[1. Broekhuijse, M.L., Feitsma, H., Gadella B.M. (2012). Artificial insemination in pigs: predicting male fertility. Vet Q 32: 151-157 10.1080/01652176.2012.73512623092203]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Johnson, L.A., Weitze K.F., Fiser, P., Maxwell, W.M.C. (2000). Storage of boar semen. Anim Reprod Sci 62: 143-172.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Riesenbeck, A. (2011). Review on international trade with boar semen. Reprod Domest Anim 46 (Suppl. 2): 1-3.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Sigleton, W.L. (2001). State of the art in artificial insemination of pigs in the United States. Theriogenology 56: 1305-1310.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Knox, R., Levis, D., Safranski, T., Singleton, W. (2008). An update on North American boar stud practices. Theriogenology 70: 1202-1208.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Feitsma, H. (2009). Artificial insemination in pigs, research and developments in The Netherlands, a review. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae 37 (Suppl. 1): 61-71.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Broekhuijse, M.L.W.J., Feitsma, H., Gadella, B.M. (2011). Field data analysis of boar semen quality. Reprod Domest Anim 46 (Suppl. 2): 59-63.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Vyt, P., Maes, D., Rijsselaere, T., Dewulf, J., De Kruif, A., Van Soom, A. (2007). Semen handling in porcine AI centers: the Belgian situation. Vlaams Diegeneeskundig Tijdschrift 76: 195-199.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. López Rodríguez, A., Rijsselaere, T., Vyt, P., Van Soom, A., Maes, D. (2012). Effect of dilution temperature on boar semen quality. Reprod Domest Anim 47: 63-66.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Martinez, E.A., Vazquez J.M., Roca, J., Cuello, C., Gil, M.A., Parrilla, I., Vazquez, J.L. (2005). An update on reproductive technologies with potential short-term application in pig production. Reprod Domest Anim 40: 300-309.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Roca, J., Parrilla, I., Rodriguez-Martinez, H., Gil, M.A., Cuello, C., Vazquez J.M., Martinez, E.A. (2011). Approaches towards efficient use of boar semen in the pig industry. Reprod Domest Anim 46 (Suppl. 2): 79-83.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Gadea, J. (2003). Review: semen extenders used in the artificial insemination of swine. Spanish J Agric Res 1 (2): 17-27.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Waberski, D., Henning, H., Petrunkina, A.M. (2011). Assessment of storage effects in liquid preserved boar semen. Reprod Domest Anim 46 (Suppl. 2): 45-48.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Goldberg, A.M., Argenti, L.E., F accin, J.E., Linck, L., Santi, M., Bernardi, M.L., Cardoso, M.R., Wentz, I., Bortolozzo, F.P. (2013). Risk factors for bacterial contamination during boar semen collection. Res Vet Sci (In press), doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2013.06.022.10.1016/j.rvsc.2013.06.02223891384]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Dziuk, P.J., Henshaw, G. (1958). Fertility of boar semen artificially inseminated following in vitro storage. J Anim Sci 17: 554-558.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. First, N.L., Stratman, F.W., Casida, L.E. (1963). Effect of sperm age on embryo survival in swine. J Anim Sci 22: 135-138. ]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Pursel, V.G., Johnson, L.A., Schulman, L.L. (1973). Fertilizing capacity of boar semen stored at 15oC. J Anim Sci 37: 532-535.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Bailey, J.L., Lessard, C., Jacques, J., Bréque, C., Dobrinski, I., Zeng, W., Galantino-Homer, H.L. (2008). Cryopreservation of boar semen and its future importance to the industry. Theriogenology 70: 1251-1259.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Großfeld, R., Sieg, B., Struckmann, C., Franzel, A., Maxwell, W.M.C., Rath, D. (2008). New aspects of boar semen freezing strategies. Theriogenology 70: 1225-1233.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Knox, R.V. (2011). The current value of frozenthawed boar semen for commercial companies. Reprod Domest Anim 46 (Suppl. 2): 4-6.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Khalifa, T.A.A., Tsakmakidis, I.A. (2012). A preliminary study on preservability of porcine semen in INRA-96 extender. Proceeding of the 17th International Congress on Biotechnology in Animal Reproduction (ICBAR), 12th to 14th September, Leipzig, Anhalt University of Applied Sciences, Germany.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Mozo-Martín, R., Gil, L., Gómez-Rincón, C.F., Dahmani, Y., García-Tomás, M., Úbeda, J.L., Grandía, J. (2012). Use of a novel double uterine deposition artifi cial insemination technique using low concentrations of sperm in pigs. Vet J 193: 251-256.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. AAlbers, J.G., Mann, T., Polge, C. (1961). Metabolism of boar semen in relation to sperm motility and survival. J Reprod Fertil 2: 42-53.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Shelby, D.R., Foley, C.W. (1971). Influence of atmosphere and incubation temperature on the metabolism of washed boar spermatozoa. J Anim Sci 32: 103-106.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Jones, A.R. (1997). Metabolism of lactate by mature boar spermatozoa. Reprod Fertil Dev 9: 227-232.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Jones, A.R. (1997). Triosephosphate metabolism by mature boar spermatozoa. Reprod Fertil Dev 9: 577-581.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Jones, A.R., Connor, D.E. (2000). Fructose metabolism by mature boar spermatozoa. Reprod Fertil Dev 12: 355-359.]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Marin, S., Chiang, K., Bassilian, S., Lee, W-N.P., Boros, L.G., Fernández-Novell, J.M., Centelles, J.J., Medrano, A., Rodriguez-Gil, J.E., Cascante, M. (2003). Metabolic strategy of boar spermatozoa revealed by a metabolomic characterization. FEBS Letters 554: 342-346.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Medrano, A., Fernández-Novell, J.MA., Ramió, L., Alvarez, J., Goldberg, E., Rivera, MA. M., Guinovart, J.J., Rigau, T., Rodríguez-Gil, J.E. (2006). Utilization of citrate and lactate through a lactate dehydrogenase and ATP-regulated pathway in boar spermatozoa. Mol Reprod Dev 73: 369-378. ]Search in Google Scholar
