[
Arnstein, S. R. 1969 ‘Ladder of citizen participation’ Journal of American Institute of Planners 35: 216–224.10.1080/01944366908977225
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bourdieu, P. 1986 ‘The forms of capital’ in: J. Richardson (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education Greenwood, New York, pp. 241–258.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Burningham, K. 2000 ‘Using the language of NIMBY: a topic for research, not an activity for researchers’ Local Environment 5(1): 55–67.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Czapiński, J. 2006 ‘Polska – państwo bez społeczeństwa’ Nauka 1: 7–26.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davidoff, P. 1965 ‘Advocacy and pluralism in planning’ Journal of the American Institute of Planning 31: 331–338.10.1080/01944366508978187
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dear, M. 1992 ‘Understanding and overcoming the NIMBY syndrome’ Journal of the American Planning Association 58(3): 288–300.10.1080/01944369208975808
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Devine-Wright, P. 2009 ‘Rethinking NIMBYism: The Role of Place Attachment and Place Identity in Explaining Place-protective Action’ Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 19: 426–441.10.1002/casp.1004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dekker, K. 2007 ‘Social capital, neighbourhood attachment and participation in distressed urban areas. A case study in the Hague and Utrecht, The Netherlands’ Housing Studies 22(3): 355–379.10.1080/02673030701254103
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dmochowska-Dudek, K. and M. Bednarek-Szczepańska 2018 ‘A profile of the Polish rural NIMBYist’ Journal of Rural Studies 58: 52–66.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.12.025
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Działek, J. 2009 ‘Social capital and economic growth in Polish regions’, Munich Personal RePEc Archive no. 18287, http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/18287/1/MPRA_paper_18287.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Faehnlea, M., Bäcklundb, P., Tyrväinenc, L., Niemeläd, J. and V. Yli-Pelkonend 2014 ‘How can residents’ experiences inform planning of urban green infrastructure? Case Finland’ Landscape and Urban Planning 130: 171–183.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.07.012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fukuyama F. 1995 Trust: the Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, New York: Free Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gans, H. 1969 ‘Planning for people, not buildings’ Environment and Planning A, 1: 33–46.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gąsior-Niemiec, A. 2010 ‘Wzory samoorganizacji Polaków na przełomie XX i XXI’ Polityka i Społeczeństwo 7: 66–76.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goldstein B. E. and W. H. Butler 2010 ‘Expanding the Scope and Impact of Collaborative Planning’ Journal of the American Planning Association 76(2): 238–250.10.1080/01944361003646463
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gunton T. and J. C. Day 2003 ‘The theory and practice of collaborative planning in resource and environmental management’ Environments 31(2): 5–19.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hager, C. 2015 ‘Introduction. The New Look at NIMBY’ in: C. Hager and M. Haddad (eds.) NIMBY is beautiful. Cases of local activism and environmental innovation around the world, Berghahn Books: 1–14.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hanifan, L. J. 1916 ‘The Rural School Community Center’ Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science no. 67.10.1177/000271621606700118
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Healey, P. 1997 ‘Collaborative Planning. Shaping Places’ in: Fragmented Societies, Planning – Environment – Cities.10.1007/978-1-349-25538-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hermansson, H. 2007 ‘The ethics of NIMBY conflicts’ Ethic theory and Moral practice 10: 23–34.10.1007/s10677-006-9038-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Innes, I. and D. Boher 2004 ‘Reframing Public Participation: Strategies for the 21st Century’ Planning Theory & Practice 5(4): 419–436.10.1080/1464935042000293170
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kinowska, Z. 2012 ‘Kondycja społeczeństwa obywatelskiego w Polsce’ in: Infos. Zagadnienia społeczno-ekonomiczne. Biuro analiz sejmowych 22: 1–4.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lidskog, R. 1997 ‘From Conflict to Communication? Public Participation and Critical Communication as a Solution to Siting Conflict in Planning for Hazardous Waste’ Planning Practice and Research 12(3): 239–249.10.1080/02697459716482
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Magnani, N. and L. Struffi 2009 ‘Translation sociology and social capital in rural development initiatives. A case study from the Italian Alps’ Journal of Rural Studies 25: 231–238.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.10.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McClymont, K. and P. O’Hare 2008 ‘“We’re not NIMBYs!” Contrasting local protest groups with idealised conceptions of sustainable communities’ Local Environment 13(4): 321–335.10.1080/13549830701803273
