. Journal of Retailing, 75, 11-32.10.1016/S0022-4359(99)80002-5Search in Google Scholar

43. Salter, A.J. and Martin, B.R. (2001). The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review. Research Policy, 30, 509-532.10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00091-3Search in Google Scholar

44. Schartinger, D., Rammer, C. Fischer, M.M. and Frohlich, J. (2002). Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants. Research Policy, 31, 303-328.10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00111-1Search in Google Scholar

45. Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D. and Link, A.N. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study. Research Policy, 32, 27-48.10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00196-2Search in Google Scholar

46. Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D. Atwater, L. and Link, A.N. (2004). Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21, 115-142.10.1016/j.jengtecman.2003.12.006Search in Google Scholar

47. Smith, J.B. (1998). Buyer-Seller relationships: Similarity, relationship management, and Quality. Psychology and Marketing, 15, 3-21.10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199801)15:1<3::AID-MAR2>3.0.CO;2-ISearch in Google Scholar

48. Sung, T.K., Gibson, D. (2005), Knowledge and technology transfer grid: empirical assessment. International Hournal of technology Management, 29, 216-23010.1504/IJTM.2005.005997Search in Google Scholar

49. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D. and Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 3, 203-222.10.1111/1467-8551.00375Search in Google Scholar

50. Trzmielak, D. and Grzegorczyk, M. (2010). Technology marketing - the use of relationship marketing principles in the process of international commercialization. In: Rozvoj marketingu v teórii a praxi Marketing Development in Theory and Practice, eds. Jozef Striss, EDIS - Vydavatel’stvo Žilinskej Univerzity, 227-233.Search in Google Scholar