[30. White, I.G. (1993). Lipids and calcium uptake of sperm in relation to cold shock and preservation: a review. Reprod Fertil Dev 5: 639-658.]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Galantino-Homer, H.L., Zeng, W-X., Omgee, S.O., Dallmeyer, M., Voelkl, D., Dobrinski, I. (2006). Effects of 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin and cholesterol on porcine sperm viability and capacitation status following cold shock or incubation. Mol Reprod Dev 73: 638-650.]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Blanch, E., Tomás, C., Graham, J.K., Mocé, E. (2012). Response of boar sperm to the treatment with cholesterol-loaded cyclodextrins added prior to cryopreservation. Reprod Deomest Anim 47: 959-964.]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Tomás, C., Blanch, E., Cebián, B., Mocé, E. (2013). In vivo fertilizing ability of frozen-thawed boar sperm treated with cholesterol-loaded cyclodextrins prior to cryopreservation. Anim Reprod Sci 140: 77-82.]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Mann, T., Lutwak-Mann, C. (1981). Male reproductive function and semen. Themes and trends in physiology, biochemistry and investigative andrology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heildelberg, New York.10.1007/978-1-4471-1300-3]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Rodríguez-Martínez, H., Kvist, U., Saravia, F., Wallgren, M., Johannisson, A., Sanz, L., Peña, F.J., Martínez, E.A., Roca, J., Vázquez, J.M., Calvete, J.J. (2009). The physiological roles of the boar ejaculate. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl. 66: 1-21.]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Pursel, V.G., Johnson, L.A., Rampacek, G.B. (1972). Acrosome morphology of boar spermatozoa incubated before cold shock. J Anim Sci 34: 278-283.]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Pursel, V.G., Johnson, L.A., Schulman, L.L. (1973). Effect of dilution, seminal plasma and incubation period on cold shock susceptibility of boar spermatozoa. J Anim Sci 37: 528-531.]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Juarez, J.D., Parrilla, I., Vazquez, J.M., Martinez, E.A., Roca, J. (2011). Boar semen can tolerate rapid cooling rates prior to freezing. Reprod Fertil Dev 23: 681-690.]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Althouse, G.C., Wilson, M.E., Kuster,C., Parsley, M. (1998). Characterization of lower temperature storage limitations of fresh-extended porcine semen. Theriogenology 50: 535-543.]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Paulenz, H., Kommisrud, E., Hofmo, P.O. (2000). Effect of long-term storage at different temperatures on the quality of liquid boar semen. Reprod Domest Anim 35: 83-87.]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Mann, T. (1964). The biochemistry of semen and of the male reproductive tract. London: Mathuen & Co LTD, New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Althouse, G.C., Pierdon, M.S., Lu, K.G. (2008). Thermotemporal dynamics of contaminant bacteria and antimicrobials in extended porcine semen. Theriogenology 70: 1317-1323. ]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Schilling, E., Vengust, M. (1987). Frequency of semen collection in boars and quality of ejaculates as evaluated by the osmotic resistance of acrosomal membranes. Anim Reprod Sci 12: 283-290.]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Arkins, S., Thomposon, L.H., Giles, J.R., Camacho, T., Hosmon, B.D. (1988). The effect of collection procedure on the sperm output and copulatory behavior of AI stud boars. Anim Reprod Sci 16: 277-283.]Search in Google Scholar
[45. Frangež, R., Gider,T., Kosec, M. (2005). Frequency of boar ejaculate collection and its influence on semen quality, pregnancy rate and litter size. Acta Vet Brno 74: 265-273.]Search in Google Scholar
[46. Aneas, S.B., Gary, B.G., Bouvier, B.P. (2008). Collectis® automated boar collection technology. Theriogenology 70: 1368-1373.]Search in Google Scholar
[47. Thacker, B.J., Larsen, R.E., Joo, H.S., Leman, A.D. (1984). Swine diseases transmissible with artificial insemination. J Am Vet Med Assoc 185: 511-516.]Search in Google Scholar
[48. Althouse, G.C., Kuster, C.E., Clark, S.G., Weisiger, R.M. (2000). Field investigations of bacterial contaminants and their effects on extended porcine semen. Theriogenology 53: 1167-1176.]Search in Google Scholar
[49. Althouse, G.C., Kristina, G. Lu. (2005). Bacteriospermia in extended porcine semen. Theriogenology 63: 573-584.]Search in Google Scholar
[50. Martín, L.O.M., Muñoz, , E.C., De Cupere, F., Van Driessche, E., Echemendia-Blanco, D., Rodríguez, J.M.M., Beeckmans, S. (2010). Bacterial contamination of boar semen affects the litter size. Anim Reprod Sci 120: 95-104.]Search in Google Scholar