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Michałowska, E. 2008 ‘Syndrom NIMBY jako przykład samoorganizacji społecznej na poziomie lokalnym’ Studia Regionalne i Lokalne 31(1): 60–80.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mihaylov, N. and D. Perkins 2015 ‘Local environmental grassroots activism: contributions from environmental psychology, sociology and politics’ Behavioral Sciences 5: 121–153.10.3390/bs5010121
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Owens, S. 2001 ‘”Engaging the public“: Information and deliberation in environmental policy’ Environment and Planning A. 32: 1141–1148.10.1068/a3330
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Panicz, U. 2014 ‘Protest NIMBY jako przejaw społeczeństwa obywatelskiego’ in: J. Osiński and J. Popławska (eds.) Oblicza społeczeństwa obywatelskiego, Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza Szkoły Głównej Handlowej, pp. 107–118.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Patel, M., Kok, K. and D. Rothman 2007 ‘Participatory scenario construction in land use analysis: An insight into the experiences created by stakeholder involvement in the Northern Mediterranean’ Land Use Policy 24: 546–561.10.1016/j.landusepol.2006.02.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Poulos, H. 2015 ‘How do grassroots environmental protests incite innovaation’ in: C. Hager and M. Haddad (eds.) NIMBY is beautiful. Cases of local activism and environmental innovation around the world, Berghahn Books, pp. 15–32.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Putnam, R. 2000 ‘Bowling alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community’, New York: Simon&Schuster.10.1145/358916.361990
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Putnam, R. 1993 ‘Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy’, Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400820740
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Renn, O. 2006 ‘Participatory processes for designing environmental policies’ Land Use Policy 23: 34–43.10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.08.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rohe, W. 2004 ‘Building Social Capital through Community Development’ Journal of the American Planning Association 70(2): 158–164.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rydin, Y. and M. Pennington 2000 ‘Public Participation and Local Environmental Planning: the collective action problem and the potential of social capital’ Local Environment 2: 153–169.10.1080/13549830050009328
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sager, T. 2001 ‘A planning theory perspective on the EIA’ in: Hilding-Rydevik (ed.) EIA, large development projects and decision-making in the Nordic countries, Nordregio Reports, Stockholm, 6: 197–222.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sevenant, M. and M. Antrop 2010 ‘Transdisciplinary landscape planning: Does the public have aspirations? Experiences from a case study in Ghent (Flanders, Belgium)’ Land Use Policy 27: 373–386.10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.05.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shively, C. 2007 ‘Understanding the NIMBY and LULU Phenomena: Reassessing Our Knowledge Base and Informing Future Research’ Journal of Planning Literature 21(3): 255–266.10.1177/0885412206295845
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Śleszyński, P., Komornicki, T., Solon, J. and M. Więckowski 2012 Planowanie przestrzenne w gminach, Warszawa: IGiPZ PAN.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Teilmann, K. 2012 ‘Measuring social capital accumulation in rural development’ Journal of Rural Studies 28: 458–465.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.10.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Upreti, B. 2004 ‘Conflict over biomass energy development in the United Kingdom: some observations and lessons from England and Wales’ Energy Policy 32: 785–800.10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00342-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Young, M. G. 2012 ‘Necessary but insufficient: NIMBY and the development of a therapeutic community for homeless persons with co-morbid disorders’ Local Environment 17(3): 281–293.10.1080/13549839.2012.665856
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van der Horst and D. Toke 2010 ‘Exploring the landscape of wind farm developments; local area characteristics and planning process outcomes in rural England’ Land Use Policy 27: 214–221.10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.05.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
White, S. 2001 ‘Public participation and organizational change in Wisconsin land use management’ Land Use Policy 18: 341–350.10.1016/S0264-8377(01)00027-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wolsink, M. 2007 ‘Planning of renewables schemes: Deliberative and fair decision-making on landscape issues instead of reproachful accusations of non-cooperation’ Energy Policy 35: 2692–2704.10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zarycki, T. 2008 ‘Dwa wymiary kapitału społecznego w kontekście polskim’ Pomorski Przegląd Gospodarczy 37(2): 49–52.
]Search in Google Scholar
