This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Bensman, S.J., & Leydesdorff, L. (2009). Definition and identification of journals as bibliographic and subject entities: Librarianship vs. ISI Journal Citation Reports (JCR) methods and their effect on citation measures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(6), 1097–1117.BensmanS.J.LeydesdorffL.2009Definition and identification of journals as bibliographic and subject entities: Librarianship vs. ISI Journal Citation Reports (JCR) methods and their effect on citation measuresJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology6061097111710.1002/asi.21020Search in Google Scholar
Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 8, 10008.BlondelV.D.GuillaumeJ.L.LambiotteR.LefebvreE.2008Fast unfolding of communities in large networksJournal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment81000810.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008Search in Google Scholar
Boyack, K., Börner, K., & Klavans, R. (2007). Mapping the structure and evolution of chemistry research. In D. Torres-Salinas, & H. Moed (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp. 112–123). Madrid, Spain: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas.BoyackK.BörnerK.KlavansR.2007Mapping the structure and evolution of chemistry researchTorres-SalinasD.MoedH.Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics112123Madrid, SpainConsejo Superior de Investigaciones CientificasSearch in Google Scholar
Bordons, M., Bravo, C., & Barrigon, S. (2004). Time-tracking of the research profile of a drug using bibliometric tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(5), 445–461.BordonsM.BravoC.BarrigonS.2004Time-tracking of the research profile of a drug using bibliometric toolsJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology55544546110.1002/asi.10397Search in Google Scholar
Carley, S., & Porter, A.L. (2012). A forward diversity index. Scientometrics, 90(2), 407–427.CarleyS.PorterA.L.2012A forward diversity indexScientometrics90240742710.1007/s11192-011-0528-1Search in Google Scholar
Costas, R., van Leeuwen, T.N., & Bordons, M. (2010). A bibliometric classificatory approach for the study and assessment of research performance at the individual level: The effects of age on productivity and impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(8), 1564–1581.CostasR.van LeeuwenT.N.BordonsM.2010A bibliometric classificatory approach for the study and assessment of research performance at the individual level: The effects of age on productivity and impactJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology6181564158110.1002/asi.21348Search in Google Scholar
de Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., & Batgelj, V. (2011). Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek (2nd Edition). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.de NooyW.MrvarA.BatgeljV.2011Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek (2nd Edition)New York, NYCambridge University Press10.1017/CBO9780511996368Search in Google Scholar
Garner, J., Porter, A.L., Borrego, M., Tran, E., & Teutonico, R. (2013). Facilitating social and natural science cross-disciplinarity: Assessing the human and social dynamics program. Research Evaluation, 22(2), 134–144.GarnerJ.PorterA.L.BorregoM.TranE.TeutonicoR.2013Facilitating social and natural science cross-disciplinarity: Assessing the human and social dynamics programResearch Evaluation22213414410.1093/reseval/rvt001Search in Google Scholar
Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2003). A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes. Scientometrics, 56(3), 357–367.GlänzelW.SchubertA.2003A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposesScientometrics56335736710.1023/A:1022378804087Search in Google Scholar
Jaffe, A.B. (1986). Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firm’s patents, profits, and market value. American Economic Review, 76(5), 984–1001.JaffeA.B.1986Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firm’s patents, profits, and market valueAmerican Economic Review765984100110.3386/w1815Search in Google Scholar
Katz, J.S., & Hicks, D.M. (1995). The classification of interdisciplinary journals: A new approach. In Proceedings of the fifth biennial conference of the international society for scientometrics and infometrics (pp. 245–255). Medford, NJ: Learned Information, Inc.KatzJ.S.HicksD.M.1995The classification of interdisciplinary journals: A new approachIn Proceedings of the fifth biennial conference of the international society for scientometrics and infometrics245255Medford, NJLearned Information, Inc.Search in Google Scholar
Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. (2009). Towards a consensus map of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(3), 455–476.KlavansR.BoyackK.2009Towards a consensus map of scienceJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology60345547610.1002/asi.20991Search in Google Scholar
Klavans, R., & Boyack, K.W. (in press). Which type of citation analysis generates the most accurate taxonomy of scientific and technical knowledge? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Retrieved on June 30, 2017, from http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.05078.KlavansR.BoyackK.W.Which type of citation analysis generates the most accurate taxonomy of scientific and technical knowledge?Journal of the American Society for Information Science and TechnologyRetrieved on June 30, 2017, fromhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1511.05078Search in Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L., & Bornmann, L. (2016). The operationalization of “fields” as WoS subject categories (WCs) in evaluative bibliometrics: The cases of “Library and Information Science” and “Science & Technology Studies”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(3), 707–714.LeydesdorffL.BornmannL.2016The operationalization of “fields” as WoS subject categories (WCs) in evaluative bibliometrics: The cases of “Library and Information Science” and “Science & Technology Studies”Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology67370771410.1002/asi.23408Search in Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2009). A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(2), 348–362.LeydesdorffL.RafolsI.2009A global map of science based on the ISI subject categoriesJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology60234836210.1002/asi.20967Search in Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L. (2008). On the normalization and visualization of author co-citation data: Salton’s cosine versus the Jaccard index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(1), 77–85.LeydesdorffL.2008On the normalization and visualization of author co-citation data: Salton’s cosine versus the Jaccard indexJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology591778510.1002/asi.20732Search in Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L., Carley, S., & Rafols, I. (2013). Global maps of science based on the new Web-of-Science categories. Scientometrics, 94(2), 589–593.LeydesdorffL.CarleyS.RafolsI.2013Global maps of science based on the new Web-of-Science categoriesScientometrics94258959310.1007/s11192-012-0784-8354724423335826Search in Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L., Hammarfelt, B., & Salah, A.A.A. (2011). The structure of the Arts & Humanities Citation Index: A mapping on the basis of aggregated citations among 1,157 journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(12), 2414–2426.LeydesdorffL.HammarfeltB.SalahA.A.A2011The structure of the Arts & Humanities Citation Index: A mapping on the basis of aggregated citations among 1,157 journalsJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology62122414242610.1002/asi.21636Search in Google Scholar
Moed, H.F., de Bruin, R.E., & van Leeuwen, T.N. (1995). New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications. Scientometrics, 33(3), 381–422.MoedH.F.de BruinR.E.van LeeuwenT.N.1995New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applicationsScientometrics33338142210.1007/BF02017338Search in Google Scholar
Morillo, F., Bordons, M., & Gomez, I. (2001). An approach to interdisciplinarity through bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 51(1), 203–222.MorilloF.BordonsM.GomezI.2001An approach to interdisciplinarity through bibliometric indicatorsScientometrics51120322210.1023/A:1010529114941Search in Google Scholar
Porter, A.L., & Rafols, I. (2009). Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics, 81(3), 719–745. Retrieved on July 10, 2017, from http://www.springerlink.com/content/c87k7754t4n24385/fulltext.pdf.PorterA.L.RafolsI.2009Is science becoming more interdisciplinary?Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics813719745Retrieved on July 10, 2017, fromhttp://www.springerlink.com/content/c87k7754t4n24385/fulltext.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Porter, A.L., Cohen, A.S., Roessner, J.D., & Perreault, M. (2007). Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity. Scientometrics, 72(1), 117–147.PorterA.L.CohenA.S.RoessnerJ.D.PerreaultM.2007Measuring researcher interdisciplinarityScientometrics72111714710.1007/s11192-007-1700-5Search in Google Scholar