[51. Bussalleu, E., Yeste, M., Sepúlveda, L., Torner, E., Pinart, E., Bonet, S. (2011). Effects of different concentrations of enterotoxigenic and verotoxigenic E. coli on boar sperm quality. Anim Reprod Sci 127: 176-182.]Search in Google Scholar
[52. Schautteet, K., De Clercq, E., Miry, C., Van Groenweghe, F., Delava, P., Kalmar, I., Vanrompay, D. (2013). Tetracycline-resistant Chlamydia suis in cases of reproductive failure on Belgian, Cypriote and Israeli pig production farms. J Med Microbiol 62 (Pt 2): 331-334.]Search in Google Scholar
[53. Bamba, K., Sone, M. (1981). Factors affecting the quality of boar semen stored by means of dialysis. J Reprod Fert 62: 193-197.]Search in Google Scholar
[54. Sone, M., Ohmura, K., Bamba, K. (1982). Effects of various antibiotics on the control of bacteria in boar semen. Vet Rec 111: 11-14.]Search in Google Scholar
[55. Okazaki, T., Mihara, T., Fujita, Y., Yoshida, S., Teshima, H., Shimada, M. (2010). Polymixin B neutralizes bacteria-released endotoxin and improves the quality of boar sperm during liquid storage and cryopreservation. Theriogenology 74: 1691-1700.]Search in Google Scholar
[56. Waberski, D., Weitze, K.F., Meding, S., Leiding, C., Weiskopf, S. (1990) Examination on sperm and fertility compatibility of Lincospectin® sterile solution as antibiotic additive in liquid boar semen. Reprod Domest Anim 25: 291-295.10.1111/j.1439-0531.1990.tb00476.x]Search in Google Scholar
[57. Morrell, J.M., Wallgren, M. (2011). Removal of bacteria from boar ejaculates by single layer centrifugation can reduce the use of antibiotics in semen extenders. Anim Reprod Sci 123: 64-69.]Search in Google Scholar
[58. Morrell, J.M., Wallgren, M. (2011). Colloid centrifugation of boar semen. Reprod Domest Anim 46 (Suppl. 2): 18-22.]Search in Google Scholar
[59. Rigau, T., Piedrafita, J., Reverter, A., Canal, M., Rodríguez-Gil, J.E. (1996). The rate of L-lactate production: a feasible parameter for the fresh boar semen quality analysis. Anim Reprod Sci 43: 161-172.]Search in Google Scholar
[60. Kamp, G., Büsselmann, G., Jones, N., Wiesner, B., Lauterwein, J. (2003). Energy metabolism and intracellular pH in boar spermatozoa. Reproduction 126: 517-525.]Search in Google Scholar
[61. Ford, W.C.L. (2006). Glycolysis and sperm motility: does a spoon of sugar help the flagellum go round? Hum Reprod Update 12: 269-274.10.1093/humupd/dmi05316407453]Search in Google Scholar
[62. Vyt, P., Maes, D., Sys, S.U., Rijsselaere, T., Van Soom, A. (2007). Air contact influences the pH of extended porcine semen. Reprod Domes Anim 42: 218-220.]Search in Google Scholar
[63. Storey, B.T. (2008). Mammalian sperm metabolism: oxygen and sugar, friend and foe. Int J Dev Biol 52: 427-437.]Search in Google Scholar
[64. Bucci, D., Isani, G., Spinaci, M., Tamanini, C., Mari, G., Zambelli, D., Galeati, G. (2010). Comparative immunolocalization of GLUTs 1, 2, 3 and 5 in boar, stallion and dog spermatozoa. Reprod Doest Anim 45: 365.]Search in Google Scholar
[65. Bucci, D., Rodriguez-Gil, J.E., Vallorani, C., Spinaci, M.,Galeati, G., Tamanini, C. (2011). GLUTs and mammalian sperm metabolism. J Androl 32: 348-355.]Search in Google Scholar
[66. Purdy, P.H., Tharp, N., Stewart, T., Spiller, S.F., Blackburn, H.D. (2010). Implications of the pH and temperature of diluted, cooled boar semen on fresh and frozen-thawed sperm motility characteristics. Theriogenology 74: 1304-1310.]Search in Google Scholar
[67. Bonet, S. (1990). Immature and aberrant spermatozoa in the ejaculate of Sus domesticus. Anim Reprod Sci 22: 67-80.]Search in Google Scholar
[68. Briz, M.D., Bonet, S., Pinart, B., Egozcue, J., Camps, R. (1995). Comparative study of boar sperm coming from the caput, corpus, and cauda regions of the epididymis. J Androl 16: 175-187.]Search in Google Scholar
[69. Harayama, H., Shibukawa, T., Miyake, M., Kannan, Y., Kato, S. (1996). Fructose stimulates shedding of cytoplasmic droplets from epididymal boar spermatozoa. Reprod Fertil Dev 8: 1039-1043. ]Search in Google Scholar
[70. Vyt, P., Maes, D., Dejonckheere, E., Castryck, F., Van Soom, A. (2004). Comparative study on five different commercial extenders for boar semen. Reprod Domest Anim 39: 8-12.]Search in Google Scholar
[71. Gilmore, J.A., Du, J., Tao, J., Peter, A.T., Critser, J.K. (1996). Osmotic properties of boar spermatozoa and their relevance to cryopreservation. J Reprod Fertil 107: 87-95.]Search in Google Scholar
[72. Fraser, L., Gorszczaruk, K., Strzeźek, J. (2001). Relationship between motility and membrane integrity of boar spermatozoa in media varying in osmolality. Reprod Domest Anim 36: 325-329.]Search in Google Scholar
[73. Yeste, M., Briz, M., Pinart, E., Sílvia, S., Bussalleu, E., Bonet, S. (2010). The osmotic tolerance of boar spermatozoa and its usefulness as sperm quality parameter. Anim Reprod Sci 119: 265-274.]Search in Google Scholar
[74. Marcos, C.P., Sanchez, R., Palacio, M., Pursel, V.G., Garcia, T.P., Rillo, S.M. (1991). Effects of dilution rate on the motility and acrosome morphology of boar spermatozoa stored at 15oC. Reprod Domest Anim 26: 112-116.]Search in Google Scholar
[75. Maxwell, W.M.C., Johnson, L.A. (1999). Physiology of spermatozoa at high dilution rates: the influence of seminal plasma. Theriogenology 52: 1353-1362.]Search in Google Scholar
[76. Harrison, R.A.P., Dott, H.M., Foster, G.C. (1978). Effect of ionic strength, serum albumin and other macromolecules on the maintenance of motility and the surface of mammalian spermatozoa in a simple medium. J Reprod Fert 52: 65-73.]Search in Google Scholar
[77. Waberski, D., Meding, S., Dirksen, G., Weitze, K.F., Leiding, C., Hahn, R. (1994). Fertility of long-termstored boar semen: influence of extender (Androhep and Kiev), storage time and plasma droplets in the semen. Anim Reprod Sci 36: 145-151.]Search in Google Scholar
