Screening of Selected Indicators of Dairy Cattle Welfare in Macedonia

1. European Communities (EC) (1976). European Convention for the Protection of Animals kept for Farming Purposes. Strasbourg, 10.3.1976. European Treaty Series No. 87. www.conventions.coe.int/Treaty/EN/Treaties/ Html/087.htmSearch in Google Scholar

2. Council Directive 98/58/EC of 1998 concerning the protection of animals kept for farming purposes. OJ L 221/23 8.8.98 (July 20, 1998)Search in Google Scholar

3. Animal welfare and protection law (2007). OJ Republic of Macedonia 113 (September 20, 2007)Search in Google Scholar

4. Regulation for conditions and methods for protection of farm animals (2009). OJ Republic of Macedonia 140 (November 20, 2009)Search in Google Scholar

5. European Commission (2007). Attitudes of EU citizens towards Animal Welfare. Special Eurobarometer 270. Wave 66.1. TNS Opinion and Social http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_270_en.pdf Search in Google Scholar

6. European Commission (2012). Communication from the commission to the European Parlament, the council and the European economic and social committee on the European Union Strategy for the Protection and Welfare of Animals 2012-2015 (Text with EEA relevance), European Commission, Brussels, BelgiumSearch in Google Scholar

7. EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) (2012). Statement on the use of animal-based measures to assess the welfare of animals. EFSA Journal 2012; 10(6): 2767, 29.Search in Google Scholar

8. Welfare Quality®, (2009). Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for cattle. Welfare Quality® Consortium, Lelystad, Netherlands, 180.Search in Google Scholar

9. State Statistical Office, Skopje - News release (2014). Number of livestock, poultry and beehives in 2013. Skopje, Macedonia. www.statgov.mkSearch in Google Scholar

10. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Economy (2013). Annual report for agriculture and rural development, 2012. Skopje, MacedoniaSearch in Google Scholar

11. Ostojić-Andrić, D., Hristov, S., Novaković, Ž., Pantelić, V., Petrović, M. M., Zlatanović, Z., Nikšić, D. (2011). Dairy cows welfare quality in loose vs tie housing system. Biotechnol Anim Husb. 27 (3): 975-984. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/BAH1103975O10.2298/BAH1103975OSearch in Google Scholar

12. Vučemilo, M., Matković, K., Štoković, I., Kovačević, S., Benić, M. (2012). Welfare assessment of dairy cows housed in a tie-stall system. Mljekarstvo 62 (1): 62-67.Search in Google Scholar

13. Popescu, S., Borda, C., Diugan, E., Niculae, M., Stefan, R., Sandru, C. (2014). The effect of the housing system on the welfare quality of dairy cows. Ital J Anim Sci. 13 (1): 2940. http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2014.294010.4081/ijas.2014.2940Search in Google Scholar

14. Popescu, S., Borda, C., Sandru, C.D., Stefan, R., Lazar, E. (2010). The welfare assessment of tied dairy cows in 52 small farms in north-eastern Transylvania using animal-based measurements. Slov Vet Res. 47 (3): 77-82.Search in Google Scholar

15. Popescu, S., Borda, C., Lazar, E.A., Hegedus, I.C. (2009). Assessment of dairy cow welfare in farms from Transylvania. Proceedings of the 44th Croatian and 4th International Symposium on Agriculture. Opatija, Croatia. 2009 Feb 16-20; 752-756.Search in Google Scholar

16. Popescu, S., Borda, C., Diugan, E. A., Spinu, M., Groza, I. S., Sandru, C. D. (2013). Dairy cows welfare quality in tie-stall housing system with or without access to exercise. Acta Vet Scand. 55 (1): 43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-55-43 PMid:23724804 ; PMCid:PMC367497210.1186/1751-0147-55-43Search in Google Scholar

17. Andersson, M., Schaar, J., Wiktorsson, H. (1984). Effects of drinking water flow rates and social rank on performance and drinking behaviour of tied-up dairy cows. Livest Prod Sci. 11, 599-610. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(84)90074-510.1016/0301-6226(84)90074-5Search in Google Scholar

18. Heath, C., Lin, C., Mullan, S., Browne, W.J., Main, D.C.J. (2014). Implementing Welfare Quality® in UK assurance schemes: evaluating the challenges. Anim Welf. 23 (1): 95-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.7120/09627286.23.1.09510.7120/09627286.23.1.095Search in Google Scholar