Pudovkin, A.I., & Garfield, E. (2002). Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(13), 1113–1119.PudovkinA.I.GarfieldE.2002Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journalsJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology53131113111910.1002/asi.10153Search in Google Scholar
Rafols, I., & Leydesdorff, L. (2009). Content-based and algorithmic classifications of journals: Perspectives on the dynamics of scientific communication and indexer effects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(9), 1823–1835.RafolsI.LeydesdorffL.2009Content-based and algorithmic classifications of journals: Perspectives on the dynamics of scientific communication and indexer effectsJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology6091823183510.1002/asi.21086Search in Google Scholar
Rafols, I., & Meyer, M. (2010). Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: Case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics, 82(2), 263–287.RafolsI.MeyerM.2010Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: Case studies in bionanoscienceScientometrics82226328710.1007/s11192-009-0041-ySearch in Google Scholar
Rafols, I., Porter, A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(9), 1871–1887.RafolsI.PorterA.LeydesdorffL.2010Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library managementJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology6191871188710.1002/asi.21368Search in Google Scholar
Rahman, A.J., Guns, R., Rousseau, R., & Engels, T.C. (2015). Is the expertise of evaluation panels congruent with the research interests of the research groups: A quantitative approach based on barycenters. Journal of Informetrics, 9(4), 704–721.RahmanA.J.GunsR.RousseauR.EngelsT.C.2015Is the expertise of evaluation panels congruent with the research interests of the research groups: A quantitative approach based on barycentersJournal of Informetrics9470472110.1016/j.joi.2015.07.009Search in Google Scholar
Rao, C.R. (1982), Diversity and dissimilarity coefficients: A unified approach. Theoretical Population Biology, 21(1), 24–43.RaoC.R.1982Diversity and dissimilarity coefficients: A unified approachTheoretical Population Biology211244310.1016/0040-5809(82)90004-1Search in Google Scholar
Rehn, C., Gornitzki, C., Larsson, A., & Wadskog, D. (2014). Bibliometric Handbook for Karolinska Institutet. Stockholm: Karolinska Institute.RehnC.GornitzkiC.LarssonA.WadskogD.2014Bibliometric Handbook for Karolinska InstitutetStockholmKarolinska InstituteSearch in Google Scholar
Riopelle, K., Leydesdorff, L., & Li, J. (2014). How to create an overlay map of science using the Web of Science. Retrieved on July 10, 2017, from http://www.leydesdorff.net/overlaytoolkit/manual.riopelle.pdf.RiopelleK.LeydesdorffL.LiJ.2014How to create an overlay map of science using the Web of ScienceRetrieved on July 10, 2017, fromhttp://www.leydesdorff.net/overlaytoolkit/manual.riopelle.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Schubert, A., Glänzel, W., & Braun, T. (1986). Relative indicators of publication output and citation impact of European physics research, 1978–1980. Czechoslovak Journal of Physics, 36(1), 126–129.SchubertA.GlänzelW.BraunT.1986Relative indicators of publication output and citation impact of European physics research, 1978–1980Czechoslovak Journal of Physics36112612910.1007/BF01599744Search in Google Scholar
Schubert, A., Glänzel, W., & Braun, T. (1989). Scientometric datafiles—A comprehensive set of indicators on 2649 journals and 96 countries in all major science fields and subfields 1981–1985. Scientometrics, 16(1–6), 3–478.SchubertA.GlänzelW.BraunT.1989Scientometric datafiles—A comprehensive set of indicators on 2649 journals and 96 countries in all major science fields and subfields 1981–1985Scientometrics161–6347810.1007/BF02093234Search in Google Scholar
Soós, S., & Kampis, G. (2011). Towards a typology of research performance diversity: The case of top Hungarian players. Scientometrics, 87(2), 357–371.SoósS.KampisG.2011Towards a typology of research performance diversity: The case of top Hungarian playersScientometrics87235737110.1007/s11192-011-0351-8Search in Google Scholar
Stirling, A. (2007). A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 4(15), 707–719.StirlingA.2007A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and societyJournal of the Royal Society Interface41570771910.1098/rsif.2007.0213237338917327202Search in Google Scholar