[78. Dziuk, P.J., Henshaw, G. (1959). Fertility of boar semen artificially inseminated following in vitro storage. J Anim Sci 17: 554-558.]Search in Google Scholar
[79. Baker, R.D., Dziuk, P.J., Norton, H.W. (1968). Effect of volume of semen, number of sperm and drugs on transport of sperm in artificially inseminated gilts. J Anim Sci 27: 88-93.]Search in Google Scholar
[80. Johnson, L.A., Aalbers, J.G., Willems, C.M.T., Rademaker, J.H.M., Rexroad, C.E. Jr. (1982). Use of boar spermatozoa for artificial insemination III. Fecundity of boar spermatozoa stored in Beltsville liquid and Kiev extenders for three days at 18oC. J Anim Sci 54: 132-136.]Search in Google Scholar
[81. Johnson, L.A., Aalbers, J.G., Grooten, H.J.G. (1988). Artificial insemination of swine: fecundity of boar semen stored in Beltsville TS (BTS), modified modina (MM), or MA-A and inseminated on one, three and four days after collection. Zuchthyg 23: 49-55.]Search in Google Scholar
[82. Waberski, D., Weitze, K.F., Lietmann, C., Lübbert zur Large, W., Bortolozzo, F.P., Willmen, T., Petzoldt, R. (1994). The initial fertilizing capacity of long term-stored liquid boar semen pre- and postovulatory insemination. Theriogenology 41: 1367-1377.]Search in Google Scholar
[83. Soede, N.M., Wetzels, C.C.H., Zondag, W., de Koning, M.A.I., Kemp, B. (1994). Effects of time of insemination relative to ovulation, as determined by ultrasonography, on fertilization rate and accessory sperm count in sows. J Reprod Fertil 104: 99-106.]Search in Google Scholar
[84. Soede, N.M., Wetzels, C.C.H., Zondag, W., Hazeleger, W., Kemp, B. (1994). Effects of a second insemination after ovulation on fertilization rate and accessory sperm count in sows. J Reprod Fertil 105: 135-140.]Search in Google Scholar
[85. Nissen, A.K., Soede, N.M., Hyttel, P., Schmidt, M., D’Hoore, L. (1997). The influence of time of insemination relative to time of ovulation on farrowing frequency and litter size in sows, as investigated by ultrasonography. Theriogenology 47: 1571-1582.]Search in Google Scholar
[86. Steverink, D.W. B., Soede, N.M., Bouwman, E.G., Kemp, B. (1998). Semen backflow after insemination and its effect on fertilization results in sows. Anim Reprod Sci 54: 109-119.]Search in Google Scholar
[87. Kuster, C.E., Althouse, G.C. (1999). The fecundity of porcine semen stored for 2 to 6 days in Androhep® and X-CellTM extenders. Theriogenology 52: 365-376.]Search in Google Scholar
[88. Foote, R.H. (2002). Within-herd use of boar semen at 5oC, with a note on electronic monitoring of estrus. Reprod Domest Anim 37: 61-63.]Search in Google Scholar
[89. Watson, P.F., Behan, J.R. (2002). Intrauterine insemination of sows with reduced sperm numbers: results of a commercially based field trial. Theriogenology 57: 1683-1693.]Search in Google Scholar
[90. Haugan, T., Gaustad, A.H., Reksen, O., Gröhn, Y.T., Hofmo, P.O. (2007). Fertility results of artificial inseminations performed with liquid boar semen stored in X-CellTM vs. BTS extender. Reprod Domest Anim 42: 94-99.]Search in Google Scholar
[91. Wolf, J., Smital, J. (2009). Quantification of factors affecting semen traits in artificial insemination boars from animal model analyses. J Anim Sci 87: 1620-1627.]Search in Google Scholar
[92. Stančić, B., Radović, I., Stančić, I., Dragin, S., Boźić, A., Gvozdić, D. (2010). Fertility of sows after intracervical or intrauterine insemination with different spermatozoa number in reduced volume doses. Acta Veterinaria (Beograd) 60: 257-262.]Search in Google Scholar
[93. Weitze, K.F., Wagner-Rietschel, H., Waberski, D., Richter, L., Krieter, J. (1994). The onset of heat after weaning, heat duration, and ovulation as major factors in AI timing in sows. Reprod Domest Anim 29: 433-443.]Search in Google Scholar
[94. Koketsu, Y., Dial, G.D., King, V.L. (1997). Returns to service after mating and removal of sows for reproductive reasons from commercial swine farms. Theriogenology 47: 1347-1363.]Search in Google Scholar
[95. de Kruif, A. (2003). Fertility and sterility in domestic animals. Verh K Geneeskd Bleg 65: 189-202. ]Search in Google Scholar
[96. Sancho, S., Pinart, E., Briz, M., Garcia-Gil, N., Badia, E., Bassols, J., Kádár, E., Pruneda, A., Bussalleu, E., Yeste, M., Coll, M.G., Bonet, S. (2004). Semen quality of postpubertal boars during increasing and decreasing natural photoperiods. Theriogenology 62: 1271-1282.]Search in Google Scholar
[97. Einarsson, S., Brandt,Y., Lundeheim, N., Madej, A. (2008). Stress and its influence on reproduction in pigs: a review. Acta Vet Scand 50:48. doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-50-48 (http:// www.actavetscand.com/content/50/1/48).10.1186/1751-0147-50-48263031019077201]Search in Google Scholar
[98. Sonderman, J.P., Luebbe, J.J. (2008). Semen production and fertility issues related to differences in genetic lines of boars. Theriogenology 70: 1380-1383.]Search in Google Scholar
[99. Huang, Y.H., Lo, L.L., Liu, S.H., Yang, T.S. (2010). Age-relating changes in semen quality characteristics and expectations of reproductive longevity in Duroc boars. Anim Sci J 81: 432-437.]Search in Google Scholar
[100. Tsakmakidis, I.A., Khalifa, T.A.A., Boscos, C.M. (2012). Age-related changes in quality and fertility of porcine semen. Biol Res 45: 381-386.]Search in Google Scholar
[101. Khalifa, T., Rekkas, C., Tsakmakidis, I., Zdragas, A., Samartzi, F., Lymberopulos, A. (2012). Long-term storage of porcine spermatozoa in chemically defi ned extenders. Reprod Domest Anim 47 (Suppl. 5): 91 (abstract P83).]Search in Google Scholar