19. Regula, G., Danuser, J., Spycher, B., Wechsler, B. (2004). Health and welfare of dairy cows in different husbandry systems in Switzerland. Prev Vet Med. 66 (1-4): 247-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2004.09.004 PMid:1557934610.1016/j.prevetmed.2004.09.00415579346Search in Google Scholar

20. Brenninkmeyer, C., Dippel, S., Brinkmann, J., March, S., Winckler, C., Knierim, U. (2013). Hock lesion epidemiology in cubicle housed dairy cows across two breeds, farming systems and countries. Prev Vet Med. 109 (3-4): 236-245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.10.014 PMid:2317421710.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.10.01423174217Search in Google Scholar

21. Zurbrigg, K., Kelton, D., Anderson, N., Millman, S. (2005). Stall dimensions and the prevalence of lameness, injury and cleanliness on 317 tie-stall dairy farms in Ontario. Can Vet J. 46 (10): 902-909. PMid:16454382; PMCid:PMC1255592Search in Google Scholar

22. Leach, K. A., Dippel, S., Huber, J., March, S., Winckler, C., Whay, H.R. (2009). Assessing lameness in cows kept in tie-stalls. J Dairy Sci. 92(4): 1567-1574. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1648 PMid:1930763710.3168/jds.2008-164819307637Search in Google Scholar

23. Cook, N. (2003). Prevalence of lameness among dairy cattle in Wisconsin as a function of housing type and stall surface. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 223 (9): 1324-1328. http://dx.doi.org/10.2460/javma.2003.223.1324 PMid:1462122210.2460/javma.2003.223.132414621222Search in Google Scholar

24. Wells, S., Trent, A., Marsh, W., Williamson, N., Robinson, R. (1995). Some risk factors associated with clinical lameness in dairy herds in Minnesota and Wisconsin. Vet Rec. 136 (21): 537-540. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.136.21.537 PMid:766055710.1136/vr.136.21.5377660557Search in Google Scholar

25. Dippel, S., Dolezal, M., Brenninkmeyer, C., Brinkmann, J., March, S., Knierim, U., Winckler, C. (2009). Risk factors for lameness in cubicle housed Austrian Simmental dairy cows. Prev Vet Med. 90 (1-2): 102-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.03.014 PMid:1940962910.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.03.014Search in Google Scholar

26. Winckler, C., Capdeville, J., Gebresenbet, G., Hörning, B., Roiha, U., Tosi, M., Waiblinger, S. (2003). Selection of parameters for on-farm welfareassessment protocols in cattle and buffalo. Anim Welf. 12 (4): 619-624. Search in Google Scholar

27. Estep, D.Q., Hetts, S., (1992). Interactions, relationships, and bonds: the conceptual basis for scientist-animal relations. In: Davis, H., Balfour, A.D. (Eds.), The Inevitable Bond-Examining Scientist- Animal Interactions (pp. 6-26). CAB International, CambridgeSearch in Google Scholar

28. Seabrook, M.F. (1972). A study to determine the influence of the herdsmans personality on milk yield. J Agric Labour Sci. 1, 45-59.Search in Google Scholar

29. Hemsworth, P.H., Coleman, G.J. (1998). Human- Livestock Interactions: The Stockperson and the Productivity of Intensively Farmed Animals. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, United KingdomSearch in Google Scholar

30. Waiblinger, S., Menke, C., Coleman, G. (2002). The relationship between attitudes, personal characteristics and behaviour of stock people and subsequent behaviour and production of dairy cows. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 79 (3): 195-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00155-7 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00155-7Search in Google Scholar

31. Waiblinger, S., Menke, C., Fölsch, D.W. (2003). Influences on the avoidance and approach behaviour of dairy cows towards humans on 35 farms. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 84 (1): 23-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(03)00148-5 10.1016/S0168-1591(03)00148-5Search in Google Scholar

32. Mattiello, S., Klotz, C., Baroli, D., Minero, M., Ferrante, V., Canali, E. (2009). Welfare problems in alpine dairy cattle farms in Alto Adige (Eastern Italian Alps). Ital J Anim Sci. 8 (2s): 628-630. Search in Google Scholar