US National Academies, Committee on Science, Engineering & Public Policy. (2005). Facilitating interdisciplinary research. Washington, DC: National Research Council.US National Academies, Committee on Science, Engineering & Public Policy2005Facilitating interdisciplinary researchWashington, DCNational Research CouncilSearch in Google Scholar
van Eck, N.J., & Waltman, L. (2009). How to normalize cooccurrence data? An analysis of some well-known similarity measures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(8), 1635–1651.van EckN.J.WaltmanL.2009How to normalize cooccurrence data? An analysis of some well-known similarity measuresJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology6081635165110.1002/asi.21075Search in Google Scholar
van Eck, N.J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538.van EckN.J.WaltmanL.2010Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mappingScientometrics84252353810.1007/s11192-009-0146-3288393220585380Search in Google Scholar
van Eck, N., Waltman, L., van Raan, A., Klautz, R., & Peul, W. (2013). Citation analysis may severely underestimate the impact of clinical research as compared to basic research. PLoS ONE, 8(4), e62395–e62395.van EckN.WaltmanL.van RaanA.KlautzR.PeulW.2013Citation analysis may severely underestimate the impact of clinical research as compared to basic researchPLoS ONE84e62395e6239510.1371/journal.pone.0062395363477623638064Search in Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, T.N., & Calero Medina, C. (2012). Redefining the field of economics: Improving field normalization for the application of bibliometric techniques in the field of economics. Research Evaluation, 21(1), 61–70.van LeeuwenT.N.Calero MedinaC.2012Redefining the field of economics: Improving field normalization for the application of bibliometric techniques in the field of economicsResearch Evaluation211617010.1093/reseval/rvr006Search in Google Scholar
Vinkler, P. (1986). Evaluation of some methods for the relative assessment of scientific publications. Scientometrics, 10(3–4), 157–177.VinklerP.1986Evaluation of some methods for the relative assessment of scientific publicationsScientometrics103–415717710.1007/BF02026039Search in Google Scholar
Wallace, M.L., & Rafols, I. (2015). Research portfolio analysis in science policy: Moving from financial returns to societal benefits. Minerva, 53(2), 89–115.WallaceM.L.RafolsI.2015Research portfolio analysis in science policy: Moving from financial returns to societal benefitsMinerva5328911510.1007/s11024-015-9271-8Search in Google Scholar
Waltman, L., & van Eck, N.J. (2012). A new methodology for constructing a publication—level classification system of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(12), 2378–2392.WaltmanL.van EckN.J.2012A new methodology for constructing a publication—level classification system of scienceJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology63122378239210.1002/asi.22748Search in Google Scholar
Waltman, L., van Eck, N.J., & Noyons, E. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629–635.WaltmanL.van EckN.J.NoyonsE.2010A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networksJournal of Informetrics4462963510.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002Search in Google Scholar
Wang, Q., & Waltman, L. (2016). Large-scale analysis of the accuracy of the journal classification systems of Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 347–364.WangQ.WaltmanL.2016Large-scale analysis of the accuracy of the journal classification systems of Web of Science and ScopusJournal of Informetrics10234736410.1016/j.joi.2016.02.003Search in Google Scholar
Wouters, P. (1998). The signs of science. Scientometrics, 41(1–2), 225–241.WoutersP.1998The signs of scienceScientometrics411–222524110.1007/BF02457980Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, L., Rousseau, R., & Glänzel, W. (2016). Diversity of references as an indicator for interdisciplinarity of journals: Taking similarity between subject fields into account. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 67(5), 1257–1265.ZhangL.RousseauR.GlänzelW.2016Diversity of references as an indicator for interdisciplinarity of journals: Taking similarity between subject fields into accountJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology6751257126510.1002/asi.23487Search in Google Scholar
Zitt, M., Bassecoulard, E., & Okubo, Y. (2000). Shadows of the past in international cooperation: Collaboration profiles of the top five producers of science. Scientometrics, 47(3), 627–657.ZittM.BassecoulardE.OkuboY.2000Shadows of the past in international cooperation: Collaboration profiles of the top five producers of scienceScientometrics47362765710.1023/A:1005632319799Search in Google Scholar