[102. Hood, R.D., Foley, C.W., Martin, T.G. (1970). Effects of cold shock, dilution, glycerol and dimethyl sulfoxide on cation concentrations in porcine spermatozoa. J Anim Sci 30: 91-94.]Search in Google Scholar
[103. Watson, P.F. (1995). Recent development and concepts in the cryopreservation of spermatozoa and the assessment of their post-thawing function. Reprod Fertil Dev 7: 871-891.]Search in Google Scholar
[104. Bamba, K., Cran, D.G. (1985). Effect of rapid warming of boar semen on sperm morphology and physiology. J Reprod Fert 75: 133-138.]Search in Google Scholar
[105. Bamba, K., Cran, D.G. (1988). Further studies on rapid dilution and warming of boar semen. J Reprod Fert 82: 509-518.]Search in Google Scholar
[106. Safranski, T.J., Ford, J.J., Rohrer, G.A., Guthrie, H.D. (2011). Genetic selection for freezability and its controversy with selection for performance. Reprod Domest Anim 46 (Suppl. 2): 31-34.]Search in Google Scholar
[107. Benson, R.W., Pickett, B.W., Komarek, R.J., Lucas, J.J. (1967). Effect of incubation and cold shock on motility of boar spermatozoa and their relationship to lipid content. J Anim Sci 35: 580-584.]Search in Google Scholar
[108. Pursel, V.G., Johnson, L.A., Schulman, L.L. (1972). Interaction of extender composition and incubation period on cold shock susceptibility of boar spermatozoa. J Anim Sci 35: 580-584.]Search in Google Scholar
[109. Tamuli, M.K., Watson, P.F. (1994). Cold resistance of live boar spermatozoa during incubation after ejaculation. Vet Rec 135: 160-162.]Search in Google Scholar
[110. Eriksson, B.M., Vazquez, J.M., Martinez, E.A., Roca, J., Lucas, X., Rodriguez-Martinez, H. (2001). Effects of holding time during cooling and of type of package on plasma membrane integrity, motility and in vitro oocyte penetration ability of frozen-thawed boar spermatozoa. Theriogenology 55: 1593-1605.]Search in Google Scholar
[111. Casas, I., Althouse, G.C. (2013). The protective effect of a 17oC holding time on boar sperm plasma membrane fluidity after exposure to 5oC. Cryobiology 66: 69-75.]Search in Google Scholar
[112. Berger, T., Clegg, E.D. (1985). Effect of male accessory gland secretions on sensitivity of porcine sperm acrosomes to cold shock, initiation of motility and loss of cytoplasmic droplets. J Anim Sci 60: 1295-1302.]Search in Google Scholar
[113. Saravia, F. (2008). Cryopreservation of boar semen: impact of the use of specifi c ejaculate portions, concentrated packaging, and simplifi ed freezing procedures on sperm cryosurvival and potential fertilizing capacity. Doctoral Thesis No. 2008:98, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Division of Reproduction, Department of Clinical Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.]Search in Google Scholar
[114. Guthrie, H.D., Welch, G.R. (2005). Impact of storage prior to cryopreservation on plasma membrane function and fertility of boar sperm. Theriogenology 63: 396-410.]Search in Google Scholar
[115. Garcia, J.C., Dominquez, J.C., Pena, F.J., Alegre, B., Gonzalez, R., Castro, M.J., Habing, G.G., Kirkwood, R.N. (2010). Thawing boar semen in the presence of seminal plasma: effects on sperm quality and fertility. Anim Reprod Sci 119: 160-165.]Search in Google Scholar
[116. Leahy, T., Gadella, B.M. (2011). Capacitation and capacitation-like sperm surface changes induced by handling boar semen. Reprod Domest Anim 46 (Suppl. 2): 7-13.]Search in Google Scholar
[117. Gómez-Fernández, J., Gómez-Izquierdo, E., Tomás, C., González-Bulnes, A., Sánchez- Sánchez, R., de Mercado, E. (2012). Inclusion of seminal plasma in sperm cryopreservation of Iberian pig. Anim Reprod Sci 130: 82-90.]Search in Google Scholar
[118. Okazaki, T., Akiyoshi, T., Kan, M., Mori, M., Teshima, H., Shimada, M. (2012). Artificial insemination with seminal plasma improves the reproductive performance of frozen-thawed boar epididymal spermatozoa. J Androl 33: 990-998.]Search in Google Scholar
[119. Okazaki, T., Shimada, M. (2012). New strategies of boar sperm cryopreservation: development of novel freezing and thawing methods with a focus on the roles of seminal plasma. Anim Sci J 83: 623-629.]Search in Google Scholar
[120. Fernández-Gago, R., Domínguez, J.C., Martínez- Pastor, F. (2013). Seminal plasma applied postthawing affects boar sperm physiology: a flow cytometry study. Theriogenology 80: 400-410. ]Search in Google Scholar
[121. Khalifa, T.A.A., Tsakmakidis, I.A., Michos, I.A., Rekkas, C.A. (2011). Effect of semen processing procedures on quality of cooled boar spermatozoa. Reprod Domest Anim 46 (Suppl. 2): 95-96 (abstract P15).]Search in Google Scholar
[122. Batellier, F., Magistrini, M., Fauquant, J., Palmer, E. (1997). Effect of milk fractions on survival of equine spermatozoa. Theriogenology 48 : 391-410.]Search in Google Scholar
[123. Vishwanath, R., Shannon, P. (2000). Storage of bovine semen in liquid and frozen state. Anim Reprod Sci 62: 23-53.]Search in Google Scholar
[124. Salamon, S., Maxwell, W.M.C. (2000). Storage of ram semen. Anim Reprod Sci 62: 77-111.]Search in Google Scholar
[125. Leboeuf, B., Restall, B., Salamon, S. (2000). Production and storage of goat semen for artificial insemination. Anim Reprod Sci 62: 113-141.]Search in Google Scholar
[126. Gutiérrez-Cepeda, L., Fernández, Á., Crespo, F., Ramírez, M. Á., Gosálvez, J., Serres, C. (2012). The effect of two pre-cryopreservation single layer colloidal centrifugation protocols in combination with different freezing extenders on the fragmentation dynamics of thawed equine sperm DNA. Acta Vet Scand 54: 72, doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-54-72.10.1186/1751-0147-54-72359959023217215]Search in Google Scholar
