Login
Register
Reset Password
Publish & Distribute
Publishing Solutions
Distribution Solutions
Subjects
Architecture and Design
Arts
Business and Economics
Chemistry
Classical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies
Computer Sciences
Cultural Studies
Engineering
General Interest
Geosciences
History
Industrial Chemistry
Jewish Studies
Law
Library and Information Science, Book Studies
Life Sciences
Linguistics and Semiotics
Literary Studies
Materials Sciences
Mathematics
Medicine
Music
Pharmacy
Philosophy
Physics
Social Sciences
Sports and Recreation
Theology and Religion
Publications
Journals
Books
Proceedings
Publishers
Blog
Contact
Search
EUR
USD
GBP
English
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Cart
Home
Journals
Fatigue of Aircraft Structures
AHEAD OF PRINT
Open Access
Some Comments Concerning the Preparation of and Fatigue Testing of the Aircraft’s Cable-Control System
Józef Brzęczek
Józef Brzęczek
| Apr 29, 2024
Fatigue of Aircraft Structures
AHEAD OF PRINT
About this article
Previous Article
Next Article
Abstract
Article
Figures & Tables
References
Authors
Articles in this Issue
Preview
PDF
Cite
Share
Article Category:
Research Article
Published Online:
Apr 29, 2024
Page range:
-
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/fas-2023-0004
Keywords
aviation cable control systems
,
cables and ropes fatigue tests
,
inspection intervals assessment
,
load spectrum
,
fatigue life
© 2023 Józef Brzęczek, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Figure 1.
The results of the KSAN cable (aviation cable) tests with a diameter of 3.5 mm up to 100,000 ± 90° bends (Kubryn et al., 2018).
Figure 2.
Simplified system of forces and moments of the aircraft in the classical layout.
Figure 3.
Simplified system of forces and moments ensuring the balance and longitudinal control of the classical layout of monoplane.
Figure 4.
Classical horizontal tail unit aircraft or glider.
Figure 5.
Typical flight mission (Brzęczek, 2020).
Figure 6.
Scheme of the elevator aircraft cable-control system.
Figure 7.
Probability density function of flight time distribution for the aircraft commuter category (Kubryn et al., 2018).
Figure 8.
Real deflection of the elevator during flight, sampling of 50 Hz. Elaborated based on tests data (Department of Avionics and Control Systems of Rzeszów University of Technology, 2019).
Figure 9.
Spectrum of rudder deflection. Elaborated on (Department of Avionics and Control Systems of Rzeszów University of Technology, 2019) data. Aerodrome traffic circuit flight. The average value depends on mass and CG location.
Figure 10.
An example of the Cmz = f (αH, βH, υ) for specific values of K = 0.25, Re = 1.49 106, Ma = 0.3 (Krzysiak, 1983).
Figure 11.
An example of b1 = f (Ma) for the value K = 0.25 (Krzysiak, 1983).
Figure 12.
An example of b2 = f (M) for the value K = 0.25 (Krzysiak, 1983).
Figure 13.
Idea of a cable test strand4. More than six points of cable testing and inspection. The strand enables the ongoing measurement of cable elongation. The markings in Figure 13 mean: 1 – spring or hydraulic system, simulation of nonlinear hinge change, 2 – cable lock, 3 – pulleys, 4 – cable A, 5 – wrap angle adjustment, 6 –turnbuckl, 7 – cable B, 8 – tensioner (pre-tension value of force), and 9 – stochastic angular displacement (βH simulation).