Robustness and Up-to-us-ness

Alvarez, Maria. 2009. Actions, thought-experiments and the ‘principle of alternate possibilities’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87(1): 61–81.10.1080/00048400802215505Search in Google Scholar

Anscombe, G.E.M. 1963. Intention. 2^nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Di Nucci, Ezio. 2011. Frankfurt versus Frankfurt: a new anti-causalist dawn. Philosophical Explorations 14(1): 117–131.10.1080/13869795.2011.544233Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Fischer, John Martin. 1994. The Metaphysics of Free Will: An Essay on Control. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Fischer, John Martin and Mark Ravizza. 1998. Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511814594Search in Google Scholar

Frankfurt, Harry. 1969. Alternate possibilities and moral responsibility. Journal of Philosophy 66(3): 829–39.10.2307/2023833Search in Google Scholar

Ginet, Carl. 2000. The epistemic requirements for moral responsibility. Noûs 34(s14): 267–277.10.1111/0029-4624.34.s14.14Search in Google Scholar

Goldman, Alvin. 1970. A theory of human action. Englewood Cliffs New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Search in Google Scholar

Goldman, Alvin. 1972. Toward a theory of social power. Philosophical Studies 23(4): 221–268.10.1007/BF00356228Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kane, Robert. 1996. The Signiicance of Free Will. New Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kittle, Simon. 2015. Abilities to do otherwise. Philosophical Studies 172(11): 3017–35.10.1007/s11098-015-0455-8Search in Google Scholar

Mele, Alfred. 2010. Moral responsibility for actions: epistemic and freedom conditions. Philosophical Explorations 13(2): 101–111.10.1080/13869790903494556Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Morriss, Peter. 1987. Power: A Philosophical Analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Naylor, Margery Bedford. 1984. Frankfurt on the principle of alternate possibilities. Philosophical Studies 46(2): 249–258.10.1007/BF00373108Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Pereboom, Derk. 2009. Further thoughts about a Frankfurt-style argument. Philosophical Explorations 12(2): 109–118.10.1080/13869790902838795Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Pereboom, Derk. 2012. Frankfurt examples, derivative responsibility, and the timing objection. Philosophical Issues 22(1): 298–315.10.1111/j.1533-6077.2012.00231.xSearch in Google Scholar

Shabo, Seth. 2014. It wasn’t up to Jones: unavoidable actions and intensional contexts in Frankfurt examples. Philosophical Studies 169(3): 379–399.10.1007/s11098-013-0187-6Search in Google Scholar

Timpe, Kevin. 2011. Tracing and the epistemic condition on moral responsibility. The Modern Schoolman 88/1/2: 5–28.10.5840/schoolman2011881/22Search in Google Scholar

Widerker, David. 1995. Libertarianism and Frankfurt’s attack on the principle of alternative possibilities. Philosophical Review 104(2): 247–261.10.2307/2185979Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Widerker, David. 2006. Libertarianism and the philosophical significance of Frankfurt scenarios. Journal of Philosophy 103(4): 163–187.10.5840/jphil2006103433Search in Google Scholar