[127. Butler, W.J., Roberts, T.K. (1975). Effects of some phosphatidyl compounds on boar spermatozoa following cold shock or slow cooling. J Reprod Fert 43: 183-187.]Search in Google Scholar
[128. Pursel, V.G., Johnson, L.A. (1975). Freezing of boar spermatozoa: fertilizing capacity with concentrated semen and a new thawing procedure. J Anim Sci 40: 99-102.]Search in Google Scholar
[129. Pursel, V.G., Schulman, L.L., Johnson, L.A. (1978). Effect Orvus ES Paste on acrosome morphology. motility and fertilizing capacity of frozen-thawed boar sperm. J Anim Sci 47: 198-202.]Search in Google Scholar
[130. Graham, E.F., Crabo, B.G., Pace, M.M. (1978). Current status of semen preservation in the ram, boar and stallion. J Anim Sci 47 (Suppl. 2): 80-119.]Search in Google Scholar
[131. Pursel, V.G., Schulman, L.L., Johnson, L.A. (1978). Effect of glycerol concentration on frozen boar sperm. Theriogenology 9: 305-312.]Search in Google Scholar
[132. Pursel, V.G. (1979). Effect of cold shock on boar sperm treated with butylated hydroxytoluene. Biol Reprod 21: 319-324.]Search in Google Scholar
[133. Bamba, K., Cran, D.G. (1992). Effects of treatment with butylated hydroxytoluene on the susceptibility of boar spermatozoa to cold stress and dilution. J Reprod Fert 95: 69-77.]Search in Google Scholar
[134. Bamba, K., Miyagawa, N. (1992). Protective action of aromatic compounds against cold-shock injuries in boar spermatozoa. Cryobiology 29: 533-536.]Search in Google Scholar
[135. Roca, J., Gil, M.A., Hernandez, M., Parrilia, I., Vazquez, J.M., Martinez, E.A. (2004). Survival and fertility of boar spermatozoa after freezethawing in extender supplemented with butylated hydroxytoluene. J Androl 25: 397-405.]Search in Google Scholar
[136. Khalifa, T.A.A., El-Saidy, B.E. (2006). Pelletfreezing of Damascus goat semen in a chemically defined extender. Anim Reprod Sci 93: 303-315.]Search in Google Scholar
[137. Khalifa, T.A.A., Lymberopoulos, A.G., El-Saidy, B.E. (2008). Testing usability of butylated hydroxytoluene in conservation of goat semen. Reprod Domest Anim 43 : 525-530.]Search in Google Scholar
[138. Hammerstedt, R.H., Keith, A.D., Snipes, W., Amann, R.P., Arruda, D., Griel, L.C. (1978). Use of spin labels to evaluate effects of cold shock and osmolality on sperm. Biol Reprod 18: 686-696.]Search in Google Scholar
[139. Parks, J.E., Graham, J.K. (1992). Effects of cryopreservation procedures on sperm membranes. Theriogenology 38: 209-222.]Search in Google Scholar
[140. Demianowicz, W., Strzezek, J. (1995). The effect of lipoprotein fraction from egg yolk on some of the biological properties of boar spermatozoa during storage of the semen in liquid state. Reprod Domest Anim 31: 279-280.]Search in Google Scholar
[141. Jiang, Z-I., Li, Q-w., Hu, J-h., W-y., Zhao, H-w., Zhang, S-s. (2007). Improvement of the quality of boar cryopreservation semen by supplementing with low density lipoprotein in diluents. Cryobiology 54: 301-304.]Search in Google Scholar
[142. Hu, J-h., Li, Q-w., Jiang, Z-I., Li, W-y. (2008). Effects of different extenders on DNA integrity of boar spermatozoa following freezing-thawing. Cryobiology 57: 257-262.]Search in Google Scholar
[143. Yamauchi, S., Nakamura, S., Lay, K.M., Azuma, T., Yakabi, T., Muto, N., Nakada, T., Ashizawa, K., Tatemoto, H. (2009). Characteristics of Okinawan native Agu pig spermatozoa after addition of lowdensity lipoprotein to freezing extender. J Reprod Dev 55: 558-565.]Search in Google Scholar
[144. Wang, P., Wang, Y.F., Wang, C.W., Bu, S.H., Li, Q.W., Pang, W.J., Yang, G.S. (2012). Effects of low-density lipoproteins extracted from different avian yolks on boar spermatozoa quality following freezing-thawing. Zygote 30: 1-7.]Search in Google Scholar
[145. Zhang, S-S., Hu, J-H., Li, Q-W., Jiang, Z-L., Zhang, X-Y. (2009). The cryoprotective effects of soybean lecithin on boar spermatozoa quality. African J Biotech 8: 6476-6480.]Search in Google Scholar
[146. Namula, Z., Sato, Y., Kodama, R., Morinaga, K., Luu, V.V., Taniguchi, M., Nakai, M., Tanihara, F., Kikuchi, K., Nagai, T., Otoi, T. (2013). Motility and fertility of boar semen after liquid preservation at 5oC for more than 2 weeks. Anim Sci J 84: 600-606. ]Search in Google Scholar
[147. Almlid, T., Johnson, L.A. (1988). Effect of glycerol concentration, equilibration time and temperature of glycerol addition on post-thaw viability of boar spermatozoa frozen in straws. J Anim Sci 66: 2899-2905.]Search in Google Scholar
[148. Fiser, P.S., Fairfull, R.W., Panich, P.L. (1996). Glycerol equilibration time revisited. Reprod Domest Anim 31 (1): 141-146.]Search in Google Scholar
[149. Fiser, P.S., Fairfull, R.W. (1990). Combined effect of glycerol concentration and cooling velocity on motility and acrosomal integrity of boar spermatozoa frozen in 0.5 ml straws. Mol Reprod Dev 25: 123-129.]Search in Google Scholar
[150. Morris, G.J., Acton, E., Murray, B.J., Fonseca, F. (2012). Freezing injury: the special case of the sperm cell. Cryobiology 64: 71-80.]Search in Google Scholar
[151. Mazur, P. (1985). Basic concepts in freezing cells. Proceeding of the 1st International Conference on Deep Freezing of Boar Semen. Swedish University of Agriculture Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden, pp. 91-111.]Search in Google Scholar
[152. Mazur, P., Leibo, S.P., Seidel Jr., E. (2008). Cryopreservation of the germplasm of animals used in biological and medical research: importance, status, and future implications. Biol Reprod 78: 2-12.]Search in Google Scholar
[153. Wessel, M.T., Ball, B.A. (2004). Step-wise dilution for removal of glycerol from fresh and cryopreserved equine spermatozoa. Anim Reprod Sci 84: 147-156.]Search in Google Scholar
[154. Burnaugh, L., Ball, B.A., Sabeur, K., Thomas, A.D., Meyers, S.A. (2010). Osmotic stress stimulates generation of superoxide anion by spermatozoa in horses. Anim Reprod Sci 117: 249-260.]Search in Google Scholar
[155. Baumber, J., Vo, A., Sabeur, K., Ball, B.A. (2002). Generation of reactive oxygen species by equine neutrophils and their effect on motility of equine spermatozoa. Theriogenology 57: 1025-1033.]Search in Google Scholar
[156. Broekhuijse, M.L.W.J., Feitsma, H., Gadella, B.M. (2012). Field data analysis of boar semen quality. Reprod Domest Anim 46 (Suppl. 2): 59-63.]Search in Google Scholar
[157. Young, L.G., King, G.L. (1986). Low concentrations of zearalenone in diets of boars for a prolonged period of time. J Anim Sci 63: 1197-1200.]Search in Google Scholar
[158. Solti, L., Pécsi, T., Barna-Vetró, I., Szász, F.Jr., Biró, K., Szabó, E. (1999). Analysis of serum and seminal plasma after feeding ochratoxin A with breeding boars. Anim Reprod Sci 56: 123-132.]Search in Google Scholar
[159. Biró, K., Barna-Vetró, I., Pécsi, T., Szabó, E., Winkler, G., Fink-Gremmels, J., Solti, L. (2003). Evaluation of spermatological parameters in ochratoxin A-challenged boars. Theriogenology 60: 199-207.]Search in Google Scholar
[160. Tsakmakidis, I.A., Lymberopoulos, A.G., Alexopoulos, C., Boscos, C.M., Kyriakis, S.C. (2006). In vitro effect of zearalenone and alphazearalenone on boar sperm characteristics and acrosome reaction. Reprod Domest Anim 41: 394-401.]Search in Google Scholar
[161. Tsakmakidis, I.A., Lymberopoulos, A.G., Vainas, E., Boscos, C.M., Kyriakis, S.C., Alexopoulos, C. (2007). Study on the in vitro effect of zearalenone and alpha-zearalenone on boar spermzona pellucida interaction by hemizona assay application. J Appl Toxicol 27: 498-505.]Search in Google Scholar
[162. Tsakmakidis, I.A., Lymberopoulos, A.G., Khalifa, T.A.A., Boscos, C.M., Saratsi, A., Alexopoulos, C. (2008). Evaluation of zearalenone and alpha-zearalenone toxicity on boar sperm DNA integrity. J Appl Toxicol 28: 681-688.]Search in Google Scholar
[163. Thibier, M., Guerin, B. (2000). Hygienic aspects of storage and use of semen for artificial insemination. Anim Reprod Sci 62: 233-251.]Search in Google Scholar
[164. Bielanski, A. (2007). Disinfection procedures for controlling microorganisms in the semen and embryos of humans and farm animals. Theriogenology 68: 1-22.]Search in Google Scholar
[165. Althouse, G.C., Rossow, K. (2011). The potential risk of infectious disease dissemination via artificial insemination in swine. Reprod Domest Anim 46 (Suppl. 2): 64-67.]Search in Google Scholar
[166. Bussalleu, E., Pinart, E., Rivera, M.M., Arias, X., Briz, M., Sancho, S., García-Gil, N., Bassols, J., Pruneda, A., Yeste, M., Casas, I., Rigau, T., Rodriguez-Gil, J.E., Bonet, S. (2008). Effects of filtration of semen doses from subfertile boars through neuter sephadex columns. Reprod Domest Anim 43: 48-52.]Search in Google Scholar
[167. Morrell, J.M., Saravia, F., Van Wienen, M., Wallgren, M., Rodriguez-Martinez, H. (2009). Selection of boar spermatozoa using centrifugation on a glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane-coated silica colloid. J Reprod Dev 55: 547-552.]Search in Google Scholar
[168. Morrell, J.M., Saravia, F., Van Wienen, M., Wallgren, M., Rodriguez-Martinez, H. (2009). Sperm survival following colloid centrifugation varies according to the part of the sperm-rich fraction used. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl 66: 85-86.]Search in Google Scholar
[169. Ramió-LIuch, L., Balasch, S., Bonet, S., Briz, M., Pinart, E., Rodríguez-Gil, J. E. (2009). Effects of filtration through sephadex columns improve overall quality parameters and “in vivo” fertility of subfertile refrigerated boar-semen. Anim Reprod Sci 115: 189-200.]Search in Google Scholar
[170. Blomqvist, G., Persson, M., Wallgren, M., Wallgren, P., Morrell, J.M. (2011). Removal of virus from boar semen spiked with porcine circovirus type 2. Anim Reprod Sci 126: 108-114.]Search in Google Scholar
[171. Holt, W.V., Van Look, K.J.W. (2004). Concepts in sperm heterogeneity, sperm selection and sperm competition as biological foundations for laboratory tests of semen quality. Reproduction 127: 527-535.]Search in Google Scholar
[172. Pertoft, H., Laurent, T.C., Låås, T., Kågedal, L. (1978). Density gradients prepared from colloidal silica particles coated by polyvinylpyrrolidone (Percoll). Anal Biochem 88: 271-282. ]Search in Google Scholar
[173. Rodriguez-Martinez, H., Larsson, B., Pertoft, H. (1997). Evaluation of sperm damage and techniques for sperm clean-up. Reprod Fertil Dev 9: 297-308.]Search in Google Scholar
[174. Mortimer, D. (2000). Sperm preparation methods. J Androl 21: 357-366.]Search in Google Scholar
[175. Henkel, R.R., Schill, W-B. (2003). Sperm preparation for ART. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 1: 108 (http://www.rbej.com/content/1/1/108).]Search in Google Scholar
[176. Morrell, J.M., Rodriguez-Martinez, H. (2009). Biomimetic techniques for improving sperm quality in animal breeding: a review. The Open Andrololgy Journal 1: 1-9 (Bentham open access).]Search in Google Scholar
[177. Morrell, J.M., Rodriguez-Martinez, H. (2010). Practical applications of sperm selection techniques as a tool for improving reproductive efficiency. Veterinary Medicine International, volume 2011, article ID 894767, SAGE-Hindawi access to research (doi: 10.4061/2011/894767).]Search in Google Scholar
[178. Vanderwall, D.K. (2008). How to process a dilute ejaculate of semen for cooled-transported insemination. Proceedings of the 54th Annual Convention of the American Association of Equine Practitioners, Dec 6-10, San Diego, California, Vol. 54, pp. 369-373.]Search in Google Scholar
[179. Matthijs, A., Harkema, W., Engel, B., Woelders, H. (2000). In vitro phagocytosis of boar spermatozoa by neutrophils from peripheral blood of sows. J Reprod Fertil 120: 265-273.]Search in Google Scholar
[180. Matthijs, A., Engel, B., Woelders, H. (2003). Neutrophil recruitment and phagocytosis of boar spermatozoa after artificial insemination of sows, and the effects of inseminate volume, sperm dose and specific additives in the extender. Reproduction 125: 357-367.]Search in Google Scholar
[181. Oh, S.A., Park, Y.J., You, Y.A., Mohamed, E. A., Pang, M.G. (2010). Capacitation status of stored boar spermatozoa is related to litter size of sows. Anim Reprod Sci 121:131-138.]Search in Google Scholar
[182. Horrigan, L.A.,Kelly, J.P., Connor, T.J. (2004). Caffeine suppresses TNF-α production via activation of the cyclic AMP/protein kinase A pathway. Int J Immunopharmacol 4: 1409-1417.]Search in Google Scholar
[183. Horrigan, L.A.,Kelly, J.P., Connor, T.J. (2009). Immunomodulatory effects of caffeine: Friend or foe? Pharmacol Ther 111: 877-892.10.1016/j.pharmthera.2006.02.00216540173]Search in Google Scholar
[184. Yeste, M., Briz, M., Pinart, E., Sancho, S., Garcia- Gil, N., Badia, E., Bassols, J., Pruneda, A., Bussalleu, E., Casas, I., Bonet, S. (2008). Hyaluronic acid delays boar sperm capacitation after 3 days of storage at 15oC. Anim Reprod Sci 109: 236-250.]Search in Google Scholar
[185. Martecikova, S., Hulinska, P., Reckova, Z., Pavlik, A., Jeseta, M., Machatkova, M. (2010). Effect of acrosome reaction progress in frozen-thawed boar spermatozoa on the efficiency of in vitro oocyte fertilization. Veterinarni Medicina, 55: 429-437.]Search in Google Scholar
[186. Yamaguchi, S., Suzuki, C., Noguchi, M., Kasa, S., Mori, M., Isozaki, Y., Ueda, S., Funahashi, H., Kikuchi, K., Nagai, T., Yoshioka, K. (2013). Effects of caffeine on sperm characteristics after thawing and inflammatory response in the uterus after artificial insemination with frozen-thawed boar semen. Theriogenology 79: 87-93.]Search in Google Scholar
[187. Li, J.-C., Yamaguchib, S., Kondoa, Y., Funahashia, H. (2011). Caffeine, dibutyryl cyclic-AMP and heparin affect the chemotactic and phagocytotic activities of neutrophils for boar sperm in vitro. Theriogenology 75:1336-1345.]Search in Google Scholar
[188. Li, J.-C., Yamaguchib, S., Kondoa, Y., Funahashia, H. (2012). Boar seminal plasma or hen’s egg yolk decrease the in vitro chemotactic and phagocytotic activities of neutrophils when co-incubated with boar or bull sperm. Theriogenology 77: 73-80.]Search in Google Scholar
[189. Jiwakanon, J., Persson, E., Berg, M., Dalin, A.M. (2011). Influence of seminal plasma, spermatozoa and semen extender on cytokine expression in the porcine endometrium after insemination. Anim Reprod Sci 123:210-220.]Search in Google Scholar
[190. Katila, T. (2012). Post-mating inflammatory responses of the uterus. Reprod Domest Anim 47 (Suppl. 5): 31-41.]Search in Google Scholar
[191. Langendijk, P., Soede, N.M., Kemp, B. (2005). Uterine activity, sperm transport, and the role of boar stimuli around insemination in sows. Theriogenology 63: 500-513.]Search in Google Scholar
[192. Yamaguchi, S., Funahashi, H., Murakami, T. (2009). Improved fertility in gilts and sows after artificial insemination of frozen-thawed boar semen by supplementation of semen extender with caffeine and CaCl2. J Reprod Dev 55: 645-649.]Search in Google Scholar
[193. Yamaguchi, S., Funahashi, H. (2012). Effect of the addition of beta-mercaptoethanol to a thawing solution supplemented with caffeine on the function of frozen-thawed boar sperm and on the fertility of sows after artificial insemination. Theriogenology 77: 926-932.]Search in Google Scholar
[194. Vazquez, J.M., Roca, J., Gil, M.A., Cuello, C., Parrilla, I., Vazquez, J.L., Martínez, E.A. (2008). New developments in low-dose insemination technology. Theriogenology 70: 1216-1224.]Search in Google Scholar
[195. Watson, P.F., Behan, J.R. (2006). A field investigation of intra-cervical insemination with reduced sperm numbers in gilts. Theriogenology 66:338-343.]Search in Google Scholar
[196. Martinez, E.A.,Vazquez, J.M., Roca, J., Lucas, X., Gil, M.A., Parrilla, I., Vazquez, J.L., Day, B.N. (2001). Successful non-surgical deep intrauterine insemination with small numbers of spermatozoa in sows. Reproduction 122: 289-296.]Search in Google Scholar
[197. Martinez, E.A.,Vazquez, J.M., Roca, J., Lucas, X., Gil, M.A., Parrilla, I., Vazquez, J.L., Day, B.N. (2002). Minimum number of spermatozoa required for normal fertility after deep intrauterine insemination in non-sedated sows. Reproduction 123: 163-170. ]Search in Google Scholar
[198. Vazquez, J.M., Roca, J., Gil, M.A., Cuello, C., Parrilla, I., Vazquez, J.L., Martínez, E.A. (2008). Low-dose insemination in pigs: problems and possibilities. Reprod Domes Anim 43 (Suppl. 2): 347-354.]Search in Google Scholar
[199. Spencer, K.W. (2010). Factors affecting fertility of frozen-thawed boar sperm. M.S. Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, USA (http://hdl.handle.net/2142/16492).]Search in Google Scholar
[200. Vazquez, J.M., Martínez, E.A., Roca, J., Gil, M.A., Parrilla, I., Cuello, C., Carvajal, G., Lucas, X., Vazquez, J.L. (2005). Improving the efficiency of sperm technologies in pigs: the value of deep intrauterine insemination. Theriogenology 63: 536-547.]Search in Google Scholar
[201. Spencer, K.W., Purdy, P.H., Blackburn, H.D., Spiller, S.F., Stewart, T.S., Knox, R.V. (2010). Effect of number of motile, frozen-thawed boar sperm and number of fixed-time inseminations on fertility in estrous-synchronized gilts. Anim Reprod Sci 121: 259-266.]Search in Google Scholar
